AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Research Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2766-2314/101
Sam Higginbottom University of Agriculture, Technology and Sciences, Uttar Pradesh, India.
*Corresponding Author: Challagurugula Kushal, Sam Higginbottom University of Agriculture, Technology and Sciences, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Citation: Challagurugula Kushal, Ashwani Kumar, (2023), Comparative Efficacy and Economics of Selected Bio Pesticides with Chlorantraniliprole Against Tomato Fruit Borer [Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner)] on tomato [Solanum lycopersicum L, J, Biotechnology and Bioprocessing, 4(3); DOI:10.31579/2766-2314/101
Copyright: © 2023, Challagurugula Kushal. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 25 April 2023 | Accepted: 05 May 2023 | Published: 12 May 2023
Keywords: bio pesticides; chlorantraniliprole; cost benefit ratio; helicoverpa armigera; tomato; yield
The field trial was conducted at Central Research Farm, Sam Higginbottom University of Agriculture, Technology and Sciences, Prayagraj, UP during Rabi, 2022–2023. The experiment was laid out in RBD (Randomized Block Design). Eight treatments were evaluated against Helicoverpa armigera i.e., (T1) Chlorantraniliprole 18.5% SC (T2) ½Dose Chlorantraniliprole + Nisco sixer plus 2ml/lit (T3) Spinosad 45% SC (T4) Nisco sixer plus 2ml/lit (T5) Neem seed kernel extract 5% (T6) Azadirachtin 5% (T7) Beauvaria bassiana and (T0) untreated Control Were tested to compare the efficacy against Helicoverpa armigera and their influences on yield of Tomato. The best and most economical treatment T1 Chlorantraniliprole 18.5% SC (1:10.), followed by T2 ½Dose Chlorantraniliprole + Nisco sixer plus 2ml/lit (1:10.0) T3 Spinosad 45% SC (1:8.7), T4 Nisco sixer plus 2ml/lit (1:8.1), T5 Neem seed kernel extract 5% (1:6.9), T6 Azadirachtin 5% (1:6.5), T7 Beauvaria bassiana (1:5.8), T0 untreated control (1:4.9) having lowest B:C ratio. Chlorantraniliprole 18.5% SC, ½Dose Chlorantraniliprole + Nisco sixer plus 2ml/lit, Spinosad 45% SC, Nisco sixer plus 2ml/lit recorded the minimum fruit infestation by 8.57, 9.60, 10.66, 11.35 percent respectively. The highest yield was noticed in Chlorantraniliprole 18.5% SC (240.5 q/ha), followed by ½Dose Chlorantraniliprole + Nisco sixer plus 2ml/lit (232.5 q/ha) and Spinosad (200 q/ha).
Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) belonging to the family Solanaceae is the native of Peru Ecuador region and is one of the most popular and widely grown crops of commercial and dietary significance in the world as it is a very versatile vegetable. Due to its high consumption rate in developed and developing countries, it is often referred to as a luxury crop. In England, it is popularly known as Love Apple and is grown in all home gardens and by a large number of market and truck growers. It is also being grown in greenhouse in off-season. Now, it has become a good source of income to small and marginal farmers. In many countries, it is considered as poor man’s orange. Tomato is also an important source of lycopene, ascorbic acid and β-carotene, which are potent antioxidants. (Kharia et al., 2022)18
Tomato is the most widely eaten vegetable, ranking first as a processing vegetable and second in terms of production after potato in the world. Nutritionally, it serves as a source of vitamins A, B, C, and D and minerals such as calcium, phosphorus, and iron. It is consumed in fresh or processed forms. However, the national average yield of tomatoes of countries such as China (59.4 tons ha− 1), India (24.6 tons ha− 1), the USA (96.8 tons ha− 1), Turkey (68.8 tons ha− 1), and Egypt (40.9 tons ha− 1) (Mengistie et al., 2022).11
