AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Research Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2690-1919/237
1 Faculty of Psychology/University of Havana, Cuba.
2 Municipal Directorate of Education Municipality of Abreus/ Cienfuegos.
*Corresponding Author: Humberto Garcia Penedo, Faculty of Psychology/University of Havana, Cuba.
Citation: Humberto G Penedo, Giselle B Rodriguez, Pedro L R Olivera, Alexis L Ruiz. (2022). Concurrent validity of Grau’s Experiential Self-Report Transdiagnostic Test Modified for a more Comprehensive Assessment of the Affective Dimension. J Clinical Research and Reports, 10(5); DOI:10.31579/2690-1919/237
Copyright: © 2022, Humberto Garcia Penedo. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 28 January 2022 | Accepted: 11 March 2022 | Published: 21 March 2022
Keywords: experiential self-report; transdiagnosis; alexithymia; depression; anxiety; anger; positive psychology; HiTOP
Based on the qualitative Self-Report Experiential test of Grau, modifications were made to increase its psychometric potential. The modifications were based on the transdiagnosis and from the integral affective dimension that included negative and positive emotions. A construct validation had already been carried out on the modifications. The trait anger construct was validated with the State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory STAXI-2,Depression with the Goldberg Trait-State Depression Inventory (IDERE),Anxiety with the Goldberg Trait-State Anxiety Inventory (IDARE);each one with its Cuban version.
A significant positive (moderate) Spearman’s correlation (rho) of rs=0.438 was obtained between the Self-Report Anxiety construct and the IDARE, as well as a sensitivity of 83.3% versus 100% of the IDARE. A significant positive (moderate) Spearman’s Rho correlation of rs=0.459 between the self-report depression construct and the IDERE. The sensitivity of this construct was 73.3% in the Self- report compared to a sensitivity of 90% in the IDERE. The specificity of the Self- report for depression was 26.7% while in the IDERE it was 90%. The correlation of anger in the Self-Report with the STAXI-2 was rs=0.558 (significant, positive and moderate). While the sensitivity for anger was 46.7% and the specificity 53.3%.
A remarkable degree of concurrence was concluded between Anxiety, Depression and Anger of Experiential Self-Report with the corresponding tests compared in a sample of 30 apparently healthy subjects. Self-report becomes a psychometric integration instrument that provides the diagnosis of anxiety, depression, anger, Alexithymia, emotional self-control, estimation of psychological trauma, a measure of positivity, emotional health and a coding of emotions. According to their clinical significance, which makes it easier to correlate them with other study variables.
In drug addictions, the rule is the presence of comorbidities, especially of the affective spectrum. Cuban alcoholic patients usually present anxiety, depression, Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD), Panic Disorder, Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) and Complicated Grief [3]. The diagnosis requires the use of dissimilar psychometric tests to evaluate each of these disorders and specify to what extent the patients are affected by some of them, and the design of a personalized psychotherapeutic treatment is facilitated. This leads to a very tedious process, both due to the excess of tests, their qualification and the lack of clarity about how to represent the sick person clinically and comprehensively.
Transdiagnosis has gained the attention of clinicians, the task of seeking alternatives in psychological evaluation focused on dimensions and categories allows not only to better catch psychopathological comorbidities but also facilitates the design of psychotherapeutic interventions with the potential to benefit all patients with more efficiently [4, 5].
The systematization of affective disorders at the neurotic level from the existing taxonomy gives prestige to only a part of the negative affect, which have been classified as some type of isolated disorder such as Anxiety or Depression, for example very frequent in addictions [6, 7]. Depression, for example, varies in intensity and more personal forms of expression. Practice shows that this disorder is usually associated with other negative emotions such as anger, jealousy, guilt, resentment, which, although they are not no so logical entities, make up the psychopathological clinical picture, feed anguish and have practical value for designing psychotherapy [6, 7]. However, this set of negative emotions tends to escape traditional psycho-pathological characterizations.
Despite the relevance and theoretical development of Positive Psychology, there is still not enough diagnostic evaluation practice that brings together negativity and positivity to analyze their integral expression in a specific person. The affective dimension from the transdiagnosis can be understood as the compilation of both affective disorders and other negative emotions of clinical interest, as well as some positive emotions such as optimism, good humor and joy, which have been the object of study of the Positive psychology [8-10].
Considering positivity in the diagnosis is based on the additive principle of emotions, which postulates the following:
“...when the individual experiences multiple sources of emotional stimulation, the emotions add up. If the emotions are negative the result will be a sum that is more intense than an emotional response alone. And if the emotions are positive, the sum will be more intense than just one. If one source of emotion is positive and the other is negative, however, the emotions elicited will subtract from each other, resulting in the stronger of the two being experienced in a more attenuated way [11].
