AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Research Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2692-9392/143
1Medical Faculty. Laboratory services. University Hospital Centre”Mother Tereza”.
2Laboratory services. University Hospital Centre”Mother Tereza”.
3Medical Faculty
*Corresponding Author: Vjollca Durro, Medical Faculty. Laboratory services. University Hospital Centre “Mother Tereza”.
Citation: V. Durro, M. Naco, D. Dinkollari, E. Shijaku and S. Saliasi, (2022) Evaluation of Antibiotic Administration in Community Pharamacy. J. Archives of Medical Case Reports and Case Study, 6(4); DOI:10.31579/2692-9392/143
Copyright: ©2022 Vjollca Durro, This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 16 August 2022 | Accepted: 31 August 2022 | Published: 23 September 2022
Keywords: antibiotic resistance; doctor’s speciality; antibiotic prescribe; community pharmacy
Introduction: Today, resistant microorganisms to antibiotics are not only encountered in hospitals, but they are also spreading more widely in the community. The aim of this study was to evaluate one of the factors of antibiotic resistance, the administration of antibiotics in the community pharmacies.
Materia and method: The study was conducted in an comunity pharmacy. The collected data covers the period of time April - June 2022, including a considerable number of patients and concrete cases. The base for data collection are the prescription of antibiotics by the family doctor and interviews with clients presented at the pharmacy.
Results: Referred our data 88.3% of the patients directed to the pharmacy had the doctor's prescription for the required antibiotics and 11.7% do not have it. The most used antibiotic for the period taken in the study is ciprofloxacin, 16%, followed by azithromycin (15.5%) and amoxiclav (10.9%). According to doctor's specialty, the most of antibiotic prescriptions were from urologist doctor 18.6% , followed by the pulmonologist 16.8% and the family doctor 15.9%.
Conclusions: Most of antibiotic are prescribe by doctor based in their experience and not to laboratory test results. In this situation is very important and urgent needs review national plan and protocols of antibiotic used in treatment of infections.
Today, resistant microorganisms to antibiotics are not only encountered in hospitals, but they are also spreading more widely in the community [1]. Evidence report that the practices of self-medication with antibiotics and the inappropriate utilization of antibiotics are key factor in antibiotic resistance. In the majority of the cases these are connected to the pharmacists unsuitable antibiotics dispensing practices or non-enforcement of legislation on drug prescriptions [2]. According to a report developed by WHO, the self-medication treatment with antibiotics is generally widespread in the developing countries [3,4,5]. The recurrent utilization of self-medication with antibiotics in developing countries is related to several elements as particularly insufficient access to healthcare, accessibility to antibiotics sold without medical prescribe, deficiencies in local regulatory legislation and higher frequency of contagious diseases as compared to developed countries [6,7]. Pharmacies serve as the first and the last point of contact for the patients in the healthcare-seeking chain. So community of pharmacies play an important role in improving the criteria use of antibiotics and promote safe and effective administration of these medications [8,9].
In Albania, dispensing antibiotics is based on national legislations which prohibits sale of antibiotics without medical prescription. The pharmacist’s community as part of the healthcare team, are the first point of contact of patients with drugs. The aim of this study was to evaluate one of the factors of antibiotic resistance, the administration of antibiotics in the community pharmacies.
The study was conducted in an comunity pharmacy. The collected data covers the period of time April - June 2022, including a considerable number of patients and concrete cases.
The base for data collection are the prescription of antibiotics by doctors in the primary health care service and interviews with clients presented at the pharmacy. They are asked if performed the laboratory test(antibiogram) before received the antibiotic from doctor. The analyzed data includes: The antibiotic used with a doctor's prescription or not. Types of antibiotics prescribed by primary health care physicians.The type of antibiotic and frequency prescribed according to pathologies. Data were analyzed by performing descriptive statistics and processed using Microsoft Excel software.
Table No1. Distribution of cases of antibiotic prescribe
Referred the data in the table No.1 88.3% of the patients directed to the pharmacy had the doctor's prescription for the required antibiotics and 11.7% do not have it. Also referred interviews with clients presented at the pharmacy our data show that 46% of antibiotic prescribed by doctor based on laboratory test, 74.7% are not based in laboratory test and 7.4% of them referred don’t know. 
Table No 2 : Frequency of antibiotic use.
Data on table No.2 show that the most used antibiotic for the period taken in the study is ciprofloxacin, 16%, followed by azithromycin (15.5%) and amoxiclav (10.9%). According to doctor's specialty, the most of antibiotic prescriptions are from urologist doctor 18.6% , followed by the pulmonologist 16.8% and the family doctor 15.9%.
