Research Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2767-7370/176
¹ Free University of the Great Lakes Countries (ULPGL), Goma, Democratic Republic of Congo.
² Mpox Incident Management System, North Kivu, Democratic Republic of Congo.
³ Provincial Health Division of North Kivu, Goma, Democratic Republic of Congo.
⁴ University of Lubumbashi, Lubumbashi, Democratic Republic of Congo.
⁵ Bwanya 4 Community Center, Goma, Democratic Republic of Congo.
⁶ La Sapientia Catholic University, Goma, Democratic Republic of Congo.
*Corresponding Author: Tambwe Patrick, Mpox Incident Management System, North Kivu, Democratic Republic of Congo; tambpatrick@gmail.com
Citation: Stéphane-Hans Bateyi Mustafaa, Tambwe Patrick, Robert Biya, Ngoy Shadimanga Sébastiem, Cizungu Safi Evelyne et al., (2026), Determinants of Vaccine Uptake Against Mpox Among Key Populations in Goma, 2024-2025, J New Medical Innovations and Research, 7(1); DOI:10.31579/2767-7370/176
Copyright: © 2026, Tambwe Patrick. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 17 March 2026 | Accepted: 31 March 2026 | Published: 10 April 2026
Keywords: Mpox; vaccine uptake; key populations
In Goma, Democratic Republic of Congo, vaccine uptake within these communities has been notably high, despite the obstacles posed by ongoing humanitarian crises and widespread misinformation. This study sought to explore the sociocultural, organizational, and communication factors that contribute to this remarkable level of vaccination adherence. Between September 2024 and January 2025, a cross-sectional study was carried out involving 420 participants from key populations including sex workers, men who have sex with men, transgender persons, and people who inject drugs across the Goma, Karisimbi, and Nyiragongo health zones. Data were gathered using structured questionnaires through proportional purposive sampling. Statistical analyses were performed in STATA and SPSS, applying logistic regression models with significance set at p ≤ 0.05. The study found an overall Mpox vaccine uptake of 81% among key populations. Key factors driving adherence included positive social acceptance (OR = 19.85), the influence of peer educators (OR = 42.91), viewing vaccination as a form of social protection (OR = 24.047), and the effect of information received (OR = 8.47). Intriguingly, certain beliefs traditionally deemed irrational such as perceiving Mpox as a community manipulation (OR = 84.9) were unexpectedly linked to higher vaccination rates. Engagement in welcoming health centers (99.7%) and living within 10 km of these facilities (82%) further facilitated uptake. Conversely, fear of side effects (43.8%) and insufficient information (28.7%) continued to hinder vaccination among those not yet immunized. In Goma, vaccine adherence is shaped by community interactions, distinct cultural perceptions, and context-specific communication strategies.
Mpox, previously referred to as monkeypox, is an emerging infectious disease that has experienced notable shifts in its epidemiological pattern, attracting heightened international concern. While historically limited to endemic areas in Central and West Africa since the 1970s, the disease has spread beyond these regions since 2022[6], disproportionately impacting men who have sex with men (MSM), who constitute approximately 80% of cases reported in non-endemic countries[1,2]. In addressing this emerging threat, various studies have sought to identify factors influencing Mpox vaccine acceptance. Nonetheless, current systematic reviews are constrained by the limited number of studies included, insufficient coverage of all six WHO regions, and a lack of focus on vaccine intention among high-risk key populations[3,4]. Data from Sub-Saharan Africa highlight significant variation in Mpox vaccine acceptance, shaped by social, cultural, and structural determinants[5]. Notably, a recent meta-analysis found that 73.6% of LGBTQI+ individuals in Nigeria were willing to be vaccinated, in contrast to a global acceptance rate of 39.8% [6].
In Goma, Democratic Republic of Congo, a significant Mpox outbreak emerged in early 2024, reporting over 30,000 suspected cases and nearly 1,000 deaths. The outbreak unfolded within a complex humanitarian setting characterized by armed conflict, large-scale displacement, and limited health infrastructure. Despite these obstacles, a targeted vaccination campaign in October 2024, distributing 265,000 doses, achieved remarkable adherence among key populations including sex workers, transgender persons, MSM, and people who inject drugs attaining an estimated coverage of 85%[7]. The remarkably high Mpox vaccine uptake in Goma despite pervasive vaccine skepticism, stigma, and insecurity contrasts sharply with trends observed elsewhere in Africa. This prompts an important question: which factors facilitated such adherence among vulnerable key populations in this context? Whereas prior studies have largely emphasized vaccine hesitancy or epidemiological determinants, there is a paucity of research exploring the conditions that promote vaccine acceptance in highly fragile settings [8-12].
The objective of this study was to explore the factors driving Mpox vaccine uptake among key populations in Goma. It particularly focuses on organizational, sociocultural, and cultural determinants of vaccine adherence, while also assessing the effectiveness of awareness campaigns implemented during the vaccination rollout.
2.1 Study setting
The research was carried out in Goma, encompassing the Goma, Karisimbi, and Nyiragongo health zones in North Kivu Province, Democratic Republic of Congo.
2.2 Study design and period:
A descriptive cross-sectional study employing both quantitative and qualitative methods was conducted to investigate the factors influencing Mpox vaccination among key populations. The research spanned five months, from September 2024 to January 2025.
2.3 Target Population:
Participants included sex workers, transgender individuals, men who have sex with men, and people who inject drugs living in Goma.
