AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Research Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2767-7370/058
1 Medical Park Ankara Hospital Department of Neurosurgery, Ankara, TURKEY
2 Yıldırım Beyazıt University Faculty of Medicine
3 Ankara Etlik City Hospital, Department of Pathology, Ankara,
4 Gazi University Faculty of Medicine Department of Biochemistry, Ankara,
*Corresponding Author: Hümeyra Kullukçu, M.D. Medical Park Ankara Hospital Department of Neurosurgery, Ankara, TURKEY.
Citation: Hümeyra Kullukçu, Ahmet Gürhan Gürçay, Atilla Kazanci, Oktay Gürcan, Mehmet Özgür Özateş et. al., (2023), Endocan; A Novel Inflammatory Indicator for Spinal Trauma? An Experimental Study in Rats. J New Medical Innovations and Research, 4(5); DOI:10.31579/2767-7370/058
Copyright: © 2023, Hümeyra Kullukçu. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 18 August 2023 | Accepted: 24 August 2023 | Published: 31 August 2023
Keywords: esm-1; endocan; spinal cord injury; spinal trauma; neuronal damage
Aim: The prognosis of spinal cord injuries is determined through the use of various inflammatory markers and scoring systems. In this study, it was aimed to investigate the relationship between trauma severity and serum endothelial cell-specific molecule 1 (ESM-1; Endocan) levels, a novel inflammatory marker, in an experimental spinal cord trauma model in rats.
Materials and Methods: Sixteen adult male Sprague-Dawley rats were assigned to 2 groups: control (Group 1) and trauma (Group 2). The spinal cord injury was induced by a modified Allen's weight-drop technique. Tail blood was collected from the subjects in both groups at 0 minutes, 6, 24, and 48 hours, centrifuged at 360 rpm for 10 minutes and endocan levels were quantified. All rats were sacrificed after 48 hours. We evaluated all tissue samples obtained from the trauma area by light microscopy on H&E-stained slides following routine tissue examination in the pathology laboratory. Neuronal degeneration was scored semiquantitatively according to nuclear shrinkage, pyknosis, and hyperchromasia, with a score of 0 representing normal/almost normal histology, and mild, moderate, and severe degeneration as scores 2, 3, and 4, respectively. ANOVA and one sample T-tests were used to analyze the difference in endocan levels between the 2 groups and the results were confirmed by Friedman and Paired sample T-tests (p<0.005).
Results: A significant difference was found between both groups in endocan levels measured at 24 and 48 hours (p=0.00). There was a relatively small difference between the two groups in endocan levels measured at 0 min; however, this difference was not significant (p=0.067). The pathological examination of the tissues revealed a score of 1 for neuronal degeneration in Group 1, a score of 2 for two subjects, a score of 3 for four subjects, and a score of 4 for two subjects in Group 2. Serum endocan levels of rats were correlated with neuronal degeneration scores determined after the pathological examination.
Discussion: In this experimental study in rats, serum endocan levels increased significantly after spinal cord injury. Elevated serum endocan levels could be used as a prognostic marker to predict the extent of neuronal damage and to determine the need for clinical follow-up after spinal cord injury. Further studies are needed to elucidate the pathways of increase in serum endocan levels.
Spinal cord injury (SCI) is one of the most important public health problems today since it is a devastating neurologic condition that leads to a number of serious physical, psychological, and economic complications, and there is currently no universally accepted treatment protocol [1, 2]. Its incidence varies between 20-40/1000.000 and it is known that the mean age of these patients is 16-30. [3, 4]. Motor vehicle accidents, falls, gunshot wounds, penetrating injuries from sharp objects, and sports-related injuries are the most common causes of SCI [5]. In light of the significant costs incurred by these patients for their treatment and care, as well as the loss of their labor force and income, as well as their social and psychological problems, this is a serious health issue that impacts not only the patient but also his or her family and the national economy [6].
It has been well-documented in experimental and clinical studies that primary and secondary damage occurs after SCI. Primary damage is the injury at the time of trauma. Meanwhile, secondary damage is a form of damage that develops after the primary damage and occurs with different physiopathological mechanisms including hemorrhage, edema, axonal or neuronal necrosis, demyelination, cyst formation, and ischemia in a longer process [7]. In the literature, some biochemical markers such as IL-6, MDA, and TNF-alpha, are used as indicators of spinal cord injury. However, none of these have yet become routine diagnostic and prognostic markers. Endothelial cell-specific molecule-1 (ESM-1), or endocan, is a soluble proteoglycan that can be measured freely in law and is usually released from vascular endothelium in inflammatory cells. Endocan is known to be a part of the chain of angiogenesis and endothelial cell cells required for inflammatory process cells [9]. Serum endocan levels are elevated alone or in combination with other biomarkers for different conditions, including some cancers (eg, brain, brain, growth, electrical and ventilation), systemic inflammation, and birth defects [9]. The operation performed shows tumor progression in cancer patients in serum endocan overgrowth and their spread in cases of endothelial cell structures or dysfunction in inflammatory diseases [10, 11]. Recent epidemiological study suggests that endocan is an inflammatory marker of endothelial dysfunction [12]. There is no data on SCI and endocan levels in the literature. The aim of this study was to determine the correlation between SCI, which is known to initiate an inflammatory process, and endocan levels and whether endocan levels have prognostic value in trauma severity.
