AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Research Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2694-0248/051
1 Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, 369 Fulham Road, London.
2 Continental Hospitals Nanakramguda, Gachibowli, India.
3 University Hospitals of Leicester Leicester, United Kingdom.
*Corresponding Author: Aditi Pandey, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, 369 Fulham Road, London.
Citation: Aditi Pandey, Deepthi Nandan Adla, Radhakant Pandey, (2023), Clinical Tests show High Diagnostic Accuracy in the Assessment of Degenerative Full-Thickness Rotator Cuff Tears, J. Clinical Orthopedics and Trauma Care, 5(1); DOI:10.31579/2694-0248/051
Copyright: © 2023, Aditi Pandey. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 08 November 2022 | Accepted: 02 January 2023 | Published: 13 January 2023
Keywords: rotator cuff injuries; predictive value of tests; arthroscopy; shoulder
Introduction
Currently, the diagnosis of full-thickness rotator cuff tears (FTCT) relies heavily on imaging. We suggest that clinical examination can reliably be used as a substitute for diagnostic imaging, particularly in relatively older patients who are undergoing conservative management. Our study evaluates the diagnostic value of 5 clinical tests in the assessment of FTCT in secondary care.
Methods
115 patients were examined by a consultant shoulder surgeon for suspected FTCT and underwent diagnostic imaging. Clinical examination included the Empty Can test, Resisted External Rotation test, External Rotation Lag test, Belly-press test and Lift-off test. 52 of these patients were referred for shoulder arthroscopy, while the rest were managed conservatively. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and diagnostic accuracy of these tests were calculated, comparing clinical results with arthroscopic findings.
Results
We show that in combination these 5 special tests have high diagnostic value for FTCT, with an overall accuracy of 90%. Both the Empty Can test and the Resisted External Rotation test had a sensitivity of 97%. While the External Rotation Lag test had poor accuracy, it was 100% successful at ruling-in tears. The Belly-press and Lift-off tests were 100% sensitive and specific for full-thickness tears of the subscapularis.
Discussion and Conclusion
Clinical tests for the diagnosis of full-thickness rotator cuff tears have high diagnostic value, comparable to imaging modalities explored in the literature. Overreliance on MRI and ultrasonography may not be justified, particularly in a relatively older population when a rotator cuff tear repair is not scheduled.
Rotator cuff disease is one of the four most common causes of shoulder pain in the community [1]. Correct diagnosis of FTCT would ensure prompt management of this condition, improving outcomes and reducing disability [2]. A comprehensive physical exam is essential as rotator cuff tears are difficult to diagnose based on history-taking alone [3].
Special clinical tests have been developed to specifically examine each component of the rotator cuff 3. Hermans et al. describe over 25 physical examination manoeuvres which have all been endorsed for this task. However, there is a sparsity of high-quality primary studies evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of these specific clinical examinations [4] . Systematic reviews comment on the heterogeneity of these primary studies, leading to difficulty in conducting meta-analysis of the data [5]. Currently BMJ: best practice suggests that a combination of 4 physical tests should be used to assess the rotator cuff. These include: the Empty Can test, the External Rotation test, the Lift-off test and the Belly-press test [6].
In light of this controversy, current management approaches rely heavily on imaging, with MRI and ultrasonography becoming almost mandatory in the diagnosis of rotator cuff tears. The use of diagnostic imaging may also be increasing because of the practice of defensive medicine and other medico-legal reasons [7]. Imaging requirements now form part of the rotator cuff repair criteria in medical coverage firms in North America [8] . Subsequently, reliance on clinical examination is decreasing. This is despite resources being wasted organising imaging to assess rotator cuff tears even when no surgical management is planned.
