Opinion Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2694-0248/018
A.O. Ordine Mauriziano Torino – S.C. Radiodiagnostica – L.go Turati 62 - 10128 Turin – ITALY, Radiographer.
*Corresponding Author: Sergio Palandri, A.O. Ordine Mauriziano Torino – S.C. Radiodiagnostica – L.go Turati 62 - 10128 Turin – ITALY, Radiographer.
Citation: Sergio Palandri, (2022). Comments on “How To Perform A Reliable Full Spine X-Ray Examination In Juvenile And Adolescent Scoliosis - Experience Outcome. J. Clinical Orthopedics and Trauma Care, 4(2); DOI:10.31579/2694-0248/018
Copyright: © 2021, Sergio Palandri. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 20 December 2021 | Accepted: 30 December 2021 | Published: 13 January 2022
Keywords: acetabulum; posttraumatic deformity; total hip arthroplasty; aspid
The article provided a very structured as well as detailed protocol on how and in which views, perform this type of examination, largely documented also with photos that shown tricks and strategies to obtain the best imaging.
Analyzing the article, is easy to see how the use of the proposed protocol allows to standardize the execution, ensureing the reproducibility and therefore the comparability of different examinations performed on the same subject at different times, avoiding the variability due to different operators.
One point on which the author focused on, is the psychological-relational aspects of the examination, seeing as how the subjects mainly involved are girls. This particular attention to relational aspects, significantly increases the Patient's comfort and lead to increase her compliance to the examination that is a foundamental condition to ensure high quality in the imaging results. The same care also comforts parents and provides them serenity. This is very important especially in the case of the first time in which the clinical diagnosis of scoliosis is established.
In February 2021, an article on the execution of full spine X-ray examination in Patients with juvenile and adolescent scoliosis, was published in this journal.
The article provided a very structured as well as detailed protocol on how and in which views, perform this type of examination, largely documented also with photos that shown tricks and strategies to obtain the best imaging.
Analyzing the article, is easy to see how the use of the proposed protocol allows to standardize the execution, ensureing the reproducibility and therefore the comparability of different examinations performed on the same subject at different times, avoiding the variability due to different operators.
One point on which the author focused on, is the psychological-relational aspects of the examination, seeing as how the subjects mainly involved are girls. This particular attention to relational aspects, significantly increases the Patient's comfort and lead to increase her compliance to the examination that is a foundamental condition to ensure high quality in the imaging results. The same care also comforts parents and provides them serenity. This is very important especially in the case of the first time in which the clinical diagnosis of scoliosis is established.
Based on the same reason of the previous point, the author also focused above all on the protection from the side effetcts of the ionizing radiation employed, since is well known that girls and young women are the most sensible subjects from this point of view. This attention has led to combine technical tricks and technological advances in the field of radiological diagnostic equipment to obtain diagnostic examinations using a dose as low as reasonable possible.
Although the aspects reported above, may suggest an efficient and innovative solution, the proposed protocol is not free from shadows. The main of these and probably the origin of all other related critical points, is linked to the adoption or not of the protocol at the level of the diagnostic imaging ward, where the examinations will be performed.
In fact, not adopting the protocol means, in other words, that ward considers the full spine X-ray examination not strategic fot itself and not as important and needed of particular attention as it really is. This leads to not invest resources e.g. to incentivize training or to detect certain mistaakes and shortcomings or to avoid them. Finally ward will have most of the operators not specifically trained for this type of examination and not sensitised on its peculiarities and its importance, mistakes and shortcomings will be considered acceptable and the possible orthopedic observations will be simply dropped.
On the other hand, the Patients and their parents have few tools to encourage the use of the proposed protocol, while praising it when it is applied. So they become substantially passive subjects, losing the active component in the examination that the protocol gave them by right. Both the Patients and the parents thus will find themselves undergoing what happens to them. However, this does not mean that their discomfort is negligible. Indeed, probably just the opposite. Except that the fact is simply ignored.
Certainly what reported does not invalidate the protocol itself, nor does it reduce its validity. Rather, it confirms, as yet another proof, that results can only be obtained from teamwork at any level: it is therefore not enough to have a good tool to perform an examination, but it is necessary that it has been accepted, shared and helped to grow by everyone in the ward, to whatever level and profession it belongs, if you really want it to be there a significant increase in the outcome.
And this naturally also involves the decision-making structures of the hospital.
Dear Editorial Team, Clinical Medical Reviews and Reports. My experience with the journal was highly positive. The peer-review process was rigorous, constructive, and completed in a timely manner. The reviewers provided valuable comments that helped improve the quality and clarity of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout all stages of the publication process. Communication was clear and efficient, and any questions were addressed promptly. Overall, I found the journal to maintain high scientific standards and an excellent publication workflow. I would be pleased to consider submitting future work to this journal. Best wishes from, Elena Popa.
It was my pleasure to submit my testimonial concerning the Reviewer Board of our Scientific Journal “Brain and Neurological Disorders”. The Reviewers focused on some modifications and their contribution was helpful. The ladies of our Editorial Office were also supported my efforts. It was my honor to have such a co-operation and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Thank you for the speedy and efficient peer review process. I appreciate the fact that your peer reviewers do not take months to respond like with some other journals. I would also like to thank the editorial office for responding quickly to my questions. It is an excellent journal. I plan to submit more manuscripts in the future. Best wishes from, Robert W. McGee
Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Working with you and your team on our recent publication in JCRR has been a truly wonderful and enjoyable experience. The responses were prompt, and the reviewers were patient, constructive, and highly professional. One reviewer in particular gave me the feeling that a professor was carefully reading and commenting on my coursework, which was deeply touching. The entire process was straightforward and hassle‑free, with no tedious online forms to complete. I highly recommend this journal. Best wishes from, DR Aibing Rao, Head of R&D
I Appreciate the Opportunity to Share my Experience with the Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. The peer review process was timely and constructive, and the feedback provided helped improve the quality of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout the process, ensuring smooth communication and efficient handling of the submission. Overall, it was a positive experience collaborating with your team.
Dear Mercy Grace, Editorial Coordinator of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, We would like to express our gratitude for your help at all stages of publishing and editing the article. The editors of the magazine answer all the necessary questions and help at every stage. We will definitely continue to cooperate and publish other works in the Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences! Best wishes from, Alla Konstantinovna Politova,