Editorial | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2693-4779/319
1Department of Public Health and Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Carabobo, Venezuela.
2Rafael María Baralt National Experimental University, Venezuela.
*Corresponding Author: Bastidas Gilberto, Department of Public Health and Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Carabobo, Venezuela.
Citation: Bastidas Gilberto, Bastidas-Delgado Gilberto de Jesús, (2026), Computer Vision Integrated into Parasitological Diagnosis, Clinical Research and Clinical Trials, 15(4); DOI:10.31579/2693-4779/319
Copyright: © 2026, Bastidas Gilberto. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 09 March 2026 | Accepted: 24 March 2026 | Published: 01 April 2026
Keywords: general practice; physician-patient communication; decision making; brief intervention; motivation; immunization; impact
The general practitioner (GP) is like a catalyst: a small amount of he or she, when present in a "chemical reaction", can produce significant results. Thus, the GP continually performs small or brief interventions that are, in reality, "maximal" due to their profound effects. The GP is a small enzyme, seemingly insignificant at first glance, but upon which the pace and speed of a chemical reaction depend. The GP's work resembles that of a powerful reagent. Their presence is never dominant, always judicious and adapted to the demands of each situation, and this is reflected in the speed and quality of the results. Their task is humble but very important: to discover what stands between people's interest in health and their attainment of it, and to know what he or she can do to help them achieve it using the least amount of our effort. To empower individuals to be in a better position to progress [1,2].
Algorithms enhance the pictorial information of previously captured images to obtain better and more comprehensive information for diagnosing many scenarios, but of particular interest in diseases. This process, known as computer vision, is a useful tool for improving human interpretation of organic images obtained through microscopy in any of its modalities, including x-rays, ultrasound, positron emission tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), among others [1-3]. We believe computer vision to be a precursor to artificial intelligence. It is considered a useful tool in the field of medical diagnosis and treatment, as it facilitates image analysis by specialists, exponentially improving the efficient interpretation of what is observed in samples of bodily substances, organs, and systems. Its application in infectious diseases, particularly parasitic diseases (which affect more than 1.5 billion people worldwide), seems of particular interest due to the difficulty of parasitological diagnosis [3-6]. In this regard, the low parasite load, morphological similarity, the parasite's location within the human host, the limited expertise of diagnostic professionals, and the lack of high-tech diagnostic tests (based on protein or nucleic acid detection) greatly hinders the accurate diagnosis of unicellular and multicellular parasites. These obstacles can be overcome with computer vision, as it allows for the examination of the parasite's composition, structure, and morphological characteristics without artifact interference [7-11]. Specifically, parasite classification in images is based on the determination of parasites and non-parasites using deep neural networks with transfer learning (generalization of experience). Furthermore, data augmentation (transforming images to create new ones) can be used in the training set with classical techniques and generative adversarial networks, all with the aim of deep classification. Therefore, in the diagnostic imaging of parasitic diseases, binary classifiers using convolutional neural networks and pre-trained deep neural networks have been employed, all with performance exceeding 95% [10, 12]. Computer vision for parasites undoubtedly allows for accurate diagnosis and timely treatment of these formidable pathologies. Even without thousands of sample images, as is often the case with parasitic diseases, the increased data allows the network to obtain more information and characteristics for the proper classification of these organisms with a high degree of accuracy [13, 14].
The authors have no conflict of interest to declare. The authors declared that this study has received no financial support.
Dear Editorial Team, Clinical Medical Reviews and Reports. My experience with the journal was highly positive. The peer-review process was rigorous, constructive, and completed in a timely manner. The reviewers provided valuable comments that helped improve the quality and clarity of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout all stages of the publication process. Communication was clear and efficient, and any questions were addressed promptly. Overall, I found the journal to maintain high scientific standards and an excellent publication workflow. I would be pleased to consider submitting future work to this journal. Best wishes from, Elena Popa.
It was my pleasure to submit my testimonial concerning the Reviewer Board of our Scientific Journal “Brain and Neurological Disorders”. The Reviewers focused on some modifications and their contribution was helpful. The ladies of our Editorial Office were also supported my efforts. It was my honor to have such a co-operation and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Thank you for the speedy and efficient peer review process. I appreciate the fact that your peer reviewers do not take months to respond like with some other journals. I would also like to thank the editorial office for responding quickly to my questions. It is an excellent journal. I plan to submit more manuscripts in the future. Best wishes from, Robert W. McGee
Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Working with you and your team on our recent publication in JCRR has been a truly wonderful and enjoyable experience. The responses were prompt, and the reviewers were patient, constructive, and highly professional. One reviewer in particular gave me the feeling that a professor was carefully reading and commenting on my coursework, which was deeply touching. The entire process was straightforward and hassle‑free, with no tedious online forms to complete. I highly recommend this journal. Best wishes from, DR Aibing Rao, Head of R&D
I Appreciate the Opportunity to Share my Experience with the Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. The peer review process was timely and constructive, and the feedback provided helped improve the quality of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout the process, ensuring smooth communication and efficient handling of the submission. Overall, it was a positive experience collaborating with your team.
Dear Mercy Grace, Editorial Coordinator of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, We would like to express our gratitude for your help at all stages of publishing and editing the article. The editors of the magazine answer all the necessary questions and help at every stage. We will definitely continue to cooperate and publish other works in the Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences! Best wishes from, Alla Konstantinovna Politova,