AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Research Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2642-9756/077
*Corresponding Author: Dalia Mohammed Mohammed El-Khaldy, Obstetrics & Gynecology Faculty of Medicine - Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
Citation: Mohamed Saeed Khallaf, Dalia Mohammed Mohammed El-Khaldy, Ahmed Mohamed Nour Eldin Hashad, Ibrahim Shazly Mohamed Amen Elshazly. (2019) Effect of Sildenafil in Endometrial Ripening with Induction of Ovulation by Clomiphene Citrate in Polycystic ovarian syndrome; Double Blinded; Randomized Controlled Trial. J. Women Health Care and Issues. 2(3); DOI:10.31579/2642-9756/077
Copyright: © 2019 Dalia Mohammed Mohammed El-Khaldy, This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 06 November 2019 | Accepted: 05 December 2019 | Published: 11 December 2019
Keywords: clomiphene citrate; sildenafil; polycystic ovarian syndrome; ultrasound; endometrium
Back ground: World Health Organization (WHO) defines infertility as a disease of the reproductive system defined by the failure to achieve a clinical pregnancy after 12 months or more of regular unprotected sexual intercourse. Worldwide, 8 to 12 percent of couples experience fertility problems. Causes of infertility in women were as follows: menstrual disorders (disorders of cycle length and flow) 62.6%, diseases (obesity, thyroid diseases, diabetes) 58.7%, impaired ovulation (hormonal disorders, oligoovulation and anovulation) 50.3%, uterine causes 16.7%, tubal factor 15.4%, and cervical causes 7.9%. In the male factor fertility there was semen abnormalities (44.6%), genetic factors (29.8%), anti-spermatogenesis agents (11%), and vascular disorders (17.2%).
Aim of the Study: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of sildenafil in endometrial ripening with induction of ovulation by clomiphene citrate in polycystic ovarian syndrome.
Patients and methods: It is a randomized controlled trial on 65 infertile women with polycystic ovarian syndrome; patients were randomly divided into two equal groups. In control group, 31 patients were given oral sildenafil, one tablet every 12 hrs. From 2nd day of the cycle till 12th day and clomiphene citrate, one tablet every 12 hours, for 5 days from 3rd day of the menstrual cycle. In study group, 34 patients were given oral placebo, one tablet every 12 hrs. From 2nd day of the cycle till 12th day and clomiphene citrate, one tablet every 12 hours, for 5 days from 3rd day of the menstrual cycle. A transvaginal ultrasound was performed to evaluated the endometrial thickness before and after treatment, the follicularometeric was measured on day 11 and day13. Uterine artery Doppler was then measured. Qualitative serum B-hCG level was checked 14 days after ovulation to assess clinical pregnancy rate.
Design: Prospective, Double blinded randomized controlled trial.
Setting: Obstetrics & Gynecology outpatient clinic, Ain Shams University Hospital. Study duration: 3 months.
Results: The present study was a double-blind, randomized, controlled study that was conducted on 65 women with PCOS who underwent induction of ovulation by Clomiphene citrate in outpatient clinic of Ain Shams University hospital.
Conclusion: Our systematic review and meta-analysis showed that follicular supplementation of sildenafil citrate (oral or vaginal), alone or adjuvant therapy can be used for improving the EM and clinical pregnancy rate in women undergoing assisted reproduction. However, given the methodological limitations the current evidence does not support its use in clinical practice yet. Future high-quality RCT with large sample size to evaluate the sildenafil citrate effect in women undergoing assisted reproduction are needed. Future RCTs should focus on type of processing, stage of embryo, embryo quality, dosage, time of administration, type of control group, in order to identify the groups of patients who would benefit the most from this intervention and the most appropriate dosage, time, and type of sildenafil citrate which would have the most positive effect and the less possible side effects.
Recommendations: Follicular supplementation of sildenafil citrate (oral or vaginal), alone or adjuvant therapy can be used for improving the EM and clinical pregnancy rate in women undergoing assisted reproduction. High-quality RCT with large sample size to evaluate the sildenafil citrate effect in women undergoing assisted reproduction are needed.
Infertility is defined by the world health organization (WHO) as a disease of the reproductive system defined by the failure to achieve a clinical pregnancy after 12 months or more of regular unprotected sexual intercourse [1]. Worldwide, 8 to 12 percent of couples experience fertility problems [2].