Including positivity is also based on the nullifying effect exerted by positive emotions on the damage caused by negative emotions [12]. Both phenomena support the possibility of carrying out a quantitative evaluation of emotions through which positive and negatives are subtracted, giving rise to differences between patients based on both the magnitude of negativity and positivity, the latter valued as a protective factor against emotional disturbances and related to better quality of life [8].
Finally, the affective dimension must be instrumented on the criteria of frequency with which the person feels an emotion and the magnitude in which they feel it, so that trait emotions can be identified. Trait anxiety and depression have been of diagnostic interest. However, it is very pertinent to know which other negative emotions are identified as traits (because they are felt with great frequency and intensity) and which positive ones are also identified as traits, since this perspective reflects the emotional patterns of reactivity of the individual that constitute components of various disorders. Psychopathological [2, 7].
This affective and trait dimensional model allows us to understand if the person suffers from the sequelae of a psychological trauma such as Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), a complicated duel, an Adjustment Disorder that is usually composed, among other symptoms, of three or more negative emotions with the same clinical significance. The inclusion of positivity allows knowing the person’s capacity for self control, since when positivity is high, the person has greater emotional resources, which prevents disorders such as depression from increasing in severity.
It is an investigation of technological development and a correlational
transactional design, for which the following research problem was proposed:
Is there concurrence between the anxiety, depression and anger constructs of the Modified Grau Experiential Self-Report with the IDARE, IDERE and STAXI-2, respectively?
General objective
To determine the concurrent validity of the anxiety, depression and anger constructs in the Modified Grau Experiential Self-Report (AVDGM) with respect to the IDARE, the IDERE and the STAXI-2, respectively.
Specific objectives
To determine the concurrent validity of the anxiety construct obtained in the Experiential Self-Report with respect to the IDARE.
Specify the concurrent validity of the depression construct obtained in the Experiential Self-Report with respect to the IDERE.
Define the concurrent validity of the anger construct obtained in the Experiential Self-Report with respect to the STAXI-2.
To correlate the variables between the corresponding tests, since each psychometric test uses its own scale and with different intervals, a standard scale was designed to facilitate correlation. This scale was based on two basic attributes: negativity (absence of disorder) and positivity (presence of disorder). Within the latter two levels of magnitude of the disorder (light-moderate and severe).
Correlation focuses primarily on two basic attributes of psychometric tests, Sensitivity (ability of the test to identify people with the disorder being explored) and Specificity (ability of the test to discriminate those who do not have the disorder being explored). explore).
The self-reported anxiety construct is made up of the items (restless, insecure and anxious)
The self-report depression construct is made up of the items (sad, unmotivated, suffered, anguished and apathetic)
The anger construct of the Self-Report is made up of the items (irritable, impulsive, angry, contemptuous and resentful)
Sample:
Thirty (30) intentionally chosen people who meet the following criteria:
Limitation of the study: it was carried out during the period of social isolation due to the COVID-19pandemic, which justifies working with this small sample.
A Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was first performed for a sample to define the prevailing type of distribution of the data; it was concluded that the sample was not normally distributed.
| AVDGM Anxiety | IDARE
| AVDGM Depression | IDERE | ||
| N | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | |
Normal parameters a, b | Mean | ,97 | ,1,57 | ,83 | ,1,20 |
| Standard deviation | ,556 | ,504 | ,592 | ,610 | |
| Maximum extreme differences | Absolute | ,357 | ,372 | ,344 | ,328 |
| Positive | ,343 | ,303 | ,289 | ,328 | |
| Negative | –,357 | –,372 | –,344 | –,272 | |
| Test statistic | ,357 | ,372 | ,344 | ,328 | |
| Sig. asymptotic (bilateral) | ,000c | ,000c | ,000c | ||
Source: author data AVDGM: Grau's experiential self-report modified IDARE: State-Trait Anxiety Inventory IDERE: Trait-State Depression Inventory | |||||
Table 1: Results of the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test for a sample regarding the constructs anxiety and depression
| AVDGM (rage) | STAXI-2 (rage) | ||
| Normal parameters a, b | 30 | 30 | |
| Mean | ,60 | ,53 | |
| Standard deviation | ,724 | ,507 | |
| Maximum extreme differences | Absolute | ,330 | ,354 |
| Positive | ,330 | ,320 | |
| Negative | -,204 | ,354 | |
| Test statistic | ,330 | ,354 | |
| Sig. asymptotic (bilateral) | ,000c | ,000c | |
Source: author data
Table 2: shows the results for the anger construct of the Self-report and the STAXI-2.
Below are the values obtained for sensitivity and specificity of each construct in the Modified Grau Experiential Self-Report (AVDGM) compared to the corresponding tests with which they were correlated.
