AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Research article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2642-973X/053
1 Anahuac University. Economy faculty. Coyoacan, Mexico.
2 Autonomous University of the State of Hidalgo, Faculty of Engineering. Pachuca, Mexico.
3 Autonomous University of the State of Mexico, Faculty of Social Work, Huehuetoca, Mexico.
*Corresponding Author: Gilberto Bermúdez Ruíz, Anahuac University. Economy faculty. Coyoacan, Mexico.
Citation: Gilberto Bermúdez Ruíz, Enrique Martínez Muñoz, Cruz García Lirios, (2023), Entrepreneurship in the COVID-19 era,Brain and Neurological Disorders,6(3): DOI:10.31579/2642-973X/053
Copyright: © 2023, Gilberto Bermúdez Ruíz. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of The Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 27 March 2023 | Accepted: 07 April 2023 | Published: 14 April 2023
Keywords: nomenclature; apparent power; output controlled voltage; integral action
Entrepreneurship in the Covid-19 era is considered an effect of the intensive use of information and communication technologies. The objective of the present work was to contrast a model to explain this phenomenon. A cross-sectional, psychometric and confirmatory study was carried out with a selection of 100 students assigned to a public university in central Mexico and with a distance learning system. A structure was found that explained 57% of the variance, suggesting the extension of the model to other scenarios and samples.
Up to the moment this work is written, the SARS CoV-2 pandemic and the Covid-19 disease have killed three million in the world, as well as 170 thousand in Mexico, although under-records are recognized due to the percentage of asymptomatic patients.[1]. Faced with this scenario, the containment policies that lie in the massive use of detection tests and confinement of people, as well as the mitigation that only lies in social isolation, waiting for the immunity of a high percentage, avoiding those affected by the epidemic.[2].
The Internet connection from root servers, the United States, Japan, Holland and Sweden are the main nodes. [3]. Japan is the nation with the highest connection speed (61.0 mbps), Sweden ranks fourth (18.2 mbps), Holland is sixth (8.8 mbps) and the United States occupies tenth place (4 .8 mbps). [4]. The economic, technological, and social consequences of globalization are described to propose the Theory of Mobile Consumption that explains the consumption of products and services through mobile telephony.[5].
A model is presented in which it is included and demonstrates that the perception of utility is the determinant of the use of mobile Internet. [6]. Based on the above scenario, it is proposed that individuals, being immersed in information communication flows and networks, become potential consumers when acquiring a mobile phone.[7].
Precisely, in the following section, the Mobile Consumption Theory (TCM) is explained, which explains the determinants of consumption through a mobile phone. [8]. The Theory of Mobile Consumption states that individuals carry out their purchases through a mobile phone based on their utilitarian perceptions and purchase decisions. [9].
The TCM maintains that people consume basic products and services through the consumption of secondary products. [10]. Individuals when buying a mobile phone or any product and technological information communication service, are exposed to the consumption of basic products and services that are advertised and sold through the technologies. [11].
Therefore, the TCM argues that it is the perceptions of utility, innovation and efficiency that determine the consumption of products and services that are advertised and sold through the mobile phone. [12]. TCM provides the indirect effect of perception of a technological innovation on the consumption of products and services via said mobile technology. [13].
It explains the relationship between ICTs with individuals saturated with multiple activities, people who buy and people who work as supervisors or vendors. [14]. The TCM predicts the use of the mobile Internet from a cognitive process that begins perceptually and ends behaviorally. From the TCM, the study detailed below was carried out.[15].
The perception of utility is the central axis of the knowledge management agenda because it translates statistical data into meanings of commitment, entrepreneurship and innovation, as well as generates new protocols for information processing whenever the objectives and goals are subject to the climate of tasks, supports and relationships between stakeholders. [16]. The TCM raises three explanations of the consumption of products and services through the mobile phone.[17].
This is how the objective of the present work was to contrast a model for the study of the entrepreneurship, considering the dimensions that literature contributes with respect to the acceptance of technology, the propensity to information and the motivation for achievement.
Do perceptions of the level of utility and the degree of innovation have an indirect, positive, and significant effect on the level of use?
The premise that guides this work alludes to the fact that containment and mitigation policies, as well as social isolation and confinement strategies, have a direct impact on entrepreneurship both unfavorably and favorably. [18]. On the one hand, commercial activity is going into recession and crisis, but on the other hand, ideas are proliferating around new forms of commerce, such as e-business. [19]. In this process, the acceptance of the technology converges both for its usefulness and ease of use, influencing the execution of entrepreneurial projects through Internet protocols.[20].
Sample
There were 100 students selected from the Metropolitan Autonomous University.
Instrument
Scale of perceived ease of use. 8 items with response options from “strongly disagree” to “strongly agree”. [21]. The table shows the convergence (indicated by the factor weight) of the reagents with respect to the factor.
