Colorectal Cancer: Insight into Incidence, Risk Factors, Diagnosis, and Prognostic Markers

Review Article | DOI: https://doi.org/DOI: 10.31579/2766-2314/108

Colorectal Cancer: Insight into Incidence, Risk Factors, Diagnosis, and Prognostic Markers

  • Abdulbasit Faraj Hadhr 1,2
  • Jamela Boder 3
  • Fathi B. Abdalla 3,4
  • Altayeb Elazomi 3*

1 Department of Biomedical Engineering, School of Engineering and Applied Science, Libyan Academy, Tripoli, Libya.

2 Higher Institute of Science and Technology, Rabta, Libya.

3 Faculty of Medical Technology, University of Zawia, Libya.

4 Bahrain Royal Medical Services.

*Corresponding Author: Altayeb Elazomi, Faculty of Medical Technology, University of Zawia, Libya.

Citation: Abdulbasit Faraj Hadhr, Jamela Boder, Fathi B. Abdalla, Altayeb Elazomi, (2023), Colorectal Cancer: Insight into Incidence, Risk Factors, Diagnosis, and Prognostic Markers, J, Biotechnology and Bioprocessing, 4(5); DOI: 10.31579/2766-2314/108

Copyright: © 2023, Altayeb Elazomi. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: 05 July 2023 | Accepted: 14 July 2023 | Published: 24 July 2023

Keywords: colorectal cancer; incidence; risk factors; diagnosis; prognostic markers

Abstract

Background: Colorectal cancer is one of the most common malignancies and a leading cause of cancer death worldwide. 

Objectives: The current review aimed to highlight colon cancer incidence, risk factors, diagnosis, and prognostic markers. Colorectal cancer is the second most common type of cancer, it was responsible for 18.7% and 15.1%, of all cancer in Portugal.  The mean age of incidence is about 60 years. The aetiological and pathogenesis of colorectal cancer are usually related to both environmental and genetic factors. Patients with inflammatory bowel disease have a definite predisposition to colorectal carcinoma. Some genetic syndromes transmitted in the family from generation to generation can increase the risk of colon cancer. The most well-defined environmental risk is exposure to ionizing radiation. If the patient has benign glandular tumors before, he is more likely to have colon or rectal cancer. Also, medical history, alcohol consumption, age, diet, physical activity, diabetes, smoking, and geographic differences are from risk factors for colorectal cancer. One of the best methods for detection of colon cancer is a screening program with blood in stool, routine physical and endoscopic examination.  The person who is on risks such as personal history of adenomas or CRC, family history of CRC or adenomas in first degree relatives before age 60 years, inflammatory bowel disease, and family history of hereditary syndromes. The usual clinical picture of an early colorectal cancer is a change of bowel habit and painless mild bleeding particularly in the left side tumors. Abdominal lymph nodes (38%) are the second most frequent site of metastasis (38%), just after liver, which is, the organ that most frequently involved (38–60% of cases) and followed by the lung (38%) and the peritoneum (28%). Colon cancers can be graded according the degree of differentiation to well differentiated (grade I). Grading Adenocarcinomas are graded predominantly on the basis of the extent of glandular appearances, and should be divided into well, moderately and poorly differentiated, or into low-grade (encompassing well and moderately differentiated adenocarcinomas) and high-grade (including poorly differentiated adenocarcinomas and undifferentiated carcinomas). the mitotic activity index (MAI) is an independent prognostic factor for recurrence free survival. SMI is a bit more efficient than MAI as a prognosticator. Classical prognostic markers in histopathology are histological grade, mitotic activity, histological type, angiogenesis, and tumor necrosis. Multivariate clinicopathological prognostic indices, molecular prognostic markers in colon cancer, the younger is the patient, the greater is the cellular proliferation and the lower is the degree of differentiation. With increasing malignancy an increased frequency of invasion and metastasis are observed and hence poor prognosis of the tumor Cell proliferation markers. Rational mutations in one allele of the p53 gene associated with congenital or acquired congenital loss of the other leads to continuous cell growth the later can promote carcinogenesis in many organs, including colon, lung, and breast. Ki-67 is a cell proliferation marker. Tumors associated with microsatellite instability tend to be mucinous or poorly differentiated with a prominent host response a circumscribed growth pattern and right-sided location in one study presence of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes was found to be the best histological predictor of microsatellite instability. 

