AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Research Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2690-1897/105
1 Department of Cardiac Anaesthesia, Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Kolkata, India.
2 MD, DM, MNAMS, Professor & HOD, Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Kolkata, India.
3 MD Anaesthesia, Assistant Professor, Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Kolkata, India.
*Corresponding Author: Chaitali SenDasgupta, MD, DM, MNAMS, Professor & HOD, Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Kolkata, India.
Citation: Kundu Shruti, SenDasgupta Chaitali, Kar Sandeep Kumar and Goswami Anupam. (2022) Comparison of Regional Cerebral Oxygen Saturation (rSO2) and Central Venous Oxygen Saturation (ScvO2) as Predictors of Outcome in Off Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (OPCABG) Surgery Patients J, Surgical Case Reports and Images 5(1); DOI: 10.31579/2690-1897/105
Copyright: © 2022, Chaitali SenDasgupta, This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 06 December 2021 | Accepted: 21 December 2021 | Published: 06 January 2022
Keywords: off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting, central venous oxygen saturation, regional cerebral oxygen saturation
Objectives: Aim of the study was to compare central venous oxygen saturation (ScvO2) and regional cerebral oxygen saturation (rSO2) to see which of the two is better predictor of prognosis of patients undergoing off–pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCABG). Heart rate (HR), invasive blood pressures, and partial pressure of oxygen (pO2) have also been recorded to see if they are independent predictors of prognosis in OPCABG patients.
Materials and Methods: A total of 56 patients undergoing OPCABG were included in the study. Baseline values and intraoperative values of ScvO2, rSO2, HR, systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and mean arterial pressure (MAP), pO2 at different time periods were recorded. Post-operatively the patients were shifted to Intensive care unit (ICU) on elective ventilation, and time to extubation since shifting to ICU were noted.
Results:The ScvO2 values after sternal closure (correlation coefficient r= -0.4821, P=0.0002), and on shifting to ICU (correlation coefficient r= -0.4575, P=0.0004) showed strong correlation with time to extubation. Similarly the rSO2 values after sternal closure (correlation coefficient r=-0.5198, P<0.0001) and on shifting to ICU (correlation coefficient r = -o.5498, P<0.0001) showed strong correlation with time to extubation. HR SBP, DBP, MAP, pO2 individually didn’t show any correlation with time to extubation (P>0.05).
Conclusion:ScvO2 and rSO2 both have strong correlation with time to extubation and are capable of predicting prognosis in OPCABG patients.
Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) has been shown to be lifesaving in patients unsuitable for coronary angioplasty. Currently, off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery (OPCAB) is done for myocardial revascularization in the majority of heart units in the developing countries for economic constrains. The role of cardiac stabilization and positioning of the heart is achieved with stabilization devices, in combination with deep pericardial traction sutures, enabling surgeon to perform multi vessel coronary revascularization in beating heart. This strategy obviates the deleterious effects of cardiopulmonary bypass associated with on pump CABG1. However even this procedure carries a significant risk of major complications. Associated comorbid conditions of the patient and positioning of the heart during the procedure significantly hampers oxygenation of the vital organs which post-operatively cumulates as increased risk of morbidity and mortality in terms of multiple organ system dysfunction.
In an attempt to reduce these complications numerous studies and trials have been carried out for adoption of goal directed, evidence based, haemodynamic treatment strategies. Apart from monitoring of haemodynamic parameters, certain variables of optimal cerebral perfusion have gained impetus.
Central venous oxygen saturation (ScvO2) has been suggested as one of the goal to address the issue of adequate cardiovascular circulatory function in context of cardiac surgeries2. It is an excellent indicator of match/mismatch between cardiac output (CO), arterial oxygen saturation, and haemoglobin (Hb) level as determinants of oxygen delivery and oxygen consumption2.
Regional cerebral oxygen saturation (rSO2) measured by near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) non-invasively detects brain hypoperfusion. Its primary aim is to detect cerebral oxygen demand and supply3. Fluctuations during intra-operative period can result in temporary brain hypoperfusion. If these periods are sustained, permanent neurological injury may ensue. Neurological injury can therefore be prevented if effective and goal oriented monitoring detects potentially harmful conditions early enough to allow initiation of effective interventions before irreversible injury has occurred.
