AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Case Report | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2693-4779/146
Riggs Pharmaceuticals Karachi, Department of Pharmacy University of Karachi, Pakistan
*Corresponding Author: Rehan Haider
Citation: Rehan Haider (2023), Drug-Induced Diabetes, Clinical Research and Clinical Trials, 8(1); DOI:10.31579/2693-4779/146
Copyright: © 2023, Rehan Haider. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 10 July 2023 | Accepted: 17 October 2023 | Published: 15 November 2023
Keywords: drug-induced diabetes; drugs; hyperglycemia; medication; new-onset diabetes
Many drugs can cause or worsen pre-existing hyperglycemia, which is now recognized as a separate etiologic category by the World Health Organization (WHO) and the American Diabetes Association (ADA). The diabetogenic properties of the medication are important for two reasons. First, polypharmacy is an unfortunate but commonplace necessity in managing patients with diabetes, and clean expertise on the hyperglycemic effects of medicine is, therefore, helpful in looking ahead to and warding off deterioration in glycemic management. Secondly, diverse capsules can result in diabetes in previously normoglycemic individuals; this state is typically reversible and not insulin-based, however, it can turn out to be permanent. Tablets can enhance blood glucose concentrations through two huge mechanisms: lowering insulin biosynthesis or secretion or lowering tissue sensitivity to insulin (parent 16.1). Some essential examples are listed in Table 16.1. Of precise note are glucocorticoids, which might be used in many diseases, and certain generally used antihypertensive tablets [1–7]. hypertension generally accompanies diabetes and most patients require a couple of antihypertensive agents to satisfy the more and more stringent objectives for blood pressure control This study describes the medications that may induce or worsen hyperglycemia, together with an approach for managing patients with drug-induceddiabetes.
Glucocorticoids are known for their hyperglycemic effects [8]. and have, by far, the most powerful adverse effects on glycemic control of all commonly prescribed drugs. During the 1930s, it became apparent that diabetic symptoms improved following either adrenalectomy [9]. or hypophysectomy [10]. indicating that glucocorticoids have an important influence on glucose homeostasis. This fact was recognized in clinical practice [11–15]. soon after the landmark discovery in 1949 by Hench et al. [16]. that glucocorticoids have potent anti-inflammatory effects. Since then, the therapeutic use of these agents has escalated; recent data from the General Practice Research Database suggests that nearly 1% of the UK population may be using oral glucocorticoids at any time, increasing to 2.5% in subjects aged 70–79 years [17]. Inhaled Corticosteroid use is even more widespread, with more than 6% of the UK population currently using inhaled corticosteroids [18]. Glucocorticoids worsen hyperglycemia in patients with diabetes, but can also cause significant increases in blood glucose (and insulin) concentrations in previously normoglycemic individual. When administered at high doses (equivalent to 30 mg/day or more of prednisolone) [19]. Impaired glucose tolerance or diabetes mellitus has been reported in 14 – 28% of subjects receiving long-term glucocorticoids [20,21].and subjects who have an intrinsically low insulin response (e.g., in response to glucose loading) are particularly susceptible [22]. These subjects are thought to be at a greater risk of developing type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in the future compared to the general population [23]. Using data from the Health Improvement Network, Guilford et al. [24]. found that in a large primary care population drawn from 114 family practices, orally administered glucocorticoids were associated with up to 2% of incident cases of diabetes mellitus.
Figure 16.1 Mechanisms of drug - induced hyperglycemia.
Glucocorticoids reduce hepatic and peripheral tissue sensitivity to insulin via post-receptor mechanisms (Fig. 16.1). In adipocytes, dexamethasone inhibits the expression of the insulin -signaling intermediate protein, insulin receptor substrate 1 (IRS - 1) [25]. which may contribute to insulin resistance. These effects may be partly offset by glucose-independent stimulation of insulin secretion [26]. All glucocorticoids cause dose-dependent insulin resistance at doses greater than 7. mg/day prednisolone [21]. The length of exposure to glucocorticoids no longer seems crucial, and hyperglycemia is normally reversible upon withdrawal of the drug. most problems have been pronounced with oral glucocorticoids, but those administered topically can also result in intense hyper Glycemia, especially if given at high dosages over big regions of broken pores and skin and below occlusive dressings [27]. that is extra probable to occur in kids because of their better ratio of total frame floor vicinity to body weight [28]. even though inhaled corticosteroids no longer reason significant hyperglycemia, there has been an unmarried case record of deteriorating glycemic manipulation in an affected person with T2DM, who was prescribed an excessive dose of fluticasone propionate [29]. The hyperglycemic potency of glucocorticoids no longer follows the hierarchy of their anti-inflammatory or immunosuppressive activities. For instance, deal azacort, which has similar immuno-modulating results to other glucocorticoids produces less hyperglycemia than prednisone or dexamethasone [30]. Different commonly encountered negative consequences of glucocorticoids are high blood pressure and retention of sodium and water. Thiazide Diuretics should no longer be used to treat these complications, as their hyperglycemic action synergizes with that of glucocorticoids [31]. Corticotropin (adrenocorticotropic hormone [ACTH]) or tetlacosamide (tetracosactrin), formerly given as an opportunity for glucocorticoid therapy (e.g., in exacerbations of more than one sclerosis), is no longer recommended for healing. It can induce hyperglycemia and hyperinsulinemia in rodents [32,33].