Conclusion: It can be concluded that the colorectal cancer is one of the most common malignancies. The aetiological and pathogenesis of colorectal cancer are usually related to both environmental and genetic factors. The colorectal cancer risk factors are medical history, alcohol consumption, age, diet, physical activity, diabetes, smoking, and geographic differences. the best methods for detection of colon cancer are a screening program with blood in stool, routine physical and endoscopic examination. Classical prognostic markers in histopathology are histological grade, mitotic activity, histological type, angiogenesis, and tumor necrosis. With increasing malignancy an increased frequency of invasion and metastasis are observed. Rational mutations in one allele of the p53 gene associated with congenital leads to continuous cell growth the later can promote carcinogenesis in the colon. Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes were found to be the best histological predictor of microsatellite instability. Further studies about colorectal cancer are needed to prove strategies for controlling the prevalence of the disease and the more accurate method for diagnosis.

1.Introduction

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common malignancies and a leading cause of cancer death worldwide [1, 2]. European countries rank the highest in the global statistics in terms of both CRC incidence and mortality [3 , 4], although in recent years, a decline in CRC mortality rates has been observed, mostly due to improvement in earlier diagnosis and treatment [3 , 5]. Among the key risk factors associated with the presence of adenomas is a factor closely linked to the development of malignant neoplasm.  The chances of cure and survival of such cancer are high when detected at an early stage. The management of adenomas has an important role in the prevention of colorectal cancer, making it necessary to conduct studies to determine new prognostic factors related to its development and progression. The cell cycle is controlled by several genes, the main function of these genes is the synthesis of proteins that promote perfectly organized cell proliferation, and the other genes that suppress the proliferation.

2. Incidence of colon cancer 

Carcinoma of the large intestine is common in Northwest Europe, North America, and other Anglo-Saxon areas and low in Africa, Asia, and some parts of South America [6, 7].

In Portugal for example, CRC is the second most common type of cancer, in both men and women. In 2008, it was responsible for 18.7% and 15.1%, respectively, of all cancer in Portugal [8]. Regarding mortality, unlike European data [9], there was an average increase of 3% from 2000 to 2005 [10], in 2012, incidence and mortality rates are higher than European rates [11].

 In the United States, it is by far the most common and most curable carcinoma of the gastrointestinal tract. There is some evidence of a further increase in its occurrence, particularly in young blacks [12]. Males and females are affected equally. The mean age of incidence is about 60 years [13, 14].

3. Risk factors 

One specific cause for colon cancer has not been identified. However, the aetiological and pathogenesis of colorectal cancer is usually related to both environmental and genetic factors [15, 16]. The former is largely dietary, particularly in terms of fast animal protein and fatty food they are related to their influence on the intestinal microflora and ultimately on the chemical composition of the intraluminal content [17, 18].

The relationship between epithelial polyps and colorectal carcinoma and the sequence of molecular alterations that have been detected in these lesions have already been recognized. Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (such as ulcerative colitis) have a definite predisposition to colorectal carcinoma, [19, 20] however they consist only a small fraction of the colonic cancer patients in the general population. Polyps of juvenile and/or adenomatous type can also occur at this juncture [21, 22]. Interestingly, these changes are preceded by abnormal colonic mucin secretion [23].