2.4 Study population:
The study included 420 participants drawn from key populations living in the Goma, Karisimbi, and urban Nyiragongo health zones. The sample comprised 270 sex workers, 90 men who have sex with men, 45 transgender persons, and 15 people who inject drugs.
2.5 Data collection methods:
Tools: Quantitative data were collected using a structured questionnaire aligned with the study objectives, while qualitative data were gathered through a semi-structured interview guide.
Sources: Participants provided information via surveys and individual interviews.
Procedure: Trained peer educators administered the questionnaires at sites known to be commonly accessed by key populations.
2.6 Data analysis:
Data were entered into Microsoft Excel and analyzed using STATA and SPSS version 20. Descriptive statistics, including frequencies and percentages, were used to summarize the characteristics of the study sample. Bivariate associations between independent variables and vaccination status were assessed using the Chi-square test, with significance defined at p ≤ 0.05. Subsequently, multivariable binary logistic regression was applied to calculate odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) and p-values, allowing for quantification of the strength and direction of significant associations identified in the bivariate analysis.
Figure 1: Mpox Vaccination Status among Key Populations
Overall, 81% of key populations received the Mpox vaccine, leaving 19% no vaccinated (see figure 1).
Figure 1: Vaccination Coverage Against Mpox in Key Populations.
The Descriptive Characteristics of Participants are presented in Table 1.
| Variables | Frequency(n=420) | Pourcentage | |
| Age (A Year) | |||
| <18> | 12 | 2.9 | |
| 19-24 | 125 | 29.8 | |
| 25-34 | 165 | 39.3 | |
| 35-44 | 86 | 20.5 | |
| >45 | 32 | 7.6 | |
| Gender | |||
| Male | 113 | 26.9 | |
| Female | 307 | 73.1 | |
| Education level | |||
| No education | 94 | 22.4 | |
| Primary | 108 | 25.7 | |
| Secondary | 188 | 44.8 | |
| University | 30 | 7.1 |
The majority of participants were young adults aged 18-34 years (69.1%) and predominantly female (73.1%). Most had completed secondary education (44.8%), and a large proportion were single (88.8%). Among key populations, sex workers constituted the largest group (62.9%), followed by men who have sex with men (20.5%), transgender individuals (11.6%), and people who inject drugs (5.0%).
The Organizational Determinants is shown in table 2.
Organizational barriers significantly shaped Mpox vaccine uptake. Among unvaccinated participants, fear of side effects (43.8%) and insufficient information (28.7%) were the primary obstacles, with personal refusal (15%) and access challenges (7.5%) also reported. Nearly all vaccinated individuals (99.7%) received their doses at friendly centers, emphasizing the pivotal role of these facilities in facilitating access. Over 80% of vaccinated participants traveled less than 10 km to vaccination sites, reflecting favorable geographic proximity. Nonetheless, perceived costs such as transportation (44.7%) or lost income opportunities—remained important considerations. Prior experiences with vaccination services further influenced adherence: 46.8% of vaccinated participants rated their experiences as “very satisfactory,” while only 10% of the unvaccinated did so. In contrast, more than 77% of the unvaccinated deemed their prior experiences “poor” or “unsatisfactory.
Sociocultural factors associated with Mpox vaccine uptake among key populations is detailed in table 3.
Bivariate analyses identified several sociocultural factors significantly associated with Mpox vaccination adherence (p ≤ 0.05). Marital status was linked to vaccination (χ² = 18.1, p = 0.037), with single individuals more frequently vaccinated and divorced participants more often unvaccinated. Sociocultural category strongly influenced uptake (χ² = 429.2, p less than 0.001), with MSM and TG showing higher vaccination rates, while PWID were predominantly unvaccinated. Positive social acceptability (χ² = 58.1, p = 0.012) and the supportive role of peer educators (χ² = 333.99, p less than 0.001) emerged as major facilitators, with nearly all vaccinated participants reporting favorable peer influence and social acceptance. Conversely, perceived social stigma did not show a significant association with vaccination status (χ² = 1.004, p > 0.05).
Cultural factors influencing Mpox vaccine uptake is presented in table 4.
Bivariate analyses revealed significant associations between cultural factors and Mpox vaccination among key populations (p less than 0.05). Participants’ beliefs about the origin of the disease (χ² = 23.43, p less than 0.001) differentiated vaccinated from unvaccinated individuals, with non-vaccinated participants more likely to view Mpox as divine punishment. Exposure to negative vaccine rumors was linked to non-vaccination (χ² = 14.09, p = 0.001), while recognition of the vaccine’s importance (χ² = 12.49, p less than 0.001) and social influence on vaccination decisions (χ² = 429.2, p less than 0.001) were strong facilitators. Moreover, positive attitudes toward vaccination itself were highly correlated with uptake (χ² = 359.16, p less than 0.001).
The Impact of Awareness Campaigns associated with Mpox vaccine uptake among key populations is summarized in table 5.