This experimental study was conducted in the laboratory after obtaining the approval of the ethic committee (No: 401). 16 male Sprague-Dawley rats (weighing between 250-300 g) were used for this study and randomly divided into 2 groups as; Group 1: Laminectomy (L) group (n: 8) (Control group)
and Group 2: Laminectomy+ Trauma (LT) group (n: 8).
Surgical Procedure
After general anesthesia (60 mg/kg of ketamine hydrochloride IP-Ketalar, Pfizer İstanbul, Turkey and 5 mg/kg of xylazin -Rompun, Bayer, İstanbul, Türkiye) the rats were stabled to the operating table by supporting the abdominal regions with a sponge in the prone position. After skin cleansing with povidone iodine scrub, a 3 cm midline incision was made over the spinous processes in the lumbar region. After dissecting the paravertebral muscles, a single-distance laminectomy was performed. The control group was only administered laminectomy. After laminectomy of the L4-5 vertebrae, the dura mater was exposed (Figure 1).
Figure 1: Dura mater exposed after laminectomy
Trauma procedure
Using the Modified Allen’s weight-drop technique, a 5-mm-diameter cylindrical glass tube was positioned at a 90º angle on the surface of the exposed dura mater, and a 4g cylindrical constant weight was dropped from a 10-cm height through the tube onto the spinal cord [13].
Biochemical analysis
Tail blood was collected from both groups, a total of 4 times starting from the moment of trauma, at 0 minutes, 6, 24, and 48 hours. After centrifugation at 360 rpm for 10 minutes, the separated sera were stored at -80°C. Serum endocan concentration was measured by ELISA method via a manual endocan kit [Boster Biological Technology, USA).
Histopathological evaluation:
After rouitine tissue follow-up in pathology laboratory all tissue samples were evaluated in HE stained slides by light microscope. The extent of tissue damage was evaluated on the basis of neuronal degeneration and necrosis. The neuronal degenaration was scored semi-quantitatively according to the nuclear shirankage, pyknosis and the hyperchromasia. Score 1 represented normal-almost normal histology whereas mild, moderate and severe degeneration was scored as 2, 3 and 4 respectively.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was conducted on a computer using the SPSS version 22.0 program. Normally distributed numerical data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation, while non-normally distributed data were expressed as median (minimum-maximum). Categorical variables were expressed as frequency (percentage). Group comparisons for variables with normal distribution were conducted by one sample t-test and ANOVA, and group comparisons for variables without normal distribution were conducted by the Shapiro-Wilk test. Correlation analysis between numerical variables was conducted using Paired sample t-test. P<0>
Biochemical results
Our study consisted of 16 subjects divided into two groups: Group 1: L (n:8) and Group 2: LT (n:8). According to results there is an increase in endocan levels each groups and this increase creates a significant difference between groups (p<0>
Table 1. Mean values of serum Endocan levels for each group
The differences in the mean values among the groups are greater than would be expected by chance; there is a statistically significant difference (p=<0>
Table 2. Mean values of serum Endocan levels for control- each group and their p values
In the light microscopic examinations of the L group, the gray and white matter neuroglial structuring of the spinal cord was normal/almost normal (Score 1) (Figure 2). The neuronal degeneration scores of the LT group were score 2 (n:2), score 3 (n:4), and score 4 (n:2) (Figure 3). Mean neuronal degeneration scores (NDS) were 0 and 1.125 (p=0.001) for Groups L and LT, respectively. Differences between neuronal degeneration scores were statistically significant among the two groups (p<0>
Figure 2. Non-degenerated normal neurons in normal spinal cord sections, score1 (H&EX100)
Figure 3. Diffuse hemorrage and congestion (H&EX100)
We found that there was a statistically difference between control and trauma group regarding endocan levels. Furthermore, there was also positive correlation between the severity of SCI and endocan levels.
