Case Report | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2690-1897/055
*Corresponding Author: Sanjay Chatterjee. Assistant Professor, Maharashtra University of health sciences, Maharashtra, India.
Citation: Deshmukh S, Chatterjee S. (2021) Curious Case of Peritoneal Loose Body. J Surg. Cas Repo and Imag 4(2); DOI: 10.31579/2690-1897/055
Copyright: © 2021, Sameer Deshmukh, This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 02 July 2021 | Accepted: 23 January 2021 | Published: 13 March 2021
Keywords: Peritoneal loose bodies; urinary obstruction; intestinal obstruction
Peritoneal loose bodies (PLB) also known as “peritoneal mice”, are rare lesions often found incidentally during laparoscopies or laparotomies. They are often small in size although PLBs measuring in size more than 5 cm have also been reported. Most small PLBs remain asymptomatic and do not require treatment, although large PLBs have also been known to cause symptoms like urinary obstruction, intestinal obstruction. We present one such case of a middle- aged man having a PLB causing subacute intestinal obstruction.
A 54 year old man presented with pain in the abdomen since 15 days. Pain was located mainly to the right iliac fossa, non-radiating dull aching type of pain with no aggravating or relieving factors. He also had complaints of post meal abdominal distension and nausea, which used to resolve by itself. On examination, his vital parameters were normal. Cardiovascular system, respiratory system and central nervous system examination was unremarkable and the abdomen was soft, with no tenderness or any palpable lump.
A Sonography of the abdomen revealed the presence of a hypoechoic space occupying lesion (SOL) in the pelvis on the right side, having well defined margins. A Computerised Tomography (CT) scan with oral and intravenous contrast showed the presence of a hyperdense non-enhancing oval lesion with well-defined margins in the mesentery of the right iliac fossa. The lesion also showed the central fat density with peripheral rim of calcification. Based on the radiological findings, a pre-operative provisional diagnosis of an ileal mesenteric mature teratoma was given.

Figure 1- CT scan of the abdomen showing a peritoneal loose body
On laparotomic examination, an ovoid, well circumscribed, egg-like, hard, freely mobile structure was found in the abdomen. Rest of the intestine, abdominal and pelvic organs were normal. Grossly, the pelvic mass was a 4.7 x 4.8 x 4.9 cm sized ovoid structure, pearly white in colour with a hard and glistening surface. Cut surface showed the presence of a central concretion of creamy material surrounded by a calcified rim of tissue.

Figure 2- Gross specimen of a peritoneal loose body.
Figure 3- Cut section of a peritoneal loose body.
Histopathological report of the lesion mentioned a completely hyalinized, centrally calcified nodule with no viable cells.

Figure 4- Histopathological slide of a peritoneal loose body.
The post-operative course of the patient was unremarkable and patient was discharged on Post-operative day 7. On follow up, the patient was doing well with no further complaints and the wound had healed well.
The etiopathogenesis of a PLB is not very clearly understood. The most commonly accepted theory is that given by Desai et al [1] who gave the theory of appendices epiploicae torsion. According to this theory, an appendix epiploicae having a thin pedicle undergoes torsion and subsequent aseptic necrosis of the fat. This is later followed by saponification and calcification of the fat. Ultimately, the pedicle degenerates and the calcified appendix epiploicae detaches to form a peritoneal loose body. Subsequent multiple peritoneal reactions cause the deposition of serum over this body which later undergoes microcalcification. Thus, the PLB consists of multilamellar, acellular fibrous tissue having a central core of saponified tissue with a calcified rim. In support of this theory, Donald and Kerr [2] demonstrated the formation of peritoneal free bodies in Guinea Pigs by placing peri-pelvic organ fat in the abdominal cavities of these animals. Subsequently, PLBs were observed in the abdomen of these creatures. The clinical presentation of PLBs is dependent mainly on ztheir location and their size. There is no particular predilection for the location of PLBs, although most of them are found freely floating in the abdomen and hence located in the dependent part of the body. Most PLBs remain small and asymptomatic and do not warrant surgical intervention. Large PLBs sized 5 cm can cause compression symptoms in the abdomen that can result in acute/subacute intestinal obstruction, urinary obstruction, urinary tract infection, abdominal fullness [3] etc. and warrant surgical intervention. The diagnosis of a peritoneal loose body can often be tricky due to this being a very rare finding. While it will be difficult to correctly diagnose a PLB on a plain radiograph of the erect abdomen, a CT scan of the abdomen will show a well defined oval body with minimal to no obliteration of surrounding fat planes and a calcified core with surrounding soft tissue. The differentials of such findings may include benign lesions like foreign body granulomas, gallstones, spontaneously detached ovaries, calcified lymph nodes, calcified uterine fibroids, enlarged mesenteric lymph nodes, fecoliths, echinococcal cysts, abdominal tuberculosis, as well as malignant lesions like mature teratoma, metastatic ovarian cancer lesions, desmoid tumours, urinary tract tumours, calcifying fibrous pseudotumours etc. [3]
Dear Editorial Team, Clinical Medical Reviews and Reports. My experience with the journal was highly positive. The peer-review process was rigorous, constructive, and completed in a timely manner. The reviewers provided valuable comments that helped improve the quality and clarity of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout all stages of the publication process. Communication was clear and efficient, and any questions were addressed promptly. Overall, I found the journal to maintain high scientific standards and an excellent publication workflow. I would be pleased to consider submitting future work to this journal. Best wishes from, Elena Popa.
It was my pleasure to submit my testimonial concerning the Reviewer Board of our Scientific Journal “Brain and Neurological Disorders”. The Reviewers focused on some modifications and their contribution was helpful. The ladies of our Editorial Office were also supported my efforts. It was my honor to have such a co-operation and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Thank you for the speedy and efficient peer review process. I appreciate the fact that your peer reviewers do not take months to respond like with some other journals. I would also like to thank the editorial office for responding quickly to my questions. It is an excellent journal. I plan to submit more manuscripts in the future. Best wishes from, Robert W. McGee
Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Working with you and your team on our recent publication in JCRR has been a truly wonderful and enjoyable experience. The responses were prompt, and the reviewers were patient, constructive, and highly professional. One reviewer in particular gave me the feeling that a professor was carefully reading and commenting on my coursework, which was deeply touching. The entire process was straightforward and hassle‑free, with no tedious online forms to complete. I highly recommend this journal. Best wishes from, DR Aibing Rao, Head of R&D
I Appreciate the Opportunity to Share my Experience with the Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. The peer review process was timely and constructive, and the feedback provided helped improve the quality of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout the process, ensuring smooth communication and efficient handling of the submission. Overall, it was a positive experience collaborating with your team.
Dear Mercy Grace, Editorial Coordinator of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, We would like to express our gratitude for your help at all stages of publishing and editing the article. The editors of the magazine answer all the necessary questions and help at every stage. We will definitely continue to cooperate and publish other works in the Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences! Best wishes from, Alla Konstantinovna Politova,