Bivariate analyses indicated a strong association between attending awareness sessions and Mpox vaccine adherence (χ² = 269.28, p less than 0.001), with most vaccinated participants having participated in these sessions. The perceived influence of information on vaccination decisions (χ² = 182.53, p < 0 xss=removed xss=removed xss=removed xss=removed xss=removed xss=removed xss=removed>
Results of multivariate analysis of Sociocultural Factors Influencing Mpox Vaccination uptake are shown in table 6.
| Mpox Vaccine Uptake in the Initial Phase | [95% Conf. | Interval] | Odds Ratio | P value |
| Marital status | ||||
| Single | Ref. | 1.0 | Ref. | |
| Married | 0.2988696 | 1.046431 | 0.5692374 | 0.069 |
| Divorced | 0.507339 | 3.820377 | 1.76336 | 0.063 |
| Categories | ||||
| PS | Ref. | 1.0 | Ref. | |
| MSM | 0.1431681 | 4.641827 | 0.045976 | 0.965 |
| TG | 0.3369899 | 3.47807 | 0.082624 | 0.894 |
| UDI | 0.041235 | 2.1777 | 0.2996621 | 0.234 |
| Social Acceptability of Vaccination | ||||
| No | Ref. | 1.0 | Ref. | |
| Yes | 5.2380183 | 59.847339 | 9.70413 | 0.016 |
| Influence of Peer Educators on Vaccination Decisions | ||||
| No | Ref. | 1.0 | Ref. | |
| Yes | 14.3142244 | 62.91058 | 4.110017 | 0.003 |
The results revealed that positive social acceptability of vaccination (OR = 19.85; 95% CI: 5.24-9.70; p = 0.016) and peer educator influence (OR = 42.91; 95% CI: 14.31-4.11; p = 0.003) were strongly associated with higher Mpox vaccine uptake. Being divorced showed a marginally significant association with vaccination (OR = 3.82; 95%
CI: 0.51-1.76; p = 0.063), whereas other sociocultural categories, including MSM, TG, and PWID, did not demonstrate a significant relationship with adherence (p > 0.2).
Multivariate analysis of Cultural Factors Influencing Mpox Vaccination uptake is presented in table 7.
| Mpox Vaccine Uptake in the Initial Phase | [95% Conf. | Interval] | Odds Ratio | P value |
| Perception of the Origin of Mpox | ||||
| A divine punishment linked to sexual practices | Ref. | 1.0 | Ref. | |
| An ancestral or family curse | 0.2774188 | 5.088268 | 0.188154 | 0.121 |
| Community manipulation | 27.0018124 | 84.8877657 | 10.0401127 | 0.001 |
| A natural disease | 13.0799357 | 50.339947 | 5.5889962 | 0.022 |
| A religious or spiritual test of faith | 0.1480463 | 8.904068 | 1.148135 | 0.895 |
| Rumors from the community about vaccination | ||||
| The vaccine is effective and safe | Ref. | 1.0 | Ref. | |
| The vaccine is a plot against Africa | 0.0733303 | 18.92078 | 1.177908 | 0.908 |
| The vaccine causes sterility or impotence | 0.1069239 | 3.102906 | 0.575999 | 0.521 |
| No rumor heard | 0.0799357 | 4.339947 | 0.5889962 | 0.603 |
| Perception of the importance of vaccination | ||||
| No | Ref. | 1.0 | Ref. | |
| Yes | 8.4641765 | 120.9846 | 7.493877 | 0.006 |
| Influence of social status on vaccination decision | ||||
| No | ||||
| Yes | 8.2723372 | 68.51257 | 4.319551 | 0.019 |
| Positive perception of vaccination | ||||
| No | Ref. | 1.0 | Ref | |
| Yes | 14.44748 | 24046.67 | 17.4181 | 0.001 |
| Influenced by someone in the vaccination decision | ||||
| No | Ref | 1.0 | Ref. | |
| Yes | 0.0406717 | 5.11038 | 0.010585 | 0.995 |
Multivariate analysis indicated that cultural beliefs about the origin of Mpox specifically viewing it as a community manipulation (OR = 84.9, p = 0.001) or a natural disease (OR = 50.3, p = 0.022) were strongly associated with increased vaccine uptake. Furthermore, acknowledgment of the vaccine’s importance (OR = 121, p = 0.006), the effect of social status (OR = 68.5, p = 0.019), and a favorable perception of the vaccine itself (OR = 24,047, p = 0.001) were identified as major factors facilitating adherence. Conversely, circulating vaccine rumors and direct external influence on vaccination decisions were not significantly linked to uptake.
Multivariate analysis of Awareness Campaign-Related Factors Influencing Mpox Vaccination uptake is summarized in table 8.
| Mpox Vaccine Uptake in the Initial Phase | [95% Conf. | Interval] | Odds Ratio | P value |
| Impact of Information on Vaccination Decision | ||||
| No | Ref. | 1.0 | Ref | |
| Yes | 1.2342449 | 8.467485 | 7.408355 | 0.023 |
| Perception of the Adequacy of Awareness Campaigns | ||||
| No | Ref. | 1.0 | Ref. | |
| Yes | 0.1480463 | 8.904068 | 1.148135 | 0.895 |
| Perception of the Role of Peer Educators in Promoting Vaccination | ||||
| No | Ref. | 1.0 | Ref. | |
| Yes | 3.1069239 | 43.102906 | 4.575999 | 0.041 |
| Participation in an Awareness Session | ||||
| No | Ref. | 1.0 | Ref. | |
| Yes | 0.0537964 | 3.154543 | 0.4119502 | 0.393 |
Multivariable logistic regression revealed that participants’ perception of the influence of information on their vaccination decision (OR = 8.47, p = 0.023) and acknowledgment of peer educators’ role in promoting vaccination (OR = 43.10, p = 0.041) were strongly associated with increased Mpox vaccine adherence. However, neither the perceived adequacy of awareness campaigns nor actual attendance at an awareness session showed a statistically significant association in this model.