In India, it ranks second among vegetables in area and production and occupies an area of 1.20 million ha. with a production of 19.4 million tons and average yield of 16.1 tons per hectare. The total cultivated area of tomato in India is about 767.32 thousand ha. With total production 16,384.98 thousand MT. India shares in the world tomato production about 11% in the year (2014-15). Madhya Pradesh is the largest tomato producing state occupying the 70.23 lakh ha. of with 2177.00 MT production (2014-15). The second largest tomato producing state in India is Karnataka having production area of 64.25 lakh ha. with a production 2034.37 MT (2014-15), Andhra Pradesh state has third rank in tomato area and production. Respectively in the area 54.22 lakh ha. and production 1473.54 MT. (Kushwaha et al., 2018)9
The important insect pests of tomato are fruit borer Helicoverpa armigera, whitefly Bemisia tabaci, leaf hopper Amrasca devastans, leaf miner Liriomyza trifolii, potato aphid Myzus persicae and hadda beetle Epilachana dedecastigma. Among the various insect pests, tomato fruit borer, Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) is highly destructive causing serious damage. Fruiting stage of the crop and the time of plantation govern the incidence of fruit borer. Larvae invade fruits, preventing fruit development and causing the fruit dropping. Tomato Fruit Borer damage can also be responsible for decreasing the seed viability compared to undamaged fruit. Larvae can be found only by opening the infested fruit. Severe infestation causes necrosis to the leaf chlorophillus tissue, suppresses tomato flowers to bloom and makes the mature fruit unfit to consume. It has been reported to cause serious losses throughout its range, in particular to tomato it has been found to cause a yield loss of 35–37.79% fruit. (Biswas et al., 2022)3 In India, loss in tomato yield 50 to 80 per cent. Similarly, in Northern India, 30% loss of the fruit was observed due to tomato fruit worm. 5–55% losses from this insect pest in the tomato growing areas of India. Tomato fruit worm has also caused 35% yield loss in tomato and 37.79% specifically in Karnataka, India.
In tomato the total life cycle was completed in 35 to 75 days depending on climate. Female lays eggs in groups of 4 to 10, sometimes they were scattered. The incubation period varied from 4 to 6 days. The larva moults six times to become adult (Singh. S 2017)17. The average corresponding days for each instars are 2 to 8 days. Pupa stage last for 10 to 14 days. The male moth emerged within 9 days and female moth takes 11 days to complete development. (Ali et al., 2009)1.
The experiment was conducted under field conditions at Central Research Farm, Sam Higginbottom University of Agriculture, Technology and Sciences, Prayagraj, UP during the rabi season 2022–2023 in Randomized block design with three replications. A good tilth area was divided into three main blocks. Each main block was sub-divided into 8 sub-plots of 2m × 1m size with maintaining 30 cm borders as a bunds and treatments was assigned randomly. The research field is situated at the right side of Rewa road at 25◦ 22’ 15.888” North Latitude and 81◦51’ 31.4712” East Longitude and is about 98m above mean sea level. The climate at Prayagraj is typical subtropical which prevails in the eastern part of UP. The extremes of both summer and winter are experienced here. The maximum temperature recorded during summer up to 47◦C and the minimum temperature was recorded during winter up to 1.5◦C. All necessary facilities for cultivation of crop were available at research farm. The spray solution of desired concentration was prepared by adoption the following formula:
Where,
V = Volume of a formulated pesticide required.
C = Concentration required.
A = Volume of total solution to be prepared.
percentage a.i. = Given Percentage strength of a formulated pesticide.
