AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Research Article | DOI: https://doi.org/ 10.31579/2768-2757/011
*Corresponding Author: Manouc Manoucheher Aghajanzadeh, Inflammatory Lung Diseases Research Center, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Iran.
Citation: M Aghajanzadeh, Mostafa z ziabari, Mohammad R Asgary, R Ebrahimiyan, Ali A Fomani, et al. (2021) Evaluation of the Relationship between Primary Spontaneous Pneumothorax and Exercise and Patient Return to Previous Activities in Patients Referring to Razi and Poursina and Aria Hospitals of Rasht during 2015-2019. Journal of Clinical Surgery and Research. 2(2) DOI: 10.31579/2768-2757/011
Copyright: © 2021 Manouchehr Aghajanzadeh, This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 13 February 2021 | Accepted: 12 April 2021 | Published: 20 April 2021
Keywords: primary spontaneous pneumothorax, exercise, pneumothorax, return to work
Introduction: The most common cause of primary spontaneous pneumothorax (PSP) is sub pleural bleb apical rupture. Little is known about the relationship between PSP and exercise and return to exercise time. In this study, we tend to investigate the relationship between exercise and PSP and time of return to exercise and previous activities.
Method: This study was designed as a case series and the sample size included all patients diagnosed with PSP in Razi and Poursina and Aria hospitals of Rasht during 2015-2019 based on inclusion criteria. Variables were analyzed using Fisher's exact test, Chi square, Mann Whitney U and t-test (p<0.05).
Results: The most common type of treatment in patients was transaxillary thoracotomy with pleurodesis with iodine (TTP) in 58.2% and tube thoracostomy and pleurodesis in 41.7%, which was not statistically significant between athletes and non-athletes (p=0.806). Athletes who underwent TTP after 4 weeks and those treated with tube thoracostomy and pleurodesis after 8-12 weeks were advised to return to their previous activity. Of athletes, 9.5% had recurrence; of non-athletes, 9.8% had recurrence. Of athletes, 4.8% did not tolerate a return to their previous activity; of non-athletes, 7.3% did not tolerate returning to their previous activity regardless of treatment, and this difference was not significant.
Conclusion: Our study showed no significant difference between clinical manifestations and image findings as well as frequency of treatment and complications in both athlete and non-athlete patients. There is no increase in recurrence and intolerance at the time recommended for return to previous activity.
Pneumothorax is defined as presence of air in the pleural cavity [1]. Pneumothorax can occur spontaneously or following direct trauma to the chest [2-3]. Spontaneous pneumothorax is divided into primary and secondary categories [4]. Primary spontaneous pneumothorax (PSP) occurs in the absence of any pathological underlying agent [5-7]. The most common cause of spontaneous pneumothorax is sub pleural bleb apical rupture [8]. PSP is more common in men [9]. Its incidence in men is 7 to 18 cases per 100,000 population per year and in women 1 to 6 cases per 100,000 population per year [10-12]. Other risk factors include smoking, tall, young men aged 10 to 30 years [13-14]. Moreover, 10% of PSP cases have a positive family history [7-8]. Climate change including pressure and temperature reductions have also been identified as a contributing factor to PSP [14-15]. Symptoms of pneumothorax include sudden onset of severe chest pain in the affected side, dry cough and cyanosis, and even the patient may die of suffocation or acute cardiovascular failure [16]. Treatment can vary from inserting a chest tube by connecting to WATER Seal to thoracoscopy and bleb resection and pleurodesis [16]. But little has been done about the relationship between PSP and exercise and return to sport time, and there is little reports and surveys in literature on the relationship and there is disagreement about main question of when to return to exercise and daily activity. In this study we tend to investigate the relationship between exercise and PSP and time of return to exercise and previous activities.
Calculation of Sample Size, Data Collection, Implementation and Instruments
From 2013 to 2019, approximately 314 cases of pneumothorax were referred to Razi, Pooursina and Aria hospitals of Rasht, of which 103 were included in our study. Of 103 patients studied, 21 were athletes and 82 were non-athletes. All of these patients underwent chest intubation after diagnosis of pneumothorax and were visited daily.
