Commentary | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/JCVM-2019/002
*Corresponding Author: Roberto Parrella, U.O.C. Malattie Infettive ad indirizzo respiratorio-AORN dei Colli-Napoli.
Citation: Roberto Parrella, Filomena Di Martino, Marco Rossi, Annunziata De Rosa, Vincenzo Sangiovanni, Francesco Scarano, (2019) Dual Testing Approach with TST and IGRAS for Detection of LTBI in HIV, J Clinical Virology and Microbiology. DOI: 10.31579/JCVM-2019/002
Copyright: © 2019 Roberto Parrella et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 15 December 2018 | Accepted: 24 January 2019 | Published: 12 February 2019
Keywords: HIV; latent tuberculosis infection; Interferon gamma release assays.
In a recent article, our team demonstrated that HIV infected people have a significantly lower response to TST for detection of LTBI and that a discordance between IGRAs and TST is evident mainly in patients with advanced immunosuppression. TST cannot be considered the optimal test to determinate LTBI mainly in immunosuppressed individuals, due to the high number of false negative results related to the energy of immune system. We showed a higher percentage of positive results of TST and IGRAs in HIV infected people with higher CD4 cell count but among TST negative individuals both T-SPOT TB and QFT IT were positive in 9.2% cases.
In a recent article published on "In vivo", our team report an interesting observation about the effectiveness of interferon gamma release assays (IGRAs) and tubercolin skin test (TST) for the detection of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) in HIV positive patients with different setting of immunodeficiency. Tuberculosis (TB) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide accounting for about 9.6 million new cases and 1.5 million deaths annually. It is estimated that over 13 million people are coinfected with HIV and Mycobacterium tuberculosis. In 2016 there were an estimated 10.4 million new tuberculosis cases, 90% adults, and 10% people living with HIV. In the same year, there were an estimated 1.3 million TB deaths among HIV negative people and an additional 374.000 deaths resulting from TB among people with HIV infection. Countries of Sub-Saharian Africa account for around 70% of all TB deaths among people living with HIV [1]. LTBI infection is the presence of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in the body without signs and symptoms or radiographic or bacteriologic evidence of the disease. HIV infection is the most important risk factor for progression from latent tuberculosis infection to active TB and the annual risk of developing acute TB is approximately 10% per year compared to a lifetime risk of 5-10% in immunocompetent subjects. Thus, the risk of progression to TB disease is 10 times greater for those who are HIV infected [2]. Datas in literature report that isoniazid preventive treatment in LTBI may reduce the risk of progression to active TB, thus it is urgent to identify and to treat latent tuberculosis mainly in HIV positive population [3]. IGRAs are simple blood tests alternative to TST for detection of TB infection, that measure a person's immune reactivity to Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Quantiferon TB Gold in Tube (QFT IT and T-SPOT TB) are more specific than TST, have advantages over TST in sensitivity and a higher positive predictive value when applied in immunocompromised patients with risk factor for LTBI. Moreover, prior BCG vaccination does not cause a false positive IGRA test result, unlike TST. A positive test result suggests that TB infection is likely; a negative one suggests that infection is unlikely. As known, the two IGRAs can yield indeterminate test results (ITRs) which limit their clinical utility mainly in T-SPOT TB test [4]. In our recent study we observed a low proportion of indeterminate results in T-SPOT TB test and in QFT IT one that seemed prevalent in patients with a low CD4 cell count. In the article by Parrella et al, the authors demonstrated that HIV infected people have a significantly lower response to TST for detection of LTBI and that a discordance between IGRAs and TST is evident mainly in patients with advanced immunosuppression. TST cannot be considered the optimal test to determinate LTBI mainly in immunosuppressed individuals, due to the high number of false negative results related to the energy of immune system. We showed a higher percentage of positive results of TST and IGRAs in HIV infected people with higher CD4 cell count but among TST negative individuals both T-SPOT TB and QFT IT were positive in 9.2% cases. The poor agreement among all tests used to detect LTBI in HIV people makes difficult to validate a golden standard method. Dual testing with TST and IGRAs should be the optimal approach of LTBI screening in HIV infected population. Diagnosis and treatment of LTBI is the most effective strategy to control TB among patients with HIV infection. Further investigations in a larger number of cases and that compare IGRAs and TST for detection of LTBI in HIV people are needed, in order to confirm our results and to evaluate the clinical impact of dual testing.
Dear Editorial Team, Clinical Medical Reviews and Reports. My experience with the journal was highly positive. The peer-review process was rigorous, constructive, and completed in a timely manner. The reviewers provided valuable comments that helped improve the quality and clarity of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout all stages of the publication process. Communication was clear and efficient, and any questions were addressed promptly. Overall, I found the journal to maintain high scientific standards and an excellent publication workflow. I would be pleased to consider submitting future work to this journal. Best wishes from, Elena Popa.
It was my pleasure to submit my testimonial concerning the Reviewer Board of our Scientific Journal “Brain and Neurological Disorders”. The Reviewers focused on some modifications and their contribution was helpful. The ladies of our Editorial Office were also supported my efforts. It was my honor to have such a co-operation and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Thank you for the speedy and efficient peer review process. I appreciate the fact that your peer reviewers do not take months to respond like with some other journals. I would also like to thank the editorial office for responding quickly to my questions. It is an excellent journal. I plan to submit more manuscripts in the future. Best wishes from, Robert W. McGee
Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Working with you and your team on our recent publication in JCRR has been a truly wonderful and enjoyable experience. The responses were prompt, and the reviewers were patient, constructive, and highly professional. One reviewer in particular gave me the feeling that a professor was carefully reading and commenting on my coursework, which was deeply touching. The entire process was straightforward and hassle‑free, with no tedious online forms to complete. I highly recommend this journal. Best wishes from, DR Aibing Rao, Head of R&D
I Appreciate the Opportunity to Share my Experience with the Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. The peer review process was timely and constructive, and the feedback provided helped improve the quality of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout the process, ensuring smooth communication and efficient handling of the submission. Overall, it was a positive experience collaborating with your team.
Dear Mercy Grace, Editorial Coordinator of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, We would like to express our gratitude for your help at all stages of publishing and editing the article. The editors of the magazine answer all the necessary questions and help at every stage. We will definitely continue to cooperate and publish other works in the Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences! Best wishes from, Alla Konstantinovna Politova,