We hypothesise that a thorough clinical examination is an accurate diagnostic tool for FTCT when it is carried out by an experienced orthopaedic surgeon. Thus, heavy dependence on MRI and ultrasonography may not be justified, particularly when surgical repair is not scheduled. Primarily, we aim to evaluate the diagnostic value of clinical examination for FTCT in comparison with arthroscopy. We will also analyse the data of patients who had FTCT but did not have arthroscopy.
This study was a retrospective review of prospectively collected data from 2010 to 2013. It was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and Good Clinical Practice.
Patient Selection
141 patients were referred by their General Practitioners to a tertiary shoulder unit with suspected rotator cuff pathology. Patients with a history of trauma to the concerned shoulder were excluded, including acute rotator cuff tears. Other exclusion criteria included: previous surgery to the same shoulder, glenohumeral arthritis, shoulder instability, frozen shoulder or a previous cuff tear diagnosed by ultrasonography or MRI. After these criteria were applied, 115 patients were included in our analysis.
Clinical Examination
All patients were examined by a single fellowship-trained consultant shoulder specialist. These patients were clinically examined for FTCT using five tests: three tests for supraspinatus/ infraspinatus tears and 2 tests for subscapularis tears. Each test was recorded as positive or negative for FTCT. The tests were regarded as positive if there was weakness or weakness associated with pain in comparison to the other shoulder. In accordance with the literature, pain alone was not taken as a positive test 9. The following clinical tests were performed.
Empty Can test
The shoulder was elevated to 900 in plane of the scapula with the elbow fully extended and the shoulder internally rotated with thumb pointing downwards. The patient resisted a downward force on the distal forearm by the examiner.
Resisted External Rotation test
The patient’s arm was positioned by their side with the elbow flexed to 900. The patient’s attempt at external rotation was resisted by the examiner.
External Rotation Lag test
The patient’s arm was positioned by their side with the elbow flexed to 900. The examiner moved the patient’s shoulder to the location of maximal external rotation, passively. The patient was then asked to hold that position.
Belly-press test
The patient was told to press the palmar surface of their hands on their abdomen and instructed to bring their elbows in front of their abdomen, keeping the arm in maximal internal rotation. The examiner applied gentle pressure on the elbows from the front.
Lift-off test
The patient was instructed to put the dorsal surface of the hand on the ipsilateral buttock and then lift the hand off the buttock by a few inches. The examiner applied resistance to the hand from behind.
Following clinical examination, all 115 patients had a radiograph, followed by an MRI (75 patients) or ultrasound scan (40 patients). After undergoing clinical examination and investigations, 52 patients required arthroscopic surgery to their shoulder. These patients had the 5 clinical tests repeated on the morning of their surgery. The rotator cuff findings on clinical examination were then compared with arthroscopic findings. The 63 patients who did not undergo arthroscopy formed the non-arthroscopy cohort. The rotator cuff findings on clinical examination were then compared with the results of diagnostic imaging.
Shoulder arthroscopy
All shoulder arthroscopies were performed under general anaesthesia and an interscalene block in a lateral position with traction by the consultant surgeon or under his supervision. The rotator cuff was thoroughly inspected and findings were recorded. A FTCT was diagnosed when a hole/ defect in part of a tendon insertion communicated through to the sub-acromial space. The sub-acromial space was then assessed for confirmation of the FTCT.
The data analysis included the calculation of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and overall accuracy. These values were determined as follows, using a 2x2 table [10,11] . In our investigation, only FTCT were considered positive. Since both input and output variables were categorical variables, we chose the Fisher’s exact test to complete statistical analysis. [12 13 14]. Our findings were regarded as significant for P-values less than 0.05.
Sensitivity
Sensitivity was analysed by dividing true positive (TP) tests by the total false negative (FN) tests and TP tests. The formula is TP/ (TP + FN).
Specificity
Specificity was calculated by dividing true negative (TN) tests by the total false positive (FP) tests and TN tests. The formula is TN/ (TN + FP).
Positive Predictive Value (PPV)
The PPV was analysed by dividing TP tests by the total TP and FP tests. The formula is TP/ (TP + FP).