3.1. Family history and genetics:

Although the aetiology of colon cancer is not fully understood, many studies have been done on the effects of family history and inherited mutation. Up to 10% of colon cancers have been found to have genetic predisposition, some genetic syndromes transmitted in the family from generation to generation can increase the risk of colon cancer. They are also responsible for 5% of case. One of these syndromes is called adenomatous polyposis coli, which is rare and characterized by presence of thousands adenomatous polyps within the rectum and on the intestinal walls [24].

3.2. Environmental factors:

The most well-defined environmental risk is exposure to ionizing radiation. Some cases of colorectal carcinomas have been seen as a late complication of pelvic irradiation of cervical carcinoma [19].

3.3. Medical history: 

If the patient has colon cancer or benign glandular tumors before, he is more likely to have colon or rectal cancer.

3.4. Alcohol consumption: 

The excessive use of alcohol is an important factor in the increased risk of colon cancer

3.5. Age:

The majority of people with colon cancer are 60 years old. Young people can also develop colorectal cancer, but their incidence is very low in these cases.

3.6. Inflammatory bowel diseases: 

Ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease; are example of inflammatory bowel diseases their presence increases the risk of colon cancer.

3.7. Diet: 

High-fat diets, calories, or low fibres foods may be a cause of colon or rectal cancer.

3.8. Physical Activity:

Physical activity plays an important role in maintaining the body's organs. It also helps maintain muscle activity and bone health. It helps the body to get rid of harmful substances and stimulates it to resist diseases such as cancer or internal infections. It also protects the body from obesity, which is another cause of colon cancer.

3.9. Growth hormone disorders

an imbalance in the growth hormone produced by the pituitary gland. This imbalance may be due to a defect in the work of the gland, which adversely affects the growth of the body organs properly, and thus increase the risk of various diseases, including colon cancer.

3.10. Diabetes:

 People with diabetes are more likely to develop colon cancer.

3.11. Smoking: 

People who smoke in large quantities are more likely to develop colon cancer, because the accumulation of nicotine in the body turns over days to cancers, including to colon cancer.

3.12. Geographic differences: 

There is a big variation in age adjusted incidence rate for colon cancer seen among countries. Carcinoma of the large intestine is common in Northwest Europe, North America, and other Anglo-Saxon areas and low in Africa, Asia, and some parts of South America [6, 7].  In the United States, it is by far the most common and most curable carcinoma of the gastrointestinal trac

4.  Diagnosis of colon cancer

One of the best methods for detection of colon cancer is a screening program with blood in stool, routine physical and endoscopic examination [25]. 

4.1. Screening for colon cancer by endoscopy

Screening means the use of investigations on asymptomatic persons, to detect the disease at an early stage in order to lower the risk of death, or complications of therapy [26].

Figure 1: Hutchinson Diagram

Screening program should begin by classifying the individual patient level of risk based on personal, family, and medical history, which will determine the appropriate approach to screening in that person [27]. For example the person who is on risks such as following:

Personal history of adenomas or CRC, family history of CRC or adenomas in first degree relative (s) before age 60 years, inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), and family history of hereditary syndromes [24].

In addition to average risky person such as: healthy people with no known risk factors other than age, In general, practical guidelines recommend starting screening at age 50 years [28,29]. Because only 38% of patients are diagnosed when the cancers are localized to the bowel wall, it is likely that widespread implementation of screening could significantly improve the outcome. Colorectal cancer screening is cost effective, irrespective of the methods used. In addition to currently available methods (fecal occult blood, flexible sigmoidoscopy, colonoscopy, and double contrast barium enema). There are further experimental methods for screening are Fecal DNA test and computed topographic colonography (virtual colonoscopy) [30,31].

4.2. Clinical examination

The usual clinical picture of an early colorectal cancer is a change of bowel habit and painless mild bleeding particularly in the left side tumors. Other less common clinical features of colorectal cancer are; constipation with penciled like stool and signs of intestinal obstruction, ulceration with signs of intestinal perforation [32]. 

Systemic complaints like fatigue, cough, anemia, ascites, or musculoskeletal discomfort, may also present During palpation, oddly shaped, hard lump that can be felt might also be sings for cancer [33].    