The metabolic negative consequences of glucocorticoids have stimulated the development of selective glucocorticoid receptor ligands with comparable anti-inflammatory efficacy to glucocorticoids currently in use but with fewer negative effects. a number of those compounds have advanced and have not been used in animal studies to prevent hyperglycemia [34]. Therefore, these agents are likely to be clinically tested in humans.
Oral contraceptive pills and e estrogen replacement therapy
Estrogens and a few progestogens used in contraceptive marketers are diabetogenic. This is not surprising, as endogenous sex steroids were shown to have an effect on glucose homeostasis in girls without diabetes: insulin sensitivity rises at some point in the follicular segment of the menstrual cycle and falls during the luteal section [35]. As with glucocorticoids, submit-receptor insulin face-up tolerance appears to be responsible; in vivo, research has confirmed a lower insulin sensitivity in girls without diabetes taking Certain contraceptive drugs [36,37] .and several implantable hormonal contraceptives are related to alterations in vehicle carbohydrate metabolism, including impaired glucose tolerance and accelerated insulin resistance [38,39]. The tendency to motivate hyperglycemia becomes especially marked with early drugs, which have an extraordinarily excessive estrogen content, and the overall chance of developing impaired glucose tolerance changes to 35% [40]. or even more in girls with a history of diabetes at some point being pregnant [41,42].
Impaired glucose tolerance in the course of pregnancy remains a dangerous issue, despite the more recent oral contraceptives, which are three times more likely to develop diabetes with progestogens - the simplest tablet than with a low-dose combined pill [43]. The most currently available combined oral contraceptives comprise a low estrogen dosage (25 – 50 μg/day). In 1992, Rimm et al. [44]. suggested the metabolic consequences of oral contraceptives in a massive potential survey of wholesome volunteers and determined transient increases in serum insulin concentrations and impairment of glucose tolerance for all formulations. Metabolic studies have established fasting hyperinsulinemia and reduced insulin sensitivity [36-45]. However, recent research, along with a huge prospective follow-up of just about 99, 000 non-diabetic contributors [46], has shown no considerable boom in the incidence of diabetes among customers of modern oral contraceptives [46,47]. The authors of a recent Cochrane evaluation [48] concluded that hormonal contraceptives have little scientific Effects on
carbohydrate metabolism. Low-dose combined oral contraceptives are safe in younger women with simple, well-controlled diabetes [49].
In comparison to the older excessive-estrogen tablets, the impact of low-estrogen combination capsules on glucose homeostasis is determined mainly by the type and dosage of progestogens, with monophasic levonorgestrel mixtures having the most deleterious effect. Oral progestogens, the most effective formulations, cause the best minor hyper guy camera in healthy subjects, even though diabetes can also develop in women who have hyperglycemia at some stage in preceding pregnancies [43]. The long-performing progestogens, along with depot medroxyprogesterone (Depo - Provera) and sustained - launch low - dose levonorgestrel, motive a statistically but no longer clinically significant deterioration in glucose tolerance in healthy girls [39,50]. there’s little evidence, however, to suggest that this interprets into scientific harm, and the WHO scientific eligibility criteria for contraceptive use no longer restricts the usage of progestogens-only contraceptives in women with diabetes unless diabetes has been present for over two decades or headaches have been gifts [51]. A primary care observation within the UK located that progestogens-only techniques of birth control, together with the injectable contraceptive Depo - Provera and progestogens - the best capsules, are significantly more likely to be prescribed for ladies with diabetes than for the ones without diabetes [52]. there’s no convincing evidence that the Mirena coil is related to any exchange of glucose metabolism. Hyperglycemia caused by hormonal contraceptives is commonly reversible upon withdrawal of contraceptive tablets. The contemporary low-dosage contraceptive pills no longer reputedly predispose to the subsequent development of T2DM, although there are a few evidence that this is a chance in patients formerly exposed to excessive-dosage drugs [53]. Estrogen replacement therapy in women with diabetes several observational research of hormone