Research Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2692-9562/033
Queen Elizabeth Hospital UK
*Corresponding Author: Waqas Jamil, ENT department, Queen Elizabeth Hospital UK.
Citation: Jamil W, Alahwal A, Suman R, Whitwell M, Naz F, Beech T (2021). Do patients correctly use steroid nose spray? A patient-reported survey of the nasal spray technique and patient compliance; J. of Clinical Otorhi. 3(4). DOI: 10.31579/2692-9562/033
Copyright: © 2021, Waqas Jamil. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 19 April 2021 | Accepted: 22 May 2021 | Published: 20 August 2021
Keywords: nasal sprays; rhinitis; allergic
Background:Correct nasal spray techniqueand patient compliance are the two mostimportant factors in the use of steroid nose spray.
Objectives:To find out if patientsuse steroid nasal spray with a correctspray technique and if they are compliant in using the spray.
Design: Patient-reported survey
Participants: 100 participants (1 excluded)
Main outcome measures 1) Nasal spray technique 2) Patient compliance
Results: Out of 99 participants included in this study only one patient used steroid nose spray with a completely correct spray technique. 40% of patients received guidance instructions from the prescriber about the spray technique. 70% of patients reported using their spray regularly and 53% of patients were found using the correct dosage of the spray.
Conclusions: Wrong spray technique and patient noncompliance is common and can be corrected. This survey emphasizes the importance of giving written and verbal instructions about the use of spray to the patients.
Key Points:
Background: Various studies conducted in the past have proven the efficacy of steroid nasal spray in the treatment of inflammatory nasal conditions. [1],[2] Currently, topical steroid nasal sprays are considered as the first-line treatment for the management of allergic rhinitis (hayfever) and chronic rhinosinusitis.[1],[3],[4],[5] Intranasal steroids work locally inside the nose and are found to be more effective than systemic steroids [2]. Local application of steroids in the nose reduces systemic absorption, hence reducing systemic side effects [6]. Various steroid- based nasal sprays are available i.e. Beconase, Nasonex, Avamys,Flixonase [7]. Combination nasal spray is also available which contains topical antihistamine and topical steroid i.e. Dymista [8].
Previous studies have investigated the correlation between the spray technique and the distribution of drug inside the nose [9],[10],[11],[12]. Correct spray technique and patient compliance are the two important factors for the nasal spray to work. Furthermore, incorrect spray technique can be associated with side effectsi.e. irritation and epistaxis [6]. Current guidance on the management of chronic rhinosinusitis, allergic and non- allergic rhinitis strongly recommends clinicians to check nasal spray technique and compliance [3], [5].
Significant material is available on the internet to educate people about nasal spray use, however, some of them are inaccurate [7, 13-16]. Therefore, after extensive research, we recommend following the written instructions for the use of steroid nasal spray from “British Societyfor Allergy and Clinical Immunology” or/and video tutorial from “ asthma.org.uk- how to use nasal spray” [7],[13] (See below). We recommend following these steps when using steroid nose spray:
The main objectives of this survey were:
Study design and Setting: This survey was conducted at Queen Elizabeth Hospital in Birmingham, UK. Initially, a written paper survey form (see figure 1) was distributed among the patients who were using steroid nasal spray and who came to attend rhinology and immunology outpatient clinics. But, shortly after this survey started, face to face patient consultations were stopped due to COVID-19outbreak. Hence, a telephonic patient-reported survey was undertaken for the remaining patients. During the telephonic survey, we made a minor change in the question 3 of the survey (see figure 1)
1.Participants: Total100 patients took part in this survey. 15 patients filled in paper survey proforma before COVID-19 outbreak and the remaining 85 responded to the telephonic survey. Mean age of the participated patients in this survey was 49 years old, ranging from 18 to 77 years. There were 53 males and 46 females and the male: female ratio was 1.15:1.

Further breakdown of the taught spray technique in those 40?ses was:


Wrong spray technique is extremely common among patients using the steroid nose spray. This seems to be overlooked by many clinicians, which is easily correctable. Moreover, patient compliance can be further improved. We emphasize the importance of giving verbal as well as written instructions to the patients when prescribing steroid nose spray.
Dear Editorial Team, Clinical Medical Reviews and Reports. My experience with the journal was highly positive. The peer-review process was rigorous, constructive, and completed in a timely manner. The reviewers provided valuable comments that helped improve the quality and clarity of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout all stages of the publication process. Communication was clear and efficient, and any questions were addressed promptly. Overall, I found the journal to maintain high scientific standards and an excellent publication workflow. I would be pleased to consider submitting future work to this journal. Best wishes from, Elena Popa.
It was my pleasure to submit my testimonial concerning the Reviewer Board of our Scientific Journal “Brain and Neurological Disorders”. The Reviewers focused on some modifications and their contribution was helpful. The ladies of our Editorial Office were also supported my efforts. It was my honor to have such a co-operation and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Thank you for the speedy and efficient peer review process. I appreciate the fact that your peer reviewers do not take months to respond like with some other journals. I would also like to thank the editorial office for responding quickly to my questions. It is an excellent journal. I plan to submit more manuscripts in the future. Best wishes from, Robert W. McGee
Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Working with you and your team on our recent publication in JCRR has been a truly wonderful and enjoyable experience. The responses were prompt, and the reviewers were patient, constructive, and highly professional. One reviewer in particular gave me the feeling that a professor was carefully reading and commenting on my coursework, which was deeply touching. The entire process was straightforward and hassle‑free, with no tedious online forms to complete. I highly recommend this journal. Best wishes from, DR Aibing Rao, Head of R&D
I Appreciate the Opportunity to Share my Experience with the Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. The peer review process was timely and constructive, and the feedback provided helped improve the quality of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout the process, ensuring smooth communication and efficient handling of the submission. Overall, it was a positive experience collaborating with your team.
Dear Mercy Grace, Editorial Coordinator of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, We would like to express our gratitude for your help at all stages of publishing and editing the article. The editors of the magazine answer all the necessary questions and help at every stage. We will definitely continue to cooperate and publish other works in the Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences! Best wishes from, Alla Konstantinovna Politova,