AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Chat with us
Research Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2639-4162/121
1,2, & 4 General Nursing Administration, Security Forces Hospital Program, Riyadh
3 Pain Consultant Security Forces Hospital Program, Riyadh.
5 Pain Nurse
*Corresponding Author: Deirdre Hawkins, General Nursing Administration.
Citation: Deirdre Hawkins, Ali M. Al Yasien, Muhammad Yasir, Shini Cherian, Najla Al Shehri, (2023), Concept Analysis: Sickle Cell Pain Clinic, J. General Medicine and Clinical Practice, 6(6); DOI:10.31579/2639-4162/121
Copyright: © 2023, Deirdre Hawkins. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 25 October 2023 | Accepted: 06 November 2023 | Published: 22 November 2023
Keywords: sickle cell disease; sickle cell pain management clinic; vaso-occlusive crisis; concept analysis; sickle cell pain
The number of people living with sickle cell disease globally is on the increase. Sickle cell pain crises often results in emergency department visits, with delays in receiving pain relief. Pain from sickle cell disease accounts for 90% of hospital admissions. While sickle cell pain clinics have been established successfully in the US there is limited evidence of the establishment of sickle cell pain clinics in the Middle East. The basis of theoretical thinking in nursing lies in delineation of the concepts that are relevant to the discipline. By using Walker and Avant’s (2011) concept analysis method,the author reviewedthe literature to better understand sickle cell pain clinics as a concept.In conducting this concept analysis, Walker and Avant’s framework was applied to examine the nature of the findings selected for the advancement of the concept. After identifying the concept, a hospital in Riyadh implemented a Sickle Cell Pain Clinic. Donabedian model was used for the implementation of the concept. The clinic allowed patients to receive pain management treatment without any delay, helping to reduce emergency department visits in an already overcrowded Emergency Department and it also helped to reduce hospital readmissions.
Sickle cell disease (SCD) is a multisystem disorder and the most common genetic disease in the United States. Prevalence of the disease is highest among the people of Sub-Saharan Africa, South Asia, the Middle East, and the Mediterranean. Knowledge of the phenotypic expression of the disease is still limited although environmental factors such as cold weather and air quality, infections, fetal hemoglobin level, and genetic subtypes play a role in the manifestations of the disease [1].SCD affects approximately 100,000 individuals in the United States and more than 3 million worldwide [2]. The number of people living with SCD globally increased by 41.4%, from 5.46 million in 2000 to 7.74 million in 2021. In children under 5 years, there were 81,100 deaths ranking SCD mortality as 12th across all causes estimated by the Global Burden of Disease in 2021 [3].
There is a clear economic burden of sickle cell related hospitalization. A study reported that there were about 113,000 hospitalizations for sickle cell related illnesses in the United States, 75% occurring in adults [4]. Orle institute reported success with a dedicated outpatient facility for the treatment of uncomplicated painful crises, which reduced the time to pain relief, increased the number of patients discharged home, decreased the hospitalization rate and reduced the use of the emergency department. Over five years studied, average savings amounted to more than USD1.7 million due to fewer hospital admissions and shorter length of stay [5].
The pain of living with sickle cell crisis is excruciating and in global terms is a major health problem. Unpredictable, recurrent, and excruciating episodes of acute pain—often referred to as “pain crises”—and the various consequences of chronic pain are responsible for most of the psychosocial devastation of the disease and are also the primary reason for the use of healthcare [6]. However, despite its importance, pain is perhaps the least understood complication of SCD. In SCD increased pain has been shown to correlate directly with death [5].
