AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Case Report | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2578-8868/154
1* Coordinator of Demyelinating Diseases Program. Department of Neurology, National Medical Center XXI Century, Specialty Hospital. Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social (IMSS).
2 Coordinator of Brain Tumor and Epilepsy Surgery Program. Department of Neurosurgery. National Medical Center XXI Century, Specialty Hospital. Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social (IMSS).
3 Second year resident. Department of Neurology, National Medical Center XXI Century, Specialty Hospital. Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social (IMSS).
4 Third year resident. Department of Neurosurgery. National Medical Center XXI Century, Specialty Hospital. Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social (IMSS).
*Corresponding Author: Brenda Bertado Cortes, Coordinator of Demyelinating Diseases Program. Department of Neurology, National Medical Center XXI Century, Specialty Hospital. Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social (IMSS).
Citation: Brenda B. Cortes., Brian M. Cortes., Massiel Z. Zenteno., and Sandoval Bonilla BR. (2021) Clippers (Chronic Lymphocytic Inflammation with Pontine Perivascular Enhancement Responsive to Steroids) Management Experience at a single Third-level Medical Center in México. J. Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. 8(1); DOI:10.31579/2578-8868/154
Copyright: © 2021 Brenda Bertado Cortes, This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of The Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited
Received: 07 January 2021 | Accepted: 29 January 2021 | Published: 05 February 2021
Keywords: Clippers; clinical evolution and management; primary tumors of the central nervous system; biopsy surgery for brainstem lesions; image-guided stereotactic biopsy.
Chronyc lymphosytic inflammation with pontine perivascular enhacement responsive to steroids (CLIPPERS), described for the first time in 2010 by Pittock and collaborators, is a rare inflammatory disease of the central nervous system (SNC) characterized by the presence of punctuate or curvilinear lesions described like “salt and pepper” appearance on the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), that enhance with Gadoliniumn administration; this lesions show an exquisite response to corticosteroid therapy.
The etiology of this disease remains unknown. However, the existing articles suggest an autoimmune component, which may or may not be related to other autoinmmune, infectious or malignant pathologies.
Due to the above, it is generally considered that in order to reach the diagnosis of CLIPPERS, the possibility of other more common or aggressive pathologies must first be ruled out through extensive investigation. However, if the clinical and imaging presentation are typical and there is a very high suspicion of CLIPPERS, early initiation of glucosteroid therapy may be recommended. There is no unanimous therapy plan due to the few cases reported worldwide thus far.
In cases of severe relapses or atypical behavior, both clinical and radiological, it is recommended to consider a stereotactic biopsy of the lesion to integrate the definitive diagnosis.
Because it is a rare disease, it is relatively unknown to first- contact medical personnel; in our particular case, this leads to referral to the neurosurgery department who, thanks to their experience, have considered a demilinizing disease as a diagnostic possibility and requested an assessment by the neurology department.
Here, we report the evolution and management of three diagnosed cases of CLIPPERS at a single Third-level Medical Center in México; based on clinical, radiological and neuropathological findings; as well as highlighting the importance of lesion biopsy in selected cases.
CLIPPERS is a rare chronic inflammatory neurological syndrome that affects multiple regions of the brain, including the brainstem, cerebellum, and spinal cord; which has gained recognition since its introduction in 2010 by Pittock [1]. The distinctive finding of CLIPPERS is the presence of multiple punctate curvilinear lesions that show a markedly enhancement "in salt and pepper" pattern, located at the pons and other parts of the brainstem on a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) [2]. A contrast-like enhancement of the dotted type has also been described in the nuclei of the base, the corpus callosum and the spinal cord. There is a positive clinical and radiological response to corticosteroids treatment [ 3 ]. Differential diagnosis include neurosarcoidosis, primary malignant neoplasms of the central nervous system, vasculitis, lymphoma, and encephalitis [6].
CLIPPERS generally appears between the age of 13 and 78 years with no predilection for sex. Common presenting symptoms include progressive gait ataxia and dysarthria [1,4]. Other symptoms include facial paresthesia, diplopia and myelopathy [5].
Histopathologically, it is characterized by a distinctly predominant CD3/CD4 positive T cell lymphocytic perivascular infiltration with white and gray matter compromise, as well as meningeal inflammation with no involvement of the vascular wall. [5-6].
