AUCTORES
Research Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2693-7247/055
1 M. Pharm., Ph. D, Associate Professor, Department of Pharmaceutics, Unity College of Pharmacy, Telangana, India.
2 B. Pharm, Unity College of Pharmacy, Telangana, India.
*Corresponding Author: G. Prasad M. Pharm., Ph. D, Associate Professor, Department of Pharmaceutics, Unity College of Pharmacy, Telangana, India.
Citation: G. Prasad, K. Devika, P. Varshith, B. Shravani, E. Pavithra and Ch. Swathi (2021) Design and Optimizations of Aceclofenac Bioadhesive Extended Release Microspheres Development; J. Pharmaceutics and Pharmacology Research 4(4) DOI: 10.31579/2693-7247/055
Copyright: © 2021, G. Prasad, This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permit unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 27 October 2021 | Accepted: 02 November 2021 | Published: 13 November 2021
Keywords: microspheres; zaltoprofen; aceclofenac
The oral route for drug delivery is the most popular, desirable, and most preferred method for administrating therapeutically agents for systemic effects because it is a natural, convenient, and cost effective to manufacturing process. Oral route is the most commonly used route for drug administration. Although different route of administration are used for the delivery of drugs, oral route remain the preferred mode. Even for sustained release systems the oral route of administration has been investigated the most because of flexibility in designing dosage forms.
Present controlled release drug delivery systems are for a maximum of 12 hours clinical effectiveness. Such systems are primarily used for the drugs with short elimination half life.
For many decades, medication of an acute disease or a chronic disease has been accomplished by delivering drugs to the patients via various pharmaceutical dosage forms like tablets, capsules, pills, creams, ointments, liquids, aerosols, injectable and suppositories as carriers [1]. To achieve and then to maintain the concentration of drug administered within the therapeutically effective range needed for medication, it is often necessary to take this type of drug delivery systems several times in a day. This results in a fluctuated drug level and consequently undesirable toxicity and poor efficiency. This factor as well as other factors such as repetitive dosing and unpredictable absorption leads to the concept of controlled drug delivery systems [2, 3]. The word new or novel in the relation to drug delivery system is a search for something out of necessity. An appropriately designed sustained or controlled release drug delivery system can be major advance toward solving the problem associated with the existing drug delivery system.
The objective of controlled release drug delivery includes two important aspects namely spatial placement and temporal delivery of drug. Spatial placement relates to targeting a drug to a specific organ or tissue, while temporal delivery refers to controlling the rate of drug delivery to the target tissue.
Oral controlled release dosage forms have been developed over the past three decades due to their considerable therapeutic advantages such as ease of administration, patient compliance and flexibility in formulation. However, this approach is be filled with several physiological difficulties such as inability to restrain and locate the controlled drug delivery system within the desired region of the gastrointestinal tract (GIT) due to variable motility and relatively brief gastric emptying time (GET) in humans which normally averages 2-3 h through the major absorption zone, i.e., stomach and upper part of the intestine can result in incomplete drug release from the drug delivery system leading to reduced efficacy of the administered dose.
The objective in designing a controlled release system is to deliver the drug at a rate necessary to achieve and maintain a constant drug blood level. This rate should be similar to that achieved by continuous intravenous infusion where a drug is provided to the patient at a rate just equal to its rate of elimination. This implies that the rate of delivery must be independent of the amount of drug remaining in the dosage form and constant over time, i.e., release from the dosage form should follow zero-order kinetics.
Preformulation Studies
Spectroscopic Studies
Preparation of 0.1N HCl (pH 1.2)
Take 8ml of HCl in a 1000ml volumetric flask and make up the volume with distilled water
Determination of λMax:
Stock solution (1000µg/ml) of Aceclofenac was prepared in methanol. This solution was appropriately diluted with 0.1N HCl(pH 1.2) and 6.8 pH phosphate buffer to obtain a concentration of 10µg/ ml. The resultant solution was scanned in the range of 200nm to 400nm on UV-Visible spectrophotometer. The drug exhibited a λmax at 252nm and 254nm.
Preparation of Standard Calibration Curve of Aceclofenac:
The Linear Regression Analysis:
The linear regression analysis was done on Absorance points. The standardcalibration curve obtained had a Correlation Coefficient of 0.998 with of slope of 0.028 and intercept of 0.004.
Compatibility Studies
A proper design and formulation of a dosage form requires considerations of the physical, chemical and biological characteristics of both drug and excipients used in fabrication of the product. Compatibility must be established between the active ingredient and other excipients to produce a stable, efficacious, attractive and safe product. If the excipient(s) are new and if no previous literature regarding the use of that particular excipient with an active ingredient is available, then compatibility studies are of paramount importance. Hence, before producing the actual formulation, compatibility of Aceclofenac with different polymers and other excipients was tested using the Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FT-IR) technique.
Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (Ft-Ir):
In order to check the integrity (Compatibility) of drug in the formulation,FT-IR spectra of the formulations along with the drug and other excipients were obtained and compared using Shimadzu FT-IR 8400 spectrophotometer. In the present study, Potassium bromide(KBr) pellet method was employed. The samples were thoroughly blended with dry powdered potassium bromide crystals. The mixture was compressed to form a disc. The disc was placed in the spectrophotometer and the spectrum was recorded.The FT-IR spectra of the formulations were compared with the FT-IR spectra of the pure drug and the polymers.
Ionotropic Gelation Method:
Batches of microcapsules were prepared by ionotropic gelation method which involved reaction between sodium alginate and polycationic ions like calcium to produce a hydrogel network of calcium alginate. Sodium alginate and the mucoadhesive polymer were dispersed in purified water (10 ml) to form a homogeneous polymer mixture. The API, Aceclofenac (100 mg) were added to the polymer premix and mixed thoroughly with a stirrer to form a viscous dispersion. The resulting dispersion was then added through a 22G needle into calcium chloride (4% w/v) solution. The addition was done with continuous stirring at 200rpm. The added droplets were retained in the calcium chloride solution for 30 minutes to complete the curing reaction and to produce rigid spherical microcapsules. The microcapsules were collected by decantation, and the product thus separated was washed repeatedly with purified water to remove excess calcium impurity deposited on the surface of microcapsules and then air-dried.
Characterization of Microcapsules:
Percentageyield
The percentage of production yield was calculated from the weight of dried microsphe-res recovered from each batch and the sum of the initial weight of starting materials. The percentage yield was calculated using the following formula:
Practical mass (Microcapsules)
% Yield=-----------------------------------------------x100
Theoretical mass (Polymer + Drug)
Drug entrapment efficiency:
Microcapsules equivalent to 100 mg of the drug Aceclofenac were taken for evaluation. The amount of drug entrapped was estimated by crushing the microcapsules. The powder was transferred to a 100 ml volumetric flask and dissolved in 10ml of methanol and the volume was made up using simulated gastric fluid pH 1.2. After 24 hours the solution was filtered through Whatmann filter paper and the absorbance was measured after suitable dilution spectrophotometrically at 252 nm. The amount of drug entrapped in the microcapsules was calculated by the following formula,
Experimental Drug Content
% Drug Entrapment Efficiency = - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - × 100
Theoretical Drug Content
Particle size analysis:
Samples of the microparticles were analyzed for particle size by optical microscope. The instrument was calibrated and found that 1unit of eyepiece micrometer was equal to 12.5μm. Nearly about 100 Microparticles sizes were calculated under 45x magnification. The average particle size was determined by using the Edmondson’s equation:
nd
Dmean=------
n
Where,
n – Number of microcapsules observed
D – Mean size range
Swelling study:
Swelling ratio of different dried microcapsules were determined gravimetrically in simulated gastric fluid pH 1.2 .The microcapsules were removed periodically from the solution, blotted to remove excess surface liquid and weighed on balance. Swelling ratio (% w/v) was determined from the following relationship:
(Wt – W0)
Swelling ratio = - - - - - - - - - - - × 100
(W0)
Where W0 & Wt are initial weight and Final weight of microcapsules respectively.
Evaluation of mucoadhesive property:
The mucoadhesive property of microcapsules was evaluated by an in vitro adhesion testing method known as wash-off method. Freshly excised pieces of goat stomach mucous were mounted on to glass slides with cotton thread. About 20 microcapsules were spread on to each prepared glass slide and immediately thereafter the slides were hung to USP II tablet disintegration test, when the test apparatus was operated, the sample is subjected to slow up and down movement in simulated gastric fluid pH 1.2 at 370C contained in a 1-litre vessel of the apparatus. At an interval of 1 hour up to 8 hours the machine is stopped and number of microcapsules still adhering to mucosal surface was counted.
Number of microcapsules adhered
% Mucoadhesion= ------------------------------------------ ×100
Number of microcapsules applied
In vitro drug release study:
The dissolution studies were performed in a fully calibrated eight station dissolution test apparatus (37 ± 0.50C, 50 rpm) using the USP type – I rotating basket method in simulated gastric fluid pH 1.2 (900ml). A quantity of accurately weighed microcapsules equivalent to 100mg Aceclofenac each formulation was employed in all dissolution studies. Aliquots of sample were withdrawn at predetermined intervals of time and analyzed for drug release by measuring the absorbance at 252nm. At the same time the volume withdrawn at each time intervals were replenished immediately with the same volume of fresh pre-warmed simulated gastric fluid pH 1.2 maintaining sink conditions throughout the experiment.
4.1. Preformulation Studies
4.1.1. Spectroscopic Studies
Determination of λmax
A solution of 10µg/ml of Aceclofenac was scanned in the range of 200 to 400nm. The drug exhibited a λmax at 252nm in simulated gastric fluid pH 1.2 and had good reproducibility. Correlation between the concentration and absorbance was found to be near to 0.998, with a slope of 0.028 and intercept of 0.004.
Calibration curve of Aceclofenac in simulated gastric fluid pH 1.2
Compatibility Studies
Drug polymer compatibility studies were carried out using Fourier Transform Infra-Red spectroscopy to establish any possible interaction of Drug with the polymers used in the formulation. The FT-IR spectra of the formulation were compared with the FTIR spectra of the pure drug.