The overall volume of antibiotic consumption in the community is one of the foremost causes of antimicrobial resistance. In developing countries, pharmacists often dispense drugs, like antibiotics, to patients who do not have a medical prescription. According to the WHO, it has been estimated that more than 50% of the antibiotics worldwide are sold without medical prescription. In addition, high resistance rates are noted in communities where antibiotic sales without prescription are common practices.(10 ,11). Also, this phenomenon was more evident during the current COVID-19 pandemic where there was not only an increase amount of antibiotics used but and the use of antibiotics without a doctor's recommendation because of many patients turn to the pharmacy to buy antibiotics based on similar experiences or fear of Covid 19 virus complication [12].
Self-treatment with antibiotics based on the similar experience of family members or friends, the prescription of antibiotics by the doctor without being based on the results of the laboratory test but on their clinical experience, sales from pharmacies without a doctor's prescription are problems encountered in daily practice in the treatment of different diseases affecting antimicrobial resistance [13,14,15,16]. The public practices of self-medication with antibiotics and the pharmacists practices of non-prescribed antibiotic sale has been extensively investigated all over the world [17,18,19,20].
In Albania we haven’t data about administration of antibiotic in community pharmacies related to medical prescription. So in this study have analysed administration of antibiotic in one of the community pharmacies during a period of time of 3 months. Our data in this study show that most of antibiotic used from outpatient 88.7% are prescribed by doctors and 11.7% of case represent to pharmacy haven’t doctor prescription (table 1). The change was statistically significant (p<0>
Most of patients represented without medical description declared that they were looking for the antibiotic based on their previous experiences, similar history of their relatives or haven’t time to go to the doctors. Based in our legislation the pharmacist haven’t sold antibiotic to these patients. The orientation towards the pharmacy and the phenomenon of seeking an antibiotic without counseling with the doctor it exists, although in a lower percentage. This continuing to be a major problem for public health, because taking them without the appropriate prescribe by the doctor or without first performing the necessary laboratory tests can later lead to the appearance of a antimicrobic resistance. These phenomena are more frequent in the low and middle-income countries were the burden of infectious disease is high [10,13,21,22].
During period of study, all patient presented to the pharmacy were asked if they had done a laboratory test/antibiogram before the antibiotic was prescribed by the doctor. Our results show that only 17.9% of patients include in study was performed the laboratory test before antibiotic prescribe by doctor, 7.4% answered don’t know and 74.7% haven’t done laboratory test but antibiotic was prescribe by doctors based on their experience. Referred our results in this survey (table no1) pediatric and pneumologist doctors prescribe the antibiotic (100% of cases) without antibiogram test referring their experience only. Some specialist doctors as gastroenterologist, otorhinolaryngologist, dermatologist and gynecologist performed the antibiogram test in a small number of cases, which varies from 2% to 20%. While other specialist doctors as family and urologist doctor performed antibiogram test before prescribe antibiotic 31% to 45.8% of presented cases. These data are statistical significant (p<0>
Although some infections are common and do not cause serious problems, or require a short treatment time, or are simple to diagnose, special attention should be paid to antibiotic treatment due to the increased prevalence of these infections, costs, morbidity, recurrences and most importantly antibiotic resistance(13,20). According to the specialty of doctors, the most of antibiotic prescriptions were from urologist doctor 18.6% followed by the pneumologist 16.8% and the family doctor 15.9%. Also in the study we analysed the frequent of antibiotic used and their distribution according to pathology. Our data show that more prescribe antibiotic are ciprofloxacin (16%), followed by azithromycin (15.5%) and amoxiclav (10.9%). According to the recipes reviewed, azithromycin was prescribed the most from family doctor, Ciprofloxacin 27.1% and Bactrim 37.5% was prescribed the most in pathology of urinary tract. Azithromycin 51,2
Our results show high antibiotic usage at community pharmacies (18 type of antibiotics), particularly the highest percentage is occupied by antibiotics with a broad spectrum of activity as azithromycin, ciprofloxacin and amoxiclav. Most of antibiotic are prescribe by doctor based in their experience and not to laboratory test results. In this situation is very important and urgent needs review national plan and protocols of antibiotic used in treatment of infections. Moreover monitoring of implementing the national legislation by pharmacist during antibiotic administration aiming to minimized the sale of antibiotic without prescription of doctors and general public education about antibiotic effect and complications.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