Statistical Analysis
SPSS software version 8 was used for data analysis. Descriptive data were calculated as mean and standard deviation. In this study, variables were analyzed using Fisher’s exact test and Chi square test, Mann-Whitney-U test and t-test (p<0.05).
Results
In this study, 73.8% of patients were male and 26.2% were female; 20.4% of the patients were athletes and 79.6% were non-athletes; 85.7% were male athletes and 14.2% were female athletes resembling the gender distribution of the disease. The most common clinical symptom was chest pain (41.7%). The most common exercise was bodybuilding (28.6%), followed by martial arts (19%), track and field and volleyball (14.3%). For 71.4% of athletes, the time interval between onset of symptoms and the last time of exercise was more than 7 days and 28.6% had activity during the last week. Of total subjects, only 3.9% had physical activity at the same time as PSP. The most common side of PSP was generally the right side (65%). The right side was the most prevalent side in athletes (52.4%) and the right side was the most common side in non-athletes (68.3%), which was not statistically significant (P=0.111). Moreover, 36.9% of patients were smokers, 19% of athlete patients were smokers and 41.5% of non-athlete patients were smokers. Although the athletes were less smoker, this difference was not significant (P=0.057). Perhaps this difference was significant as the number of samples increased.
The most common finding in athlete and non-athlete patients was bleb observed on CT scan, which was not significantly different between athletes and non-athletes (p=0.937) (Table 1).
The most common type of treatment in patients was trans-axillary thoracotomy with pleurodesis with iodine (58.2%) and tube thoracostomy and pleurodesis (41.7%). Among athletes, TTP was the most common treatment (47.6%); among non-athletes, TTP was the most common treatment (60.9%), which is not significantly different between athletes and non-athletes based on Fisher exact test (p=0.806) (Table 2). Among athletes, 47.6% undergoing TTP were recommended to return to their previous activity after 4 weeks and 52.4% undergoing tube thoracostomy and pleurodesis were recommended to their previous activity after 8 to 12 weeks. Among non-athletes, 60.9% undergoing TTP were recommended to return to their previous activity after 4 weeks and 39.1% treated conservatively were recommended to return to their previous activity after 12 to 18 weeks.
In this study, 93 patients did not have recurrence, 37.6% underwent tube thoracostomy and the rest underwent TTP. Not all patients with recurrence (10 patients) underwent thoracotomy and all underwent tube thoracostomy. This difference was statistically significant (P<0.0001) in all those who recurred and underwent tube thoracostomy and pleurodesis compared to patients who underwent thoracotomy and did not recurred (Table 3); 96 patients had tolerated treatment, of which 44.8% underwent tube thoracostomy and 55.2% underwent thoracotomy. Of total number of patients who did not tolerate treatment, 28.6% underwent tube thoracostomy and 71.4% underwent thoracotomy. However, thoracotomy was more common among those who did not tolerate the treatment. But this difference was not significant (P=0.464).
Of 21 athletes, 52.4% underwent tube thoracostomy and returned to their previous exercise after 8 to 12 weeks and 18.2% recurred. Of 21 athletes, 10 underwent thoracotomy and returned to exercise after 4 weeks with no recurrence. Of 82 non-athlete patients, 32 underwent tube thoracostomy, of which 25% recurred after 8 weeks. Comparison of athlete and non-athlete patients who underwent tube thoracostomy and had recurrence using Fisher test showed no significant difference between them (P=0.710) (Table 4). Since there were no recurrences in patients undergoing thoracotomy, no comparison can be made between different subgroups.
Among athletes, recurrence rate was 9.5% and recurrence rate of non-athletes was 9.8%. Overall, this difference was not significant (P=0.998) (Table 6). Of athletes, 4.8% did not tolerate their return to their previous activity, and 7.3% of non-athletes did not tolerate their return to their previous activity, regardless of the type of treatment, and this difference was not significant (P=0.998).