Causes of infertility in women were as follows: menstrual disorders (disorders of cycle length and flow) 62.6%, diseases (obesity, thyroid diseases, diabetes) 58.7%, impaired ovulation (hormonal disorders, oligoovulation and anovulation) 50.3%, uterine causes 16.7%, tubal factor 15.4%, and cervical causes 7.9%. In the male factor fertility there was semen abnormalities (44.6%), genetic factors (29.8%), anti-spermatogenesis agents (11%), and vascular disorders [3].
Polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) is a common disorder in women that is characterized by hyperandro-genism (that is, evidence of excess male hormone or androgen effect; for example, clinically, such as hirsutism, and/or biochemically, such as hyper-andro-genaemia or excess levels of androgen), ovulatory dysfunction (including menstrual dysfunction) and polycystic ovarian morphology (PCOM; an excessive number of preantral follicles in the ovaries) [4].
Embryo implantation depends on the quality of the ovum and endometrial receptivity. Successful embryo implantation can take place only in a receptive uterus. Adequate growth of the endometrium is indispensable for successful pregnancy [5]. Patients with a thin endometrium showed low pregnancy rates [6].
Uterine blood flow is an important factor for endometrial growth and receptivity [7]. Nitric oxide (NO) leads to relaxation of vascular smooth muscles through a cyclic guanyl monophosphate (cGMP) mediated pathway. Nitric oxide synthase isoforms have been identified in the vascular muscles of both human endometrium and myometrium. Phosphodiesterase (PDE) is a family of isoenzymes that hydrolyze cyclic nucleotides, such as cGMP. The inhibitors of specific Phosphodiesterase (PDE) subtypes have been identified with an ability to augment the effects of cyclic nucleotides on target tissues as the endometrium [8].
Sildenafil citrate is a potent and selective inhibitor of cGMP specific phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) that prevents the breakdown of cGMP and potentiates the effect of nitric oxide on vascular smooth muscles [9]. Sildenafil citrate could lead to an improvement in uterine blood flow and, in conjunction with estrogen, led to the estrogen-induced proliferation of the endometrial lining [8].
AIM OF THE STUDY:
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of sildenafil in endometrial ripening with induction of ovulation by clomiphene citrate in polycystic ovarian syndrome.
Research question:
Is there a difference between the cases treated with sildenafil and clomiphene citrate to clomiphene citrate alone on endometrium thickness in females with polycystic ovarian syndrome?
Null hypothesis:
There is no difference regarding the response of endometrium in females with polycystic ovarian syndrome treated with Sildenafil and other available treatment option.
The present study was double blinded randomized controlled trial which was approved by the local Ethical and Research Committee, Ain-Shams University, Cairo, Egypt. It was conducted at the Infertility Outpatient Clinic in Ain Shams University Maternity Hospital .the study duration was 3 months. Eighty patients diagnosed as polycystic ovarian syndrome recruited from outpatient infertility clinic, Sixty five patients were fulfilling inclusion and exclusion criteria. The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) Age between 18-35 years. (2)Two of three diagnostic criteria of PCOS (Rotterdam Criteria) Biochemical and clinical hyperandrogenism ,Irregular cycles and ovulatory dysfunction ,Polycystic ovarian morphology.(3)All patients underwent full infertility investigation, such as: Hormonal tests (FSH, LH, Prolactin, TSH, free testosterone), trans-vaginal ultrasound, and Semen analysis. (4) Hysterosonography.
The exclusion criteria were (1) Women with myoma, adenomyosis or congenital uterine anomaly.(2)Chronic use of any medications including non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.(3)Associated cases of infertility other than PCOs (male factor, tubal factor).(4) Cases with endometrial hyperplasia or endometrial polyp. (5)Discontinued patient for the full study time (3 cycles of treatment). (6)Presence of any medical contraindication to the medication like heart diseases.
Eighty opaque easy opening envelopes were numbered serially from 1-80 on each envelope. The corresponding number in randomization table written and when the patient comes to the clinic, she was examined for required criteria. On finding required criteria, the first envelope was opened and the patient received treatment according to the envelope. Recruited patients were divided into two groups (A and B) according to a sequence of random numbers created by a computer system.
We missed 15 cases from the total number of cases required. The number of cases become 65 of patients in this study due to discontinuation of treatment and follow up from some patients because of COVID 19 virus pandemic.
