Community Associated Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus Causing Acute Urinary Tract Infection and Epididymo-Orchitis: A Case Report

Research Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2690-4861/227

Community Associated Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus Causing Acute Urinary Tract Infection and Epididymo-Orchitis: A Case Report

  • Vishal Phogat MBBS *
  • Harvir S. Gambhir MD

 SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York 13202 

*Corresponding Author: Vishal Phogat, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York 13202

Citation: Phogat V., Harvir S. Gambhir (2022) Community Associated Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus Causing Acute Urinary Tract Infection and Epididymo-Orchitis: A Case Report. International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. 11(3); DOI: 10.31579/2690-4861/227

Copyright: © 2022 Vishal Phogat, this is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Received: 23 May 2022 | Accepted: 27 May 2022 | Published: 07 June 2022

Keywords: MRSA; UTI; epididymitis; orchitis; genito-urinary infection.

Abstract

Acute epididymitis is most commonly infectious in etiology, usually secondary to a urinary tract infection (UTI) or a sexually transmitted infections (like gonorrhea and chlamydia). Enteric gram-negative bacteria (like Escherichia coli) and coagulase-negative Staphylococcus saprophyticus are the most frequently encountered organisms associated with UTIs. Staphylococcus aureus, especially methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), is an uncommon pathogen when considering community associated acute UTI and acute epididymitis. We present an unusual case of a 28-years-old immunocompetent male, who presented with a left scrotal swelling and was found to have acute epididymo-orchitis due to an acute MRSA UTI.

Abbreviations

MRSA= Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus

SA= Staphylococcus aureus 

UTI= Urinary tract infection

STI= Sexually transmitted infections

IV= intravenous

ID= infectious diseases

CFU= Colony Forming Units

Introduction

Acute epididymitis is the most common cause of scrotal pain in adults in the outpatient setting, accounting for 600,000 cases per year in the United States (Tracy et al., 2008). Acute cases most commonly arise from infections like urinary tract infections (UTIs) or a sexually transmitted infections (such as gonorrhea and chlamydia). Noninfectious causes of epididymitis generally present as subacute or chronic, and the etiology can range from trauma to autoimmune diseases. Staphylococcus aureus (SA) is an uncommon pathogen when considering epididymitis. We present an unusual case of acute epididymo-orchitis and UTI secondary to community associated methicillin-resistant SA (MRSA) in a young immunocompetent male.

Methods

Data was obtained from the electronic medical record The patient gave verbal informed consent for the case report. The diagnosis of epididymo-orchitis was confirmed through ultrasound findings, which correlated with clinical findings. MRSA UTI was diagnosed by urine cultures. 

Results

A 28-years-old Caucasian male with a past medical history of intravenous drug use, MRSA bacteremia, and hepatitis C (not on active treatment) was admitted with complaints of left scrotal swelling, increased urinary frequency, dysuria, and hematuria for 5 days. He denied any fevers or chills. No history of kidney stones, sexually transmitted infections (STIs), UTIs, or exposure to tuberculosis was reported. His personal history included a monogamous long-term relationship with a female partner, active use of intravenous drugs (heroin), 10 pack- years of cigarette smoking, and occasional marijuana smoking. 

On physical examination, the patient had significant erythema, tenderness, induration, and swelling of the left hemi-scrotum. No fluctuance, crepitus, or active drainage was noticed. Cord structures were thickened and tender on the left-sided scrotum. Cremasteric reflex was present on both sides. On rectal examination, the prostate was smooth, non-tender, nonindurated, and without any boggy areas. 

His labs were significant for leukocytosis (WBC count of 29,800/uL) with neutrophilic predominance, and an elevated CRP of 305 mg/L. All other labs, including tumor markers, were normal. Urine analysis was suggestive of a urinary tract infection and the urine cultures grew >100,000 CFU/ml of MRSA. Amplified urine testing for Neisseria and Chlamydia was negative. Blood cultures were drawn. 

Ultrasound of the scrotum showed an enlarged hyperemic left testicle and epididymis, consistent with epididymo-orchitis. Multiple focal hypoechoic lesions were seen within the left testis suggestive of micro-abscesses. There was also an associated thickening and edema of the left scrotal wall with a small complex hydrocele. Transthoracic echo, obtained as part of workup to locate for the source of MRSA infection, did not show any obvious cardiac vegetations. 

