AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Research Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2693-7247/148
1 School of Pharmacy, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences.
2 Department of Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran.
*Corresponding Author: Maryam Etminanesfahani, Department of Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran.
Citation: Maryam Etminanesfahani, Faezeh Dehnavi, Hamadan, (2023), Examining the consumption pattern of three expensive antibiotics (Meropenem, Ciprofloxacin and Cefepime) in Shahid Beheshti Hospital, Hamedan. J. Pharmaceutics and Pharmacology Research, 6(6); DOI: 10.31579/2693-7247/148
Copyright: © 2023, Maryam Etminanesfahani. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 20 September 2023 | Accepted: 06 October 2023 | Published: 09 November 2023
Keywords: antibiotic; covid 19; hamadan
The aim of this study was to investigate the consumption pattern of three expensive antibiotics (meropenem, ciprofloxacin and cefepime) in Shahid Beheshti Hospital, Hamedan.
Method: In a retrospective cross-sectional study, all patients who were admitted to Shahid Beheshti Hospital in Hamedan, Iran, in the first 6 months of 2019 as the period before the epidemic and the first 6 months of 2021 as the period during the epidemic and after hospitalization, meropenem, ciprofloxacin and cefepime were prescribed to them, they entered the study. Data were analyzed using SPSS software.
Result: The drug prescribed for the patients were meropenem in 213 (35.2%) patients, cefepime in 270 (34.2%) and ciprofloxacin in 187 (30.6%) patients. The microorganism was correct in 2.5% of cases, 10.9% was wrong and 86.6% was no tested. The site of infection for the patients were bacteremia in 2 (0.3%) patients, coronary artery catheter in 3 (0.5%) patients, kidney and bladder in 14 (2.3%) patients, and skin and soft tissue in 1 (0.2%) patient.
Conclusion: Based on the results of the study, for most cases receiving three expensive antibiotics (meropenem, ciprofloxacin, and cefepime) in Shahid Beheshti Hospital in Hamedan, before and during the covid-19 epidemic, it is not possible to judge if the prescription has been rational or not.
Antibiotic is generally a product or substance that is produced or taken from a microorganism and kills other microorganisms or prevents their growth [1-3]. Different types of antibiotics are different in terms of chemical, physical, pharmacological properties, antimicrobial scope and mechanism of action [4-5].
Broad-spectrum antibiotics are those that are active against different types of microorganisms. Like tetracycline, which is effective against many gram-positive bacteria, chlamydia, mycoplasma, and rickettsia. Antibiotics with a limited range are those that are active against only one microbe or a very limited range of microbes; such as vancomycin, which is mostly used against gram-positive cocci such as staphylococci and enterococci [6-7].
The World Health Organization recently warned against antibiotic resistance worldwide and declared the practice of prescribing and overusing antibiotics as one of the biggest threats to public health in the world. After this warning, many countries began to educate and improve the understanding of the medical community and people in this field with advertisements and media training on various television channels [8-9].
Statistics show that in Tehran, the capital city of Iran, 40-50% of outpatient prescriptions include antibiotics, while according to the World Health Organization, the standard of antibiotics in prescriptions should be less than 20%. Therefore, it seems that we are facing the problem of irrational prescribing of antibiotics [10-12].
The indiscriminate prescription of new and expensive antibiotics, in addition to imposing costs on the patient and the country's healthcare system, causes the emergence of antibiotic resistance at the community level, which in turn creates many problems in the treatment of infectious and contagious diseases in the future (13-14). Antibiotic misuse and over-prescription not only can lead substantial economic burden on patients and health systems, also may complicate the treatment of patients and increase the likelihood of microbial resistance [16-15].
There is a dearth of information on hospital antibiotic usage, particularly in countries without well-established antimicrobial stewardship programs [15-17]. In addition, data reveal that nations with a high frequency of COVID-19 infection have a substantial rank in the occurrence of multi-drug resistant infections, indicating that this pandemic is happening under critical circumstances of microbial resistance [18]. In order to reduce the harmful effects of overuse, antibiotics should be used responsibly [19]. Information about the antibiotics used by hospitalized patients assists in the development of programs to regulate antibiotic usage (17). Considering the explained issues, the present research was conducted to study the consumption of the injectable form of three antibiotics, meropenem, ciprofloxacin, and cefepime at Shahid Beheshti Hospital in Hamedan.
Shahid Beheshti Hospital in Hamadan served as the subject of this retrospective and cross-sectional research.
The target population included patients admitted to Shahid Beheshti Hospital in Hamedan in the first 6 months of 2018- as the period before the epidemic- and the first 6 months of 2014- as the period during the epidemic- who injectable forms of meropenem, ciprofloxacin or cefepime were prescribed for them. Sampling was done in such a way that at least 100 cases were included in the study for each period before and after Corona for each antibiotic; where the total number of patients for one antibiotic was less than 100 in each of the two mentioned periods, the census was used.
The required data were extracted from the patients' files. The investigated parameters included:
demographic information (age, gender), underlying disease, WBC blood cell count, conduction of microbial culture, antibiotic sensitivity, drug dose, duration of treatment, presence or absence of fever, specialty of the prescribing physician, and indication of prescription.
Data were analyzed by using SPSS. 16 software. Quantitative variables were reported as mean and standard deviation, and qualitative ones were reported as frequency (percentage).
In total, 605 files were studied; 297 out of them were selected among patients admitted during the first 6 months of 2018 (as the period before the epidemic of covid-19) and 308 patients were selected from the cases belonged to the first 6 months of 2014 (as the period during the epidemic).