The 65 PCOS females were included in this study. They were divided into 2 groups; Group [A]: 31 patients were given oral sildenafil (Respatio®, 20 mg), one tablet every 12 hrs. From 2nd day of the cycle till 12th day and clomiphene citrate (clomid® 50 mg), one tablet every 12 hours, for 5 days from 3rd day of the menstrual cycle. Group [B]: 34 patients were given oral placebo, one tablet every 12 hrs. From 2nd day of the cycle till 12th day and clomiphene citrate (clomid® 50 mg), one tablet every 12 hours, for 5 days from 3rd day of the menstrual cycle.
All patients were subjected to: Full personal, family, maternal and medical history were taken, Serum of (FSH, LH, Prolactin,TSH and free testosterone levels), Full 2D Ultrasound examination was done and Hysterosalpingography. Also, transvaginal ultrasound was performed for all patients eligible for the study at Ain-Shams Fetomaternal Ultrasound Unit. The used machine was (Voluson pro 730 General Electric) machine; using 5-9 MHz probe. During the procedure, endometrial thickness was measured (maximum distance between each myometrial/endometrial interface through the longitudinal axis of the uterus). Using two dimensional (2D) transvaginal Doppler, flow velocity wave forms were obtained from the ascending main branch of the uterine artery on the right and left side of the cervix before it enters the uterus.
The primary outcomes: To evaluate endometrial thickness in females with polycystic ovary syndrome who received sildenafil and who received ordinary treatment regimens.
The secondary outcomes: Positive pregnancy test (Time Frame: 14 days after triggering of ovulation) and Sub-endometrial blood flow (Time Frame: 9 days)
Table 1 shows the demographic and clinical characteristics of the included patients. There were no statistically significant differences between both groups in terms of age, BMI, and parity.
Table 3: The infertility characteristics of the included patients
Variables | Sildenafil +CC (N =31) | CC+Placebo (N =34) | P-value |
Type of infertility, No (%)
|
24 (77.4%) 7 (22.6%) |
|
0.531 |
Duration of infertility in years
|
1.4 ±0.83 0.5 -4.0 |
1.6 ±1.0 0.5 -5.0 |
0.395 |
*Data are presented as mean ±SD, Range, number (%), P-value (>0.05).
Table 3 shows the infertility characteristics of the included patients. There were no statistically significant differences between both groups in terms of type and duration of infertility.
Table 4: The laboratory parameters of the included patients
Variables | Sildenafil+CC(N =31) | CC+Placebo (N =34) | t-test | P-value | ||
| Range | Mean±SD | Range | Mean±SD | |||
| FSH (mIU/ml) | 2- 12.9 | 6.0±1.9 | 3.9- 12.9 | 6.7±2.1 78 | 1.278 | 0.206 |
| LH (mIU/ml) | 2.5- 14.7 | 8.0±2.5 | 6.3 - 14.7 | 8.7±1.8 1.321 | 1.321 | 0.191 |
| TSH (μIU/ml) | 1- 4.8 | 2.3±.9 | 1.6 - 4.1 | 2.4±.8 0.482 | 0.482 | 0.631 |
| Free testosterone (ng/dl) | 0.7 - 4.5 | 2.9±1.0 | 0.8 - 4.3 | 3.2±.8 1.310 | 1.310 | 0.195 |
| Prolactin (ng/ml) | 10.1 - 23.5 | 17.1±3.0 | 10.1-23.1 | 16.5±3.3 | 0.694 | 0.490 |
*Data are presented as mean ±SD, Range, t-test, P-value (>0.05).
Table 4 shows the laboratory parameters of the included patients. There were no statistically significant differences between both groups in terms of serum FSH, serum LH, serum TSH, serum testosterone, and serum prolactin.
Table 5: The Folliculometric measures of the included patients
Variables | Sildenafil +CC (N =31) | CC+Placebo (N =34) | t-test | P-value | ||
Range | Mean±SD | Range | Mean±SD | |||
| Folliculometric measure on day 11 (mm) | 11 - 18 | 13.8±2.26 | 10 - 18 | 14.4±2.27 | 1.024 | 0.310 |
| Folliculometric measure 13 (mm) | 13 - 20 | 16.3±2.17 | 12 - 20 | 16.3±2.13 | 0.885 | 0.380 |
*Data are presented as mean ±SD, Range, t-test, P-value (>0.05).
Table 5 shows the folliculometric measures of the included patients. There were no statistically significant differences between both groups in terms of folliculometric measure on day 11 (mm) and folliculometric measure 13 (mm).
