AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Research Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2637-8892/152
1 Azerbaijan State Advanced Training Institute for Doctors named by A. Aliyev, department of psychiatry and drug addiction, Baku, Azerbaijan.
2 Azerbaijan Medical University, department of psychiatry Baku, Azerbaijan.
*Corresponding Author: Nadir A. Aliyev, Department of psychiatry and addiction, Azerbaijan State Advanced Training Institute, Baku, Azerbaijan.
Citation: NA Aliyev and ZN Aliyev (2022) Combination of Clomipramine and Carbamazepine for Treatment of Patients with Methamphetamine Dependence. J. Psychology and Mental Health Care, 6(1): DOI: 10.31579/2637-8892/152
Copyright: ©2022, Nadir A. Aliyev, This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 04 October 2021 | Accepted: 01 December 2021 | Published: 05 January 2022
Keywords: methamphetamine addiction; anafrani; carbamazepine; therapy
Objective: There are few new approaches to the pharmacotherapeutic treatment of methamphetamine dependence in the literature. The publications contain abundant data on various methods of pharmacotherapeutic treatment of methamphetamine dependence. However, no pharmacotherapeutic therapy for methamphetamine dependence is sufficient.
Materials and Methods: This was a double-blind study in patients diagnosed with methamphetamine dependence according to DSM-5. A total of 100 patients who met the DSM-5 criteria for methamphetamine dependence were examined. All male patients from 18 to 60 years old. The patients were divided into two groups of 50 people: the first group received clomipramine (anafranil) 300 mg / day (100 mg 3 times a day) and carbamazepine 600 mg / day (200 mg 3 times a day) orally. The second group received an indifferent drug (placebo)
Results: as shown by follow-up data (12 months), among 50 patients who received anaphrani and carbamazepine only, 10 had short-term breakdowns associated with exposure to microsocial causes. The rest of the patients were in remission. Among patients receiving placebo, only 5 patients experienced remission, all the rest had cases of relapse. Responder analysis was performed using chi-square (x2) and analysis of variance (ANOVA).
Conclusion. Clinical statistics indicate the high efficiency of the use of anaphrani and carbamazepine in the treatment of methamphetamine dependence. The mechanisms of action of the drug are being discussed.
According to [1] WORLD DRUG REPORT 2021, methamphetamine continues to dominate the global production of ATS amphetamine-type stimulants (ATS). During the period 2015–2019, around 24,000 clandestine laboratories used to manufacture ATS1 (45 countries) were discovered or dismantled worldwide. More than 95 percent of them produced methamphetamine. 2019 saw a record number of ATS seized and increased by 64 percent over the previous year, the highest annual growth rate since 2001. The increase in the number of ATS seized over the past decade is mainly attributable to the nearly tenfold amount of methamphetamine seized over the period 2009–2019. Between 2015 and 2019, methamphetamine accounted for 72 per cent of the total ATS seized worldwide.
In the WORLD DRUG REPORT 2021[2] indicated, that the abuse of methamphetamine, a highly addictive and potent stimulant, remains an extremely serious problem in the United States. In some countries, this problem has even reached the point where it is more dangerous than opioids and leads to more crime and violence. . According to the 2017 National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH), more than 14.7 million people (5.4 percent of the population) have tried methamphetamine at least once. Chomchai C, Chomchai S. [3] write that- NSDUH also reports that nearly 1.6 million people used methamphetamine in the year preceding the survey, 1 and remains one of the most frequently abused stimulants in the world.
As a result, methamphetamine abuse causes problems in all walks of life - psychological, medical, social, professional and family. The consequence of methamphetamine use contributes to a number of mental and behavioral disorders as well as somatic disorders such as, aggression, mental and behavioral, damage to the cardiovascular and other body systems, malnutrition and serious dental problems.
As you know, from the RAND Corporation. The economic cost of methamphetamine use in the United States [4] in addition to the devastating effects on human health, methamphetamine abuse threatens entire communities, contributes to new waves of crime, unemployment, neglect and other anti-social activities It is known from the literature that the abuse of methamphetamine is causing great damage to the economies of some countries. For example, according to the RAND Corporation, in 2009 the figure in the United States was $ 23.4 billion.
