AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Case Report | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2690-4861/558
Assistant Professor, Department of Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, Sharda University, Greater Noida, 201310, Uttar Pradesh, India.
*Corresponding Author: Subba Dil, Assistant Professor, Department of Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, Sharda University, Greater Noida, 201310, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Citation: Subba Dil, (2024), Evaluation of Adverse Drug Reactions Associated with Monocef(ceftriaxone) in a 65-Year-Old Male with Hypertension and COPD: A Case Study, International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews, 20(1); DOI:10.31579/2690-4861/558
Copyright: © 2024, Subba Dil. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 05 November 2024 | Accepted: 15 November 2024 | Published: 25 November 2024
Keywords: 65-year-old male; adverse drug reaction (ADR); naranjo scale; ceftriaxone; loose stools
A 65-year-old male with a history of hypertension and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) was admitted with complaints of cough, shortness of breath, fever, and fatigue. Initial treatment included multiple medications, among which Monocef (Ceftriaxone) was suspected to cause adverse drug reactions, specifically loose stools. Two days into treatment, the patient developed loose stools, which resolved after the discontinuation of Monocef(Ceftriaxone ). Using the Naranjo Adverse Drug Reaction Probability Scale, the reaction was determined to be probable (score of 6). The patient’s condition improved over the course of four days, and he was discharged in stable condition on the fifth day. This case highlights the importance of monitoring for adverse drug reactions in elderly patients with comorbidities, as well as adjusting treatment based on observed symptoms.
Monocef 1 gm Injection contains ceftriaxone, which a broad-spectrum cephalosporin antibiotic effective against various bacterial infections, including infections of the brain (e.g,meningitis) ,lungs(Pneumonia),ear, urinary tract,skin and tissues, joints,blood and heart. Research indicates that ceftriaxone is crucial in treating gonorrhoea, particularly with increasing resistance; a single 1 g dose can effectively eradicate most ceftriaxone-susceptible and some resistant strains [1]. The preparation of ceftriaxone for injection involves careful manufacturing processes to minimize impurities, which can affect its stability and compatibility with other solutions, such as calcium-containing ones [2][3]. Additionally, ceftriaxone functions by inhibiting bacterial cell wall synthesis, leading to cell death, and is often combined with sulbactam to enhance its efficacy against beta-lactamase-producing bacteria [5]. The pharmacokinetics of ceftriaxone, including its concentration at the surgical site, supports its use in various clinical settings, ensuring effective treatment outcomes [4].
The higher the score, the more likely the adverse drug reaction (ADR) is considered to be caused by the drug. Questions with a score [6], The Naranjo Adverse Drug Reaction Probability Scale is a tool used to determine the likelihood that an adverse drug reaction (ADR) is related to a specific medication. It scores various factors, leading to a total score that categorizes the relationship between the drug and the ADR as certain, probable, possible, or doubtful. Naranjo Scale Interpretation as
1.Certain (Score of nine or more): The ADR is clearly related to the drug.
2.Probable (Score of five to eight): There is evidence to suggest that the ADR is likely due to the drug.
3.Possible (Score of one to four): The ADR may be related, but the evidence is not strong.
4.Doubtful (Score of zero or less): The ADR is unlikely related to the drug.
The Naranjo Scale is a widely used tool for assessing the causality of adverse drug reactions (ADRs), categorizing them into four levels: certain, probable, possible, and doubtful based on a scoring system. A score of nine or more indicates a "Certain" relationship, suggesting the ADR is clearly linked to the drug. Scores between five and eight classify the ADR as "Probable,"[9-10] indicating a likely connection. Scores of one to four denote a "Possible" relationship, where evidence is insufficient, while a score of zero or less suggests a "Doubtful" association, implying the ADR is unlikely related to the drug [7]. However, inter-rater agreement between the Naranjo algorithm and the WHO-UMC system has shown minimal concordance, highlighting the need for improved methodologies in causality assessment [8]. Additionally, automated algorithms, including Bayesian approaches, are being explored to enhance the efficiency of ADR screening [8].
