AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Review Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2692-9406/151
1 Department of Legal Medicine, Toxicology and Forensic Medicine, Jordan University of Science & Technology, Jordan.
2 International Mariinskaya Academy, department of medicine and critical care, department of philosophy, Academician secretary of department of Sociology.
3 Cypress International Institute University, Texas, USA.
*Corresponding Author: Ahed J Alkhatib, Department of Legal Medicine, Toxicology and Forensic Medicine, Jordan University of Science & Technology, Jordan.
Citation: Ahed J Alkhatib, (2023), Exploring the Etiological Overlap between Parkinson's Disease and Multiple Sclerosis: A Novel Avenue for Treating MS, J. Biomedical Research and Clinical Reviews. 8(2); DOI:10.31579/2692-9406/151
Copyright: © 2023, Ahed J Alkhatib. this is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 25 April 2023 | Accepted: 01 May 2023 | Published: 08 May 2023
Keywords: multiple sclerosis; parkinson's disease; neurodegenerative conditions; treatments; dopamine agonists
After many years of monotherapy with ursodeoxycholic acid and many reports of its long-term benefits, mostly positive the physician now has an opportunity to consider the use of newer medications. However, the decision to choose a newer medication is biased in favor of ursodeoxycholic acid because it is viewed as the ““gold standard” implying that other medications will always have a secondary role. A major threat to the patient’s well-being is persisting with this approach and the failure to recognize in a timely manner that ursodeoxycholic acid is causing liver injury. Very rarely toxicity is apparent within a few weeks of administration.
Both Parkinson's disease (abbreviated as PD) and multiple sclerosis (abbreviated as MS) are degenerative neurological conditions that afflict millions of people all over the world. Recent study has demonstrated that there may be some etiological overlap between these disorders, despite the fact that each condition manifests clinically in a manner that is distinctive from the others. In particular, Parkinson's disease (PD) and multiple sclerosis (MS) both entail deregulation of the immune system, inflammation, and oxidative stress, which implies that similar pathways may be implicated in the pathogenesis of both conditions (Lee et al., 2012; Ghorbanian et al., 2017; Kaur et al., 2018; Sehgal et al., 2018).
In this article, we will investigate the evidence supporting the etiological parallels between Parkinson's disease (PD) and multiple sclerosis (MS), and we will talk about the prospective therapeutic approaches that could be applied to both disorders.
Etiological similarities between PD and MS
Immunological dysregulation
Immunological dysregulation is a hallmark of both Parkinson's disease and multiple sclerosis (MS), leading researchers to hypothesize that the immune system plays a significant part in the pathogenesis of both of these illnesses. According to Kaur et al. (2018), researchers believe that Parkinson's disease is caused when the immune system incorrectly recognizes proteins in the brain as being foreign. This results in an inflammatory response that ultimately kills neurons. In a manner analogous, multiple sclerosis is characterized by an attack by the immune system on the myelin sheath that surrounds neurons, which results in demyelination and, ultimately, neuronal impairment (Sehgal et al., 2018).
Recent research has shown that the immunological responses seen in people with Parkinson's disease and multiple sclerosis share significant similarities. For instance, activation of microglia, which are immune cells found in the brain, is a common feature of both disorders. According to Kaur et al. (2018), activated microglia in Parkinson's disease (PD) emit pro-inflammatory cytokines and reactive oxygen species (ROS), both of which contribute to neuronal damage. In multiple sclerosis (MS), activated microglia and other immune cells emit pro-inflammatory cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-) and interleukin-6 (IL-6), both of which lead to demyelination and damage to neuronal cells (Lee et al., 2012).
In addition, both PD and MS are associated with a dysfunction in regulatory T cells, also known as Tregs, which are an immune cell subtype that works to suppress inflammation. According to research done by Saunders et al. (2012), people who have Parkinson's disease have fewer regulatory T cells, which also have a diminished ability to control inflammation in the brain. Also, people with multiple sclerosis have less regulatory T cells (Tregs), which is one factor that contributes to their abnormal immune response (Feger et al., 2007).
Oxidative stress
Oxidative stress is another characteristic that both PD and MS have in common. According to Kaur et al. (2018), oxidative stress arises in Parkinson's disease when reactive oxygen species (ROS) created by activated microglia and other cells damage neurons. In a manner analogous, oxidative stress can develop in multiple sclerosis (MS) when reactive oxygen species (ROS) are produced by immune cells during demyelination (Smith and Lassmann, 2002).
Recent research has indicated that oxidative stress may have a causal relationship with the onset of multiple sclerosis and Parkinson's disease (PD). Exposure to environmental toxins such as pesticides and heavy metals, for instance, has been found to lead to increased oxidative stress and an increased chance of acquiring Parkinson's disease (Gorell et al., 1998; Kamel et al., 2013). Another example is that exposure to environmental toxins can lead to an increased risk of developing Alzheimer's disease. In a similar vein, oxidative stress has been linked to the development of multiple sclerosis (MS), with research indicating that patients suffering from the condition had lower levels of antioxidant enzymes than healthy individuals.
(Dutta and Trapp, 2011). stress is another shared feature of PD and MS. In PD, oxidative stress occurs when ROS produced by activated microglia and other cells damage neurons (Kaur et al., 2018). Similarly, in MS, oxidative stress occurs when ROS are generated by immune cells during demyelination (Smith and Lassmann, 2002).