4.1 Organizational Determinants Influencing Mpox Vaccine Uptake
The analysis of organizational barriers to Mpox vaccination highlighted four primary obstacles: concerns about side effects (43.8%), insufficient information (28.7%), personal refusal (15%), and challenges related to access (7.5%). The high prevalence of fear of adverse effects reflects a global pattern, exemplified by U.S. data in which 62% of COVID-19 vaccine-hesitant individuals reported similar concerns, often exacerbated by misinformation and lack of trust in institutions[15,16]. However, unlike in some African contexts where social stigma represents a major barrier, it was reported infrequently in our sample [12]. Logistics played a pivotal role in vaccine uptake, as nearly all vaccinated participants (99.7%) utilized welcoming vaccination centers, and over 80% were within 10 km of a site, indicating a successful urban decentralization approach. This contrasts with findings from Nigeria, where half of the population had to travel more than 20 km to reach vaccination services[12]. The results underscore the effectiveness of welcoming vaccination centers similar to those in France and Australia as non-stigmatizing environments that enhance vaccine acceptability[12]. Economic barriers, cited by 44.7% of unvaccinated individuals, align with findings reported by Espinoza in Peru in 2023[13] In contrast, countries with robust social safety systems, like Canada, implement free vaccination or compensation programs that contribute to improved vaccine coverage [3]. The quality of the vaccination experience was a key determinant: 46.8% of vaccinated individuals described it as “very satisfactory,” compared with only 10% among the unvaccinated, highlighting the strong influence of positive experiences on vaccine adherence[13], Conversely, Constantino (2022) reported that negative vaccination experiences undermine confidence in vaccine programs [14]. The results emphasize the importance of prioritizing service quality and user experience as critical indicators, complemented by targeted communication strategies and financial support measures.
4.2 Sociocultural Determinants Influencing Mpox Vaccine Uptake
The study demonstrates that collective sociocultural factors play a critical role in Mpox vaccination adherence. Perceived social acceptability increased the odds of vaccination nearly tenfold (OR = 9.7), emphasizing the influence of community norms. Peer educators also had a substantial effect (OR = 4.1), reinforcing their importance in vaccine promotion, especially in settings with institutional distrust like Goma. Notably, membership in key populations was not significantly associated with uptake (p > 0.2), suggesting the success of inclusive local strategies. These findings highlight the need to further empower peer educators through integration into health services and engagement of community leaders to enhance social acceptance. Limitations include the absence of data on religious beliefs, potential underrepresentation of certain high-risk groups, and the risk of social desirability bias.
4.3 Cultural Determinants Influencing Mpox Vaccine Uptake
Cultural factors influencing Mpox vaccination are heterogeneous, shaped by social norms, local beliefs, and health system organization. The “7C” model provides a framework to examine how trust, social conformity, and institutional context interact differently across cultural settings[15]. Interestingly, certain irrational beliefs such as viewing Mpox as a community manipulation (OR = 10) or a natural disease (OR = 5.5) were paradoxically linked to increased vaccination likelihood, suggesting that perceived threats can act as catalysts for adherence. The significant influence of peer educators (OR = 7.4) emphasizes their critical role in settings with low institutional legitimacy. Cross-cultural comparisons reveal variability: in Bangladesh, vaccine uptake is associated with education and marital status, with divorced individuals three times more likely to be vaccinated, possibly reflecting higher personal autonomy in health decisions [16]. Cultural drivers of vaccine adherence vary substantially in Western contexts. Social conformity has a limited impact (OR = 1.4 in Sweden), while personal trust in institutions is pivotal. In France, leveraging non-stigmatizing community centers achieved a 75% vaccination rate among MSM, compared with only 22–34.8% among healthcare workers, revealing notable distrust even within medical professionals[16]. The results carry significant operational relevance. In collectivist settings like the DRC, engaging traditional authority figures, including religious leaders and community chiefs, is a crucial strategy. Lessons from Sierra Leone, where imams were actively involved during the Ebola outbreak, demonstrate the effectiveness of this approach in improving vaccination adherence[15]. Key research priorities include validating culturally adapted psychometric instruments (such as the 7C model in the DRC), conducting qualitative analyses to understand how conspiracy beliefs may promote vaccine adherence, and experimentally testing hybrid approaches that integrate digital influencers with peer educators.
4.4 Influence of Awareness Campaigns on Mpox Vaccination Adherence
Perceived informational impact is a critical driver of vaccination adherence, as participants who believed the messaging influenced their decision were significantly more likely to be vaccinated (OR = 7.4; p = 0.023). This underscores that the effectiveness of communication relies more on perceived relevance and credibility than on simple exposure[17]. A positive perception of peer educators’ role emerged as the strongest predictor of vaccination adherence (OR = 43.10; p = 0.041), underscoring their strategic importance in settings of institutional distrust, such as eastern DRC. Conversely, the perceived adequacy of awareness campaigns showed no significant association with vaccine uptake (OR ≈ 1; p > 0.05), indicating that information density alone does not guarantee effectiveness unless messaging is tailored to the specific needs of target populations a trend consistently observed in information-saturated environments[17]. International evidence offers further perspective on effective vaccination strategies. In the DRC, integrating community campaigns with engagement of traditional and religious leaders, and leveraging local radio and vernacular-language materials, markedly decreased refusal rates[2]. In both France and Canada, implementing decentralized and inclusive strategies has resulted in high vaccination coverage, reaching 75-81% among key populations [15]. Nevertheless, assessments frequently rely on narrow quantitative metrics, overlooking the substantial yet less visible influence of informal peer educators. These findings inform practical recommendations: incorporate peer educators, implement hybrid digital and face-to-face interventions, and prioritize measuring genuine engagement over simple information dissemination. In contexts of crisis or institutional fragmentation, like Goma, campaign effectiveness relies more on embedding initiatives within community structures than on the quantity of information disseminated.