A 65-year-old male presented with a week-long history of cough, shortness of breath, fever, tiredness for four days, but no vomiting, abdominal pain, or prior allergies. The patient had a medical history of hypertension and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The initial treatment included Monocef(ceftriaxone )1gm BD , capsule doycycyline 100mg BD,injection Pentocid40mg BD, inj.Paracetamol1gm BD, Tablet Montek Lc levocetrizine and montelukast and inhaler Seroflo 250(salmeterol and fluticasone propionate),injection diclofenac sodium 75 TID ,tablet amlodipine 5mg BD , tablet paracetamol 650mg BD.After two days, the patient experienced three episodes of loose stools per day and body pain. The doctor adjusted the medication by stopping Dolo and Monosave and starting Paracetamol and Providec, along with Magnus. Following these changes, the patient’s loose stools resolved, but body pain and underlying conditions like bilateral pneumonia, COPD, and hypertension persisted.
To evaluate the likelihood that Monocef(ceftriaxone) caused the loose stools in this patient using the Naranjo Adverse Drug Reaction Probability Scale, we can go through the scale's questions and assign scores accordingly.
Naranjo Scale Assessment for Monocef(ceftriaxone):
1.Are there previous conclusive reports on this reaction?
Answer:No. (Score: 0)
2.Did the adverse event appear after the suspected drug was administered?
Answer:Yes, loose stools occurred after starting Monocef. (Score: 2)
3.Did the adverse reaction improve when the drug was discontinued or a specific antagonist was administered?
Answer:Yes, the loose stools resolved after stopping Monocef. (Score: 1)
4.Did the adverse reaction reappear upon re-exposure to the drug?
Answer:Not applicable; the patient was not re-exposed. (Score: 0)
5.Are there alternative causes (other than the drug) that could have caused the reaction?
Answer:No, other causes are less likely given the timeline. (Score: 2)
6.Did the reaction occur after the drug was given at a recommended dose?
Answer:Yes. (Score: 1)
7.Was the patient previously aware of the potential for the reaction?
Answer:No previous allergy now as ted. (Score: 0)
we have total score calculation were found to be: 0 + 2 + 1 + 0 + 2 + 1 + 0 = 6 (that is probable).
Interpretation:With a total score of six, according to the Naranjo Scale, this indicates that the ADR is Probable[Naranjo CA, et al]. This suggests that it is likely that Monocef(ceftriaxone) caused the loose stools, In this case, a 65-year-old male presented with cough, shortness of breath, fever, and fatigue, along with a medical history of hypertension and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. After receiving multiple medications, the patient developed loose stools, which occurred shortly after starting Monocef(ceftriaxone). Using the Naranjo Adverse Drug Reaction Probability Scale, the assessment yielded a total score of six, indicating that the loose stools were Probable to be caused by Monocef(ceftriaxone). The reaction improved after discontinuation of Monocef(ceftriaxone), supporting the likelihood of the drug's role in this adverse effect. Ultimately, while the loose stools resolved, the patient continued to experience underlying conditions, including bilateral pneumonia, COPD, and hypertension. Monitoring and appropriate management of these conditions remain necessary.
A 65-year-old male, admitted from the general ward with a history of hypertension and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), presented with cough, shortness of breath, fever, and fatigue. The patient was treated with a combination of medications, including Monocef(ceftriaxone). After two days, the patient developed loose stools and body pain, prompting a change in medication by the attending physician. Monocef(ceftriaxone) was discontinued, and the loose stools resolved afterwards. Using the Naranjo Adverse Drug Reaction Probability Scale, the assessment yielded a score of 6, suggesting a Probable relationship between Monocef(ceftriaxone )and the development of loose stools. The resolution of symptoms following the discontinuation of Monocef(ceftriaxone) further supports this connection. The patient’s underlying conditions, such as bilateral pneumonia, COPD, and hypertension, persisted, requiring continued monitoring and treatment. This case underscores the need for careful observation of ADRs, especially in elderly patients with multiple comorbidities. Further management should focus on optimizing treatment for the patient’s primary health issues while minimizing drug-related side effects.
The adverse reaction to Monocef(ceftriaxone) which was likely responsible for the loose stools, was effectively managed by stopping the drug. The patient's underlying conditions—COPD, hypertension, and pneumonia were monitored, and he responded well to treatment. His recovery and eventual discharge highlight the importance of careful medication management in elderly patients with comorbidities.
Our institute doesn’t impose ethical approval for case study reports. Nevertheless, written informed consent for the publication of this case report was obtained from the patient the identification details (Name and address) of the patient were kept in privacy s requested. The patient u understoodthat any information that disclosed her identification would not be published.
No potential conflicts.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.