Table 6: The endometrial thickness of the included patients
Variables | Sildenafil +CC (N =31) | CC+Placebo (N =34) | t-test | P-value | ||
| Range | Mean±SD | Range | Mean±SD | |||
| Endometrial thickness before intervention (mm) | 1.5 - 4 | 3.1±0.88 | 1.5 – 4.5 | 3.0±0.94 | 0.417 | 0.678 |
| Endometrial thickness after intervention (mm) | 7.5 - 13 | 10.0±1.40 | 7 - 12 | 9.5±1.38 | 1.526 | 0.132 |
*Data are presented as mean ±SD, Range, t-test, P-value (>0.05).
Table 6 shows the endometrial thickness of the included patients. There were no statistically significant differences between both groups in terms of endometrial thickness before intervention and endometrial thickness after intervention.
Table 7: The UA Doppler measures of the included patients
Variables | Sildenafil +CC (N =31) | CC+Placebo (N =40) | t-test | P-value | ||||
| Range | Mean±SD | Range | Mean±SD | |||||
| Resistive index (RI) | ||||||||
| UA RI (right side) | 0.66-0.82 | 0.7±0.06 | 0.72-1.06 | 0.9±.13 | 4.754 | <.001 | ||
| UA RI (left side) | 0.67-0.83 | 0.8±0.06 | 0.74-1.09 | 0.9±.13 | 5.088 | <.001 | ||
| Pulsatility index (PI) | ||||||||
| UA PI (right side) | 0.97-1.79 | 1.4±0.29 | 1.38-3.35 | 2.3±0.69 | 7.065 | <.001 | ||
| UA PI (left side) | 1.05-1.81 | 1.4±0.27 | 1.43-3.46 | 2.3±0.76 | 6.209 | <.001 | ||
*Data are presented as mean ±SD, Range, t-test, P-value.
Table 7 shows theUA Doppler measures of the included patients. There were statistically significant differences between both groups in terms of Uterine artery PI right and Uterine artery PI left with higher values in the CC+Placebo group. But there is no statistically significant difference between the right and left in each group.
There were statistically significant difference between the two group regarding Uterine artery RI right and Uterine artery RI left with higher values in the CC+ Placebo group. But there is no statistically significant difference between the right and left in each group.
Table 8: The clinical pregnancy rate per cycle of the included patients
Variables | Sildenafil +CC (N =31) | CC+Placebo (N =34) | X2 | P-value |
Clinical pregnancy, No (%)
|
13(41.9%) 18(58.1%) |
11 (32.4%) |
0.639 |
0.424 |
*Data are presented as number or (%), X2, P-value (>0.05).
Table 8 shows the clinical pregnancy rate per cycle of the included patients. There were no statistically significant difference between both groups in terms of clinical pregnancy rate per cycle.
Table 9: The Repeated measure analysis of the follicular diameter and endometrial thickness of the included patients
Repeated measures | Between groups | ||||
Variables | Replication | F test | P-value | F test | P-value |
| Follicular diameter | Day 11- Day13 | 620.551 | <0> | 0.945 | 0.335 |
| Endometrial thickness | Before -After | 1461.492 | <0> | 3.13 | 0.215 |
*Data are presented as replication, F test, P-value (<0>
Table 9 Repeated measure analysis of the follicular diameter and endometrial thickness of the included patients. There confirmed the statistically significant increase in both diameters after either intervention but without statistically significant difference between the two interventions.
Table 10: Incidence of drug-related adverse effects in the two study groups
Variables | Sildenafil +CC(N=31) | CC + placebo (N=34) | X2 | P-value | ||
n | % | n | % | |||
| Drug-related adverse effects | ||||||
| Nil | 13 | 42.9% | 32 | 95.2% | 62.773 | <.001 |
| Mild side effects not requiring treatment | 16 | 51.4% | 2 | 4.8% | ||
| Significant side effects requiring treatment | 2 | 5.7% | 0 | 0.0% | ||
*Data are presented as number (%), X2, P-value.
Table 10 shows incidence of drug-related adverse effects of the included patients. There were statistically significance higher among the sildenafil group. The adverse effect was almost headache.
This was a Double blinded randomized controlled trial conducted on 65 female patients with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCO); to evaluate the effect of sildenafil in endometrial ripening with induction of ovulation by clomiphene citrate in polycystic ovarian syndrome.
In our study we found no statistically significant difference between the two groups regarding basal demographic, hormonal and clinical characteristics as age, BMI, parity, types of infertility, duration of infertility in years, serum FSH, serum LH, serum free testosterone, TSH, Prolactin as well as clinical features of Pcos (p > 0.05 respectively). Which came in agreement with Ashoush & Abdelshafy, [10] and Selim & Borg, [11].