The aim of this study is to investigate which of the two parameters either ScvO2 or rSO2 is a better predictor of prognosis in OPCABG patients, when the prognosis marker considered in this study is the “time taken for extubation of the patient” after shifting to ICU. Other parameters such as heart rate (HR), invasive blood pressure, partial pressure of oxygen in arterial blood (pO2) has been recorded to see whether these are independent predictors for prognosis of patients.
It was an Observational study with longitudinal follow up and all the consecutive subjects fulfilling the criteria was recruited in the study. So, no control was required for the study.
After getting Institutional Ethical Committee approval 56 patients undergoing elective OPCABG surgery were recruited for the study after obtaining informed written consent from them.
Exclusion Criteria of this study were patient refusal, patients with history of cerebrovascular accident with persistent neurological deficit, unilateral occlusion of carotid artery greater than 70%, bilateral occlusion of carotid artery greater than 50%, combined cardiac procedures i.e. CABG plus heart valve replacement, left ventricular ejection fraction < 30>2mg/dl, and if the procedure had been converted to on-pump CABG.
Pre-anaesthetic evaluation including detailed history taking, thorough physical and neurological examination, assessment of spine, airway examination were performed in all patients. Preoperative routine haematological investigations including Haemoglobin, TLC, DLC, ESR, platelet count, blood sugar (Fasting and Post Prandial), serum urea and creatinine, liver function test, chest X-ray (PA view), ECG-all 12 leads, Echocardiography and Coronary angiogram were done.
All patients were fasted overnight. On the day of surgery patient were shifted to the operation theatre. NIBP, ECG leads, SpO2 probe, NIRS sensors were attached to the patient. Arterial line was inserted in left hand under local anaesthesia. Baseline values of all variables were recorded.
Patient was pre-oxygenated with 100% oxygen for 3 mins. Induction of anaesthesia was done with inj midazolam 0.1-0.2 mg/kg, inj fentanyl 2-3 microgram/kg and inj thiopentone 4-5mg/kg. Intubation of trachea was facilitated with administration of inj rocuronium (1-1.5mg/kg) after 90secs. Central line was inserted in right internal jugular vein and pulmonary artery catheter was inserted. A pre incision value of all the variables were recorded. Patients were monitored continuously and values were recorded intermittently. Maintenance of anaesthesia was done with isoflurane, midazolam, fentanyl, and vecuronium. Inj Heparin 2 mg/kg was administered before start of grafting, and was repeated hourly as 0.5/kg to maintain Activated clotting time (ACT) between 200-300sec. After completion of grafting heparin activity was reversed by inj protamine 1.3 times the initial heparin dose. ACT was rechecked and maintained <150>
The variables rSO2, ScvO2, MAP, HR, pO2 were recorded at baseline (after insertion of CVP), pre incision, after sternotomy, after each graft, after sternal closure and after shifting to ICU Time to extubation was considered as the prognosis in the study. The patients were extubated when they met the criteria for extubation as per Institutional protocol.
Preoperative and intraoperative data were collected as regional cerebral oxygen saturation (rSO2) measured by NIRS spectrometry, central venous oxygen saturation (ScvO2), partial pressure of oxygen in arterial blood (pO2), heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP).
Data was summarized by routine descriptive statistics, namely mean and standard deviation for normally distributed numerical variable, median and interquartile for skewed numerical variable and counts and percentages for categorical variables. Association between numerical variables was quantified by calculating Pearson’s Rank correlation coefficient ‘R’ after examination for linear relation through construction of scatter plots. Strong correlations were observed, an attempt was made to build up regression equation to predict extubation time on the basis of numerical predictors.
Sample size calculation:- The purpose of this study was to explore the impact of various predictors, esp. rSO2 and ScvO2 on outcome in OPCABG patients. For the purpose of sample size we had considered ‘Time to extubation’ as primary outcome measure. Assuming a linear relationship between an oxygenation parameter and time to extubation, the sample size was calculated to achieve a sample correlation coefficient of 0.5. It was estimated that at least 47 patients are to be studied with 80 percent power and 5 percent probability of type I error, assuming a population correlation coefficient of 0.75. Analysis was two sided.