For the definitive diagnosis of CLIPPERS, Tobbin and collaborators have proposed diagnostic criteria consisting on the following.
Clinical characteristics: Subacute cerebellar dysfunction, which responds initially to the use of steroids, without involvement of peripheral nervous system, and without the presence of another pathology that explains the symptoms [6].
Radiological characteristics: homogeneous nodular gadolinium-enhancement, absence of ring enhancement, lacking mass effect predominantly in the pons and cerebellum, smaller than 3 mm in diameter, decrease or disappearance with the use of steroids, presence of punctate or curvilinear hyperintense lesions on T2 and FLAIR [5-6].
Neuropathological characteristics: Predominant perivascular lymphocytic inflammation and diffuse parenchymal infiltration mostly in white matter and possible gray matter involvement, without myelin loss, dominance of CD 3-positive lymphocytic infiltrate, CD4 and CD8 may also be present, as well as macrophages. The bilateral location of the disease is an important feature that points to CLIPPERS as a diagnosis. Patients with unilateral lesions should be carefully evaluated for alternative causes, such as neoplasms or granulomatous diseases [6].
As previously mentioned, corticosteroid treatment generates a significant reduction in pontine lesions size. A five-day course of daily intravenous methylprednisolone is recommended, followed by a prolonged treatment of 1 mg / kg oral prednisone daily, with adequate precautions regarding the prevention of side effects. Steroid-sparing agents, such as methotrexate or azathioprine, can be started at the same time as oral prednisone and generally require higher doses [1]. It is known that the disease has a relapsing/remitting course, for which methotrexate is added weekly to treat the relapse event, treatment with anti-CD 20 agents (Rituximab) has now been incorporated, achieving an adequate clinical and radiological response [7, 9]. Oral steroid treatment leads to complete resolution of the improved lesions, producing gradual atrophy of the affected regions and resolution of clinical symptoms [10-11].
We present our experience of three patients who were initially evaluated by the Brain Tumor Program of the Neurosurgery Department in our hospital, due to initial suspicion of central nervous system neoplasia. Subsequently, CLIPPERS diagnosis was concluded by clinical evolution, radiological and neuropathological study. We describe the evolution and management of these cases by the Demyelinating Diseases Program of the Neurology Department in our Hospital. Clinical, radiological and histopathological data were collected from clinical records.
Case 1
A 44-year-old female patient who started on January 22, 2014; with a clinical presentation characterized by left pulsatile hemicranial headache, accompanied by bilateral incomplete CN III paresis and pancerebellar syndrome, for which she was evaluated and referred to the Neurosurgery Department in a Second-level Hospital, with a possible diagnosis of a pontine region tumor lesion. The magnetic resonance imaging study with gadolinium showed punctuate lesions at the bilateral pontine level, hypointense in T1, hyperintense in T2 and punctiform in FLAIR, with gadolinium enhancement, seen in (figure 2).
Due to high suspicion of demyelinating disease, evaluation of the case is requested to the Neurology Department. It was decided to start treatment with methylprednisolone 1g for 5 days and continuing maintenance with oral prednisone after the acute treatment with methylprednisolone. The patient showed clinical improvement and it was observed a significant decrease in brain stem lesions in the follow up MRI. One year later, she developed a relapse with the same symptoms and a stereotactic biopsy of the relapsing lesions was requested at our Center. Histopathological sample showed the presence of an inflammatory process with perivascular lymphocytic infiltrate of predominant T CD3 lymphocytes, supporting the diagnosis of CLIPPERS. Mycophenolic acid 1 g every 12 hours is added to the treatment and currently, no clinical relapse or new radiological lesions have been documented, this can be seen in (Figure 1), where the evolution and the number of relapses it has presented is summarized.