In relation to the anxiety construct of the AVDGM versus the IDARE, a significant positive Spearman’s Rho correlation (rs=0.438) was obtained, of a moderate level. Table 3 shows that the sensitivity of the AVDGM for anxiety reaches 83.3%, that is, 25 patients truly suffer from anxiety) compared to 100% of the IDARE, while the Specificity is 16.7%.
|
| Frequency | Percentage | Valid percentage | Cumulative percentage |
AVDGM | 0 (Specificity) | 5 | 16,7 | 16,7 | 16,7 |
| 1 (Sensitivity) | 25 | 83,3 | 83,3 | 100.0 |
| Total | 30 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
|
IDARE | 0 (Specificity) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 1 (Sensitivity) | 30 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
Source: author data
Table 3: Sensitivity and specificity of the anxiety construct in the Self-report and the IDARE.
When analyzing the correlations between the depression construct of the AVDGM and the IDERE, a significant positive Spearman’s Rho correlation coefficient (rs=0.459) of moderate level was obtained. Table 4 shows that the sensitivity of the AVDGM for depression reaches 73.3% (22 were true positives to suffering from depression) compared to 100% of the IDERE, while the Specificity of the AVDGM was 26.7% compared to 90% of the IDERE.
|
| Frequency | Percentage | Valid percentage | Cumulative percentage |
AVDGM | 0 (Specificity) | 8 | 26,7 | 26,7 | 26,7 |
| 1 (Sensitivity) | 22 | 73,3 | 73,3 | 100.0 |
| Total | 30 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
|
IDERE | 0 (Specificity) | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 1 (Sensitivity) | 30 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
Source: author data
Table 4: Sensitivity and specificity of the depression construct in the self-report and the IDERE
Table 5 shows that the sensitivity of the AVDGM for anger reaches 46.7% compared to 53.3% of the STAXI-2, indicating that 14 of 30 people are true positives to suffer from trait anger, while the sensitivity in the STAXI- 2 was 53.3%, 16 of 30 subjects are true positives for trait anger. The Specificity of the Self-report is 53.3%, indicating that they are the true negatives compared to 46.7% of the STAXI-2.
| Frequency | Percentage | Valid Percentage | Cumulative Percentage | |
AVDGM | 0 (Specificity) | 16 | 53.3 | 53.3 | 53.3 |
1(Sensitivity) | 14 | 46.7 | 46.7 | 46.7 | |
Total | 30 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
| |
STAXI-2 | 0 (Specificity) | 14 | 46.7 | 46.7 | 46.7 |
1(Sensitivity) | 16 | 53.3 | 53.3 | 53.3 | |
Source: author data
Table 5: Sensitivity and Specificity of the Trait Anger Construct in Self-Report and STAXI-2
Although the results in each of the three constructs are not optimal, they are at least very close; this denotes the psychometric ability of the AVDGM to measure them. It is understandable that the classic IDARE, IDERE and STAXI-2 tests have greater validity to assess the corresponding constructs, since they have a greater number of items and are more specific. For this reason, it is stated that the in- tended psychometric integration in the AVDGM, although it loses some sensitivity and specificity, seems to be very relevant as a test for a rapid evaluation of patients upon arrival at a care service.
The psychometric potential of its constructs was already validated in previous studies but in the previous version of the Self-Report [13, 14]. In these studies, the significant positive correlation between the Anxiety, Depression and Anger constructs was demonstrated with other psychometric tests, a very favorable aspect if one considers that almost all of its items have been preserved and the modifications to the instrument have focused on adding psychometric capacity. and create new opinions that are better suited to the transdiagnostic model.
It is worth noting that among these new opinions of the AVDGM are the affective profile, emotional health, emotional self-control, psychological trauma and Alexithymia. The affective profile is specified in a personal numerical code that reflects the singularity of the patient in this area, in addition to which each emotion ends with a numerical value resulting from its clinical significance. These data are very valuable to be correlated with dissimilar psychological variables and biological markers, which will help to clarify the relationship between emotions and diseases, whatever their type [15].
On the other hand, both the opinion of emotional self-control and that of Alexithymia are important to understand the seriousness of the person’s disorders because they offer a measure of the deficit in this competence. This aspect is very useful to support the inclusion of emotional regulation training in Psychotherapy [16, 17].
One more element to consider the relevance of the AVDGM is that its opinions greatly contribute to identifying the spectrum of Distress according to the hierarchical taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP)-for its acronym in English.
Negative emotionality, anxiety, depression, anger, and irritability are grouped into this spectrum, which in turn make up affective spectrum disorders [5].
Finally, the amount of positivity provided by the instrument represents a tentative measure of the person’s affective resources to deal with their negativity. The specific deficits detected in positivity are the basis for guiding the promotion of emotional health; for example, people who report little good humor are candidates to be trained in this competence to contribute to their personal development, increase emotional intelligence and enhance an internal protective factor against addictions [18, 19].
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.