This study has notable limitations, including its urban-focused sample which limits extrapolation to rural settings, underrepresentation of specific key populations, omission of critical variables (socioeconomic status, religion, social media exposure), use of non-probabilistic sampling prone to selection bias, potential social desirability bias from peer interviewers, and a cross-sectional design that precludes causal conclusions.
The findings indicate that Mpox vaccination adherence is strongly driven by sociocultural and community dynamics, with peer educators and social acceptability being pivotal in contexts of institutional distrust. Strengthening the formal role of peer educators through ongoing training and official recognition is recommended. Moreover, tailoring communication materials to local languages and cultural frameworks, in collaboration with religious and traditional leaders, is critical to enhance campaign effectiveness. Despite study limitations, these results offer actionable insights for improving vaccine coverage, while further qualitative and psychometric research is warranted to better understand cultural drivers and refine hybrid mobilization strategies.
Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate
Ethical approval for this study was obtained from the Ethics Committee of the University of Goma (UNIGOM) under approval number UNIGOM/CEM/007/2024. All participants were fully informed about the study objectives, procedures, potential risks, and benefits. Verbal informed consent was obtained from all participants following ethics committee authorization. The research was conducted in accordance with the ethical principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki (2013 revision). Participation was voluntary, anonymous, and confidential, and participants were free to withdraw at any time without consequence.
Consent for Publication
Not applicable.
Availability of Data and Materials
The datasets generated and analysed during this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. To protect participant confidentiality, only de-identified data will be shared.
Competing Interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Funding
This study did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors. The research was conducted as part of the ongoing Mpox surveillance and response activities coordinated by the Mpox Incident Management System, North Kivu, Democratic Republic of Congo.
All authors contributed to data interpretation, revised the manuscript critically, and approved the final version for submission.
Clinical trial registration
Not applicable.
Clinical Trial registration
This study was not a clinical trial. Clinical trial number: not applicable
Acknowledgements
The authors extend sincere appreciation to all key population and peer educators who supported the study. The team also acknowledges the Mpox Incident Management System, North Kivu, for technical guidance and logistical support.
Dear Editorial Team, Clinical Medical Reviews and Reports. My experience with the journal was highly positive. The peer-review process was rigorous, constructive, and completed in a timely manner. The reviewers provided valuable comments that helped improve the quality and clarity of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout all stages of the publication process. Communication was clear and efficient, and any questions were addressed promptly. Overall, I found the journal to maintain high scientific standards and an excellent publication workflow. I would be pleased to consider submitting future work to this journal. Best wishes from, Elena Popa.
It was my pleasure to submit my testimonial concerning the Reviewer Board of our Scientific Journal “Brain and Neurological Disorders”. The Reviewers focused on some modifications and their contribution was helpful. The ladies of our Editorial Office were also supported my efforts. It was my honor to have such a co-operation and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Thank you for the speedy and efficient peer review process. I appreciate the fact that your peer reviewers do not take months to respond like with some other journals. I would also like to thank the editorial office for responding quickly to my questions. It is an excellent journal. I plan to submit more manuscripts in the future. Best wishes from, Robert W. McGee
Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Working with you and your team on our recent publication in JCRR has been a truly wonderful and enjoyable experience. The responses were prompt, and the reviewers were patient, constructive, and highly professional. One reviewer in particular gave me the feeling that a professor was carefully reading and commenting on my coursework, which was deeply touching. The entire process was straightforward and hassle‑free, with no tedious online forms to complete. I highly recommend this journal. Best wishes from, DR Aibing Rao, Head of R&D
I Appreciate the Opportunity to Share my Experience with the Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. The peer review process was timely and constructive, and the feedback provided helped improve the quality of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout the process, ensuring smooth communication and efficient handling of the submission. Overall, it was a positive experience collaborating with your team.
Dear Mercy Grace, Editorial Coordinator of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, We would like to express our gratitude for your help at all stages of publishing and editing the article. The editors of the magazine answer all the necessary questions and help at every stage. We will definitely continue to cooperate and publish other works in the Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences! Best wishes from, Alla Konstantinovna Politova,
Dear Maria Emerson, Editorial Coordinator of International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews, What distinguishes International Journal of Clinical Case Report and Review is not only the scientific rigor of its publications, but the intellectual climate in which research is evaluated. The submission process is refreshingly free of unnecessary formal barriers and bureaucratic rituals that often complicate academic publishing without adding real value. The peer-review system is demanding yet constructive, guided by genuine scientific dialogue rather than hierarchical or authoritarian attitudes. Reviewers act as collaborators in improving the manuscript, not as gatekeepers imposing arbitrary standards. This journal offers a rare balance: high methodological standards combined with a respectful, transparent, and supportive editorial approach. In an era where publishing can feel more burdensome than research itself, this platform restores the original purpose of peer review — to refine ideas, not to obstruct them Prof. Perlat Kapisyzi, FCCP PULMONOLOGIST AND THORACIC IMAGING.