Sample size calculation was done with help of nMaster 2.0 (department of biostatistics, Christian Medical College Vellore) software.
Statistical analysis:- Data was summarized by routine descriptive statistics, namely mean and standard deviation for normally distributed numerical variable, median and interquartile for skewed numerical variable and counts and percentages for categorical variables. Association between numerical variables was quantified by calculating Pearson’s Rank correlation coefficient ‘R’ appropriate, after examing for linear relation through construction of scatter plots. Good correlations were observed, regression equation were build based on the variables to predict extubation time in minutes.
Regarding demographic profile of the patients mean±SD of age was (54.64±8.11) years, height (157.67±6.944) cm, weight (157.67±6.944) Kg and male: female ratio was 49:7. (Table-1)
Statistically significant difference in rSO2 on Left and Right sides was assessed using paired t tests. There was no statistically significant difference between rSO2 of left and right side (p > 0.05). So instead of considering rSO2 Left and rSO2 Right values separately, their mean values (rSO2 values) were considered for further analysis. (Table-2)
The rSO2 values after graft 3, after sternotomy closure and on shifting to ICU shows good correlation with the time taken for extubation (Table-3).
Significance level was p< 0>
The significance level was P=0.0002 after sternal closure and P=0.0004 after shifting to ICU with ScvO2 values and time to extubation while 95% confidence interval for time to extubation by ScvO2 values were -0.6612 to -0.2510 and -0.6431 to -0.2212 after sternal closure and shifting to ICU respectively. (Table-6)
The rSO2 values and the ScvO2 values after sternal closure and on shifting to ICU showed the strongest correlation with time to extubation of the patient.
The other parameters HR, SBP, DBP, MAP, PO2 individually didn’t show any correlation with time to extubation.
Haemodynamic instability throughout positioning, stabilization and interruption of coronary blood flow are important factors that affect the performance of off-pump CABG4. Scientific literature demonstrates that near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) monitoring may be able to enhance the detection of hypoxic conditions associated with neurological sequelae and would allow intervention on individual patients and drive refinements in strategies to reduce patients at risk5.
Shepherd SJ et al states that decrease in ScvO2 is seen in conditions of alveolar hypoventilation, anaemia, heart failure, hypovolemia, pain, agitation, pyrexia, shivering, and respiratory failure whereas oxygen therapy, blood transfusion, intravenous fluids, inotropes, sedation, anaesthesia, analgesia, warming, respiratory support brings about an improvement in ScvO2. It concludes that use of venous oxygen saturation as a therapeutic goal for haemodynamic therapy may reduce postoperative complication rates6.
Predictors of cerebral oxygen saturation included, partial pressure of carbon dioxide (pCO2), pump flow rate, temperature, mean arterial pressure, haematocrit, heart rate, oxygen saturation(SpO2) 7.
The current study showed that both these oxygenation parameters have strong correlation with the time to extubation of the patient especially after sternal closure and on shifting to ICU. The values of the variables at these time periods bore better correlation with the prognosis of patient suggesting they can be used as surrogate measures of each other, and a correlation may exist between them. Factors influencing the cerebral physiology and these two oxygenation parameters is varied. So interventions to keep it within physiological limit has to be individualized.
Normal rSO2 values, prior to the induction of GA, range from 60% to 80%. Although lower values (55-60%) for cardiac surgery patients breathing room air are not considered atypical8. Besides cerebral oxygenation, baseline cerebral oximetry values reflect a patient’s overall cardiopulmonary function and systemic oxygen needs. Cerebral oximetry values were found low in patients with normotensive acute heart failure. Successful treatment increased rSO2 values8.