The antibiotic prescribed for 213 (35.2%) patients was meropenem, for 270 cases (34.2%) was cefepime, and for 187 ones (30.6%) was ciprofloxacin. The microorganism was correct in 2.5% of patients, for 10.9% of the cases was wrong and 86.6% of the cases were no tested.
The site of infection was not recorded for most patients. More details can be found in table 1.
| site of infection | Frequency | Percent |
| No | 585 | 96.7 |
| Bacteremia | 2 | 0.3 |
| Coronary artery catheter | 3 | 0.5 |
| Kidney and bladder | 14 | 2.3 |
| Skin and soft tissue | 1 | 0.2 |
Table 1: The frequency of site of infection for the patients
In the case of 31.6% of cases, prescribing physician’s specialty major was infectious diseases (Table 2).
| Specialist doctor | Frequency | Percent |
| No | 9 | 1.5 |
| Infectious | 191 | 31.6 |
| Others | 405 | 66.9 |
Table 2: The frequency of specialist doctor for patients
No significant relationship was observed between microorganism and the prescribed antibiotic in the 2 studied time periods (P>0.05) (Table 3).
| time period | prescription drug | Microorganism | P Vallue | ||
| No test | Correct | Wrong | |||
| 2019 | meropenem | 98 (81.7%) | 3 (2.5%) | 19 (15.8%) | 0.095 |
| cefepime | 88 (89.7%) | 4 (4.1%) | 6 (6.1%) | ||
| ciprofloxacin | 75 (94.9%) | 1 (1.3%) | 3 (3.8%) | ||
| 2021 | meropenem | 79 (87.9%) | 4 (2.7%) | 10 (9.4%) | 0.12 |
| cefepime | 96 (88.1%) | 3 (2.8%) | 10 (9.2%) | ||
| ciprofloxacin | 88 (83%) | 0 (0%) | 18 (17%) | ||
Table 3: Relationship between microorganism and patients' prescription drugs in the 2 studied time periods
Figure 1: Conformity of the prescribed antibiotic with the identified microorganism in the 2 studied time periods
A significant relationship was observed between doctors’ specialty and prescribed antibiotic in the 2 studied time periods (P<0>
| time period | prescription drug | Specialist doctor | P_Vallue | ||
| No | Infectious | Others | |||
| 2019 | meropenem | 3 (2.5%) | 29 (24.2%) | 88 (73.3%) | <0> |
| cefepime | 0 (0%) | 59 (60.2%) | 39 (39.8%) | ||
| ciprofloxacin | 1 (1.3%) | 12 (15.2%) | 66 (83.5%) | ||
| 2021 | meropenem | 3 (1.4%) | 57 (26.8%) | 153 (71.8%) | <0> |
| cefepime | 1 (0.5%) | 97 (46.9%) | 109 (52.7%) | ||
| ciprofloxacin | 5 (2.7%) | 37 (19.4%) | 143 (77.3%) | ||
Table 4: Relationship between doctors’ specialty and prescribed antibiotic in the 2 studied timeperiods
Figure 2: Frequency of prescription drugs based on specialist doctors in the 2 studied time periods
The present research addressed the pattern of use of three expensive antibiotics (meropenem, ciprofloxacin, and cefepime) before and during the COVID-19 epidemic in Shahid Beheshti Hospital in Hamadan. According to a review of the literature, no previous research has studied this topic.
Based on the results of the study, it seems that in Shahid Beheshti Hospital in Hamedan, three expensive antibiotics (meropenem, ciprofloxacin, and cefepime) were widely used without any record on antibiogram test, which probably means that antibiogram test has not been performed. several prior investigations reported that meropenem, ciprofloxacin, and cefepime have been used in large quantities [20-25]. For instance, Molla et al. (2021) found that 133 patients (68.91%) had received numerous antibiotics. Patients with serious illnesses often got more antibiotics. Ceftriaxone (53.8%), meropenem (40.9%), moxifloxacin (29.5%), and doxycycline (25.4%) were the four antibiotics administered among the patients undergoing the examination; the authors came to the conclusion that patients with severe illness and those who had abnormal CRP and d-dimer values had a greater incidence of numerous antibiotic prescriptions. However, there was no data about the effectiveness of antibiotic administration [17].
In accordance with the findings of the current study, Bojana Beovic et al. (2020) in an investigation on the antibiotic prescription in patients with COVID-19 reported that the most significant justification for initiating antibiotics was clinical symptoms [22].
According to Liyang Wang and his colleagues' (2020) findings, which are in line with the findings of the current investigation, the majority of the patients had received antibiotic treatment experimentally, and just 2.7% of cases (n=37) had serious co-infections. This paper demonstrates that while paying attention to inflammatory variables may be beneficial for the experimental administration of these medications, experimental antibiotic therapy may not be required for all individuals [24].
In accordance with the findings of the current investigation, Alvaro Goncalves Mendes Neto et al. (2020) revealed that the administration of antibiotics to patients was documented in 67% of cases, and in 72% of those, no evident bacterial infection cause was noted [25].
Based on the results of the study, for most cases receiving three expensive antibiotics (meropenem, ciprofloxacin, and cefepime) in Shahid Beheshti Hospital in Hamedan, before and during the covid-19 epidemic, it is not possible to judge if the prescription has been rational or not. Therefore, improvement in antibiotic stewardship seems needed.
This article was elicited from the first author's Pharm.D thesis and was supported by Hamadan University of Medical Sciences [grant number 1400120310169].
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