There is evidence of successful outpatient facilities in the management of sickle cell pain in the United States. In one study patients with frequent episodes of moderate-to-severe pain from SCD were seen in an outpatient clinic. Visits included group music therapy and individual medical care, including comprehensive blood work and scheduling of medical tests when appropriate. Between visits, the pain and palliative care physicians followed patients on an as-needed basis. Emergency department (ED) visits and hospital admissions were dramatically reduced in the three patients whose pain was managed in the pain clinic. For each patient, hospital admissions were reduced to lessthan or = 1 visit per year. These reduced levels of ED visits and hospital admissions remained constant for more than three years [5]. Using the intranasal or sublingual approach to administering analgesia to SCD patients with VOC offers a fast, safe, noninvasive, non-traumatic, and easily accessible route of administration which could reduce the time to first dose of analgesia [7].
Walker and Avant’s [8] Concept Analysis consists of 8 steps. These iterative steps include as follows: 1) selecting a concept; 2) determining the aims of the analysis; 3) identifying all possible uses of the concept in nursing; 4) defining concept attributes; 5) constructing a model case; 6) constructing related and contrary cases; 7) identifying antecedents and consequences of the concept; and 8) defining empirical referents of the model. Careful examination of the implications of this concept provides an understanding of the phenomena [9].
1. Selecting a Concept
The concept selected was Sickle Cell Pain Clinic. There is no clear definition in the literature for Sickle Cell Pain Clinic. There were inconsistencies in the definition of Pain Clinics where definition varied depending on whether they were provider-based, treatment based or outcome based. Examples of definitions include “integrate multiple (or single) approaches of pain treatments through co-ordinated teams” [10]. The simplest definition of Sickle Cell Disease itself is an inherited blood disorder marked by defective hemoglobin. It inhibits the ability of hemoglobin in red blood cells to carry oxygen. Sickle cells tend to stick together (forming the shape of a sickle), blocking small blood vessels causing painful and damaging complications [11,12]. Medical clinicians need to view Sickle Cell not just as a hematological disorder but as a biopsychosocial model. The biopsychosocial model affirms that in addition to biological elements, psychological and social elements also play a role in managing pain [13]. A biopsychosocial model Sickle Cell Pain Clinic was implemented in a hospital in Riyadh.
2. Determining the aims of the analysis
The objective of the concept analysis was to synthesis the literature to formulate the defining attributes, antecedents and consequences of a sickle cell pain clinic. The researcher did an in-depth analysis of the literature regarding the concept of a Sickle Cell Pain Clinic. A comprehensive search for the term sickle cell pain clinic was entered into online databases for articles published in the last 20 years. The main aim of the Sickle Cell Pain Clinic was to help improve the care and management of sickle cell patients (12 years and above) by minimizing complications, thus minimizing visits to the emergency room and hospital readmissions.
3. Identification of possible use of concept in nursing
The conceptual framework used to evaluate the quality of care provided in the clinic was the Donabedian Model. The Donabedian model is a conceptual model that provides a framework for evaluating quality from three categories: “structure,” “process,” and “outcomes.” Structure describes the context in which care is delivered, including hospital buildings, staff, financing, and equipment. Process denotes the transactions between patients and providers throughout the delivery of healthcare. Outcome refers to the effects of healthcare on the health status of patients [14]. In this case the structure was the setting up of the clinic, including the provision of staff (a pain physician, pain nurses, hematologist, psychologist and social worker) and resources (including availability a of clinic room with equipment, a clinical guideline etc.). Process included firstly, the assessment (involving patient self-appraisal of attitude and readiness in determining the type of sickle cell disease, the nature of the pain and the assessment of its significance for the patient) and secondly, the treatment (concerned with the planning and execution of an assessment-based management of the illness and pain) and finally, the evaluation of the effectiveness of the treatment executed. The processing system included feedback loops or regimen- adjustment strategies (titration, maintenance, rescue and taper-dosing) so that if the treatment was not deemed to be effective, the healthcare provider may alter after original and/or subsequent treatment based upon assessment of the sickle cell disease or pain, or both. Outcome included the benefits gained for both the sickle cell patients and the hospital, such as improved quality of life with faster pain relief, reduced emergency visits, hospital admissions and reduction in economic costs.
Stage 1
Patients come to the clinic as a walk-in or as a referral from the emergency department.