Mixed venous oxygen saturation (SvO2) and central venous oxygen saturation (ScvO2) monitoring has shown mixed results from different randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses. In sepsis, ScvO2 less than 70% or SvO2 lower than 65% correlate with poor prognosis. Certain studies have shown that maintaining goal ScvO2 greater than 70% leads to reduced mortality. Therefore, ScvO2 is used to guide treatment algorithms in the Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC). As part of initial resuscitation practice guidelines, SSC recommends achieving a ScvO2 of over 70% within the first 6 hours.9
Some authors evaluated the connection between SvcO2 and prognosis and considering SvcO2 optimization as a goal for resuscitation. A decrease in ScvO2 during the first 8 postoperative hours in patients with major surgery was associated with an increase in 28-day morbidity and mortality. In major abdominal surgery ScvO2 <70>
Nebout S et al concluded ScvO2 maesurement is an interesting tool, especially in the early stages of shock to guide fluid management and blood transfusion and inotropic support10. Van Beest P et al concluded that low venous oxygen saturation are important signs for inadequacy to meet oxygen demands. Low values may warn the clinician about cardio-circulatory or metabolic impairment and should urge for further diagnostics and appropriate action, whereas normal or high valve do not rule out persistent tissue hypoxia11.
Paarmann H et al concluded that rSO2 assessment prior to cardiac surgeries is significantly related to time to extubation , and may thus be used to stratify candidates in fast track programmes3.
In the current study the rSO2 values towards the end of surgery bore greater significance in terms of extubation of patient. In the current study fast track cardiac anaesthesia was not practised as per Institutional protocol. Schreen T.W. et al states that NIRS offers non invasive online monitoring of tissue oxygenation in a wide range of clinical scenerios. A common application is to measure rSO2 during cardiac surgeries12.
Moritz S et al concluded, positioning of the heart during off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting leads to a decrease in regional cerebral oxygen saturation. This decrease is associated with changes in cardiac output, haemoglobin concentration, arterial CO2 partial pressure, and central venous pressure13. de Tournay-Jetté E et al showed, intraoperative cerebral oxygen desaturation is associated with early and late Post operative Cognitive Dysfunction in elderly patients. Cerebral oximetry is a promising tool in the prediction of subtle neuropsychistric drficits and further studies is needed14.
Harilall Y et al in another study showed the correlation between central venous saturation and cerebral saturation in the study and indicated that central venous saturation can be used as a surrogate measure of cerebral oxygen saturation, for neurologically asymptomatic patients undergoing OPCAB. The study further stated that with every one unit increase in left cerebral oxygen saturation, there was a corresponding 0.760 unit increase in central venous oxygen saturation and with every one unit increase in right cerebral oxygen saturation, there was a corresponding 0.879 unit increase in central venous oxygen saturation15.
McQuillen PS et al study on the association between regional and central venous oxygen saturation in paediatric cardiac surgery concluded that neither individual values, nor changes in rSO2 are interchangeable measures of ScvO2 in postoperative paediatric cardiac patients16.
Coronary artery disease is a disease of the adult population, and cardiac surgery in paediatric population was not considered in the current study. The mean age in the current study population was 54.64±8.114.
Kakuta N et al in a case report noted that ScvO2 shows more marked changes than rSO2, a combination of these two parameters for monitoring during Glenn shunt may be safer17.
In this study, it has been seen that ScvO2 and rSO2 can both or either be used depending on the economic constrains, to guide therapy during OPCABG. rSO2 by NIRS is a noninvasive method, but it requires new equipments and disposable sensors which may not be economical in many centers. Again, it has the risk of interference from dirt, skin pigmentation, disconnection leading to false readings. ScvO2 is attractive as is readily measurable without any additional monitoring technology. Central venous line is routinely placed in every patient undergoing OPCABG. Even if continuous ScvO2 monitoring by a spectrophotometer is not done, intermittent evaluation after significant events can be equally useful.
The limitations of the study are, small sample size. Events in the ICU factors were not documented which might have influenced the extubation time. Continuous monitoring of ScvO2 with spectrophotometer was not done, while rso2 was continuously monitored by NIRS.
ScvO2 and rSO2 can both can be used to guide therapy. As they are the cumulative effects of many interplaying factors, hence are better predictors than other individual haemodynamic factors. Choosing between any of the two modalities will depend on individualization for the undergoing procedure, patient and institutional infrastructure.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.