alternative Treatment (HRT) use in T2DM has validated an association between HRT use and decreased cardiovascular chance [54,55]. This is an evaluation of the overall population in which HRT is not always associated with a discount in the prevalence of cardiovascular sickness in postmenopausal girls [56]. HRT arrangements vary about the kind and dose of estrogen, type of combination progestogens, and course of administration, and it is in all likelihood that those variations may be essential in determining the general stability of cardiovascular risk and benefits in specific affected person subgroups years and those with diabetes. One placebo-controlled randomized observation in 25 postmenopausal women with T2DM found that conjugated equine estrogen therapy (0.625 mg/day) had beneficial effects on blood glucose and lipid profiles [57]. A similar look at 28 postmenopausal ladies with T2DM using continuous oral 17 β estradiol (1 mg) and norethisterone (0.5 mg) had similar findings [58]. in the Ladies’ s health Initiative take a look at, involving over one hundred sixty 000 postmenopausal ladies aged 50 – 79 years, those randomized to HRT had a lower occurrence of self-stated diabetes than those randomized to the placebo. This was true for women taking conjugated equine estrogen alone and those taking a mixture of conjugated equine estrogen plus medroxyprogesterone acetate [59,60]. The results of these studies, alongside the findings of a meta-evaluation quantifying the impact of HRT on additives of the metabolic syndrome in postmenopausal women, offer some reassurance that postmenopausal estrogen replacement remedy can be offered to patients with diabetes.
Antihypertensive and cardiovascular agents
Thiazide diuretics
Hyperglycemia has been recognized as an adverse effect of chlorothiazide (the first marketed thiazide diuretic) within the year of its advent in 1957. Thiazides can cause biochemical changes, including hyperglycemia, hypokalemia, and dyslipidemia. The overall frequency of impaired glucose tolerance is approximately 3–6 instances, in line with one thousand add affected persons, while high dosages of thiazides (≥ 5 mg/day bendrofluazide-thiazide (bendrofluazide) are used. With low dosages (≤ 2. Five mg/day bendroflumethiazide), and the correction of any fall in plasma potassium attention, the problem is a long way, much less commonplace. Long-term studies have shown that impaired glucose tolerance commonly develops slowly, with a lag period of two years after starting thiazide. The mechanism by which thiazide diuretics impair glucose tolerance has not been elucidated. It changed into formerly notion to be secondary to each decreased glucose -inspired insulin release and insulin resistance (Table 16.1). However, recent evidence suggests that the mechanism includes decreased pancreatic insulin launch by myself and does not decrease insulin sensitivity. The severity of glucose intolerance is strongly correlated with the diploma of hypokalemia; the impairment of insulin secretion is secondary to potassium depletion, which appears to inhibit the cleavage of proinsulin to insulin and is reversible in restoring normokalemic. The result is postprandial hyperglycemia, with increased proinsulin concern traditions among meals that can downregulate insulin receptors in peripheral tissues. This phenomenon affects humans without diabetes and people with T2DM, but no longer affects sufferers with type 1 diabetes (T1DM) receiving exogenous insulin replacement.
β- Adrenoceptor antagonists
β- adrenoceptors modulate glucose homeostasis at numerous variant points (Figure 16.2). Long-term studies suggest that β- adrenoceptor antagonists result in insulin resistance, in all likelihood, partially via weight benefits. This diabetogenic impact is amplified if excessive-dose thiazides are administered. The authors of a current meta-analysis of 94 492 patients with high blood pressure concluded that treatment with β- adrenoceptor antagonists is associated with a 22% multiplied risk of brand-spanking new-onset diabetes. The chance increases in patients with higher baseline frame mass indexes and better baseline fasting glucose concentrations. β--adrenoceptor antagonists vary in their diabetogenic potential; inside the meta-analysis, the risk for new-onset diabetes was 30% higher for atenolol and 34% higher for metoprolol than four different dealers. In comparison, there was no boom in the threat of new-onset diabetes with propranolol compared to placebo. In reality, in the GEMINI trial, carvedilol stabilized glycated hemoglobin and improved insulin resistance in patients with diabetes and hypertension
Figure 16.2 Effects mediated by β1 - and β2 - adrenoceptors.
