Case Report | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2692-9562/062
1 Department of Emergency Medicine, Rowan University SOM/Jefferson - Stratford, NJ, USA
2 Program Director, Emergency Medicine, Jefferson NJ/Rowan University SOM, Stratford, NJ USA
3 Department of Otolaryngology, Jefferson NJ Washington Township, NJ USA
*Corresponding Author: James Espinosa, Department of Emergency Medicine, Rowan University SOM/Jefferson - Stratford, NJ, USA.
Citation: James Espinosa, Eric Maddock, Alan Lucerna, David Temmerm and, (2022). Digital extraction of a barbed foreign body impalement of the soft palate in a child (bedspring). Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology 4(4); DOI: 10.31579/2692-9562/062
Copyright: © 2022, James Espinosa. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 20 May 2022 | Accepted: 16 June 2022 | Published: 09 July 2022
Keywords: impalement injury of the soft palate; digital removal barbed object from soft palate
Here we present the case of a 3-year-old child who fell while running with a bedspring in his hand. The bedspring was in his mouth and appeared to be impaled. The ends were barbed. When the patient appeared to become nauseous, the decision was made to attempt digital identification of the location of the bedspring. It was clear that it had impaled into the soft palate. The barb was digitally eased from the soft palate and the bedspring was removed. Impalement injuries of the oral cavity are generally associated with the preschool age group. The most common objects are sticks, pencils, straws and toothbrushes. Potential complications depend on the location of the impalement and include deep space abscesses and internal carotid thrombosis. Internal carotid thrombosis is a rare complication and is more common with lateral palate and peritonsillar injuries. However, most impalement injuries of the oral cavity in children heal spontaneously and with minimal intervention.
Impalement injuries of the oral cavity are generally associated with the preschool age group. The most common objects are sticks, pencils, straws and toothbrushes [1]. Matsusue looked at a series of 144 pediatric palatal impalement injuries (age range 7 months to 10 years) and found that 92% were younger than 5 years of age. Over 50% occurred by falling onto an object held in the mouth. The most common object was a toothbrush (21%) and the second most common was a cylindrical toy (18%) [2].
Here we present the case of a 3-year-old child who fell while running with a bedspring in his hand. The bedspring was in his mouth and appeared to be impaled. His family had been in the process of removing a broken box spring mattress from house. He was carried into the emergency department (ED) by his father. There was no obvious bleeding from his mouth. He was placed on a stretcher in a sitting position. Initial attempts at visualization of the oropharynx were difficult due to the presence of the bedspring. The family brought an identical bedspring with them. Both ends had a small barb. No attempts had been made by the family to remove the spring. When the patient appeared to become nauseous, the decision was made to attempt digital identification of the location of the bedspring. It was clear that it had impaled into the soft palate. The barb was digitally eased from the soft palate and the bedspring was removed. There was no active bleeding and no laceration was noted on visual inspection. The patient was transferred to a Pediatric unit and was observed for 24 hours. He was discharged in good condition and was in good health at 3 day follow up.
In the series of 144 pediatric palatal impalement injuries by Matsusue, the soft palate was involved in 44% of cases. The hard palate was involved in 18% of cases. In this series, observation alone was sufficient in 68% of cases with surgical intervention in 31% of cases (most under local anesthesia). 8% were admitted with no complications in the series [2]. Potential complications depend on the location of the impalement and include deep space abscesses and internal carotid thrombosis [3-5].
Internal carotid thrombosis is a rare complication and is more common with lateral palate and peritonsillar injuries [6]. However, most impalement injuries of the oral cavity in children heal spontaneously and with minimal intervention [2,6,7].
Impalement injuries of the oral cavity are generally associated with the preschool age group. The most common objects are sticks, pencils, straws and toothbrushes. Potential complications depend on the location of the impalement and include deep space abscesses and internal carotid thrombosis. Internal carotid thrombosis is a rare complication and is more common with lateral palate and peritonsillar injuries. However, most impalement injuries of the oral cavity in children heal spontaneously and with minimal intervention.
Dear Editorial Team, Clinical Medical Reviews and Reports. My experience with the journal was highly positive. The peer-review process was rigorous, constructive, and completed in a timely manner. The reviewers provided valuable comments that helped improve the quality and clarity of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout all stages of the publication process. Communication was clear and efficient, and any questions were addressed promptly. Overall, I found the journal to maintain high scientific standards and an excellent publication workflow. I would be pleased to consider submitting future work to this journal. Best wishes from, Elena Popa.
It was my pleasure to submit my testimonial concerning the Reviewer Board of our Scientific Journal “Brain and Neurological Disorders”. The Reviewers focused on some modifications and their contribution was helpful. The ladies of our Editorial Office were also supported my efforts. It was my honor to have such a co-operation and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Thank you for the speedy and efficient peer review process. I appreciate the fact that your peer reviewers do not take months to respond like with some other journals. I would also like to thank the editorial office for responding quickly to my questions. It is an excellent journal. I plan to submit more manuscripts in the future. Best wishes from, Robert W. McGee
Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Working with you and your team on our recent publication in JCRR has been a truly wonderful and enjoyable experience. The responses were prompt, and the reviewers were patient, constructive, and highly professional. One reviewer in particular gave me the feeling that a professor was carefully reading and commenting on my coursework, which was deeply touching. The entire process was straightforward and hassle‑free, with no tedious online forms to complete. I highly recommend this journal. Best wishes from, DR Aibing Rao, Head of R&D
I Appreciate the Opportunity to Share my Experience with the Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. The peer review process was timely and constructive, and the feedback provided helped improve the quality of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout the process, ensuring smooth communication and efficient handling of the submission. Overall, it was a positive experience collaborating with your team.
Dear Mercy Grace, Editorial Coordinator of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, We would like to express our gratitude for your help at all stages of publishing and editing the article. The editors of the magazine answer all the necessary questions and help at every stage. We will definitely continue to cooperate and publish other works in the Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences! Best wishes from, Alla Konstantinovna Politova,