Dear Reader: We have published several articles in the Auctores Publishing, LLC, journal, Clinical Medical Reviews and Reports in recent years (CMRR). This is an ‘open access’ journal and the following are our observations. From the initial invitation to submit an article, to the final edits of galley proofs, we have found CMRR personnel to be professional, responsive, rapid and thorough. This entire process begins with Catherine Mitchell, Editorial Coordinator. She is simply outstanding, and, I believe, unparalleled in her capacity. I cannot imagine a more responsive and dedicated Editorial Coordinator. As I read the dates and timing of her correspondence with us, it seems that she never sleeps. I hope Auctores Publishing, LLC, appreciates her efforts as much as these authors do. Thank you to Auctores Publishing, LLC, to the Editorial Staff/Board, and to Catherine Mitchell from a grateful author(s).
Dear Maria Emerson, Editorial Coordinator of - Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. ''I am pleased to provide this testimonial following the publication of our recent case report in this journal. The peer review process was rigorous, constructive, thorough, and conducted in a timely manner. The reviewers’ comments were thoughtful, detailed, and highly constructive, contributing substantially to the refinement, clarity, and scientific robustness of our manuscript. The process was conducted with professionalism and academic integrity throughout. The support provided by the editorial office was exemplary. Communication was consistently prompt, clear, and courteous at all stages of the submission and publication process. The editorial team demonstrated a high level of organization and responsiveness, ensuring that all queries were addressed efficiently and that the process remained transparent and well-coordinated. The overall quality of the journal is reflected in its strong editorial standards, commitment to scientific excellence, and dedication to publishing clinically meaningful research. It has been a privilege to publish our work in this journal, and we would welcome the opportunity to contribute further in the future.'' Best wishes from, Dr. Efstratios Trogkanis, Cardiologist.
Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of the journal IJCCR, I had a very positive experience with Auctores - Journal throughout the publication process. The Editorial Team was highly responsive, professional, and supportive at every stage. I would like to extend my sincere thanks to the Editor: Grace Pierce, for her guidance and assistance. The peer-review process was smooth and constructive, helping improve the quality of my work. I would gladly recommend Auctores Journal to fellow researchers and authors. Dr. SABITA SINHA, Medical Oncologist, MD (Electro Homeopathy).
Dear Mayra Duenas, Editorial Coordinator of the journal IJCCR, I write here a little on my experience as an author submitting to the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews (IJCCR). This was my first submission to IJCCR and my manuscript was inherently an outsider’s effort. It attempted to broadly identify and then make some sense of life’s under-appreciated mysteries. I initially had responded to a request for possible submissions. I then contacted IJCCR with a tentative topic for a manuscript. They quickly got back with an approval for the submission, but with a particular requirement that it be medically relevant. I then put together a manuscript and submitted it. After the usual back-and-forth over forms and formality, the manuscript was sent off for reviews. Within 2 weeks I got back 4 reviews which were both helpful and also surprising. Surprising in that the topic was somewhat foreign to medical literature. My subsequent updates in response to the reviewer comments went smoothly and in short order I had a series of proofs to evaluate. All in all, the whole publication process seemed outstanding. It was both helpful in terms of the paper’s content and also in terms of its efficient and friendly communications. Thank you all very much. Sincerely, Ted Christopher, Rochester, NY.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is a high quality journal that has a clear and concise submission process. The peer review process was comprehensive and constructive. Support from the editorial office was excellent, since the administrative staff were responsive. The journal provides a fast and timely publication timeline.
Dear Cecilia Lilly, Editorial Coordinator, Endocrinology and Disorders, Thank you so much for your quick response regarding reviewing and all process till publishing our manuscript entitled: Prevalence of Pre-Diabetes and its Associated Risk Factors Among Nile College Students, Sudan. Best regards, Dr Mamoun Magzoub.
Dear Editorial Team, Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions. I am really grateful for the peers review; their feedback gave me the opportunity to reflect on the message and impact of my work and to ameliorate the article. The editors did a great job in addition by encouraging me to continue with the process of publishing.
Dear Mayra Duenas, Editorial Coordinator of ‘International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews Herewith I confirm an optimal peer review process and a great support of the editorial office of the present journal
Dear Maria Emerson, Editorial Coordinator of ‘International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews’, I appreciate the opportunity to publish my article with your journal. The editorial office provided clear communication during the submission and review process, and I found the overall experience professional and constructive. Best regards, Elena Salvatore.
Dear Editorial Team, Journal-Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, “Publishing my article with Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions has been a highly positive experience. The peer-review process was rigorous yet supportive, offering valuable feedback that strengthened my work. The editorial team demonstrated exceptional professionalism, prompt communication, and a genuine commitment to maintaining the highest scientific standards. I am very pleased with the publication quality and proud to be associated with such a reputable journal.” Warm regards, Dr. Mahmoud Kamal Moustafa Ahmed
Dear Editorial Team, Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions. It was truly a rewarding experience to work with the journal “Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions”. The peer review process was insightful and encouraging, helping us refine our work to a higher standard. The editorial office offered exceptional support with prompt and thoughtful communication. I highly value the journal’s role in promoting scientific advancement and am honored to be part of it. Best regards, Meng-Jou Lee, MD, Department of Anesthesiology, National Taiwan University Hospital.