Methamphetamine is a highly addictive stimulant that affects the central nervous system. It is a white crystalline powder, odorless with a bitter taste, which dissolves easily in water or alcohol. In Azerbaijan, in the jargon of drug addicts, it is called glass or stamps. In Azerbaijan, this drug comes from Iran. Only 10% of this drug is detained by the relevant authorities, the rest of it is transported to Europe. Only 10% of this drug is detained by the relevant authorities, the rest of it is transported to Europe. As a precursor in Iran, it is made from citric acid or lemon salt, together with asetyl anhydride
Kish SJ. Write [5] that methamphetamine has been classified as a Schedule II stimulant by the US Drug Enforcement Administration, making it legally available only on a one-off prescription basis. Medically, it may be indicated for the treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and as a short-term component of weight loss treatment, but its use is limited and rarely prescribed; in addition, the prescribed doses are much lower than those usually used incorrectly.
This was a double-blind trial for patients diagnosed with DSM-5 for methamphetamine dependence. When examining patients, ethical standards were observed in accordance with both international and local legislation. The patients gave their informed, written consent to participate. In accordance with the Helsinki Declaration of the World Medical Association “Recommendations for doctors engaged in biomedical research involving people”, adopted by the 18th World Medical Assembly (Finland, 1964, revised in Japan in 1975, Italy-1983, Hong Kong-1989, the South African Republic-1996, Edinburgh-2000); The Constitution of the Republic of Azerbaijan, the Law “On Psychiatric Assistance” (adopted on 12.06.2001, with amendments and additions -11.11.2011, Decisions of the Cabinet of Ministers of the Republic of Azerbaijan No. 83, dated April 30, 2010 “On Approval of the Rules for Conducting Scientific, Preclinical and Clinical studies of medicines” are established. The conditions of the conducted researches corresponded to the generally accepted norms of morality, the requirements of ethical and legal norms, as well as the rights, interests and personal dignity of the participants of the studies were observed.
Conducted research is adequate to the topic of research work.
a) There is no risk for the subject of research.
b) Participants in the study were informed about the goals, methods, expected benefits of the study and associated with risk and inconvenience in the study.
c) The subject's informed consent about participation in the research was received.
The decision of the Ethical Committee at the Azerbaijan Psychiatric Association on the article of NA Aliev, ZN Aliev “New pharmacological approaches to methamphetamine dependence” submitted for publication in psychiatric journals: in connection with compliance with its legislative requirements and regulatory documents is to approve the article by NA Aliyev, Z.N. Aliev “Combination of clomipramine and carbamazepine for treatment of patients with methamphetamine dependence”. The method of randomization core out different methods, we were given by the lottery. This was a double-blind study in patients diagnosed with methamphetamine dependence according to the DSM-5. A total of 100 patients who met the DSM-5 criteria for methamphetamine dependence were examined. All male patients from 18 to 60 years old. The patients were divided into two groups of 50 people: the first group received clomipramine (anafranil) 300 mg / day (100 mg 3 times a day) and carbamazepine 600 mg / day (200 mg 3 times a day) orally. The second group received an indifferent drug (placebo). Therapy 12 months at the Mental Health Center of the Ministry of Health of the Republic of Azerbaijan. The study was conducted from January 01, 2020 to January 01, 2021, using a double-blind, placebo-controlled method. All patients with other, mental, neurological and somatic diseases were excluded from the study.
For the diagnosis, a clinical interview was used, for DSM-5 Axis I Disorder, Patient Edition, was used to diagnose methamphetamine dependence [6]. All male patients from 18 to 60 years old. The patients were divided into two groups of 50 people: the first group received clomipramine (anafranil) 300 mg / day (100 mg 3 times a day) and carbamazepine 600 mg / day (200 mg 3 times a day) orally. The second group received an indifferent drug (placebo).
The randomization of patients is usually carried out in several ways: as the patient turns to the hospital, according to the table of random numbers and by the lottery method. In our research, we used given by lottery.
The clinical and pharmacological characteristics of anafranil and carbamazepine are sufficiently reflected in the literature on psychopharmacology [6, 7, 8]. Here we will give very brief information about these drugs.
Clomipramine (Anafranil). Nomenclature based on neurology: Serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SRI). Tricyclic antidepressant (TCA). The parent drug is a potent serotonin reuptake inhibitor. The active metabolite is a potent norepinephrine / norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor.
Stahl Stephen M. Stephens sowed that [7] commonly prescribed to treat: obsessive-compulsive disorder ((in bold, FDA approved)); depression; severe depression that does not respond to treatment; cataplexy syndrome; anxiety; insomnia; neuropathic pain / chronic pain. Mechanism of action:
Interacts with the open channel conformation of voltage sensitive sodium channels. Interacts with a specific region of the alpha pore-forming subunit of voltage-sensitive sodium channels
Response analysis refers to the last observation carried over for all
subjects who had valuable efficacy at baseline and on treatment. Responder analysis was performed using chi-square (x2) and analysis of variance (ANOVA) according to Glantz [10].