Recording PSP cases in athletes is particularly encouraged by practitioners to provide guidelines that improve the diagnosis and treatment of these conditions and they recommend to provide guidelines in determining the safe return time. In this study, we tended to investigate the relationship between exercise and primary spontaneous pneumothorax and the time to return to exercise and previous activities of patients with PSP. The results of our study showed that 73.8% of the participants were male and 26.2% were female. The most common clinical symptom in our patients was chest pain (41.7%).Aghajanzadehet al studied PSP epidemiology in rasht during 2009-2014; in their study, 79.9% of patients were male. The most common clinical symptom (53.2%) was chest pain (9). Yoon et al. examined risk factors for spontaneous pneumothorax in 2013; they showed that 65.7% of patients were male, with the most common complaint being chest pain in 35.2% and shortness of breath in 21.7% [13]. In addition to clinical findings, our study examined CT scans, with the most common finding in both athlete and non-athlete patients being multiple blebs ranging from 42.7% to 52.4%. In our study, 57.3% of patients did not give description of heavy activity. Yoon et al. noted that 53.4% of patients did not give a description of heavy activity, while Uramoto et al. showed that heavy activity is not a strong risk factor for predicting spontaneous pneumothorax [17].
The most common part of pulmonary involvement in spontaneous pneumothorax was in the right side of the chest (65%) and only 5.8% of patients had involvement in both sides of the lung. Yoon et al. reported that 3.2% of patients with spontaneous pneumothorax showed both sides of the lung involved [13]. Few studies have investigated spontaneous pneumothorax in athletes, most of which were case reports (5-8). In our study, 103 patients with primary spontaneous pneumothorax were evaluated, of whom 21 were athletes (20.4%). In our study, we refer to an athlete who meets the following four criteria: 1) Performing sports to improve performance; 2) Participating actively in sports competitions; 2) Formally recognized in local or regional or national competitions; 4) Exercising and participating in most competitions included daily activity and mental focus. Of the sports studied, bodybuilding (n=6; 5.8%) was the most frequent sports in our study. It is worth noting that one of the most important issues in this disease is the high rate of recurrence despite different treatments available, ranging between 20-50% for primary and 10-20% for secondary cases [9]. While recurrence rate in our study between athletes and non-athletes ranged from 9.5% to 9.8%, which may be due to the method used to examine patients undergoing CT scans and more patients receiving intervention. In our study, the most common type of treatment was transaxillary thoracotomy with pleurodesis with iodine, which had the same frequency in both groups. In athletic patients who underwent transaxillary thoracotomy, 100% had tolerated return to previous activity. Among non-athlete patients, only 10% could not tolerate a return to their previous activity. Of athlete and non-athlete patients who underwent tube thoracostomy and pleurodesis, 18.2-25% had recurrence. None of our patients who underwent TTP recurred. Overall, 9.5% of the athletes had recurrence and only 4.8% did not tolerate a return to their previous activity. We recommended 47.6% of athletes after four weeks based on TTP treatment received to return to their previous activity and recommended 52.4% to return to their activity after 8 to 12 weeks. As noted earlier, only one case did not tolerate return to previous activity regardless of time interval of return to daily activity. Through a case report and empirical observation, Sean M. Curtin et al. noted that, depending on general conditions and cause of spontaneous pneumothorax, it is possible to decide on sports activities of these athletes and the time to start exercises and sports activity should be limited at least for three weeks and activity must gradually increase at the time of return to exercises under supervision of the practitioner [6]. In a case report by Peter F. Davis et al., a track and field athlete was treated conservatively. The patient showed full recovery six days after onset of symptoms and started light activities after one week and started over the competition after three weeks. This patient had no problem after three months [7].
Overall, few studies have investigated spontaneous pneumothorax in athletes. Most studies have been in the form of case reports; however, in order to provide a guideline for diagnosis, treatment and timing of safe return of athletes with spontaneous pneumothorax to exercise, appropriate size of studies is required. Our study showed that both athlete and non-athlete patients were evaluated based on the same diagnostic and therapeutic indications. There were no significant differences in the results derived from clinical presentations and imaging findings and in terms of frequency of treatment and side effects (recurrence and tolerance to return to exercise and previous activity). At the recommended time to return to previous activity in our study, we did not see any increase in recurrence and intolerance compared to other studies. Therefore, it can be claimed that return to previous activity in athletes with spontaneous pneumothorax depends on general conditions and type of treatment, whether conservative or thoracotomy, and regardless of the exercise.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.