4.3. Colon biopsies (endoscopic biopsy and open biopsy)

A positive biopsy should always be obtained from colorectal carcinoma before performing radical surgery. In large lesions, it is advisable to perform several biopsies from different regions. Those biopsies which are taken from the center may show only granulation tissue, and those which are taken from the very periphery may contain only hyperplastic (so-called-transitional) colonic epithelium. Lesions below the peritoneal reflection should be removed in to wherever possible to facilitate their orientation for section by the pathologist. Although most adenocarcinomas are easily diagnosed, the main problems being presented by the well differentiated tumors and- the highly malignant signet ring carcinomas in which only a few tumor cells may by present [30].

43.1.  Endoscopy biopsy

The endoscopic tissue biopsies are usually with size about of 3x1 mm, and the biopsy can be performed under local anesthesia. The endoscopic biopsy allows the diagnosis as well as the distinction between invasive and in situ cancer. However, both false positives and negatives can occur. It is also very helpful in the differential diagnosis of adenomatous polyp, and hyperplastic polyp or from cancer, but examiner experience is highly required to properly performing this task. Increased utilization of endoscopic biopsy for obtaining tissue samples has led to major advances in both detection and diagnosis [30].

4.3.2. Open biopsy                                                                                                                                                                     

The proper diagnostic procedure for patients with suspected colon cancer is the open excisional biopsy of the mass. Generally, this often applied to benign lesions that the patient wants be removed, and also to removal of doubtful lesions, if a malignancy has not been demonstrated by endoscopic biopsy. When the lesion is still suspected to be cancer, or if a mass is likely to be malignant, and the biological makeup of the tumor seems to be abnormal, the biopsy can be examined as a frozen section by the pathologist for a quick, but preliminary diagnosis. More commonly, the biopsy is processed routinely, and a diagnosis is made. If a malignancy is found within the cancer cases [30].

5. Classical clinicopathological prognostic markers 

For CRC, the pathologic clinical stage is currently the single most important prognostic factor [1, 3, 34, 35], correlating with long-term survival [3, 36 ,37], although it does not fully predict individual clinical outcome [3, 37 , 38]. This is particularly true for those tumours with intermediate stage disease (T3-T4N0M0) [38], where one-third of patients with tumor-free lymph nodes have recurrences, and therefore adjuvant chemotherapy may be beneficial [39]. In this group, carcinoma cells are not detected in lymph nodes by conventional staging methods in 24% of patients. Therefore, the lymphatic staging is essential to improve treatment of these patients. Indeed one-third of the patients submitted to curative intent surgery die of local and/or distant tumor recurrence [49 , 3]. Abdominal lymph nodes (38%) are the second most frequent site of metastasis (38%), just after liver, which is, the organ that most frequently involved (38–60% of cases) and followed by the lung (38%) and the peritoneum (28%) [49, 35].

5.1. Tumor size 

Although a correlation between size of the  tumour  and  prognosis  exists,  there are  too  many exceptions  for   this to  be  a  reliable   prognostic indicator . Along   the same lines, there is  little  relation between  the  size of  the  tumor  and  the  incidence  of  nodal  metastases [2]. 

 5.2. Lymph node status

Lymph node involvement is inversely correlated with tumor survival rate.  Once the tumor has spread to the lymph nodes, the 5-year survival rate drops sharply. The location and extent of lymph node involvement are also significant" Cures are very rare when nodes other than those in the immediate vicinity of the tumor are involved [42, 43] Involvement of tie apical node is a particularly ominous feature [44, 45]. The greater the number of lymph nodes involved the worse the prognosis in one study [46]. if more than 6 lymph nodes contained metastatic carcinoma" Less than 10% of the patients survival more than 5 years If more than 16 mesenteric lymph nodes contained carcinoma all patients died within the 5-year period. The former extent of involvement was not observed in carcinomas less than 2cm in greatest diameter and the latter extent of involvement was not observed in carcinomas less than 3cm in diameter, With in these parameters there was correlation between degree of lymph node involvement and size of tumor. it has been claimed that nodal micrometaslases detected only immunohistochemically or molecularly (with a RT – PCR technique for CEA) are also associated with a decreased survival [47,48].