Case 2
A 56-year-old female started with neurological symptoms in October 2014, characterized by the presence of binocular diplopia in horizontal gaze due to CN VI paresis in addition to the presence of vertigo and gait ataxia. A MRI study with gadolinium of the brain was performed in which lesions at the level of the pons and bilateral midbrain where evident, hypointense in T1 and hyperintense in T2 and FLAIR, homogeneously enhancing with gadolinium. A high-grade glioma of the brainstem was initially considered for differential diagnosis and was evaluated by the Neurosurgery Department of our Center. Demyelinating disease was also suspected, requesting assessment of the case to the Neurology Department. Clinically, the patient showed a subacute course of cerebellopontine dysfunction, with hyperintense lesions at the pontine and mesencephalic level on T2 and FLAIR and with contrast enhancement on MRI. CLIPPERS diagnosis was suspected and a methylprednisolone 1g every 24 hours for 5 days treatment was started, presenting in a matter of weeks clinical improvement with disappearance of lesions in follow up MRI. A year later, in 2015 she presented with clinical relapse characterized by ataxic gait and it was decided to perform a stereotactic biopsy of the pontine lesion with histopathological findings of an inflammatory infiltrate with a predominance of T lymphocytes, confirming the diagnosis of CLIPPERS. Treatment with Rituximab was started with cycles of 2g every 6-month. Afterwards, in 2018, the patient presented a new relapse of symptoms with pancerebellar syndrome, can be seen in Fig4; which clinically improved with the use of methylprednisolone 1g/ 5 doses and remained stable with Rituximab in an already established dose. Currently, she has showed no additional relapse of the disease, as shown in figure 3.
Case 3
A 25-year-old male patient started on November 25, 2019 with a right hemispheric cerebellar syndrome with an insidious instauration during the previous month. An initial diagnostic approach was started with a contrast MRI of the brain where a lesion was identified in the mesencephalon and bilateral pontine tegmental region, isointense in T1, hyperintense on T2 and FLAIR, with gadolinium enhancement, observed in the images of Figure 6.
Formerly evaluated by the Brain Tumor Outpatient Appointment Program, hospitalization of the patient was recommended to complete a diagnostic protocol, and treatment with methylprednisolone 1 g for 5 days is started with clinical improvement and a decrease of about 70% of previous imaging findings on follow up MRI. Management with oral steroids was started and was referred to the Demyelinating Diseases Program of our Center. During follow up, the patient has shown clinical improvement responding to oral steroid dose adjustment. A control MRI was requested with no evidence of previous findings. CLIPPERS diagnosis was integrated by clinic, imaging studies and significant response to steroids. Currently, the patient is under surveillance without new relapse at the moment, as it is graphed in Figure 5. Additional management with immunotherapy will be assessed.
CLIPPERS is a CNS inflammatory disorder with an uncertain etiology, multiple hypothesis have been proposed however there is not a definitive consensus. Diagnostic uncertainty remains, due to a lack of definitive diagnostic markers. Diagnostic approach must be performed in order to differentiate from primary malignant neoplasms of the central nervous system, demyelinating diseases, autoimmune diseases, among other pathologies. All diagnostic resources should be applied, such as, but not limited to, serological immunological markers, cerebrospinal fluid cytology, as well as an intentional search for infectious pathologies. Tobbin and collaborators proposed diagnostic criteria which include clinical, radiological and neuropathologic characteristics, which can serve as a reference to reach the CLIPPERS diagnosis. This condition has symptoms related to the brain stem, cerebellum or both with a very characteristic initial response to steroid use; however, patients require prolonged therapy with steroids and immunosuppressants to avoid relapses and the duration of such treatment remains unknown.
In our Center a total of 3 patients in a period of 6 years arrived with subacute symptoms of cerebellar dysfunction, along with punctiform lesions in the brainstem that show gadolinium enhancement in the magnetic resonance imaging. They were initially assessed by the Brain Tumor Program and a diagnostic protocol was started; the patients presented a favorable response to steroids, we administered methylprednisolone 1g for 5 days and continuing maintenance with oral prednisone. Patients were subsequently referred to the Demyelinating Diseases Program and a CLIPPERS diagnosis was integrated in the first 2 cases, upholding the diagnosis with neuropathology. In these cases, a noticeable initial response to steroids had been presented, however, relapses appeared during their clinical evolution and the use of immunotherapy was required.
