Cystic Duct with Medial Spiral Insertion: A Case Report.

Case Report | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2690-4861/1019

Cystic Duct with Medial Spiral Insertion: A Case Report.

  • Ilija Golubović,
  • Aleksandar Vukadinovic,
  • Nebojša Ignjatović,
  • Miroslav Stojanović

Clinic for Digestive Surgery, University Clinical Center Nis, 18000 Nis, Serbia.

*Corresponding Author: Ilija Golubovic, Clinic for Digestive Surgery, University Clinical Center Nis, 18000 Nis, bul. dr Zorana Djindjica 48, 18000 Nis, Republic of Serbia.

Citation: Ilija Golubović, Aleksandar Vukadinovic, Nebojša Ignjatović, Miroslav Stojanović, (2026), Cystic Duct with Medial Spiral Insertion: A Case Report, International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews, 33(3); DOI:10.31579/2690-4861/1019

Copyright: © 2026, Ilija Golubovic. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Received: 16 December 2025 | Accepted: 05 January 2026 | Published: 16 January 2026

Keywords: cystic duct; anatomical variations; magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography

Abstract

Introduction: The biliary system is well known for its anatomical variability. Precise imaging and evaluation of the cystic duct are essential for surgeons and interventional radiologists.

Case report: We reported a rare case of cystic duct variation. Coronal oblique 3D magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) showed posterior spiral course of cystic duct with medial spiral insertion to the mid part of the extrahepatic bile duct. Intraoperative cholangiogram also confirms the finding.

Conclusions: Specific anatomical variations might require modifications to the surgical approach. Understanding cystic duct anatomy, variants, and disease processes aids in better diagnosis and interpretation of imaging results. MRCP is essential in giving important information on cystic duct anatomy and helps in preparing for and reducing the risk of complications during percutaneous, endoscopic, and surgical procedures.

Introduction

The biliary system is well known for its anatomical variability which are usually unrecognized [1]. With the growing frequency of laparoscopic cholecystectomy, hepatobiliary surgery, and transcholecystic biliary treatments, precise imaging and evaluation of the cystic duct are essential for surgeons and interventional radiologists [2]. The biliary tract consists of intrahepatic and extrahepatic components. The cystic duct is roughly 2-4 cm long and 1-5 mm in diameter, connecting the neck of the gallbladder to the common hepatic duct (CHD) and forming the common bile duct (CBD). The cystic duct's point of insertion into the CHD varies. It typically enters the CHD from the right lateral aspect. It joins the CHD approximately halfway between the hepatic confluence and the ampulla of Vater [3].

Case Report:

Herein, we reported a rare case of cystic duct with medial spiral insertion to the mid part of the extrahepatic bile duct. A 60-year-old male was admitted to our department due to abdominal pain for 7 days. The patient had a five-year history of recurrent visits to the hospital for right upper quadrant pain, nausea, and vomiting. Alcohol abuse was denied.  On admission he had normal vital signs. Physical examination demonstrated right upper quadrant tenderness without peritoneal signs with negative clinical Murphy’s sign. His blood work showed a white blood cell count of 12,500 /microliter, alanine aminotransferase of 218 U/L, aspartate aminotransferase of 159 U/L, alkaline phosphatase of 100 U/L, and total bilirubin of 1.4 mg/dL.

Ultrasound of the abdomen and pelvis revealed a dilated gallbladder with a thicker wall and with stones. The common bile duct (CBD) measured 15 mm in diameter, and stones were visible within it. Furthermore, the ultrasonography revealed the dilatation of the intrahepatic bile ducts. MRCP was conducted using 1.5 T MRI (Ingenia; Philips Healthcare, Best, the Netherlands) in the coronal, axial, and sagittal planes in accordance with standard protocol. T2-weighted sequences in multi planar reconstruction were used for the evaluation. Respiratory-triggered T2 SPAIR axial and T2 coronal sequences with slice thickness of 5 mm, comprising the liver and region, were acquired. The MRCP revealed a gallbladder with 3 small stones and a 16 mm-diameter common bile duct (CBD) with four stones visible inside. Furthermore, coronal oblique 3D MRCP showed posterior spiral course of cystic duct with medial insertion with CHD (Figure 1) 

Figure 1: Coronal oblique 3D MR cholangiopancreatography (A and B) and T2w-SPAIR sequence in axial plane (C) show posterior spiral course of cystic duct (red arrow) with medial insertion with CHD.

Due to the large number of adhesions from previous operations, the laparoscopic approach was abandoned, and open cholecystectomy with bile duct exploration was indicated for symptomatic choledocholithiasis and acute on chronic cholecystitis. 

Before the end of the operation, intraoperative cholangiogram was performed through the cystic duct, which showed in the affirmative spiral course of cystic duct with medial insertion with CHD, intact CBD, CHD, as well as right and left hepatic ducts without stones (Figure 2).