5.3. Clinical staging 

The practical clinical decision is dependent on summing the above basic features of a tumor by means of a staging system. American Joint Committee (AJC) on cancer staging has modified the TNM staging system that was proposed by the International Union Against Control of Cancer (IUAC) and based upon the size of tumor (T), degree of spread to lymph nodes (N) and systemic metastasis (M) at the time of diagnosis. The staging system goes from stage I to stage IV. Staging is regarded as the most important prognostic factor. As stage increases the prognosis deteriorates. For example; the 5 years survival in stage I colon cancer is more than 90% while patients with stage IV disease have very poor prognosis and a 5 years survival are less than 30% [49]

Figure 2:  Layers of colon (Taylor, 2012)

6. Classical prognostic markers in histopathology

6.1 Histological grade

Colon cancers can be graded according the degree of differentiation to well differentiated (grade I), Grading Adenocarcinomas are graded predominantly on the basis of the extent of glandular appearances, and should be divided into well, moderately and poorly differentiated, or into low-grade (encompassing well and moderately differentiated adenocarcinomas) and high-grade (including poorly differentiated adenocarcinomas and undifferentiated carcinomas). Poorly differentiated adenocarcinomas should show at least some gland formation or mucus production; tubules are typically irregularly folded and distorted. When a carcinoma has heterogeneity in differentiation, grading should be based on the least differentiated component, not including the leading front of invasion. Small foci of apparent poor differentiation are common at the advancing edge of tumours, but this feature is insufficient to classify the tumour as poorly differentiated [51]. The percentage of the tumour showing formation of gland-like structures can be used to define the grade. Well differentiated (grade 1) lesions exhibit glandular structures in > 95% of the tumour; moderately differentiated (grade 2) adenocarcinoma has50-95% glands; poorly differentiated (grade 3) adenocarcinoma has 5-50%; and undifferentiated (grade 4) carcinoma has < 5>

6.2 Mitotic activity

Several authors suggested that evaluation of mitotic activity alone can be as prognostic as the grading system or even more powerful [55,56]. There are many available ways to measure cell proliferative activity e.g. by counting the number of mitoses from ten high power fields from the most cellular area of the sample, using a standard light microscope (objective, x40; numeric aperture, 0.75; field diameter, 420µm), or by expressing the count by square millimeter, which produces the standardized mitotic index (SMI), also called volume fraction corrected mitotic index (M/Vv index) [56,57 ,55]. Many studies on different organs demonstrated that the mitotic activity index (MAI) is an independent prognostic factor for recurrence free survival. SMI is a bit more efficient than MAI as a prognosticator [57].

6.3 Histological type

Cancer at the site (CIS) consists of sever dysplasia. They are classified as pre-invasive cancers. In theory, it can be curable without any threat to life when surgically removed. Colorectal cancer and invasive adenocarcinomas have a slightly better prognosis than mucinous carcinoma [58].

6.4 Angiogenesis (Microvessel density)

Neo-vascularisation is the formation of new micro vessels in stroma. There is general agreement that angiogenesis has an important role in growth and metastasis of malignant tumors [14,25].

6.5 Tumor necrosis 

Tumor necrosis is morphologically characterized by nuclear karyorrhexis, pyknosis and karyolysis, often accompanied by granular eosinophilic cytoplasm. When tumor necrosis has been present for a prolonged time it may be associated with fibrosis. Necrosis is usually related to adenocarcinoma of non-specific type, especially when has high grade [60]. A few studies suggested that tumor necrosis is accompanied with lowered survival and early treatment failure [58]. However, low reproducibility in evaluating necrosis may limit its use as a prognostic factor.

