AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Case Report | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2690-4861/232
*1 Associate professor of medicine, Faculty of health and medical sciences, University of Western Australia, 35/ Stirling Highway, Perth Western Australia 6009.
2 Royal Hobart hospital, 48liverpool street, Hobart Tasmania 7000 Australia.
*Corresponding Author: Adel Ekladious. Associate Professor, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Royal Hobart Hospital, 48 Liverpool Street, Hobart Tasmania 7000 Australia.
Citation: Ekladious A. (2022) Disseminated Mycobacterium Bovis Report. International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. 11(4); DOI: 10.31579/2690-4861/232
Copyright: © 2022 Adel Ekladious, This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 20 June 2022 | Accepted: 28 June 2022 | Published: 21 July 2022
Keywords: intravesical bacillus chalmette- guerin; haematuria; bladder cancer
Intravesical BacillusChalmette- Guerin (BCG) still a popular medication for non-invasive bladdercancer in the low-income country, one of the uncommon side effects is disseminated Mycobacterium Bovis. We present a patient who presented with haematuria, diagnosed as urothelial superficial bladder cancer, treated with incomplete resectionand intravesical BCG, 6 months after treatment, he presented with increasing shortness of breath, headache and abdominal pain, diagnosed as tuberculous, meningitis, massive pleural effusion, granulomatous hepatitis he responded very well to anti tuberculous treatment.
50-year-old man presented to ED with frank total haematuria for three weeks and fever, His past medical history was unremarkable, he was up- to-date with vaccination including Double dose Fizer vaccine, he lives in Kuala Lumper and works as a truck driver, He smokes for the last three years 15 cigarette a day and drinks two glass of wine in the weekend and public holidays, he does not suffer from any medical condition and does not take any medication.
He is married and was in monogamous relationship and has had two healthy children, On examination, he had a low grade fever 37.8, Blood Pressure 130/80, normal oxygen saturation on room air, systemic examination was unremarkable with no rash or arthritis, Urine deep stick showed frank haematuria, no nitrates, the following investigation were done and were either normal or negative, FBC, Urea, electrolytes, immunoglobulin, PANCA, CANCA, Anti GBM, serum IGA, Albumin creatinine ratio (from urine), ANA, DNA, ACCP, complements, LFT, corrected serum Calcium, patient had cystoscopy and multiple biopsies from the bladder mass, Pathology confirmed high grade Urothelial tumour, immunohistochemistry confirmed the diagnosis, patient treated with transurethral resection, six months later, patient developed total haematuria, Cystoscopy confirmed recurrence of the tumour, whole body scan excluded any metastasis, Patient treated with surgery and intravesical BCG (live attenuated Bacille Chalmette –Guerin) 6 months later patient presented to his GP with headache, low grade fever, abdominal pain and increasing shortness of breath, patient transferred to hospital for investigation and management, In ED patient was unwell with fever, neck pain, tachypnoea.
On examination he had neck stiffness, fever 38, respiratory rate of 28/min, heart rate 110/minute, No rash, generalised arthralgia but no arthritis, congested sclera, examination of the chest showed stony dullness in the right hemithorax with decreased chest expansion and vocal resonance, normal cardiac sounds, abdominal examination showeda palpable spleenand tender liver, results of blood test in the hospital HB 9 grams, neutrophils 8000, and platelets 600000, normal urea and creatinine, Normal transaminases, ALK 400, Gam GGT 500, INR 1, Aptt 30, corrected serum calcium 3 momol/L, ESR 100 CRP 200, parathyroid hormone assay marginally low, serum phosphate normal,25 hydroxy vitaminD low (30), 1-25 hydroxylvitamin D elevated, parathyroid related protein negative, urinary calcium elevated, CXR massive right pleural effusion, echocardiogram normal myocardium, valves, and no coronary calcification, normal, systolic and diastolic function of right and left ventricles, and normal pressure, CSF study Normal including opening pressure, CSF sugar 2,5 mmol/L (corresponding serum sugar 6 mmol/L).