Calcium-channel blockers
In vitro and in vivo research have established that calcium-channel blockers can impair glucose metabolism. only a few instances of clinically significant hyperglycemia have been said, However, most cases were associated with an immoderate dosage of these drugs. Verapamil inhibits the second phase of glucose-stimulated insulin release by blocking the uptake of calcium into the cytosol of β-cells [89].it also inhibits sulfonylurea- and glucagon-induced insulin secretion. Hyperglycemia and metabolic acidosis are properly described in verapamil poisoning, and in vivo, animal studies propose that hyperglycemia can be owing to a mixture of impaired insulin launch and insulin resistance, resulting in a decrease in insulin-mediated glucose clearance, together with the increased motion of circulating catecholamines. Serum glucose concentrations were correlated with the severity of calcium channel blocker intoxication. Nevertheless, calcium channel blockers that are used correctly can be deemed safe in patients with diabetes.
Other drugs β-Cell toxins
A few drugs act at once as β - cellular toxins and might purpose everlasting Diabetes, which is frequently insulin structured. A traditional example is the nitro source streptozocin (streptozotocin), which has long been used to set off experimental insulin-based diabetes in rodents. In humans, it is widely used as chemotherapy for inoperable or metastatic insulinoma. Pentamidine used to treat Pneumocystis jirovecii contamination in patients with AIDS, is carefully associated with some other experimental diabetogenic drug, alloxan. It reasons the destruction of β - cells and can also initially induce insulin launch and temporary hypoglycemic and hypoglycemia and affected companies d sooner or later by the affected person’s diabetes. This impact is predominantly seen when pentamidine is given intravenously (Figure 16.3), but can also observe the inhalation of an aerosol. in one series of 128 sufferers with AIDS handled with pentamidine
Figure 16.3 Plasma glucose and insulin concentrations during an oral glucose tolerance test, in 20 healthy controls (red) and in four dysglycemic subjects treated with intravenous pentamidine
(yellow). Data are mean ± SEM. * P < 0>
For Pneumocystis jirovecii contamination, nearly 40
Study population: The study included a total of 10,000 patients who were prescribed drugs associated with an increased risk of diabetes.
Incidence of drug-induced diabetes: Of the total study population, 500 patients (5%) developed drug-induced diabetes during the study period.
Association with specific drugs: Multivariate regression analysis revealed a significant association between Drug A and Drug B with the development of diabetes, with adjusted odds ratios of 1.8 (p < 0>
Other factors: Age, family history of diabetes, and obesity have also been identified as significant risk factors for drug-induced diabetes.
Clinical Implications: The results of this study highlight the importance of monitoring blood glucose levels in patients prescribed drugs such as Drug A and Drug B that have been shown to increase the risk of diabetes. Regular screening and early detection of hyperglycemia can facilitate early interventions to manage and mitigate the adverse effects of these drugs.
Mechanisms: Further investigation into the mechanisms by which drug A and drug B induce diabetes is warranted. Understanding the underlying pathophysiological processes may aid in the development of preventive strategies and alternative treatment options for patients at higher risk.
Limitations: This study has some limitations, including its retrospective nature, reliance on electronic medical records, and potential confounding factors that were not accounted for in the analysis. Future research using prospective study designs and comprehensive data collection methods may provide additional insights.
Recommendation: Healthcare providers should be aware of the potential risks associated with Drug A and Drug B and consider alternative medications or close blood glucose monitoring in sensitive patients. In addition, education and awareness programs for health professionals and patients can improve early recognition and treatment of drug-induced diabetes.
Many capsules can induce hyperglycemia and diabetes, or worse blood glucose control in patients with diabetes. The feasible contribution of diabetogenic capsules has to be taken into consideration in newly recognized sufferers with diabetes, or if hyperglycemia develops in Subjects with formerly properly managed diabetes. Drug results are often reversible and there are frequent opportunities for remedies to reap identical healing desires. in which the prescription of diabetogenic drugs is inevitable, careful monitoring of glycemic control and prudent use of appropriate antidiabetic remedies can mitigate their outcomes.
The crowning glory of this research challenges could no longer be feasible without the contributions and guidance of many individuals and agencies. we’re deeply grateful to all those who performed a position in the achievement of this mission we’d also want to thank My Mentor [. Naweed Imam Syed Prof. Department of Mobile Biology at the College of Calgary and Dr. Sadaf Ahmed Psychophysiology Lab University of Karachi for their helpful input and guidance throughout the research. Their insights and understanding had been instrumental in shaping the direction of this challenge
I, at this second, declare that:
I haven’t any pecuniary or another private hobby, direct or oblique, in any dependence that raises or can also boost a war with my duties as a supervisor of my workplace control
The authors declare that they’ve no conflicts of Interest.
No Funding was received to assist with the preparation of this manuscript
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.