Stage 2
Initial Assessment including patient identification, allergies, and vital signs (blood pressure, heart rate, oxygen saturations, temperature and pain score recorded as per the Numerical Pain Rating Scale) are completed. The assessment must occur within 15-20 minutes of the patient’s arrival to the clinic [16].
Stage 3
Patient to be seen by the Pain Nurse who will assess the patient’s pain using the Pain Assessment Tool. The patient will have complete pain assessments at half hour intervals. The nurse will differentiate whether the patient will need urgent care (for example, acute chest pain, aplastic crisis-pulmonary or abdominal on the basis of temperature >38 degrees, respiratory signs/symptoms, low saturations, tachycardia or hypotension. If required, nurses will make necessary arrangements to move the patient to the emergency department. Full blood count, reticulytes, urea and electrolytes will be determined on all patients attending with severe pain.
Stage 4
Once it is decided to manage the patient in the clinic, the patient will be seen by the physician. The physician will treat the pain aggressively and promptly. The 1st dose analgesia will be administered within 30 minutes of arrival and the 2nd dose will be administered if there is a delay in transfer to an alternate care site. Opioids will be administered as per patient specific protocol --- subcutaneous, intramuscular, intranasal or sublingual when intravenous is not available. Pain sedation will be reassessed every 15-30 minutes and analgesic doses will be administered until pain relief is obtained (pain score 2 or less). Also non-pharmacological approaches such as heat pads will be provided as necessary. Pain will be managed for 6-8 hours. If unable to control pain, admission to short term observation unit will be considered.
Patient can be categorised into 2 categories: The first category are infusion visits used to treat patients with acute vaso-occlusive crisis who need extended, parenteral analgesic and hydration. The second category is acute follow up visit who usually do not require extended analgesics and hydration [16].
Time to 1st Dose
Analgesic Therapy should be initiated with a goal of having patients receive their 1st dose of opioid within 30 minutes of assessment.
Evaluate, record and treat adverse effects:
Assess and record for occurrence of nausea, vomiting, pruritus, respiratory depression and sedation when indicated.
Identify and treat precipitating factors:
Precipitating and propagating events, such as dehydration, acidosis, hypoxia, infection and stress also need to be treated.
If a pain pump needs to be started follow the hospital policy and procedures.
Stage 5
After intervention reassessment will be done by the pain nurse and communicated to the physician.
If pain remains untreated then physician will decide to prolong the stay by either referring the patient to the ED or admitting the patient [16].
Stage 6
• The pain nurse will assess the patient and communicate readiness for discharge. Once the pain is settled to the extent that it can be managed by oral medication at home, then the patient can be discharged and pain education to be given by nurse.
• The pain nurse will provide the patient advice in relation to discharge instructions, for example no driving and he/she will also explain the prescription along with the discharge form.
• At discharge, titrate off the parenteral opioids before conversion to oral opioids and adjust the home dose of long and short-acting opioids to prevent withdrawal.
• The pain nurse will arrange a follow up appointment as per the instructions of the physician. If the patient does a repeat visit to the ED or clinic within the next 7 days this visit will be considered part of the same crisis.
• If the patient needs to see a psychologist or social worker the physician will make an arrangement for that.
• On discharge the patient should have sufficient medication until their next appointment [17].
1. Defining Concept Attributes
Pain is the most common characteristic of the sickle cell patient. Not all patients experience pain with the same frequency or intensity and degree of disability associated with sickle cell disease crisis are highly variable. Patients with sickle cell presented to the clinic with mild, moderate or severe episodes of acute pain. Acute pain is caused by recurrent and unpredictable episodes of vaso-occlusive crises (VOC) [18]. VOC is when a sickle cell patient experiences acute painful episode caused by deformed sickle shaped red blood cells which can lead to tissue infarction. Anemia and Infection are the other attributes of patients with Sickle Cell who need to be referred to the Sickle Cell Pain Clinic.
