Short Communication | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2690-4861/786
Department of Propaedeutics of Internal Medicine, Grodno State Medical University, Grodno, Belarus.
*Corresponding Author: Maksimovich Yelizaveta, Department of Propaedeutics of Internal Medicine, Grodno State Medical University, Grodno, Belarus.
Citation: Martin Gruenberg, (2025), Effect of Intraoperative Hemolysis on Complications Development in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease, International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews, 28(1); DOI:10.31579/2690-4861/786
Copyright: © 2025, Maksimovich Yelizaveta. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 04 April 2025 | Accepted: 10 June 2025 | Published: 18 July 2025
Keywords: coronary bypass; hemolysis; degree
The assessment of the degree of IOH was made by the level of free hemoglobin (Hb) on the analyzer HemoCue Plasma/Low Hb, Sweden. In accordance with [Hb] in the blood plasma patients with CABs are divided into 3 groups:1 – without IOH (Hb≤0.1g/l), n=43, 2 – with low IOH (lIOH)–with [Hb]>0.1g/l and<0.5g/l, n=42, 3 with high IOH (hIOH) corresponded to [Hb]≥0.5g/l, n=38. The detection of complications was made in the perioperative (during the operation and the first day after it) and in the early - up to 1 month by dynamic observation of patients. It was detected such complications as arrhythmias, myocardial infarction, stroke, progression of heart failure, death. The study also sought to determine whether specific patient characteristics or surgical techniques influenced the relationship between IOH and postoperative complications [3-5]. By examining these factors, the research aimed to identify patients at highest risk for IOH-related complications and to develop targeted interventions to minimize these risks.
This investigation sought to comprehensively evaluate the impact of intraoperative hemolysis (IOH) on the development of postoperative complications in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG). The study aimed to elucidate the relationship between the degree of IOH, as measured by free hemoglobin levels, and the incidence and severity of various postoperative complications. A particular focus was placed on understanding the potential mechanisms by which IOH may contribute to adverse outcomes following CABG [1-3]. This includes exploring the potential for IOH to exacerbate existing comorbidities, trigger inflammatory responses, and contribute to organ dysfunction. By defining this relationship, the study sought to inform strategies to mitigate IOH during CABG and ultimately improve patient outcomes [3-5].
Purpose: It was to study the effect of intraoperative hemolysis (IOH) on complications development in patients with coronary artery disease after CABs.
This prospective observational study enrolled 123 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Intraoperative hemolysis (IOH) was quantified using a HemoCue Plasma/Low Hb analyzer (HemoCue AB, Ängelholm, Sweden) to measure free hemoglobin ([Hb]) levels in plasma [6]. Measurements were taken at three specific time points: (1) pre-operatively, prior to initiation of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB); (2) immediately following connection to the CPB circuit; and (3) 15 minutes before weaning from CPB. The highest recorded [Hb] value for each patient was used for group assignment.
Patients were stratified into three groups based on their maximum intraoperative free [Hb] concentration:
⦁ Group 1: No IOH: Free [Hb] ≤ 0.1 g/L (n=43)
⦁ Group 2: Low IOH (lIOH): Free [Hb] > 0.1 g/L and < 0.5 g/L (n=42)
⦁ Group 3: High IOH (hIOH): Free [Hb] ≥ 0.5 g/L (n=38)
Postoperative complications were systematically monitored and recorded during two distinct periods:
⦁ Perioperative Period: Encompassing the intraoperative phase and the first 24 hours postoperatively.
⦁ Early Postoperative Period: Spanning from 24 hours to one month after surgery.
The following specific complications were tracked and analyzed:
⦁ Cardiac Arrhythmias: Including both atrial and ventricular arrhythmias, documented by continuous electrocardiographic monitoring.
⦁ Myocardial Infarction (MI): Diagnosed based on elevated cardiac biomarkers (e.g., troponin) and characteristic electrocardiographic changes.
⦁ Stroke: Identified through clinical neurological examination and confirmed by neuroimaging (e.g., CT scan, MRI).