6.6 Multivariate clinicopathological prognostic indices

In last few years many authors combined different independent prognostic factors in multivariate indices in many organs including breast cancer and colon cancer. They found that these models are better prognostic indicators than the traditional grading system alone and can be expected to be more reproducible [61,58].

Typically, mitotic count has an important position in these models. It is important to notice that most multivariate models include lymph node status as a contributing feature and for that reason multivariate models or indices are applicable to both LN+ and LN- patients. One of the most common prognostic indices is Nottingham prognostic index which combines tumor size, lymph node status, and Nottingham histological grade [11].

6.7 Molecular prognostic markers in colon cancer.

A common feature of all cancers is the imbalance that exists between the proliferative activity and cell death; therefore, the evaluation of cell proliferation rate may be interesting in the study and characterization of tumors [63]. Some molecules, such as the Ki-67 protein, permit this assessment and are used as markers of proliferation because Ki67 expression is dependent of cell division rate; thus, over expression of these markers may suggest a disruption in the proliferation mechanism leading to the appearance of tumors [63].

Ki-67 protein, when used to evaluate the percentage of dividing cells, allows us to determine neoplastic growth [63] and has been documented to correlate with neoplastic progression [64] showing different levels of expression between normal mucosa, adenoma, and adenocarcinoma [65], verifying a progressive increasing of positive Ki-67 expression from the first (normal mucosa) to the last part of the tissue (adenocarcinoma) [64, 66 , 67].

Other studies correlate Ki-67 with the degree of malignancy, tumour invasiveness [67, 68], metastatic potential [63], patient survival, and the risk of relapse [69 ,70]. Thus, a high Ki-67 expression in tumour cells is assumed to correlate with a poor tumour differentiation and an increased tumor size [66, 68]. Micev et al. [71] demonstrated that there is an association between Ki-67 expression and a less effective response in patients undergoing chemotherapy.

Other correlations with clinical and pathological data were also investigated and a correlation was detected between a high expression of this protein and the following variables; Patient's age [67], tumor size [72], tumor localization [70], dysplasia degree [72], the presence of lymph node metastasis [63, 67 ,70], and TNM [67] and Dukes [70] classification. 

Accordingly, the younger is the patient, the greater is the cellular proliferation and the lower is the degree of differentiation. With increasing malignancy a increased frequency of invasion and metastasis are observed and hence poor prognosis of the tumor [67].

6.7.1 p53.

The p53 gene is located on chromosome 17p13.1, and is encoded for p53 protein. p53 is thought to be the gate keeper in the cell cycle, also called the guardian of the genome. When active, the main function of p53 is to suppress cell proliferation and activate apoptosis. When DNA is damaged, p53 inhibits the evolution of the cell cycle from G1 to stage S and activates DNA repair genes. The cell is directed with irreversible DNA to apoptosis by activating the estrogenic genes [73,74 ,75]. Rational mutations in one allele of the p53 gene associated with congenital or acquired congenital loss of the other leads to continuous cell growth the later can promote carcinogenesis in many organs, including colon, lung, and breast [75]. A p53 mutation increases the half-life of the non-functional p53 protein, accumulated in the cancer cell nucleus.

The accumulated p53 protein can be identified with IHC [76]. p53 hyperplasia has been detected in many human cancers including breast cancer [76], [75].and is often associated with poor prognosis[77]. p53 mutations, which can be detected by DNA sequence, appear to be independent indicators [78] Allred and his group reported in 1993 that p53 predicted a disease-free survival in patients with colon cancer. However, it has been shown that the expression of mutated p53 protein is also associated with more aggressive tumors, including the early recurrence of disease and early death in colon cancer [79].

6.7.2 Bcl-2               

Family of membrane proteins that control apoptosis. It has been stated that immunohistochemical expression of bc1-2 is associated with an improved prognosis [80].

