AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Case Report | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2690-8808/192
Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/ Northwell, Hempstead, New York, USA.
*Corresponding Author: Kavya Rao, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/ Northwell, Hempstead, New York, USA.
Citation: Kavya Rao and Vijay Singh (2024), Considering the Cost-Effective Utilization of Exparel in Lieu of Patient-Controlled Analgesia, J, Clinical Case Reports and Studies, 5(3); DOI:10.31579/2690-8808/192
Copyright: ©2024, Kavya Rao. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 04 April 2024 | Accepted: 15 April 2024 | Published: 25 April 2024
Keywords: patient-controlled analgesia (PCA); arthroplasty; abdominal surgery; analgesia; cost to hospital systems; lobectomy; drug doses; thoracoscopic surgery; TKA; THA
Patient-controlled anesthesia (PCA) is utilized to treat acute, chronic, labor, and postoperative pain in patients. The administration of PCA intravenously (IV), through an epidural or peripheral nerve catheter, or transdermally each allow the patient to have autonomy over their pain control. Although beneficial in regard to patient care and outcomes, the current regimen of PCA is not cost-effective. Unused medication, cost of Anesthesia team consults, equipment, and the price of frequently used PCA medications contribute a substantial cost to hospital systems. Moreover, patient outcomes with PCA have been shown to be equivalent to those with traditional pain medication dosing.
As such, we investigated two anesthetic routines in post-operative cardiothoracic patients. In the novel group, we started to utilize Exparel™ (liposomal bupivacaine), which was instilled into the intercostal space at the conclusion of the surgical procedure. This Exparel™ receiving cohort did not receive PCA, and were instead managed as needed with narcotics in the post-operative period. Our prospective study with 10 patients, each undergoing a lobectomy, or surgical removal of a lobe of the lung, compared the outcomes in pain control and cost between Exparel™ and narcotic management and PCA.
Our outcomes showed that the pain control was the same when controlling for the receiving arm. However, the cost of the PCA-receiving arm was substantially more. Given the pain control of the Exparel™-receiving arm is non-inferior, it should be considered an acceptable post-operative pain control option to PCA, given its decreased cost.
PCA (patient-controlled anesthesia) is utilized and given to patients for acute, chronic, labor, and postoperative pain control. PCA encompasses a method of delivery in which medication doses are calculated based on patient metrics, such as weight, and can be administered directly to patients intravenously every ten minutes. Although this approach does allow patients to have more autonomy over their pain control, as well as improved mobility, alertness, and sense of control during recovery periods [1-3], there are still a fair amount of cost with this approach. In addition to the cost of the IV line and the medications utilized, there is often a fair amount of unused medication, the cost of the Anesthesia consult, which is responsible for the management of PCA, and other additional costs that need to be considered.
Hospital analysis studies have revealed that PCA contributes a substantial cost to hospital systems. A study analyzed the specific economic cost-breakdown of PCA in patients who had received a total knee arthroplasty (TKA), total hip arthroplasty (THA), or abdominal surgery. Palmer et al. (2014) reported that morphine and hydromorphone “were the most [consistently] utilized PCA medications, with a mean cost per 30 cc syringe of $16 (30 mg) and $21 (6 mg), respectively. The mean number of syringes used for morphine and hydromorphone in the first 48 hours were 1.9 and 3.2 (TKA), 2.0 and 4.2(THA), and 2.5 and3.9 (abdominal surgery), respectively. Average costs of PCA pump, intravenous tubing set, and medicine" reached an estimated cost of $47, $21, and $40, respectively. Costs for pumps, tubing, and saline for maintenance of intravenous catheter summed to an estimated cost of $37 to $44 for a 48-hour period. Supplemental non-PCA opioid use was still prevalent in THA and abdominal surgery cases, adding additional costs. Palmer et al. found that "total costs, including adverse events, complications, and intravenous PCA errors, ranged from $647 to $694” [4].
In addition, studies have shown that PCA is less cost-effective than traditional anesthetic dosing and does not statistically alter the average length of hospital stay in post-operative patients [5]. In fact, PCA had been shown to result in greater opioid consumption compared to traditional pain control, although no significant differences in opioid-related side effects was shown [5].