Primary injury is the initial injury caused by the mechanical trauma to the spinal cord at the time of injury. However, there is no treatment modality to reverse the effects of the primary injury [14]. Secondary spinal cord injury is a process that starts within minutes or hours and continues for weeks following the primary injury. In this period, many intertwined pathologic processes, especially ischemia due to impaired perfusion, are involved in the occurrence of secondary injury. These cascades have different sub-reactions of injury, mitochondrial damage, apoptosis, and cell death [7]. The aim of research on secondary spinal cord injuries is to find and use pharmacological agents and measures to protect neurons in the lesion area, which are still alive and connected with distal neurons after primary injury, to increase their resilience or to halt pathological processes that will damage them. Some of the secondary damage mechanisms include free radical theory, lipid peroxidation, and inflammatory changes [15]. A free radical is a chemical compound with an unpaired, free electron in its outer orbit. This electron is transferred to other biological molecules, leading to oxidation. Excessive increase in free radicals causes cell death [16,17]. A key step in ensuring the survival of cells is to prevent the formation of intense free radicals. Because potential oxygen-toxic metabolites are continuously formed in normal cellular respiratory processes. [15,18]. Even though neurological examinations, MRI evaluations, and electrophysiological examinations can provide insight into the severity of the disease in patients with spinal cord injury, all of them have limitations. For instance, neurological examinations in patients with multiple extremity fractures or uncooperative patients, and electrophysiological examinations due to loss of reflexes in patients with spinal shock may be inadequate in diagnosing and prognostic follow-up. Midden drop et al. emphasized the importance of the need to find potential biomarkers in patients with spinal cord injury due to these limitations [19]. Endocan is an indicator of angiogenesis and endothelial cell activation [8]. It was first described and reported in 1996 [20]. Endocan may be involved in molecular interactions required for the regulation of a wide range of biologically active modalities, such as cell adhesion, migration, and biological processes related to proliferation and neovascularization. A group of specialized cells known as tip cells are more important for blood vessel growth and development than other cells known as stalk cells and mediate vascular growth by acting as sensors [9]. Furthermore, it is thought to be involved in the pathogenesis of vascular disorders, inflammation, and endothelial dysfunction [8]. Considering that endocan is released especially from inflamed endothelial cells, this suggests that its spread from vascular endothelial cells may also increase in inflammatory functions involved in the spinal cord injury process. The contents show that the serum shows a correlation with the pathology of endocan vessels [11]. In our study, the presence of serum endocan was correlated with the degree of neural degeneration performed histopathologically. This suggests that endocan is an inflammatory marker of endothelial dysfunction and may increase in color with the severity of the pathology [12]. In a study by Balta et al. showing the relationship between endocan in Behçet's Disease, a chronic inflammatory disease, plasma endocan levels in 33 Behçet's patients were found to be higher than in 35 healthy volunteers. The endocan level has shown a significant positive correlation with CRP, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and disease activity [21]. Initially, Kose et al, comparing 53 acute coronary syndrome patients and 30 healthy controls, found that the expression levels of serum endocan in patients with acute coronary syndrome was significantly increased [22]. A study by Balta et al, including 18 newly diagnosed, untreated hypertensive patients, found that serum endocan levels were significantly higher in those hypertensive patients than in the control group [12]. Based on these findings, the researchers revealed that endocan levels were associated with disease severity and mortality and suggested that endocan may be a marker of endothelial dysfunction. On the other hand, our study had several limitations: the number of rats was insufficient, samples were not taken from CSF, and blood samples were taken only during sacrifice, rather than at different times after the trauma.
Serum endocan levels may be a novel biomarker of endothelial dysfunction in patients with spinal trauma and may be involved in the pathogenesis of spinal cord ischemia followed by contusion or compression injury. Therefore, endocan may be used to evaluate prognosis ischemia of spinal cord in patients with spinal trauma. Monitoring serum endocan levels can help identify high risk individuals, and early intervention, may reduce the prevalence of sekonder effects of spinal cord injury. However, additional prospective clicical studies are still needed to validate this conclusion.
Highlights
The primary injury resulting from trauma and the secondary injury, which is dominated by the inflammatory process and results in ischemia, are responsible for neurological damage following a spinal cord injury.
Endocan, secreted by vascular endothelial cells and is an indicator of angiogenesis and endothelial cell activation.
The serum endocan levels clearly increased especially 24-48 hours after spinal cord injury.
Increased endocan levels are observed in plasma of patients in the course of inflammatory processes like spinal cord injury suggesting that it might be a potential indicator of neuronal ischemia.
Acknowledgment:
We are grateful to Dr. Korhan Arun from Tekirdağ Namık Kemal University, Department of Management for their statistical contributions to the study.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