Dear Maria Emerson, Editorial Coordinator, Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. Thank you for publishing our case report: "Clinical Case of Effective Fetal Stem Cells Treatment in a Patient with Autism Spectrum Disorder" within the "Journal of Clinical Research and Reports" being submitted by the team of EmCell doctors from Kyiv, Ukraine. We much appreciate a professional and transparent peer-review process from Auctores. All research Doctors are so grateful to your Editorial Office and Auctores Publishing support! I amiably wish our article publication maintained a top quality of your International Scientific Journal. My best wishes for a prosperity of the Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. Hope our scientific relationship and cooperation will remain long lasting. Thank you very much indeed. Kind regards, Dr. Andriy Sinelnyk Cell Therapy Center EmCell
I recommend without hesitation submitting relevant papers on medical decision making to the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I am very grateful to the editorial staff. Maria Emerson was a pleasure to communicate with. The time from submission to publication was an extremely short 3 weeks. The editorial staff submitted the paper to three reviewers. Two of the reviewers commented positively on the value of publishing the paper. The editorial staff quickly recognized the third reviewer’s comments as an unjust attempt to reject the paper. I revised the paper as recommended by the first two reviewers.
Dear Chrystine Mejia, Editorial Coordinator, Journal of Neurodegeneration and Neurorehabilitation. “The peer review process was efficient and constructive, and the editorial office provided excellent communication and support throughout. The journal ensures scientific rigor and high editorial standards, while also offering a smooth and timely publication process. We sincerely appreciate the work of the editorial team in facilitating the dissemination of innovative approaches such as the Bonori Method.” Best regards, Dr. Matteo Bonori.
Dear Maria Emerson, Editorial Coordinator, we have deeply appreciated the professionalism demonstrated by the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. The reviewers have extensive knowledge of our field and have been very efficient and fast in supporting the process. I am really looking forward to further collaboration. Thanks. Best regards, Dr. Claudio Ligresti
Dear Ms. Mayra Duenas, Editorial Coordinator, International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. “The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews represented the “ideal house” to share with the research community a first experience with the use of the Simeox device for speech rehabilitation. High scientific reputation and attractive website communication were first determinants for the selection of this Journal, and the following submission process exceeded expectations: fast but highly professional peer review, great support by the editorial office, elegant graphic layout. Exactly what a dynamic research team - also composed by allied professionals - needs!" From, Chiara Beccaluva, PT - Italy.
Dear Clarissa Eric, Editorial Coordinator, Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Studies, Auctores Publishing LLC, USA Office: +1-(302)-520-2644. I would like to express my sincere appreciation for the efficient and professional handling of my case report by the ‘Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Studies’. The peer review process was not only fast but also highly constructive—the reviewers’ comments were clear, relevant, and greatly helped me improve the quality and clarity of my manuscript. I also received excellent support from the editorial office throughout the process. Communication was smooth and timely, and I felt well guided at every stage, from submission to publication. The overall quality and rigor of the journal are truly commendable. I am pleased to have published my work with Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Studies, and I look forward to future opportunities for collaboration. Sincerely, Aline Tollet, UCLouvain.
Dear Chrystine Mejia, Editorial Coordinator, Journal of Neurodegeneration and Neurorehabilitation, Auctores Publishing LLC, We would like to thank the editorial team for the smooth and high-quality communication leading up to the publication of our article in the Journal of Neurodegeneration and Neurorehabilitation. The reviewers have extensive knowledge in the field, and their relevant questions helped to add value to our publication. Kind regards, Dr. Ravi Shrivastava.
Dear Clarissa Eric, Editorial Coordinator, Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Studies, I would like to express my deep admiration for the exceptional professionalism demonstrated by your journal. I am thoroughly impressed by the speed of the editorial process, the substantive and insightful reviews, and the meticulous preparation of the manuscript for publication. Additionally, I greatly appreciate the courteous and immediate responses from your editorial office to all my inquiries. Best Regards, Dariusz Ziora
Dear Ashley Rosa, Editorial Coordinator, International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews, Auctores Publishing LLC. Thank you for publishing our article, Exploring Clozapine's Efficacy in Managing Aggression: A Multiple Single-Case Study in Forensic Psychiatry in the international journal of clinical case reports and reviews. We found the peer review process very professional and efficient. The comments were constructive, and the whole process was efficient. On behalf of the co-authors, I would like to thank you for publishing this article. With regards, Dr. Jelle R. Lettinga.
Dear Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator, Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, Auctores Publishing LLC. The peer review process of the journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions was excellent and fast, as was the support of the editorial office and the quality of the journal. Kind regards Walter F. Riesen Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. Walter F. Riesen.
Dear Erin Aust, Editorial Coordinator, Journal of General Medicine and Clinical Practice. We are pleased to share our experience with the “Journal of General Medicine and Clinical Practice”, following the successful publication of our article. The peer review process was thorough and constructive, helping to improve the clarity and quality of the manuscript. We are especially thankful to Ms. Erin Aust, the Editorial Coordinator, for her prompt communication and continuous support throughout the process. Her professionalism ensured a smooth and efficient publication experience. The journal upholds high editorial standards, and we highly recommend it to fellow researchers seeking a credible platform for their work. Best wishes By, Dr. Rakhi Mishra.
Dr Hala Al Shaikh This is to acknowledge that the peer review process for the article ’ A Novel Gnrh1 Gene Mutation in Four Omani Male Siblings, Presentation and Management ’ sent to the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was quick and smooth. The editorial office was prompt with easy communication.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Editorial Coordinator, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The entire process including article submission, review, revision, and publication was extremely easy. The journal editor was prompt and helpful, and the reviewers contributed to the quality of the paper. Thank you so much! Eric Nussbaum, MD
Dear Ashley Rosa, Editorial Coordinator, International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. Many thanks for publishing this manuscript after I lost confidence the editors were most helpful, more than other journals Best wishes from, Susan Anne Smith, PhD. Australian Breastfeeding Association.