Negative Predictive Value (NPV)
The NPV was determined by dividing TN tests by the total TN and FN tests. The formula is TN/ (TN + FN).
Accuracy
Accuracy was determined by dividing the sum of TP and TN tests by the sum of all tests. The formula is (TP + TN)/ (TP + TN + FP + FN).
The selection procedure for our patient sample is displayed in Figure 1.
Figure 1: Diagram demonstrating the selection procedure of our study. n = the number of patients assessed at each stage.
141 patients were referred by their GPs to a tertiary shoulder unit with suspected rotator cuff pathology. 115 patients entered the study after exclusion criteria were applied. Of the 52 patients who required arthroscopic surgery, 33 patients had full-thickness tears while 19 patients did not. However, on clinical examination 36 patients were thought to have FTCT, indicating that there were 3 falsely positive clinical examinations in this cohort. Patient demographics are displayed in Table 1. The non-arthroscopy cohort had an older age range, reflecting clinical practice to refer younger patients for shoulder surgery while managing older patients conservatively.
| Arthroscopy cohort | Non-arthroscopy cohort | |
| Number of patients | 52 | 63 |
| Age range (years) | 40 - 68 (Mean = 51) | 62 - 79 (Mean = 68) |
| Gender | 33 males and 19 females | 39 males and 24 females |
| Duration of symptoms (months) | 6 - 18 (Mean = 9) | 6 - 24 (Mean = 10) |
Table 1: Patient demographic information
The diagnostic value of overall clinical examination for FTCT is displayed in Table 2. The results show that as a whole, clinical examination has statistically significant diagnostic value in the diagnosis of FTCT. With a very high sensitivity and NPV, clinical examination was particularly successful at ruling-out FTCT in our sample population. Overall, physical examination has a diagnostic accuracy of 90%.
| Test | Sensitivity | Specificity | Positive Predictive Value | Negative Predictive Value
| Accuracy
| P-value |
| Overall clinical examination | 0.97 | 0.79 | 0.89 | 0.94 | 0.90 | <0> |
Table 2: The diagnostic values of overall clinical examination for FTCT.
The reference standard was shoulder arthroscopy. The P-value was calculated using Fisher’s exact test comparing clinical test results to arthroscopic findings
The diagnostic value of the 5 different clinical tests for FTCT are displayed in Table 3. The Empty Can test, Resisted External Rotation test and External Rotation Lag test assess the integrity of the supraspinatus, infraspinatus and teres minor. The Belly-press test and Lift-off test assess the subscapularis.Both the Resisted External Rotation test and Empty Can test were very accurate when ruling-out FTCT: they both have a sensitivity of 97%. However, the Resisted External Rotation test had a higher specificity and PPV than the Empty Can test, indicating it was more capable of ruling-in tears. The External Rotation Lag test had the highest specificity of the 3 tests (100%). However, it had a sensitivity of 17% and poor diagnostic accuracy. A combination of tests had higher specificity (P-value <0> Positive Predictive Value Negative Predictive Value Accuracy Test Sensitivity Specificity P-value Empty Can test 0.97 0.83 0.86 0.95 0.90 <0> Resisted External Rotation test 0.97 0.91 0.93 0.95 0.94 <0> External Rotation Lag test 0.17 1.00 1.00 0.49 0.54 0.0586 Lift-off test 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 <0> Belly-press test 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 <0>
Table 3: The diagnostic values of individual clinical examinations for FTCT.
The reference standard was shoulder arthroscopy. The P-value was calculated using Fisher’s exact test comparing clinical test results to arthroscopic findings.