6.7.3 Cell proliferation markers

A. MIB-1 (Ki-67)

Ki-67 is a cell proliferation marker. It is a non- histone DNA binding protein that can be detected by immunohistochemistry [81, 82]. It is expressed in all phases of cell cycle except the resting phase [81]. The Ki-67 positive cells are in preparing for the S phase. Ki-67 labeling index (fraction of Ki-67 positive nuclei of all cells nuclei) indicates the fraction of cells in proliferation or near S-phase in the cell cycle. Several authors detected that high Ki-67 labeling index correlate with high histological grade [83], and large tumor size of colon cancer [73]. Therefore, Ki67 when used to evaluate the percentage of dividing cells, allows us to determine neoplastic growth [63] and has been documented to correlate with neoplastic progression [64] showing different levels of expression between normal mucosa, adenoma, and adenocarcinoma [65], verifying a progressive increasing of positive Ki-67 expression from the first (normal mucosa) to the last part of the tissue (adenocarcinoma) [64, 66, 67].

Ki-67 labeling index (determined e.g. by the MIB1; IgG monoclonal antibody used for detection Ki-67 in paraffin embedded material) showed a significant adverse correlation with survival in colon cancer, particularly among patients without LN involvement [58]. However, the independent prognostic significance of MIB-1 is much less than that of mitotic count (as determined with either MAI or SMI [57,84]. The molecular classification of colon cancer based on gene expression profiling, The identification of several types of carcinoma of the large intestine has led to the discovery of some of the genetic alteration associated with (and presumably path-genetically responsible for) these tumors [85,186]. It was subsequently shown that somatic mutations of these genes also occur in sporadic colorectal cancer [87,88 89]. the most important of these genes are APC mismatch repair genes p53, k-ras and DCC [90].

In CRC, the analysis of colon adeno4mas has shown a different pattern for Ki-67 expression between normal tissue, adenomas, and adenocarcinomas. This was limited to the crypts in normal tissue and expressed both in the crypts and in the surface epithelium in adenomatous polyps e.g. (tubular, villous) [67], and distributed homogeneously in adenocarcinoma [92]. Nussrat et al. [72] also observed an increase in Ki-67 rates which was associated with the growth and rise of dysplasia in adenomas.

Studies on CRC indicated that Ki-67 is a prognostic marker since the survival rate for patients with high expression of Ki-67 is significantly lower compared to those with low expression [67, 93 94] and a predictor of CRC recurrence [95]. Also, significant associations were found between higher index of Ki-67 and increased tumour penetration [94, 96], the presence of lymph node [64, 94] and distant [94], metastasis, advanced TNM stage [92, 94], highest degree of differentiation, and subtypes of adenocarcinoma other than mucinous [97].However, not all studies were in agreement, and no correlations were found between patient age, gender, tumor location [64, 72,  93 98], and the type of adenoma [72] in some cases. Although, Jansson and Sun [98], did not find any associations between index Ki-67 and clinicopathological data or prognosis, Allegra and his group [99], described opposite associations, between a low rate of Ki-67 and high recurrence rate and poor overall survival. Regarding the use of Ki-67 in CRC metastasis, no full information is available, and the only similar study found compares Ki-67 index in primary tumour with peritoneal metastasis and had observed a lower proliferative index in metastasis compared with the primary tumor [100]. However, in other types of cancer, in particular breast cancer, a higher Ki-67 index was found in systemic and lymph node metastasis than in primary tumors [101 ,102], suggesting greater aggressiveness of these [102], it might be using of Ki-67 in lymph node metastasis in selecting the appropriate treatment for certain subgroups of patients [103].

6.7.4 Other molecular prognostic markers.

DNA mismatch repair deficiencies with resulting microsatellite instability MSI has been found to be an important alternate pathway present in approximately 15% of cases it operates in hereditary nonpolypsis colorectal carcinomas [104,105 ,106]. and is possibly a marker for the cancers arising from hyperplastic polyps and serrated adenomas [107].