Scale of the perceived usefulness. 8 items with response options from “never” to “always” [22]. Considering the factor weights of the perceptual variable of self-efficiency, the convergence of four reagents is demonstrated.
Scale of intention use. 8 items with response options from “less than ten minutes” to “more than twenty minutes. [23].
Process
Through email, students were contacted to invite them to visit the survey page, attaching an informed consent form where they were warned that they would not receive any payment, bonus or benefit for answering the survey, although it was offered to send them the general results without identifying the respondents. [24].
Analysis
The information was processed in the statistical analysis package for social sciences (SPSS by its acronym in English, version 24.0). The parameters for the validity and contrast of the model were estimated, considering that the instrument had had a sufficient reliability and superior to 0.70, which is the minimum value to demonstrate internal consistency. [25].
Interpretation
Values close to unity were assumed as evidence of collinearity and multi-collinearity. Values close to zero as evidence of a spurious relationship.[26]. Values between the threshold 0.70 and 0.90 for reliability were considered as evidence of internal consistency. values between 0.300 and 0.600 were assumed as indicators for the demonstration of construct validity.[27]. Values between 0.90 and 0.99 for the goodness of fit indices were assumed as evidence of non-rejection of the null hypothesis relative to the significant differences between the theoretical structure and the model of structural equations.[28]. Values less than 0.008 for the adjustment parameter were assumed as evidence of empirical contrast. [29].
Table 1 shows the values that show the reliability and validity of the instrument, considering the threshold established as the minimum essential to accept the null hypothesis of significant differences between the theoretical structure with respect to the observed model.
| R | M | SD | A | F1 | F2 | F3 |
| r1 | 4,23 | 1,23 | ,762 | ,345 | ||
| r2 | 4,15 | 1,43 | ,783 | ,435 | ||
| r3 | 4,39 | 1,56 | ,704 | ,456 | ||
| r4 | 4,65 | 1,89 | ,762 | ,546 | ||
| r5 | 4,53 | 1,56 | ,783 | ,512 | ||
| r6 | 4,12 | 1,74 | ,761 | ,632 | ||
| r7 | 4,37 | 1,43 | ,754 | ,435 | ||
| r8 | 4,92 | 1,56 | ,765 | ,546 | ||
| r9 | 4,01 | 1,89 | ,789 | ,542 | ||
| r10 | 4,67 | 1,54 | ,768 | ,657 | ||
| r11 | 4,65 | 1,65 | ,743 | ,563 | ||
| r12 | 4,82 | 1,32 | ,723 | ,546 | ||
| r13 | 4,39 | 1,45 | ,761 | ,435 | ||
| r14 | 4,12 | 1,35 | ,763 | ,346 | ||
| r15 | 4,53 | 1,23 | ,789 | ,324 | ||
| r16 | 4,12 | 1,43 | ,798 | ,431 | ||
| r17 | 4,36 | 1,57 | ,762 | ,436 | ||
| r18 | 4,81 | 1,67 | ,741 | ,430 | ||
| r19 | 4,39 | 1,65 | ,703 | ,546 | ||
| r20 | 4,36 | 1,89 | ,762 | ,532 | ||
| r21 | 4,76 | 1,65 | ,742 | ,435 | ||
| r22 | 4,12 | 1,90 | ,761 | ,431 | ||
| r23 | 4,31 | 1,54 | ,783 | ,345 | ||
| r24 | 4,31 | 1,65 | ,761 | ,456 |
Source: Elaborated with data study; R = Reactive, M = Mean, SD = Standard Deviation. Adequation and Sphericity ⌠ꭔ2 = 13,25 (23 df) p < ,05; KMO = 0,780⌡Method: Principal axes, Rotation: Promax. F1 = Perceived Ease of Use (25% total variance explained and alpha with ,780), F2 = Perceived Usefulness (19% total variance explained and alpha with ,775), F3 = Intention Use (13% total variance explained and alpha with ,769).
Once the validity structure that explained 57% of the total variance was established, its structure of relationships was estimated to detect regression relationships between the factors (see Table 2).
Table 1. Instrument descriptions
| M | SD | F1 | F2 | F3 | F1 | F2 | F3 | |
| F1 | 21,23 | 14,23 | 1,000 | 1,624 | ,435 | ,654 | ||
| F2 | 23,22 | 15,43 | ,435* | 1,000 | 1,879 | ,542 | ||
| F3 | 24,35 | 13,56 | ,546** | ,647*** | 1,000 | 1,783 |
Source: Elaborated with data study; M = Mean, SD = Standard Deviation, F1 = Perceived Ease of Use, F2 = Perceived Usefulness, F3 = Intention Use; * p < ,01; ** p < ,001; *** p < ,0001
Table 2. Relations between factors
The structure of relationships reveals the emergence of a common factor that the literature identifies as Internet entrepreneurship to explain how this activity underlies this activity from the fact that users have access to the Internet, develop a skill and ability to use, as well as a compatibility disposition between their daily activities and the technologies, devices and networks they use. To appreciate the axes and trajectories of this phenomenon of Internet entrepreneurship, we proceeded to contrast the null hypothesis of differences between the theoretical structure with respect to the empirical model (see Figure 1).