Our results show that full-thickness tears of the subscapularis are not common; only 4 out of the 33 FTCT were tears of the subscapularis. Therefore, the Belly-press test and Lift-off test may have limited utility as a universal screening tool for FTCT due to the low incidence of positive test results. However, both tests had a sensitivity and specificity of 100%: all 4 patients that had full-thickness subscapularis tears clinically were confirmed to have full-thickness subscapularis tear arthroscopically. In this respect, both the Belly-press test and the Lift-off test are highly accurate at screening for full-thickness subscapularis tears.
Additionally, we analysed the patients in the non-arthroscopy group who were clinically positive for FTCT. Of the 63 patients who did not have arthroscopy, 25 had FTCT diagnosed clinically while 28 had FTCT diagnosed by imaging modalities, indicating that there were 3 falsely negative clinical examinations in this cohort. The diagnostic values of clinical examination for FTCT in this cohort are displayed in Table 4. Even when diagnostic imaging was used as the reference standard, clinical examination had high diagnostic value for the assessment of FTCT.
| Test | Sensitivity | Specificity | Positive Predictive Value
| Negative Predictive Value
| Accuracy
| P-value |
| Overall clinical examination | 0.89 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.92 | 0.95 | <0> |
Table 4: The diagnostic values of overall clinical examination for FTCT.
The reference standard was diagnostic imaging. The P-value was calculated using Fisher’s exact test comparing clinical examination findings to the results of diagnostic imaging.
Our results show that clinical examination (using the combination of special tests described in our methods) is an accurate diagnostic tool for the diagnosis of FTCT when compared to arthroscopy. This remained true in the non-arthroscopy cohort when our reference standard was diagnostic imaging.
One test to rule them all?
As the current literature stands, there is little evidence recommending one special test over another in the assessment of rotator cuff disease. Key systematic reviews have worked to identify the most accurate individual clinical test but variation in their methodology alongside poor quality primary studies has prevented consensus [4, 5, 15-18].
In agreement with our findings, the Empty Can test, External Rotation Lag test and Belly-press test have been shown to have diagnostic utility by these systematic reviews. Individually, our results show that the Resisted External Rotation test was the best test to use as a screening tool for FTCT. Alternatively, if any one of the External Rotation Lag test, Belly-press test or Lift-off test was positive we were quite likely to find a tear on arthroscopy. Although highly specific, the External Rotation Lag test showed poor sensitivity and NPV in our study. Notably, the 5 patients in the arthroscopic cohort with a positive External Rotation Lag test all had large cuff tears. Similarly, the 11 patients with a positive External Rotation Lag test in the non-arthroscopic cohort all had large cuff tears on MRI. Therefore, it is possible that this test is particularly sensitive at detecting large to massive rotator cuff tears.
Do multiple tests increase diagnostic accuracy?
While individual tests may fall short, our results show that a thorough clinical examination by an experienced orthopaedic surgeon still provides a highly accurate diagnosis. Moreover, an experienced clinician is unlikely to rely on merely one manoeuvre to assess the shoulder: the diagnostic process involves the amalgamation of several clinical tests to arrive at a conclusion.
Sgroi et al. demonstrated that diagnostic capability increased when 3 or more clinical tests were used to identify tears in the supraspinatus muscle. The authors went on to establish the same when 2 or more clinical tests were used to identify tears in the infraspinatus muscle [10,19] . In agreement with our findings, the literature demonstrates that combining multiple clinical tests improves their diagnostic value in the assessment of rotator cuff disease [20,21].
Murrell et al. found that a combination of 3 clinical features: weakness in abduction, weakness in external rotation and impingement, had a PPV of 98% when predicting rotator cuff tears [22]. Notably, patients had the same PPV if they had 2 out of 3 of these clinical features and were also over the age of 60 years. There is limited exploration of the diagnostic value of patient information for rotator cuff tears in the literature. However, increasing age and night pain are examples of patient characteristics & history which have significant diagnostic value in this condition [23,11]. In future research, it would be interesting to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of history-taking and physical examination in combination.