Recent studies have shown that there may be a direct link between oxidative stress and the development of PD and MS. For example, it has been shown that exposure to environmental toxins, such as pesticides and heavy metals, can lead to increased oxidative stress and an increased risk of developing PD (Gorell et al., 1998; Kamel et al., 2013). Similarly, oxidative stress has been implicated in the pathogenesis of MS, with studies showing that the levels of antioxidant enzymes are decreased in patients with the condition (Dutta and Trapp, 2011).
Potential therapeutic approaches
It is feasible that therapeutic techniques developed for one ailment may be useful to the treatment of the other condition given the etiological parallels between Parkinson's disease and multiple sclerosis. In the following paragraphs, we will go through some of the potential therapeutic options that have the potential to be successful in treating both PD and MS (Khatib, 2022).
Immunomodulatory therapies
Immunomodulatory therapy, which tries to modify the immune system to minimize inflammation and prevent neuronal damage, is one prospective therapeutic method that can be used for both Parkinson's disease and multiple sclerosis. Immunomodulatory therapy have been demonstrated to improve motor function and reduce inflammation in the brain in animal models of Parkinson's disease (Dobbs et al., 1999; Olechowski et al., 2013) (Dobbs et al., 1999; Olechowski et al., 2013). It has been demonstrated that immunomodulatory treatments, such as interferon-beta and glatiramer acetate, can reduce inflammation and halt the course of multiple sclerosis (Frohman et al., 2006).
However, it is important to keep in mind that the efficacy of immunomodulatory therapy differs from patient to patient, and there is a possibility of experiencing adverse effects as a result of receiving these treatments. Therefore, additional research is required to
produce immunomodulatory medications that are both more successful and safer for the treatment of Parkinson's disease and multiple sclerosis (Mehanna and Jankovic, 2010; Fox and Khatri, 2017; Rizvi and Mubarak, 2019).
One study that supports the concept of personalized medicine for multiple sclerosis (MS) was carried out by Klein and Wu (2019). They explored a number of genetic characteristics that have been connected with response to MS medications, such as differences in genes related to immune regulation and inflammation. This study is one example of a study that lends support to the concept of personalized medicine for MS. The authors propose that genetic testing may be able to assist in identifying individuals who are more likely to benefit from particular treatments or who may be at a higher risk for experiencing harmful effects from those treatments.
Another study looked especially at the impact of genetic polymorphisms on the response to interferon-beta therapy, which is a typical treatment for multiple sclerosis (MS). This study was published in the journal Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders in the year 2020. According to the findings of the study that was conducted by Saboori et al. in 2020, particular variants in the genes that code for the interferon-beta receptor and related signaling pathways were associated with variances in treatment response as well as the development of adverse effects.
In general, the findings of these and other studies imply that personalized medicine techniques that take into account individual genetic differences may assist to maximize treatment outcomes for multiple sclerosis and other autoimmune illnesses. However, additional research is required in order to have a complete understanding of the intricate relationships that exist between genetics, immunological function, and treatment response.
Anti-oxidant therapies
Anti-oxidant medicines are another potential option for treating both Parkinson's disease and multiple sclerosis (MS), given the role that oxidative stress plays in the pathophysiology of both of these disorders. It has been demonstrated in Parkinson's disease (PD) through the use of animal models that the administration of antioxidants, such as coenzyme Q10 and vitamin E, can reduce oxidative stress and improve motor function (Shults, 2006, 2008). Antioxidants like alpha-lipoic acid and N-acetylcysteine have been proven to lower oxidative stress and enhance clinical outcomes in multiple sclerosis both in animal models and in human trials (Yadav et al., 2009; Gaby, 2010).
On the other hand, the efficacy of antioxidant therapy, like that of immunomodulatory therapies, varies from patient to patient, and there is a possibility of experiencing adverse effects in conjunction with these treatments. Therefore, additional research is required to create antioxidant medications that are both more effective and safer for the treatment of Parkinson's disease and multiple sclerosis (Sanoobar et al., 2013; Vollmer et al., 2014).
Stem cell therapies
Stem cell therapies are a third potential treatment option for both Parkinson's disease and multiple sclerosis. According to Barker et al. (2017), because stem cells are capable of differentiating into a wide variety of cell types, including neurons and immune cells, they can be employed to replace damaged cells in the brain and to control the immunological response.
Dopaminergic neuron transplantation, which is derived from stem cells, has been proven in a number of trials to be effective in the treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD) in animal models of the condition. Stem cell transplantation has also been demonstrated to enhance clinical outcomes in human trials for multiple sclerosis (MS), presumably by replacing damaged immune cells with healthy ones (Mendonca et al., 2009; Barker et al., 20017). These findings were published in the journals Mendonca et al., 2009 and Barker et al., 20017.
However, the efficacy of stem cell therapies varies between patients, and there is a possibility of experiencing adverse effects in conjunction with these treatments (Weiss et al., 2019). This is similar to the situation with immunomodulatory and antioxidant therapy.
Parkinson's disease (PD) and multiple sclerosis (MS) are two separate neurological ailments; nevertheless, new research has suggested that there may be some etiological overlap between these conditions. To be more specific, Parkinson's disease and multiple sclerosis both include deregulation of the immune system, inflammation, and oxidative stress, which suggests that similar pathways may be implicated in the pathogenesis of both diseases. As a consequence of this, there may be prospective therapeutic methods that are applicable to both illnesses, such as stem cell therapies, immunomodulatory therapies, and anti-oxidant therapies. However, additional research is required to create treatments that are both more successful and safer for people living with Parkinson's disease and multiple sclerosis (MS), as well as to improve the application of these medicines for particular patients.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.