Percent Fruit Infestation:
Cost Benefit
Ratio:
Gross return = Marketable Yield x Market price
(Singh et al., 2017)16
Results and Discussions:
| S.No. | Treatments | Percent fruit infestation of 5 plants | Overall Mean | Yield (q/ha) | C:B ratio | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dosage | First Spray | Second Spray | |||||||||||
| DBS | 7DAS | 14DAS | Mean | DBS | 7DAS | 14DAS | Mean | ||||||
| T1 | Chlorantraniliprole18.5%SC | 1ml/L | 21.67 | 8.44 | 10.59 | 9.515 | 11.85 | 6.64 | 8.62 | 7.63 | 8.57 | 240.5 | 1:10.4 |
| T2 | ½Dose chlorantraniliprole + Nisco sixer plus 2ml/lit | 0.5ml/L+ 2ml/L | 19.48 | 9.06 | 11.37 | 10.216 | 13.43 | 8.9 | 9.08 | 8.99 | 9.60 | 232.5 | 1:10.0 |
| T3 | Spinosad 45% SC | 0.4ml/L | 18.69 | 10.25 | 12.05 | 11.15 | 14.43 | 9.63 | 10.0 | 9.81 | 10.66 | 200 | 1:8.7 |
| T4 | Nisco sixer plus 2ml/lit | 2ml/L | 18.91 | 11.23 | 13.07 | 12.15 | 14.87 | 10.52 | 10.59 | 10.56 | 11.35 | 187.5 | 1:8.1 |
| T5 | Neem seed kernel extract 5% | 50ml/L | 18.31 | 15.00 | 13.86 | 14.43 | 15.32 | 11.29 | 11.60 | 11.44 | 12.93 | 160 | 1:6.9 |
| T6 | Azadirachtin 5% | 5ml/L | 18.02 | 16.31 | 15.31 | 15.81 | 16.86 | 12.80 | 12.50 | 12.65 | 14.23 | 150.5 | 1:6.5 |
| T7 | Beauvaria bassiana | 2gm/L | 20.36 | 17.66 | 16.17 | 16.92 | 17.51 | 14.39 | 13.46 | 13.92 | 15.42 | 135.5 | 1:5.8 |
| T0 | Control | 21.53 | 23.19 | 25.33 | 24.26 | 23.14 | 18.86 | 19.49 | 19.17 | 21.87 | 110.5 | 1:4.9 | |
| F-test | NS | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | - | - | ||
| S. Ed. (±) | 1.38 | 0.35 | 0.32 | 0.85 | 0.39 | 0.31 | 0.15 | 0.42 | 0.58 | - | - | ||
| C.D. (P = 0.05) | - | 1.047 | 0.995 | 2.842 | 1.175 | 0.941 | 0.463 | 1.396 | 1.954 | - | - | ||
Figure 1: Percentage infestation of tomato fruit borer [Helicoverp aarmigera (Hubner)] in Tomato during 1st and 2nd spray.
DBS** - Day Before Spray**, DAS*** - Day After Spray***
In present investigations, efforts have been made to evolve an effective and economically viable pest management strategy against tomato fruit borer. From these view point, the present investigation “Comparative efficacy of selected bio pesticides with Chlorantraniliprole 18.5% SC against Tomato fruit borer [Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner)] on Tomato [Solanum lycopersicum L.]”. The results obtained on per cent fruit infestation and benefit cost ratio on tomato for evaluating each treatment, for tomato fruit borer management have been described thoroughly here
In this experiment, eight different treatments, consisting of applications (T1) Chlorantraniliprole 18.5 SC (T2) ½Dose chlorantraniliprole + Nisco sixer plus 2ml/lit (T3) Spinosad 45% SC (T4) Nisco sixer plus 2ml/lit (T5) Neem seed kernel extract 5% (T6) Azadirachtin 5% (T7) Beauvaria bassiana and (T0) untreated Control were tested to compare the efficacy against Helicoverpa armigera and their influence on yield of Tomato. The results obtained are discussed from available and relevant literature in this chapters before. All the treatments were significantly superior over control. Among all the treatments minimum percent infestation of fruit borer was recorded in T1 Chlorantraniliprole 18.5 SC (8.57%) as compared to T0 – untreated control (21.87%). These results were similar to the findings reported by Jamir et al., (2022)7, Hivare et al., (2019)6, Patil et al., (2018)12, reported that among all the treatments lowest number of fruit borer was recorded in Chlorantraniliprole 18.5% SC. Next most effective treatment was recorded in T₂ ½Dose Chlorantraniliprole + Nisco sixer plus 2ml/lit (9.604%) and these results were similar to