Sociodemographic characteristics of patients are shown in table 1.
When analyzing between the two groups, no statistical difference was found, the results of which are presented in Table 2.The responder was conducted by X2 demonstrated superior for than for placebo (Table2). Anafranil and Carbamazepine was generally well tolerated by the patients in the study. Anafranil and Carbamazepine group in 10 had short-term breakdowns associated with exposure to microsocial causes. Among patients receiving placebo, only 5 patients experienced remission, all the rest had cases of relapse. There were not unexpected or serious adverse events.
Side effects were studied on the basis of spontaneous complaints of patients, while serious side effects were not found.
According to date of Rawson, R.A et al, Huber, A et al, [11, 12] have found that various types of psychotherapy have a positive effect in the treatment of methamphetamine dependence, with particular emphasis on cognitive-behavioral interventions.
For example, the matrix model - a 16-week comprehensive approach to behavioral treatment combining behavioral therapy, family education, one-to-one counseling, 12-step support, drug testing, and encouragement for non-drug activities - in particular, this method has been found to be beneficial in reducing the abuse of methamphetamine. Petry et all., indicated that [13], contingency management activities that provide material incentives in exchange for participating in treatment and maintaining abstinence have also been shown to be effective. Motivational Incentives to Improve Drug Abuse Recovery (MIEDAR), an incentive-based method of encouraging abstinence from cocaine and methamphetamine, has been shown to be effective among methamphetamine abusers through the NIDA National Drug Abuse Clinical Trials Network.
According to date Salo, R et al., Huber, A. et all., [14, 15] in drug development, researchers typically study the effects of potential drugs with neurobiological effects that may counteract the known physiological effects of chronic methamphetamine use. They may also test medications that have proven to be effective in treating other addictions or other mental disorders. The following goals and strategies have shown promising results in animal or human studies associated with methamphetamine use disorder.
Among the non-invasive methods, transcranial magnetic stimulation of the brain should be especially noted. Makani et al., [16] pointed out the usefulness of this method for methamphetamine dependence. Researchers are exploring this approach as a treatment for substance use disorders, but this work is at a very early stage [16]. Rostami R, Dehghani-Arani F. [17] indicated that Neurofeedback Training as a New Method in Treatment of Crystal Methamphetamine Dependent Patients Neurofeedback: Neurofeedback (also called neurotherapy or neurofeedback) is a type of biofeedback that uses real-time imaging of brain activity (most commonly electroencephalography) to teach people how to regulate their own brain function. In one study, neurofeedback to the treatment of methamphetamine use disorder reduced the severity of addiction and improved mental health and overall quality of life.
Collins KC put forward [18] Vaccines and antibodies: Methamphetamine vaccines, which use the body's immune system to prevent the drug from entering the brain, are currently being tested in animals.
Problems of pharmacological treatment to methamphetamine dependence very problematic. This is the first study on the use of anafranil and cabamazepine, randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled study. Of the 50 patients who received anafranil in combination with cabamazepine, 40 people went into remission, 10 patients experienced short-term breakdowns associated with exposure to microsocial causes. Among patients receiving placebo, only 5 patients went into remission. Thus, patients with methamphetamine dependence gave a very good result.
First, our anafranil in combination with cabamazepine treatment of pharmacological approaches to methamphetamine dependence study group and we recommend that these results be replicated in a larger population of patients in order to more accurately estimate the magnitude of the effect is necessary. Second, this work is a necessary study of the possibility of generalizability these data to women. Notwithstanding these limitations, this study suggests that, anafranil in combination with cabamazepine are efficacious and well toler¬ated in the treatment of pharmacological approaches to methamphetamine dependence.
The authors would like to thank staff of the Mental Health Center of the Ministry of Health of the Republic of Azerbaijan.
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.
I would like to offer my testimony in the support. I have received through the peer review process and support the editorial office where they are to support young authors like me, encourage them to publish their work in your esteemed journals, and globalize and share knowledge globally. I really appreciate your journal, peer review, and editorial office.
Dear Agrippa Hilda- Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, "The peer review process was very quick and of high quality, which can also be seen in the articles in the journal. The collaboration with the editorial office was very good."