⦁ Progression of Heart Failure: Assessed by clinical evaluation, including signs and symptoms of worsening heart failure, and changes in echocardiographic parameters.
⦁ Mortality: All-cause mortality within the one-month follow-up period.
In the majority of patients with coronary artery disease (n = 94 or 76.4 % ), the postoperative period after CABs was with positive dynamic. The 29 (23.6 % ; p < 0.001) patients have had cardiovascular genesis complications. Arrhythmias were most commonly detected in operated patients (21.95 % , p < 0.001), less frequently – heart failure progression (9.8 % , p < 0.001), myocardial infarction-in 4.1 % , p = 0.003, stroke – in 1, 6 % , p = 0.323. The fatal outcome was in 2 people (1.6 % , p = 0.010). The analysis of complications in groups with different levels of IOH revealed their greatest frequency in the group with hIOH. Thus, in the 3rd group, the incidence of complications was observed in 22 (57.9 % ) patients (p < 0.001), in the group with lIOH – in 5 (11.9 % ) patients (p < 0.001), and in the group without IOH – only in 2 (4.7 % ) operated patients (p < 0.001). In the group with hIOH, the frequency of arrhythmias was 52.6 % , in the group with lIOH – 11.9 % , p < 0.001, without IOH – only 2.32 % , p < 0.001. Myocardial infarction, which is one of the most dangerous complications of CABs, was in 5 patients (4.07 % ), and it was observed only in patients of the 3rd group with hIOH (13.2 % , p < 0.001). In 10 (26.3 % ) patients of the 3-rd group, progression of heart failure was observed, which is more than in the lIOH group – 2 (4.8 % , p < 0.001) and without IOH – in 1(2.3 % ) patients, p < 0.001. In 2 (5.3 % , p < 0.001) patients of the group of the hIOH showed the development of stroke. Fatal outcomes were in two (5.3 % ) patients of the 3rd group (p < 0.001).
CABG: coronary artery bypass grafting
IOH: intraoperative hemolysis
CAD: coronary artery disease
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.
Dear Editorial Team, Clinical Medical Reviews and Reports. My experience with the journal was highly positive. The peer-review process was rigorous, constructive, and completed in a timely manner. The reviewers provided valuable comments that helped improve the quality and clarity of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout all stages of the publication process. Communication was clear and efficient, and any questions were addressed promptly. Overall, I found the journal to maintain high scientific standards and an excellent publication workflow. I would be pleased to consider submitting future work to this journal. Best wishes from, Elena Popa.
It was my pleasure to submit my testimonial concerning the Reviewer Board of our Scientific Journal “Brain and Neurological Disorders”. The Reviewers focused on some modifications and their contribution was helpful. The ladies of our Editorial Office were also supported my efforts. It was my honor to have such a co-operation and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Thank you for the speedy and efficient peer review process. I appreciate the fact that your peer reviewers do not take months to respond like with some other journals. I would also like to thank the editorial office for responding quickly to my questions. It is an excellent journal. I plan to submit more manuscripts in the future. Best wishes from, Robert W. McGee
Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Working with you and your team on our recent publication in JCRR has been a truly wonderful and enjoyable experience. The responses were prompt, and the reviewers were patient, constructive, and highly professional. One reviewer in particular gave me the feeling that a professor was carefully reading and commenting on my coursework, which was deeply touching. The entire process was straightforward and hassle‑free, with no tedious online forms to complete. I highly recommend this journal. Best wishes from, DR Aibing Rao, Head of R&D
I Appreciate the Opportunity to Share my Experience with the Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. The peer review process was timely and constructive, and the feedback provided helped improve the quality of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout the process, ensuring smooth communication and efficient handling of the submission. Overall, it was a positive experience collaborating with your team.
Dear Mercy Grace, Editorial Coordinator of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, We would like to express our gratitude for your help at all stages of publishing and editing the article. The editors of the magazine answer all the necessary questions and help at every stage. We will definitely continue to cooperate and publish other works in the Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences! Best wishes from, Alla Konstantinovna Politova,