In first case, the patient achieved clinical and radiological inactivity after the establishment of immunotherapy. In the second case, after immunotherapy treatment only one relapse was present -predominantly cerebellar- which yielded with acute steroid treatment and subsequent maintenance of immunotherapy. Currently, the patient is free of relapses for 2 years. Our last patient presented with a 1-year clinical picture with an excellent response to steroids treatment. A close follow-up was maintained and an early start of immunotherapy has been considered.
Currently in our center, chronic glucocorticosteroid therapy and immunosuppressive agents are used as the standard treatment in this pathology, with adequate response so far. There are not enough cases and studies to determine the duration or to recommend a specific immunosuppressive treatment.
Biopsy surgery for brainstem lesions was historically associated with an unacceptably high mortality and morbidity. In general, the vast majority of brainstem lesions are not amenable to surgical resection, especially in case of diffuse lesions, where the difficulty in identifying and planning a reliable preoperative target may become an issue.
Image-guided stereotactic biopsy for histopathological diagnosis of cerebral lesions has become a standard component of the neurosurgical armamentarium; particularly in adults where the diversity of pathology is broader.
Regarding rates for transient and permanent neurological deficits in lesions in the pons, were only slightly higher than with superficial lesions. A recent meta-analysis demonstrated that histological diagnosis could be obtained in 96.2% of the biopsies. Overall and permanent morbidity were 7.8%, with a mortality rate of 0.9%.
To date, as previously mentioned, validated diagnostic criteria for CLIPPERS are not available, due to the varied clinical presentation and the potential for diagnostic confusion. Until now, 23 atypical CLIPPERS presentations had been described that have contributed to expanding the clinical spectrum of this pathology.
Simon et al. has highlighted core features of CLIPPERS including clinical, radiological, therapeutic response and histopathological criteria. In “typical cases”, Pittock et al. suggested a non-invasive approach, who started treatment in 50% of patients without biopsy.
There is an issue about the appropriate time to take the biopsy. Reluctance can be legitimate considering the potential risks of the procedure and the lack of specificity of histopathologic findings in CLIPPERS; however, it could be the only way to save an early diagnosis of such an underlying serious disease.
In literature, there are descriptions of some conditions which clinically and radiologically seemed to be compatible with CLIPPERS but were only detected by biopsy [e.g. primary CNS lymphoma, lymphomatoid granulomatosis, low-grade glioma and primary angiitis of CNS]. Performance of a brainstem biopsy should therefore be recommended in cases which exhibit one or more of the following attributes: if alternative etiologies remain a distinct possibility despite rigorous investigations, uncommon or atypical clinical/MRI-findings are noticed and resistance to glucosteroid treatment is evident. In these cases, brainstem biopsy may finally add the definitive support. In some cases, CLIPPERS was the preceding diagnosis several months before a B-cell lymphoma.
Therefore, it is recommended to intentionally explore some neuroimaging hints suggestive of an alternative diagnosis which may appear during a latter course of the disease:
In our experience, it has been extremely useful for the Brain Tumor Program recognizing CLIPPERS as a differential diagnosis of primary neoplasms of the Central Nervous System, especially if located in brainstem and cerebellar regions. Identifying such type of patients allows us to carry out an adequate clinical approach and implement treatment quickly. At the moment there is no well-established therapeutic plan, however, treatment based on steroids and immunosuppressors is scientifically accepted.
The performance of a brainstem biopsy in 2 of our patients has been fundamental for an adequate differentiation of this pathological identity. Especially considering that aggressive pathologies such as Lymphoma can mimic the clinical manifestations of CLIPPERS, as well as it response with glucocorticoid therapy, the relation between this two diseases remains unclear, but several cases have been reported in the literature. In our center, a biopsy was taken early in the course of the disease due to the relapse of the disease in spite of glucocorticoid treatment and risk age group of our patients for other pathologies.
We consider that this is where the importance of follow-up with long-term serial magnetic resonance studies of patients with a diagnosis of CLIPPERS lies.
Stereotactic brainstem biopsy of unclear inoperable lesions in deep and midline structures can be performed in experienced centers, irrespective of the patient’s age or preoperative Karnofsky performance status scale index, with low morbidity and mortality. Even though neuropathological findings are essential for the diagnosis of definite CLIPPERS, we agree that biopsy should be limited to those cases with atypical behavior where an alternative pathology is strongly suspected and possible differential diagnosis must be excluded.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.