the findings reported by Lalhluzuala et al., (2022)10, Reddy et al., (2020)14, Gayathri et al., (2021)4. Next effective treatment was recorded in T3 Spinosad 45% SC (10.66%), and the similar reports were given by Harshita et al. (2018)5. It is followed by T4 Nisco Sixer Plus 2ml/lit (11.35%) and the similar report was recorded by Tejeswari et al. (2021)18. T5 Neem Seed Kernal Extract (12.939%) and the similar report was recorded by Rahman et al. (2014)13. T6 Azadirachtin 5% (14.234%) and the similar was reported by Hivare et al. (2019)6. and the least effective and maximum percent incidence was showed by T7 Beauvaria bassiana (15.423%) and the similar reported by Rijal et al. (2008)15. Higher yield (240.5 q/ha) and Higher Cost: Benefit Ratio (1:10.4) was obtained from Chlorantraniliprole 18.5% SC treated plots and lowest (110 q/ha) in untreated control plot. Similar findings made by Jamir et al., (2022)7 who reported that the Chlorantraniliprole 18.5% SC is the best and most economical treatment recorded yield (222.54q/ha) and cost benefit ratio (1:9.14).
Next highest yield and benefit cost ratio was recorded in T₂ –½Dose Chlorantraniliprole + Nisco sixer plus 2ml/lit (232.5 q/ha and 1:10.0). Similar findings made by Lalhluzuala et al., (2022)10. Bandhavi et al. (2022)2 who reported that the T3 Spinosad 45SC is the best and most economical treatment which is similar to yield (200 q/ha) and cost benefit ratio (1:8.7). Jamir et al. (2022)7 reported that the cost effective of T4 Nisco sixer Plus was high with the yield of (187.5 q/ha) and cost benefit ratio (1:8.1). Next effective treatment was T5 – Neem seed Kernal Extract (160 q/ha and 1:6.9 respectively), this was supported by Rahman et al. (2014)13.
It was concluded that among all the treatments in Chlorantraniliprole% SC with minimum mean 8.57% and maximum yield of 240.5q/ha proved to be the best treatment which is followed by ½ Chlorantranilirpole + Nisco Sixer Plus 2ml/lit mean of 9.6% and yield with 232.5 q/hac, Spinosad 45% SC with mean 10.66% and yield 200 q/ha, Nisco Sixer plus 2ml/lit with mean of 11.35% and yield 187.5 q/hac, Neem Seed Kernal Extract 5% mean 12.93% and yield is 160 q/hac, Azadirachtin 5% mean is 14.23% and yield is 150.5 q/hac, Beauveria bassiana with mean of 15.42% and yield is 135.5 q/hac and at last Untreated control with mean of 21.87% and yield is 110.5q/hac in managing Helicoverpa armigera reduction. Recommended dose of chemicals may be useful in devising proper integrated pest management strategy against fruit borer of tomato.
Acknowledgement
I express my heartful gratitude to Dr. Ashwani Kumar, associate Professor and Head, Department of Entomology, and I am grateful to Prof. (Dr.) Rajendra B. Lal Hon’ble Vice Chancellor, SHUATS, Prof (Dr.) Shailesh Marker, Director of Research, (Dr.) Deepak Lal, Dean of PG Studies, Prof (Dr.) Gautam Gosh, Dean, Naini Agricultural Institute, SHUATS, Prayagraj for making their keen interest and encouragement to carry out this research work.
The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and its supplementary materials.
I hereby declare that all the information given above is true and correct to the best of my knowledge.
This work was supported by Sam Higginbottom University of Agriculture, Technology and Sciences, Prayagraj, Uttarpradesh – 211007 (India).
We have no conflicts of interest to disclose. All authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
No Software application or custom code.
This work was carried out in collaboration between both authors. Both authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