Source: Elaborated with data study; F1 = Perceived Ease of Use, F2 = Perceived Usefulness, F3 = Intention Use; r = Indicator, e = Error measurement indicator, d = Disturbance measurement factor
Figure 1. Structural equation modelling
The model shows a structure of three factors that converge in the digital entrepreneurship construct and reflect the deliberate, planned and systematic decision-making process in the face of a risk event such as the pandemic. The adjustment and residual parameters ⌠ꭔ2 = 23,21 826df) p > ,05; GFI = ,995; CFI = ,997; RMSEA = ,0008⌡suggest the norm of the null hypothesis allusive to the differences between the structure reported in the literature with respect to the established model.
Studies on the acceptance of technology have consistently shown a structure of adoption and compatibility of information and communication technology in the daily activities of users. In the present work a part of the process is observed, which the literature reports as digital entrepreneurship to explain the learning and use of technology in the face of the pandemic.
Performance expectations determine usage intent. In the present work, the intention to use technology reflects a broader structure in which entrepreneurship on the Internet is explained by its relationship with utility and ease of use.
The perception of utility determines the use of distance education technology, but in the present study it was established that it is rather a dimension of entrepreneurship, since if students find a useful technology, it is very likely. carry out actions that involve remuneration in exchange for the development of their skills and knowledge.
The perceived utility anticipates the intention to use the technology. In the present work, both factors reflected a deliberate, planned and systematic process of digital entrepreneurship that the literature identifies as a decision-making structure after access to an electronic device and a network.
Lines related to the prediction of internet use based on utility and intention will show that entrepreneurship is the result of the acceptance and adoption of electronic technology, devices and networks in the Covid-19 era. In this way, anticipating the emergence of entrepreneurial projects based on Internet access will allow the redesign of economic reactivation policies.
The objective of the present work was to specify a model for the study of the perception of utility, considering the dimensions reported in the literature, as well as those established in the present work, but its design limited the contributions to the analyzed sample, suggesting the extension of work towards other scenarios and other study samples.
In relation to the perception of utility that literature identifies as concomitant to the perceived ease of use. The present work has shown that it affects, together with the perception of efficiency, the intensive use of electronic technologies, devices, and networks. Regarding the perception of effectiveness that literature links to the perception of control. The present study has shown that when interrelated with the perception of utility generates a predictive structure of Internet use.
In relation to the use of the Internet, literature stands out as a result of the interrelationship between perceptions of utility, ease, efficiency and control. The present work has shown that the perception of utility associated with the perception of effectiveness generates a structure that determines the use of the Internet. Research lines concerning the associative structure of the perception of utility with the perception of efficiency and these as determinants of the use of the Internet will explain the rational, deliberate, planned, and systematic process of acceptance of technology.
From the Mobile Consumption Theory, a new model was designed with the variables that met the criteria of reliability. Multiple linear regression was calculated to establish the determinants of the dependent variable and the non-linear relationship between independent variables. The scheme shows that the perception factor of academic utility is the main determinant of the level factor of Internet use for academic purposes.
This finding indicates a modification of the TCM measurement model by proposing a direct, positive, and significant effect of the utility factor on the use for academic purposes. That is, a person looking to buy for example a book, could get it if there was a virtual library connected to the mobile phone. Similar reasoning would imply the perception factor of self-efficiency as a determinant of academic mobile use. An individual looking for academic information could find it through his mobile phone. However, the causal relationship lacking the required significance suggests the exclusion of the variable.
The strength of association between independent variables indicates its spurious implication. From the original measurement model only two variables maintain a causal relationship that selects them for inclusion in another measurement model. These consequences and implications are discussed below.
The objective of this paper was to specify a model based on the theory of mobile consumption, which highlights the relationship between perceptions as determinants of the use of technologies, devices, and networks.
However, the present work proposed a modification of the perceptual structure to increase the predictive power of the theory of mobile consumption, highlighting the association between the perception of utility and the perception of efficacy as predictors of behavior. Research lines concerning the predictive structure of electronic consumption will explain the associative relationship between utility and perceived effectiveness, as well as its impact on the use of the Internet.
This work has been carried out thanks to the support of the Transdisciplinary Academic Network. The authors thank Dr Javier Carreón Guillén and Dr José Marcos Bustos Aguayo for their collaboration in preparing this article.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.