Diagnostic imaging in rotator cuff disease
Clinicians rely heavily on MRI/ultrasonography for the diagnosis of rotator cuff disease. However, there are disadvantages to this diagnostic approach. Due to the high prevalence of asymptomatic rotator cuff tears in the population, interpreting diagnostic imaging can be complex. This is particularly true in older patients; over 50% of asymptomatic individuals have rotator cuff tears on diagnostic imaging when they are over 65 years of age [24] . Furthermore, MRI is expensive and it cannot be used in obese, claustrophobic patients or patients with devices such as pacemakers. In comparison with MRI, ultrasonography is an inexpensive and convenient method of evaluating the shoulder. However, the type of ultrasound equipment as well as operator experience affect its accuracy in identifying tears [25].
In light of these disadvantages, we suggest that elderly patients who are being scheduled for surgical rotator cuff repair should only have diagnostic imaging after failing conservative management. Patients with tears in the non-arthroscopic cohort were treated non-operatively as they were relatively older than patients scheduled for arthroscopy (Table 1). Nevertheless, clinical examination had a high overall diagnostic accuracy in both cohorts, regardless of the age difference. Our results show that an accurate diagnosis for FTCT can be made clinically by a skilled orthopaedic surgeon in secondary care. There were 3 falsely negative patients who displayed FTCT on imaging but not examination. However, these were small full-thickness tears in relatively older patients and were treated non-operatively leading to asymptomatic patients.
Both MRI and ultrasonography have been shown to have similar levels of efficacy in identifying rotator cuff tears. A Cochrane review commented that MRI had an estimated sensitivity of 98% and specificity of 79% 26. This is nearly identical to our results for the sensitivity and specificity of overall clinical examination, which were 97% and 79% respectively. However, ultrasonography can have a sensitivity and specificity as low as 66% and 54% respectively [27].
Similar to clinical examination, both imaging modalities are poorer at identifying partial-thickness tears than full-thickness tears [25 28]. However, the majority of the time partial- thickness tears do not need surgical management. For these reasons, we aimed to diagnose only full-thickness tears on clinical examination.
Clinical relevance and future implications
Hanchard et al. expand on the merits of having sensitive and specific physical manoeuvres for the diagnosis of musculoskeletal conditions [5]. They do not require additional time and resources to organise and they can be completed during routine secondary care consultation with an orthopaedic consultant, yielding immediate results. Since they rely on reproducing symptoms, they will not superfluously detect asymptomatic tears.
Although clinical examinations can be conducted in primary or secondary care, we suggest that they may only be diagnostically accurate when performed by specialists; in this way they can reliably be used as a substitute for diagnostic imaging. As one author eloquently puts it: “Respect must be shown for the physical exam [8].
Like primary studies which have come before us, there are some key limitations to our methodology. We have used the QUADAS tool to aid our retrospection [29]. Firstly, we acknowledge that the diagnostic value of a test transforms with changes in disease prevalence. Since our sample size was highly selective, it is likely the prevalence of FTCT was higher than in the general population [30]. Secondly, our shoulder surgeon was not blinded to the results of the clinical tests, which may have led to bias when the arthroscopy was performed. This may have caused him to overestimate the diagnostic value of clinical examination.
Clinical tests for the diagnosis of FTCT have high sensitivity and specificity, comparable to imaging modalities explored in the literature. When used in combination, these tests are valuable and reliable diagnostic tools. In conclusion, over-reliance on MRI and ultrasonography may not be justified, particularly in a relatively older population when a rotator cuff tear repair is not scheduled.
This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. AP and RP did the literature search, analysed and interpreted the data and wrote the manuscript. NA and RP did the study design and collected and analysed the data. All authors contributed to final approval of draft of the manuscript. All listed authors meet authorship criteria. This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors. No author has any competing interests to declare. Data privacy laws have been followed. Patients or the public were not involved in the design, or conduct, or reporting, or dissemination plans of our research. The manuscript is an accurate, and transparent account of the study.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.
