Short Review | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2640-1053/011
1 Department of Medical Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Thailand
*Corresponding Author: Nattapong Phliba, Department of Medical Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Thailand
Citation: Nattapong Phliba. Evaluation of Ovarian Neoplasms concurrent with Contralateral Benign Tumorsd . J Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics, Doi: 10.31579/2640-1053/011
Copyright: © 2017 Nattapong Phliba. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of The Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 30 May 2017 | Accepted: 11 August 2017 | Published: 24 August 2017
Keywords: Ovary; Teratoma; Contralateral Neoplasm; Ethnology
Neoplasm of the ovary may coexist with benign teratoma of the opposite organ. I report from an Ethnic Group in Nigeria the 6 cases which were collected during a period of 30 years at a Reference Pathology Laboratory. As the age range was from 21 to 40 years, the series confirms the uncommonness of teratomas in menopausal females. In contrast, dysgerminoma is shown to feature in younger persons. As bilaterality of neoplasms may occur in the ovaries, attention should be paid during clinical work-up.
Benign teratoma is a relatively common tumor of the ovary. According to Parrington’s associates,[1] it is “formed of fully differentiated mature tissues, often from all three cell layers, and usually comprise a cyst containing sebaceous material, hair, and often teeth.” World-wide reports have covered its association with diverse conditions such as pregnancy,[2,3] mimicking malignancy,[4] forming squamous cell carcinoma,[5] superinfection,[6,7] and menopause.[8] It has been associated with primary carcinoma of the fallopian tube.[9] Its ethnological parameters have even been presented in a South African research.[10]
Research on the teratomas of this organ was previously carried out personally.[11] This was based on surgical specimens received at a Reference Pathology Laboratory that serves the Igbos,[12] one of the major ethnological groups in Nigeria. Here, using the personally kept Laboratory Records let me present how certain tumors coexisted with benign teratomas in the contralateral ovary. A review of the literatures is added.
I have experienced 6 cases of various neoplasms coexisting with a benign cystic teratoma of the other ovary. See Table 1. In all probability, the parameters of these patients are worthy of note.
Note was taken of the age range which was from 21 to 40 years (mean 31 years). These are child-bearing years but no case was associated with pregnancy as in the torsion case from Taiwan,2 and the obstruction case from Ethiopia.3 Therefore, this series confirms the uncommonness of teratoma presentating in menopausal females.8
Females of younger ages are those who suffer from dysgerminoma. The single case in this series is consistent with the New York experience of Barber who stated that it is the most common malignant germ cell tumor found in childhood.[13] The 40 years age limit in this series tallies with Jamaican experience,[14] in the United Kingdom,[15] out of 9 malignant tumors recorded in infancy and childhood, as many as 8 were dysgerminomas. In Yugoslavia,[16] out of 15 such malignant tumors, five showed the dysgerminoma pattern.
Pattern of growths in a community is epidemiologically important. If the benign patterns are considered, namely, cystadenoma, cystadenofibroma, fibroma, and Brenner tumor, each of which occurred once in Table 1, they were precisely those highlighted in a large US report.[17] Incidentally, an Israeli paper devoted attention wholly to cystadenofibroma,[18] remarking that “the characteristic pathologic features of this neoplasm justify its separate listing.”
Listing requires that, if neoplastic disease occurs in the one ovary, the state of the contralateral counterpart must be ascertained.[19] Indeed, the frequency of bilaterally of teratoma itself necessitates careful attention.[20] In the US series,[17] out of 103 such cases, [9] (8.7%) were bilateral. It was 10.8% in another US series.[19].
Series have so far been cited from Journals based in the UK,[1,4,15,20] Taiwan,[2] Ethiopia,[3] South Africa,[5,10] USA,[6,8,11,13,17,19] Iran,[7] Korea,[9] Jamaica,[14] Yugoslavia,[16] and Israel.[18] In the present series, the data collected became possible on account of the personal establishment of the histopathology pool recommended by Birmingham, UK, authors,[21] who recommended the importance of epidemiological analysis using such pools. It is concluded, therefore, that ovarian neoplasms may coexist with contralateral benign teratomas. Accordingly, when one ovary is involved, its contralateral counterpart should always be examined at operation and, if necessary, biopsied. In other words, whatever the advance in therapy it should take into account the state of the contralateral organ.
Dear Editorial Team, Clinical Medical Reviews and Reports. My experience with the journal was highly positive. The peer-review process was rigorous, constructive, and completed in a timely manner. The reviewers provided valuable comments that helped improve the quality and clarity of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout all stages of the publication process. Communication was clear and efficient, and any questions were addressed promptly. Overall, I found the journal to maintain high scientific standards and an excellent publication workflow. I would be pleased to consider submitting future work to this journal. Best wishes from, Elena Popa.
It was my pleasure to submit my testimonial concerning the Reviewer Board of our Scientific Journal “Brain and Neurological Disorders”. The Reviewers focused on some modifications and their contribution was helpful. The ladies of our Editorial Office were also supported my efforts. It was my honor to have such a co-operation and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Thank you for the speedy and efficient peer review process. I appreciate the fact that your peer reviewers do not take months to respond like with some other journals. I would also like to thank the editorial office for responding quickly to my questions. It is an excellent journal. I plan to submit more manuscripts in the future. Best wishes from, Robert W. McGee
Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Working with you and your team on our recent publication in JCRR has been a truly wonderful and enjoyable experience. The responses were prompt, and the reviewers were patient, constructive, and highly professional. One reviewer in particular gave me the feeling that a professor was carefully reading and commenting on my coursework, which was deeply touching. The entire process was straightforward and hassle‑free, with no tedious online forms to complete. I highly recommend this journal. Best wishes from, DR Aibing Rao, Head of R&D
I Appreciate the Opportunity to Share my Experience with the Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. The peer review process was timely and constructive, and the feedback provided helped improve the quality of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout the process, ensuring smooth communication and efficient handling of the submission. Overall, it was a positive experience collaborating with your team.
Dear Mercy Grace, Editorial Coordinator of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, We would like to express our gratitude for your help at all stages of publishing and editing the article. The editors of the magazine answer all the necessary questions and help at every stage. We will definitely continue to cooperate and publish other works in the Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences! Best wishes from, Alla Konstantinovna Politova,