Despite these findings, consistent trends have been reported suggesting that PCA-associated care does not necessarily yield the most optimal patient and financial outcomes. Despite the increased involvement of patients in their care and recovery, this does not ensure appropriate patient use of analgesia nor use to pain satisfaction. The methodology of “one-size-fits-all” cannot be successfully applied to pain management, in addition to other therapeutic fields [6]. Physicians should rather alter opioid medication, administration method, and dose to individual patients’ requirements and needs, as well as respond appropriately to any alterations that need to be made to these factors of pain control as care progresses [6]. Given the high-risk indicated with opioid prescription, a more conservative approach is more appropriate when considering patient safety [6]. These considerations must be kept in mind by physicians when creating PCA doses, and less necessarily so when manually administering pain control medications
We conducted a prospective study with 10 patients, each undergoing a lobectomy of a lung (removal of lobe of the lung). We wanted to see if there was a difference in pain control in patients with PCA and patients with Exparel™ pain control. PCA patients followed the traditional standards of post-operative care. Exparel™ (liposomal bupivacaine) was instilled into the intercostal space at the site of the incision at the conclusion of the procedure. No PCA was given to the Exparel™-treated group and these patients were managed as needed with narcotics in the post operative periods.
According to its developmental company, Pacira, Exparel™ is available in 133 mg (10 mL) doses for $214.75 and 266 mg (20 mL) doses for $365.16 [6]. The 133 mg (10 mL) and 266 mg (20 mL) doses of Exparel™ are available in cartons of 4 and 10 vials [7].
Although these doses show less variability, physician utilization and administration of Exparel™ allows for more nuanced control and dosage given to patients. Dosages of Exparel™ according to its guidelines are based on the size of the surgical incision site, with a maximum dose being 266 mg [8,10]. Given that a minimally invasive approach, video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) is now more commonly, if not routinely, utilized for lobectomy, surgical incision sites are quite small [12]. As such, even with the maximum dose cost consider, there is a significant difference in the estimated cost of $647 to $694 per patient using PCA [8,9,11,12].
Our patient outcomes showed that the pain control in either group was the same, but the cost of the PCA group of patients was substantially more. Given the pain control of the Exparel™ arm is noninferior, it should be considered an acceptable post operative pain control option given its decreased cost
Compared with scheduled intramuscular dosing of Exparel™, PCA was more costly and did not have clinical advantages for pain management after lung lobectomy. Because of the comparable outcomes, the general use of PCA in similar patients should be questioned. Our data support a trend towards provider alteration to anesthetic and analgesic pain control in patient populations.
Although our case study focused on cardiothoracic patients who were recovering from a lung lobectomy, our findings are not limited to one specific specialty or surgical procedure. A prospective study found that intravenous PCA and regularly timed intramuscular injections of morphine yielded comparable analgesia outcomes in patients who underwent abdominal hysterectomy, with no significant differences in side effects incidence nor patient satisfaction. The data also supported that PCA did not result in shorter recovery periods, based on times to ambulation, return to liquid and solid diets, passage of bowel contents and gas, and hospital discharge [14]. With these comparable outcomes, the same cohort study found that PCA was more expensive than the alternative morphine analgesia routine, even without the addition of pump costs [14].
PCA has also shown the same pattern of increased costs with comparable pain control with alternative analgesics in the emergency department (ED) setting. Although rare in its utilization compared to other clinical environments, PCA use in the ED has been investigated [15]. Patients with pain attributed to traumatic injury or non-traumatic abdominal pain were treated with either PCA or standard practice of care for patient pain – the cost-effectiveness of the treatments indicated that overall costs with higher with PCA than standard care on both patient pain categories [15]. Specific cost increases were noted to be an additional $23.10 per 12 hours for traumatic injury and an additional $25.09 per hours for non-traumatic abdominal pain for patients on PCA compared to standard ED care practices [15].
PCA can be a very effective, yet safe method of individualized pain relief. However, it is not a “one-size-fits-all” therapy, and original prescriptions and dosages may need to be adjusted to ensure maximal benefit is given to all patients [6,16]. Efficacy and safety can also be better managed if increased attention to paid towards patient pain and analgesic use. Thus, the success or dismissal of PCA lies in how well it is used [16]. Effective pain relief requires flexibility in dosages, ease in dose delivery, such as PCA, regular monitoring of any drug-related side effects, and the use of these parameters to individualize treatment- PCA devices simply just facilitate this process [16]. If similar caution and heedfulness can be applied to other methods of opioid administration, conventional physician- administered anesthesia could be as effective, if not more effective, as PCA in many patients.
Guarantor Statement: VS had full access to the data in the study and take full responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
Author Contributions: VS had full access to the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. VS contributed substantially to the study design, interpretation, and KR contributed substantially to the writing of the manuscript. VS substantially to the study design and statistical analyses.
Financial/nonfinancial Disclosures: We have no funding information to disclose.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