Figure 2: Intraoperative cholangiogram shows spiral course of cystic duct (white arrow) with medial insertion with CHD.

The patient's liver function tests returned to normal after surgery. On the third postoperative day after surgery, the drain was removed, and the patient was tolerating diet. At his 2- and 4-week post-operative assessments in the outpatient clinic, there were no concerns regarding a bile leak or any problems. The pathology report showed acute on chronic cholecystitis.

Discussion:

Ultrasonography (US), computed tomography (CT), endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography (PTC), T-tube cholangiography, intraoperative cholangiography (IOC), magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP), and cholescintigraphy can all be used to evaluate the biliary system [4].

 In one set of studies incorporating IOC, only 57% of cases yielded conclusive results, hence it is not frequently conducted [5]. To address these limitations, MRCP is considered as the primary imaging modality. MRCP has a reported accuracy of 94.8% when compared to CT and US for detecting the anatomical variants. MRCP is crucial for providing essential data regarding cystic duct anatomy in cross-section and three-dimensional reconstruction images of the biliary tree, and it considerably improves the safety of laparoscopic cholecystectomy [6]. Different cystic duct variations are described in the literature depending on their length, course, and site of insertion with CHD. Sarawagi et al. (2016) presented some variations which are clinically more important (Table 1). In their study medial insertion was seen in 16% of cases, of which 4% were low medial insertions [7].

Ilow insertion of cystic duct
IIparallel course of cystic duct with CHD
IIIanterior or posterior spiral course with medial insertion
IVabsent or short cystic duct (length < 5 mm)
Vaberrant drainage of cystic duct to right hepatic or left hepatic duct
VIaberrant or accessory intrahepatic ducts draining into cystic duct
VIIdouble cystic duct

Abbreviation: CHD: the common hepatic duct

                                                                                     Table 1: Different cystic duct variations which are clinically more important.

Conclusions:

In conclusion, we reported a rare case of cystic duct with medial spiral insertion to the mid part of the extrahepatic bile duct. Specific anatomical variations might require modifications to the surgical approach. Understanding cystic duct anatomy, variants, and disease processes aids in better diagnosis and interpretation of imaging results. In addition to greatly improving the safety of laparoscopic cholecystectomy, MRCP is essential in giving important information on cystic duct anatomy in cross-section and three-dimensional reconstruction images of the biliary tree. Prior understanding of the cystic duct's morphology and variations would be extremely helpful in preparing for and reducing the risk of problems during percutaneous, endoscopic, and surgical procedures. 

Acknowledgements

Funding: None. 

Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. 

Ethical StatementThe authors are accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

References

Dear Editorial Team, Clinical Medical Reviews and Reports. My experience with the journal was highly positive. The peer-review process was rigorous, constructive, and completed in a timely manner. The reviewers provided valuable comments that helped improve the quality and clarity of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout all stages of the publication process. Communication was clear and efficient, and any questions were addressed promptly. Overall, I found the journal to maintain high scientific standards and an excellent publication workflow. I would be pleased to consider submitting future work to this journal. Best wishes from, Elena Popa.

img

Dr Elena Popa

It was my pleasure to submit my testimonial concerning the Reviewer Board of our Scientific Journal “Brain and Neurological Disorders”. The Reviewers focused on some modifications and their contribution was helpful. The ladies of our Editorial Office were also supported my efforts. It was my honor to have such a co-operation and I am looking forward for more collaboration.

img

Dr Nikolaos Andreas Chrysanthakopoulos

Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Thank you for the speedy and efficient peer review process. I appreciate the fact that your peer reviewers do not take months to respond like with some other journals. I would also like to thank the editorial office for responding quickly to my questions. It is an excellent journal. I plan to submit more manuscripts in the future. Best wishes from, Robert W. McGee

img

Robert W McGee

Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Working with you and your team on our recent publication in JCRR has been a truly wonderful and enjoyable experience. The responses were prompt, and the reviewers were patient, constructive, and highly professional. One reviewer in particular gave me the feeling that a professor was carefully reading and commenting on my coursework, which was deeply touching. The entire process was straightforward and hassle‑free, with no tedious online forms to complete. I highly recommend this journal. Best wishes from, DR Aibing Rao, Head of R&D

img

Aibing Rao

I Appreciate the Opportunity to Share my Experience with the Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. The peer review process was timely and constructive, and the feedback provided helped improve the quality of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout the process, ensuring smooth communication and efficient handling of the submission. Overall, it was a positive experience collaborating with your team.

img

Kashani Mehdi

Dear Mercy Grace, Editorial Coordinator of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, We would like to express our gratitude for your help at all stages of publishing and editing the article. The editors of the magazine answer all the necessary questions and help at every stage. We will definitely continue to cooperate and publish other works in the Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences! Best wishes from, Alla Konstantinovna Politova,

img

Alla Konstantinovna Politova