Ashoush & Abdelshafy, [10] reported that, no statistically significant differences were found between both groups regarding basal demographic, hormonal and clinical characteristics [10].
Selim & Borg, [11] reported that, a total of 201 cycles of ovulation induction were carried out, of which 102 cycles were in the sildenafil group and 99 cycles were in the CC group. There were no statistically significant differences in demographic characteristics of both groups of patients. The mean age, body mass index (BMI), the mean duration, and whether the patients had primary or secondary infertility were comparable between the two groups [11].
In our study we found there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups regarding Follicular diameter – day 11, Follicular diameter – day 13, Endometrial thickness before intervention as well as Endometrial thickness after intervention (p > 0.05 respectively). Which came in agreement with Ashoush & Abdelshafy, [10] and Fetih et al., [12].
Ashoush & Abdelshafy, [10] reported that, pre ovulatory follicumetric measurements didn’t differ significantly between both groups [10].
Fetih et al., [12] reported that, endometrial thickness showed a statistically significant increase from a value of 6.6 +/- 1.4 mm with CC only treatment during the sixth cycle, to 9.3+/- 3.1mm with CC+ sildenafil vaginal gel in the seventh cycle. P value was <0>
In our study we found there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups regarding number of clinically pregnancy rate pre cycle (p > 0.0 respectively).Which came in agreement with Ashoush & Abdelshafy, [10].
Ashoush & Abdelshafy, [10] reported that, Clinical pregnancy rate was significantly higher in the sildenafil group (43.7% vs 34.5%) with a calculated number needed to treat (NNT) of 10.8 (95% CI: 6.36-37.84) [10].
In our study we found there is statistically significant difference between the two group regarding Uterine artery PI right and Uterine artery PI left with higher values in the placebo + clomid group. But there is no statistically significant difference between the right and left in each group (p > 0.001 respectively). Which came in agreement with Fetih et al., [12]
Fetih et al., [12] reported that, as an indicator of uterine blood flow, we used Doppler ultrasound to measure the pulsatility index in both uterine arteries. With the addition of the sildenafil vaginal gel, the uterine artery pulsatility index dropped from 2.4 +/- 0.8 to 1.6 +/- 1.3 (P value = 0.002) indicating a significant reduction in blood flow resistance in the uterine artery. PCOS women who ovulated under clomiphene citrate treatment had significantly higher uterine artery resistive index (RI), and increased impedance in endometrial and sub endometrial vasculature compared to healthy ovulatory women [12].
Repeated measure analysis in our study of the follicular diameter and endometrial thickness confirmed the statistically significant increase in both diameters after either intervention but without statistically significant difference between the two interventions. Which came in agreement with Fetih et al., [12], Selim & Borg, [11].
Fetih et al., [12] reported that, Follicular number and size (measured on the day of HCG injection), and number of cycle days until HCG injection were comparable for our cohort of women in their CC only cycle (6th cycle), and the CC + sildenafil vaginal gel cycle (7th cycle). Mean follicular number was 1.3 in the sixth cycle, and 1.4 in the seventh cycle (P value = 0.38). Mean follicular diameter was 17.8 versus 18.8 during the sixth and seventh cycle respectively (P value = 0.096) [12]
Selim & Borg, [11] reported that, the results of this study indicate that infertile women with PCOS experience no significant changes in the number of mature ovarian follicles (diameter = 18mm) and ovulation rate, although a significant increase in pregnancy rates was observed in patients who received sildenafil in comparison to CC [11] .
Our systematic review and meta-analysis showed that follicular supplementation of sildenafil citrate (oral or vaginal), alone or adjuvant therapy can be used for improving the EM and clinical pregnancy rate in women undergoing assisted reproduction.
CONCLUSION:
Our systematic review and meta-analysis showed that follicular supplementation of sildenafil citrate (oral or vaginal), alone or adjuvant therapy can be used for improving the EM and clinical pregnancy rate in women undergoing assisted reproduction. However, given the methodological limitations the current evidence does not support its use in clinical practice yet. Future high-quality RCT with large sample size to evaluate the sildenafil citrate effect in women undergoing assisted reproduction are needed. Future RCTs should focus on type of processing, stage of embryo, embryo quality, dosage, time of administration, type of control group, in order to identify the groups of patients who would benefit the most from this intervention and the most appropriate dosage, time, and type of sildenafil citrate which would have the most positive effect and the less possible side effects.
LIMITATIONS
RECOMMENDATIONS
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.