Dear Maria Emerson, Editorial Coordinator, International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews, Auctores Publishing LLC. I am delighted to have published our manuscript, "Acute Colonic Pseudo-Obstruction (ACPO): A rare but serious complication following caesarean section." I want to thank the editorial team, especially Maria Emerson, for their prompt review of the manuscript, quick responses to queries, and overall support. Yours sincerely Dr. Victor Olagundoye.
Dear Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator, Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, Auctores Publishing LLC. I appreciate the journal (JCCI) editorial office support, the entire team leads were always ready to help, not only on technical front but also on thorough process. Also, I should thank dear reviewers’ attention to detail and creative approach to teach me and bring new insights by their comments. Surely, more discussions and introduction of other hemodynamic devices would provide better prevention and management of shock states. Your efforts and dedication in presenting educational materials in this journal are commendable. Best wishes from, Farahnaz Fallahian.
Dear Ashley Rosa, Editorial Coordinator of the journal - Psychology and Mental Health Care. " The process of obtaining publication of my article in the Psychology and Mental Health Journal was positive in all areas. The peer review process resulted in a number of valuable comments, the editorial process was collaborative and timely, and the quality of this journal has been quickly noticed, resulting in alternative journals contacting me to publish with them." Warm regards, Susan Anne Smith, PhD. Australian Breastfeeding Association.
Dear Jessica, and the super professional team of the ‘Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions’ I am sincerely grateful to the coordinated work of the journal team for the no problem with the submission of my manuscript: “Cardiometabolic Disorders in A Pregnant Woman with Severe Preeclampsia on the Background of Morbid Obesity (Case Report).” The review process by 5 experts was fast, and the comments were professional, which made it more specific and academic, and the process of publication and presentation of the article was excellent. I recommend that my colleagues publish articles in this journal, and I am interested in further scientific cooperation. Sincerely and best wishes, Dr. Oleg Golyanovskiy.
To Dear Erin Aust – Editorial Coordinator of Journal of General Medicine and Clinical Practice! I declare that I am absolutely satisfied with your work carried out with great competence in following the manuscript during the various stages from its receipt, during the revision process to the final acceptance for publication. Thank Prof. Elvira Farina
My article, titled 'No Way Out of the Smartphone Epidemic Without Considering the Insights of Brain Research,' has been republished in the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. The review process was seamless and professional, with the editors being both friendly and supportive. I am deeply grateful for their efforts.
We found the peer review process quick and positive in its input. The support from the editorial officer has been very agile, always with the intention of improving the article and taking into account our subsequent corrections.
Dear Jessica Magne, with gratitude for the joint work. Fast process of receiving and processing the submitted scientific materials in “Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions”. High level of competence of the editors with clear and correct recommendations and ideas for enriching the article.
I thank the ‘Journal of Clinical Research and Reports’ for accepting this article for publication. This is a rigorously peer reviewed journal which is on all major global scientific data bases. I note the review process was prompt, thorough and professionally critical. It gave us an insight into a number of important scientific/statistical issues. The review prompted us to review the relevant literature again and look at the limitations of the study. The peer reviewers were open, clear in the instructions and the editorial team was very prompt in their communication. This journal certainly publishes quality research articles. I would recommend the journal for any future publications.
"I am grateful for the opportunity of contributing to [International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews] and for the rigorous review process that enhances the quality of research published in your esteemed journal. I sincerely appreciate the time and effort of your team who have dedicatedly helped me in improvising changes and modifying my manuscript. The insightful comments and constructive feedback provided have been invaluable in refining and strengthening my work".
To Dear Erin Aust, I would like to express my heartfelt appreciation for the opportunity to have my work published in this esteemed journal. The entire publication process was smooth and well-organized, and I am extremely satisfied with the final result. The Editorial Team demonstrated the utmost professionalism, providing prompt and insightful feedback throughout the review process. Their clear communication and constructive suggestions were invaluable in enhancing my manuscript, and their meticulous attention to detail and dedication to quality are truly commendable. Additionally, the support from the Editorial Office was exceptional. From the initial submission to the final publication, I was guided through every step of the process with great care and professionalism. The team's responsiveness and assistance made the entire experience both easy and stress-free. I am also deeply impressed by the quality and reputation of the journal. It is an honor to have my research featured in such a respected publication, and I am confident that it will make a meaningful contribution to the field.
I would like to express my sincere gratitude for the support and efficiency provided by the editorial office throughout the publication process of my article, “Delayed Vulvar Metastases from Rectal Carcinoma: A Case Report.” I greatly appreciate the assistance and guidance I received from your team, which made the entire process smooth and efficient. The peer review process was thorough and constructive, contributing to the overall quality of the final article. I am very grateful for the high level of professionalism and commitment shown by the editorial staff, and I look forward to maintaining a long-term collaboration with the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
Dear Agrippa Hilda- Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, "The peer review process was very quick and of high quality, which can also be seen in the articles in the journal. The collaboration with the editorial office was very good."
I would like to offer my testimony in the support. I have received through the peer review process and support the editorial office where they are to support young authors like me, encourage them to publish their work in your esteemed journals, and globalize and share knowledge globally. I really appreciate your journal, peer review, and editorial office.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