2. Constructing A Model Case
Walker and Avant [8] defined a model case as one that demonstrates all of the concept’s defining characteristics. In other words, the model case should be a pure case of the concept, a paradigmatic example, or a pure exemplar. The following is an example of a model case that is consistent with the concept. A 28-year woman with a diagnosis of sickle cell disease since birth has had 3 episodes of VOC in the past three months. She is now experiencing pain in her chest, arms, back and legs. She is desaturation. She is currently experiencing a VOC and her pain score is 10 out of 10. She attends the clinic and is seen by the Hematologist, Pain Physician, Psychologist and Nurse. The patient is immediately put on high- flow oxygen to maintain her saturations above 95%. Hydroxyurea is administered and a blood transfusion is commenced. The patient receives intravenous morphine within 30 minutes of arrival to the clinic. The nurse has reassessed her pain score which is now
5. She receives an additional dose of morphine and a further reassessment of her pain. Her pain score is now 2. Her blood transfusion is completed within a couple of hours of arrival at the clinic. Her saturations are within normal parameters. The psychologist has reviewed the patient and has recommended breathing techniques. [19] The patient is now settling. If she continues to settle she can be discharged home today with home pain medications. Education will be given on discharge by the pain nurse.
3. Constructing Related and Contrary Cases
A contrary case is a clear example of when the concept is absent. A 19-year-old sickle cell patient diagnosed since birth arrives at the sickle cell pain clinic. She has been experiencing sickle cell crises since birth. She is very anxious and demanding pain relief. The nurse assesses her pain score which is reported by the patient as 10 out of 10 but the nurse doesn’t believe the patient and documents the pain score as 3. She believes the patient is an addict. Based on the pain score of 3 recorded, the doctor doesn’t prescribe strong painkillers. The patient remains in pain. No pain reassessment is done as no intervention has been given. After 1 hour the doctor is asked to review the patient again. This time he realizes that the patient is in pain. However, the doctor is reluctant to prescribe opioids for fear of addiction to the patient. The patient continues to remain in pain. The patient starts to desaturate because of her ongoing crisis which is not being managed. The patient starts to clinically deteriorate and has to be admitted to the Intensive Care Unit for closer observation and proper management.
4. Identifying Antecedents and Consequences of The Concept
Antecedents are events or incidents that must be present before a concept can occur. Prior to admission to the clinic the patients had to have experienced 3 or more vaso-occlusive episodes in the past 3 months where they previously visited the emergency department or were previously admitted to the hospital as a result of their vaso-occlusive crisis. Stress, poor diet, infection can all lead to vaso-occlusive crises but also the cause can be unknown. Antecedent included a patient self -assessment of their pain and attitude towards their pain.Consequences are those incidents that occur as a result of the interpretation of the concept. With the establishment of a Sickle Cell Pain Clinic sickle cell patients are provided with safe and timely treatment to patients in pain, reducing emergency visits and hospital readmissions and resulting in improved quality of life for patients who suffer from this excruciating pain.
5. Defining Empirical Referents of The Model
The measurement of sickle cell pain involved the use of a validated Pain Assessment Tool. Both the patient and the pain nurse completed the validated Pain Assessment Form.
Emergency department visits and hospital readmissions were reduced for the patients who were seen in the Sickle Cell Pain Clinic. Patients with SCD need effective management in the outpatient setting in the hope to receive more efficient pain relief, reduce ED visits, prevent readmissions, and ultimately decrease the economic burden to the healthcare system.
The implications of better understanding the concept of a Sickle Cell Pain Clinic in the Middle East and its implementation in hospitals will lead to improved quality of life for sickle cell patients by providing faster pain relief, less emergency visits and hospital readmission, not to mention reduced economic burden in an already overstretched healthcare service, particularly in a time of economic crisis.
This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
The author contributed substantially to the conception and design of this work and revised and drafted the manuscript. The author approved the final version to be published and is accountable for all aspects of this work.
None declared.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