Urology and Infectious diseases (ID) were consulted. Urology recommended conservative management and ID recommended intravenous (IV) vancomycin. The patient’s scrotal swelling and dysuria improved with a couple of days of IV vancomycin, and the patient decided to leave the hospital against medical advice. Upon discharge, the patient was prescribed Bactrim (Double Strength) twice a day for 21 days and Doxycycline 100 mg twice daily for 14 days as per ID recommendations. Outpatient follow-ups were scheduled with Urology and ID. His blood cultures did not show any growth over the next 5 days. 

Discussion

Acute epididymitis is a clinical syndrome consisting of pain, swelling, and inflammation of the epididymis lasting <6>C. trachomatis or N.gonorrhoeae. In men aged ≥35 years, epididymis usually becomes infected in the setting of bacteriuria secondary to bladder outlet obstruction (e.g., benign prostatic hyperplasia) (Tracy & Costabile, 2009). In older men, non-sexually transmitted acute epididymitis is also associated with prostate biopsy, urinary tract instrumentation or surgery, systemic diseases, and/or immunosuppression. 

The most frequently encountered organisms associated with bacteriuria and UTI are the enteric gram-negative bacteria (Escherichia coli being the most predominant) and coagulase-negative Staphylococcus saprophyticus. Repeated unprotected anal intercourse can predisposes men to UTIs from enteric flora (like E. coli); (Ashby & Smith, 2010). Proteus mirabilis, and Enterococcus, account for less than 5

Conclusions

Community-associated SA predominantly causes skin and soft tissue infections, and other fatal infections such as necrotizing pneumonia and necrotizing fasciitis. Community-associated MRSA is an uncommon pathogen for urogenital infections, and a little is published on MRSA-positive urine cultures. Recent studies have reported an increasing prevalence of SA in UTIs (E & O, 2008). This case report points out that there may be an increasing incidence of community-associated MRSA as a causative agent of genitourinary infections, like UTIs and acute epididymo-orchitis. This case also points out the importance of obtaining urine cultures in these cases. More case reports and case series are required to ascertain the true incidence and prevalence of MRSA las a cause of community acquired infections, including UTIs and genito-urinary infections.

Acknowledgement

No sources of financial support were needed for writing or publishing this manuscript. The authors do not have any commercial or other associations that might pose a conflict of interest.

References

Dear Editorial Team, Clinical Medical Reviews and Reports. My experience with the journal was highly positive. The peer-review process was rigorous, constructive, and completed in a timely manner. The reviewers provided valuable comments that helped improve the quality and clarity of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout all stages of the publication process. Communication was clear and efficient, and any questions were addressed promptly. Overall, I found the journal to maintain high scientific standards and an excellent publication workflow. I would be pleased to consider submitting future work to this journal. Best wishes from, Elena Popa.

img

Dr Elena Popa

It was my pleasure to submit my testimonial concerning the Reviewer Board of our Scientific Journal “Brain and Neurological Disorders”. The Reviewers focused on some modifications and their contribution was helpful. The ladies of our Editorial Office were also supported my efforts. It was my honor to have such a co-operation and I am looking forward for more collaboration.

img

Dr Nikolaos Andreas Chrysanthakopoulos

Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Thank you for the speedy and efficient peer review process. I appreciate the fact that your peer reviewers do not take months to respond like with some other journals. I would also like to thank the editorial office for responding quickly to my questions. It is an excellent journal. I plan to submit more manuscripts in the future. Best wishes from, Robert W. McGee

img

Robert W McGee

Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Working with you and your team on our recent publication in JCRR has been a truly wonderful and enjoyable experience. The responses were prompt, and the reviewers were patient, constructive, and highly professional. One reviewer in particular gave me the feeling that a professor was carefully reading and commenting on my coursework, which was deeply touching. The entire process was straightforward and hassle‑free, with no tedious online forms to complete. I highly recommend this journal. Best wishes from, DR Aibing Rao, Head of R&D

img

Aibing Rao

I Appreciate the Opportunity to Share my Experience with the Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. The peer review process was timely and constructive, and the feedback provided helped improve the quality of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout the process, ensuring smooth communication and efficient handling of the submission. Overall, it was a positive experience collaborating with your team.

img

Kashani Mehdi

Dear Mercy Grace, Editorial Coordinator of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, We would like to express our gratitude for your help at all stages of publishing and editing the article. The editors of the magazine answer all the necessary questions and help at every stage. We will definitely continue to cooperate and publish other works in the Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences! Best wishes from, Alla Konstantinovna Politova,

img

Alla Konstantinovna Politova