Tumors associated with microsatellite instability tend to be mucinous or poorly differentiated with a prominent host response a circumscribed growth pattern and right-sided location in one study presence of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes was found to be the best histological predictor of microsatellite instability [108,109]. it has been further pointed out that differences may exist depending on the specific type of mismatch repair gene involved [110].

Another group of molecules thought to play an important role in the pathogenesis of colorectal carcinomas is that of E-cadherin and catenins [110,111, 112] β-catenin is associated with APC protein and is dysregulated at all stages of the adenoma-carcinoma sequence [113,114] the expression of E-cadherin and α-catenin in colorectal carcinoma correlates with local invasion and metastases [115], mutations of p53 have been detected by molecular techniques in the majority of colorectal carcinomas [116]. E-cadherin and α-catenin have been correlated with an overexpression of the p53 protein that coded by the abnormal gene as detected immunohistochemically [109]. Approximately, half of the tumors showed positive staining of these proteins but do not seem to differ from others in terms of site of differentiation or DNA ploidy [117, 118]. As expected the (transitional) mucosa present between the edge of the carcinoma and the normal mucosa is uniformly negative for this marker [119].

Mutations of the rats oncogene have been found in a minority of colorectal carcinoma particularly those in the metastatic group. [120, 121] expression of this gene which is said to influence the morphogenesis of early cancers [105] can be detected immunohistochemically in histologic and cytogenetic preparations[123, 124] Deletion of the von Hippei-Lindau gene has been detected in a high proportion of colorectal adenocarcinoma cases [125]. An enhanced expression of the c-myc oncogene occurs in approximately 90% of colorectal carcinomas [126] The increased proliferative activity of colorectal carcinoma has been measured by S-phase determination staining for Ki-67 or PCNA.

7. Conclusion

It can be concluded that the colorectal cancer is one of the most common malignanciesThe aetiological and pathogenesis of colorectal cancer are usually related to both environmental and genetic factors. The colorectal cancer risk factors are medical history, alcohol consumption, age, diet, physical activity, diabetes, smoking, and geographic differences. the best methods for detection of colon cancer is a screening program with blood in stool, routine physical and endoscopic examination. Classical prognostic markers in histopathology are histological grade, mitotic activity, histological type, angiogenesis, and tumor necrosis. With increasing malignancy an increased frequency of invasion and metastasis are observed. Rational mutations in one allele of the p53 gene associated with congenital leads to continuous cell growth the later can promote carcinogenesis in the colon. Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes were found to be the best histological predictor of microsatellite instability. Further studies about colorectal cancer are needed to prove strategies for controlling the prevalence of the disease and the more accurate method for diagnosis.

References

Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.

img

Virginia E. Koenig

Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.

img

Delcio G Silva Junior

Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.

img

Ziemlé Clément Méda

Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.

img

Mina Sherif Soliman Georgy

We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.

img

Layla Shojaie

The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.

img

Sing-yung Wu

Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.

img

Orlando Villarreal

Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.

img

Katarzyna Byczkowska

Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.

img

Anthony Kodzo-Grey Venyo

Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.

img

Pedro Marques Gomes

Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.

img

Bernard Terkimbi Utoo

This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.

img

Prof Sherif W Mansour

Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.

img

Hao Jiang

As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.

img

Dr Shiming Tang

Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.

img

Raed Mualem

International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.

img

Andreas Filippaios

Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.

img

Dr Suramya Dhamija

Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.

img

Bruno Chauffert

I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!

img

Baheci Selen

"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".

img

Jesus Simal-Gandara

I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.

img

Douglas Miyazaki

We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.

img

Dr Griffith

I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.

img

Dr Tong Ming Liu

I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.

img

Husain Taha Radhi

I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.

img

S Munshi

Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.

img

Tania Munoz

“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.

img

George Varvatsoulias

Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.

img

Rui Tao

Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.

img

Khurram Arshad