Evaluation and Characterisation of Microspheres
Percentage Yield
It was observed that as the polymer ratio in the formulation increases, the product yield also increases. The low percentage yield in some formulations may be due to blocking of needle and wastage of the drug- polymer solution, adhesion of polymer solution to the magnetic bead and microspheres lost during the washing process. The percentage yield was found to be in the range of 80 to 88% for microspheres containing sodium alginate along with GUAR GUMas copolymer, 62.22 to 87% for microspheres containing sodium alginate along with LOCUST BEAN GUM as copolymer and 80 to 87.5% for microspheres containing sodium alginate along with XANTHAN GUMas copolymer. The percentage yield of the prepared microspheres is recorded in Table 6.2 and displayed in Figures 6.4 to 6.6.
Drug Entrapment Efficiency
Percentage Drug entrapment efficiency of Aceclofenac ranged from 82.66 to 88.66% for microspheres containing sodium alginate along with GUAR GUMas copolymer, 53.2 to 76.66% for microspheres containing sodium alginate along with Locust Bean Gum as copolymer and 66.73 to 79.2% for microspheres containing sodium alginate along with Xanthan Gum as copolymer. The drug entrapment efficiency of the prepared microspheres increased progressively with an increase in proportion of the respective polymers. Increase in the polymer concentration increases the viscosity of the dispersed phase. The particle size increases expone- ntially with viscosity. The higher viscosity of the polymer solution at the highest polymer concentration would be expected to decrease the diffusion of the drug into the external phase which would result in higher entrapment efficiency. The % drug entrapment efficiency of the prepared microspheres is displayed in Table 6.3, and displayed in Figures.
Particle Size Analysis
The mean size increased with increasing polymer concentration which is due to a significant increase in the viscosity, thus leading to an increased droplet size and finally a higher microspheres size. Microspheres containing sodium alginate along with Guar gum as copolymer had a size range of 512µm to 826µm, microspheres containing sodium alginate along with Locust Bean Gum as copolymer exhibited a size range between 517µm to 834µm and microspheres containing sodium alginate along with XANTHAN GUM as copolymer had a size range of 664µm to 903µm. The particle size data is presented in Tables 6.3 to 6.13 and displayed in Figures. The effect of drug to polymer ratio on particle size is displayed in Figure. The particle size as well as % drug entrapment efficiency of the microspheres increased with increase in the polymer concentration.
The swelling ratio is expressed as the percentage of water in the hydrogel at any instant during swelling. Swell ability is an important characteristic as it affects mucoadhesion as well as drug release profiles of polymeric drug delivery systems. Swell ability is an indicative parameter for rapid availability of drug solution for diffusion with greater flux. Swell ability data revealed that amount of polymer plays an important role in solvent transfer. It can be concluded from the data shown in Table 6.14 that with an increase in polymer concentration, the percentage of swelling also increases. Thus we can say that amount of polymer directly affects the swelling ratio. As the polymer to drug ratio increased, the percentage of swelling increased from 28 to 85% for microspheres containing sodium alginate along with GUAR Gum as copolymer, 24 to 64% for microspheres containing sodium alginate along with Locust Bean Gum as copolymer and 31 to 85 for microspheres containing sodium alginate along with Xanthan Gum as copolymer. The percentage of swelling of the prepared microspheres is displayed in Figures. The effect of drug to polymer ratio on percentage swelling is displayed in Figure.
In-Vitro Mucoadhesion Test
As the polymer to drug ratio increased, microspheres containing sodium alginate along with Guar Gum as copolymer exhibited % mucoadhesion ranging from 65 to 85%, microspheres containing sodium alginate along with Locust Bean Gum as copolymer exhibited % mucoadhesion ranging from 60 to 75% and microspheres containing sodium alginate along with Xanthan Gum as copolymer exhibited % mucoadhesion ranging from 60 to 80%.
The rank of order of mucoadhesion is Guar Gum> Xanthan Gum > Locust Bean Gum. The results of in-vitro mucoadhesion test are compiled in Table 6.15. Effect of polymer proportion on % mucoadhesion is depicted in Figures 6.14 to 6.16 and comparative depiction of % mucoadhesion is depicted in Figure 6.17.
In-Vitro Drug Release Studies
Dissolution studies of all the formulations were carried out using dissolution apparatus USP type I. The dissolution studies were conducted by using dissolution media, pH 1.2.for fisrt 2hr and then it was eplaced with 6.8ph phosphate buffer The results of the in-vitro dissolution studies of formulations T1 to T4, T5 to T8 and T9 to T12 are shown in table. The plots of Cumulative percentage drug release Vs Time. Figure shows the comparison of
In thepresent work, bioadhesive controlled release microspheresof Zaltoprofen using Sodium alginate along with HPMC K100M, HPMC K15M, XANTHAN GUMas copolymers wereformulated to deliver Zaltoprofen via oral route.
Details regarding the preparation and evaluation of the formulations have been discussed in the previous chapter. From the study following conclusions could be drawn:-
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.