Cells 300 all mononuclear, Protein elevated, CSF saved for viral and bacterial cultures, including Acid fast bacilli, Cryptococcus, listeria monocytogenes, patient started om cephalosporin, ampicillin, gentamycin and dexamethasone, Pleural cavity was punctured and one litter of fluid f withdrawn, fluid sent for cells, culture, lactic acid dehydrogenase, albumin, and deaminase, sugar, PH, ProBNP, culture and PCR for tuberculosis, Listeria, Cryptococcus, and Toxoplasmosis, Pleural fluid examination was consistent with exsudative, pleuralfluid deaminase level was 219u/ml(less than 40u/ml), and pleural biopsy was performed and sent for culture.
While patient in the hospital he started to have continuous fever and testicular pain, patient seen by surgeon who diagnosed epedidmoorchitis, testicular ultrasound supported the diagnosis of epedidmoorchitis, patient taken to theatre and had testicular biopsy and sent for microbiology and culture.
Metronidazole was added to his antibiotics, patient seen by infectious disease specialist who added interferon gamma assay to pleural fluid and serum trsting, and advised to start on rifampicin, INH, Ethambutol, Pyrazinamide and dexamethasone, after two weeks, result of pleural biopsy confirmed mycobacterium tuberculosis, resistant to pyrazinamide and sensitive to refamcin, INH and Ethambutol , interferon gamma assay was strongly positive, patient was started on Reamfin, INH , Ethambutol and levofloxacin for 12 months, patient started to improve after 4 month of quadruple therapy, repeated induced sputum for mycobacterium was negative, Patient was diagnosed as TB meningitis, epididmoorchitis and pulmonary TB due to disseminated TB related BCG.
BCG is an attenuated live strain of mycobacterium bovis which is used as a vaccine to prevent tuberculosis in low-income country, [1]
People vaccinated with BCG develop positive tuberculin skin test (Monteux test), BCG was part of Australian vaccination rejmn till 1989, because of decreased incidence of TB in Australia, it was removed,BCG is currently recommended for people of high risk of TB [2.3]
BCG had shown good efficacy to prevent fulminantTB in young children, BCG stillused as a diagnostic tool to excludelatent TB in some countries where the exposure risk is low, BCG had been replaced by interferon gamma release assay (IGRA) as it is more specificfor latent TB, it is also a common screening test for ptients to do for patients startingon rituximab and other immunotherapy in patient at risk to develop TB while they are on chemotherpay
Intravesical BCG had proven efficacy as an adjacent treatment for intermediate and high grade non muscle invasive bladder cancer, despite its proven efficacy, it can cause disseminated Tuberculosis, [4,5] clinicians should have a low threshold to treat for disseminated TB, in patients treated with intravesical BCG in the past especially if they developed pulmonary, meningeal or disseminated symptoms
Until metastasis related primary disease (urothelial bladder cancer) are ruled out all symptoms of BCG include hepatitis and pancytopenia, carditis, pneumonitis, epididymitis, meningitis should be treated as disseminted Tuberclosis till proved potherwise
The mode of dissemination could be due to haematogenous dissemination from the bladder and type 1V hypersensitivity reaction, the response to steroid treatment had supported the notion of delayed allergic reaction, there is no established measures to avoid disseminated TB related BCG, but
Patients who had the injection close to the site of surgery and those who had repeated catherization or had multiple bladder biopsies are at increased risk of infection, disseminated non-caseating granuloma detected by histology, positive acid-fast bacilli and mycobacterium bovis by molecular biology almost confirmthe diagnosis, dissemination can happen six months to few years after intravesical instillation of BCG,
The incidence of systemic complications ranged from 3% to 4.3%, common organs to develop granuloma are liver and lung, corticosteroids had been reported to ameliorate the systemic symptoms in most patients, [6,7,8]
BCG should only be used as an adjacent therapy to TURP in high grade non-invasive cancer due to unfavraboule risk of disseminated Tuberculosis [9,10].
The optimumdose of BCG, optimal frequencyand duration differsamong urologists,
The standardof care is 6 weekly injections as an inductiondose followed by a maintance dose of one injection every three months for one year,
Most of the BCG tested vaccine strains are susceptible to all antituberculosis drugs apart from Pyrazinamide and this should be taken into consideration when starting empirical treatment, There is in vitro evidence that BCG vaccine strains that have lost region of deletion 2(RD2) are susceptible to macrolides whereas those retained RD2 are resistant,
Different strains are used in BCG and this might have impact on the choice of empirical antituberculosis treatment, [11,12,13].
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
