AUCTORES
Review Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2693-7247/053
Associate Professor of Pharmacology, via Sant’Andrea 32, 56127 Pisa, Italy.
*Corresponding Author: Gian Maria Pacifici, Associate Professor of Pharmacology, via Sant’Andrea 32, 56127 Pisa, Italy
Citation: Gian M Pacifici (2021) Clinical pharmacology of morphine in infants and children. J. Pharmaceutics and Pharmacology Research. 4(5); DOI: 10.31579/2693-7247/053
Copyright: © 2021, Gian Maria Pacifici, This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 25 November 2021 | Accepted: 30 November 2021 | Published: 30 December 2021
Keywords: morphin; dosing; efficacy and safety; effects; adverse-effects; pharmacokinetics; metabolism; drug interaction; treatment; brain;placenta; Brest-milk; infants; children.
Abstract
Morphine is used to treat pain, for treatment of opioid dependence, and neonatal abstinence syndrome. Morphine is modestly absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract whereas after rectal administration, by intranasal or buccal application morphine is well absorbed. Morphine is eliminated by glomerular filtration and by conjugation with glucuronic acid; morphine-3-glucurinide and morphine-6-glucurinide are the main metabolites and the last has analgesic effect. In infants, morphine is used to treat severe or sustained pain, sedation, and pain relief. In children, morphine is used to control pain and morphine may be administered by subcutaneous or intravenous injection, orally, by rectum, or by continuous subcutaneous infusion and morphine dose varies according to the child age. Morphine has been found efficacy and safe in infants and children but may induce adverse-effects. The effects caused by morphine and the treatment with morphine have been studied in infants and children. In newborns, morphine elimination half-life ranges from 7.7 to 13.5 hours and decreases with infant maturation. In newborns, infants and children, the total body clearance of morphine ranges from 14.5 to 71.1 L/h/70kg and increases with infant maturation and child development. Morphine is transported in the human brain, poorly crosses the human placenta and accumulates in breast-milk. The aim of this study is to review the published data on morphine dosing, efficacy and safety, effects, adverse-effects, pharmacokinetics, metabolism, drug interaction, treatment, transport into human brain of infants and children and morphine transfer across the human placenta and migration into the breast-milk.
Running title: Morphine in infants and children.
Mechanism of opioid-induced analgesia
The analgesic actions of opiates after systemic delivery represent actions in the brain, spinal cord, and in some instances the periphery.
Supraspinal actions.
Microinjections of morphine into a number of highly circumscribed brain regions will produce a potent analgesia that is reversible by naloxone, a µ opioid receptor antagonist (MOR). The best characterized of these sites is the mesencephalic periaqueductal gray (PAG) region. Several mechanisms exist whereby opiates with an action limited to the PAG may act to alter nociceptive transmission. MOR agonists block release of the inhibitory transmitter γ-aminobutyric acid from topically active PAG systems that regulate activity in projections to the medulla. PAG projections to the medulla activate medullospinal release of norepinephrine and serotonin at the level of the spinal dorsal horn. The release can attenuate dorsal horn excitability. Interestingly, this PAG organisation can also serve to increase excitability of dorsal raphe and locus coeruleus from which ascending serotoninergic and noradrenergic projections to the limbic forebrain, respectively, originate. Aside from direct supraspinal effects on forebrain structures, these limbic projections provide a mechanism for the effects of opiates on emotional tone [1].
Spinal opiate actions.
A local action of opiates in the spinal cord will selectively depress the discharge of spinal dorsal horn neurones evoked by small high-threshold but not large (low-threshold) afferent nerve fibres. Intrathecal administration of opioids in animal ranging from mice to humans will reliably attenuate the response of the organism to a variety of somatic and visceral stimuli that otherwise evoke pain states. Specific opiate receptors are largely limited to the substantia gelatinosa of the superficial dorsal horn, the region in which small, high-threshold sensory afferent show their principal termination. A significant proportion of these opiate receptors are associated with small peptidergic primary afferent C fibres; the remainder are on local dorsal horn neurons. Spinal opiates act on spinal receptors located presystemically on small, high-threshold primary afferents to prevent the opening of voltage-sensitive Ca2+ channels, thereby preventing transmitter release from those afferents. A postsynaptic action is demonstrated by the ability of opiates to block excitation of dorsal activation of dorsal horn projection neurons partly by hyperpolarizing the neurons through the activation of K+ channels, such that the membrane potential more closely approximates the equilibrium potential for K+. The joint capacity of spinal opiates to reduce the release of excitatory neurotransmitters from C fibres and to decrease the exatibility of dorsal horn neurons is believed to account for the powerful and selective effect of opiates on spinal nociceptive processing. A variety of opiates delivered spinally (intrathecally or epidurally) can induce powerful analgesia that is reversed by low doses of systematic naloxone.
Peripheral actions.
Direct application of high concentrations of opiates to a peripheral nerve can in fact, produce a local anaesthetic-like action, but this effect is not reversed by naloxone and is believed to reflect a “nonspecific” action. Conversely, at peripheral sites under conditions of inflammation where there is an increased sensitivity leading to an exaggerated pain response, direct injection of opiates produces a local action than can exert a normalizing effect on exaggerated thresholds. Whether the effects are uniquely on the peripheral afferent terminal or whether the opiate acts on inflammatory cells that release products that sensitize the nerve terminal, or both, is not known [1].
Absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion of opioids
Absorption.
In general, the opioids are modestly well absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract; absorption through the rectal mucosa is adequate, and a few agents (e.g., morphine and hydromorphone) are available in suppositories. The more lipophilic opioids are absorbed readily through the nasal or buccal mucosa. Opioids, particularly morphine, have been widely used for spinal delivery to produce analgesia though a spinal action. With most opioids, including morphine, the effect of a given dose is less after oral than after parenteral administration because of variable but significant first-pass metabolism in the liver. For example, the bioavailability of oral preparations of morphine is only 25%. If adjustment is made for variability of first-pass metabolism and clearance, adequate relief of pain can be achieved with oral administration of morphine. When morphine and most opioids are given intravenously they act promptly. Compared to more lipid-soluble opioids such as codeine, heroin, and methadone, morphine cross the blood-brain-barrier at considerably lower rate.
Distribution and metabolism.
About one-third of morphine in the plasma is protein bound after a therapeutic dose. Morphine itself does not persist in tissues, and 24 hours after the last dose, tissue concentrations are low. The major pathway for the metabolism of morphine is conjugation with glucuronic acid. The two major metabolites formed are morphine-6-glucuronide and morphine-3-glucuronide. Small amounts of morphine-3,6-glucuronide also may be formed. Although the 3- and 6-glucuronudes are polar, both still can cross the blood-brain-barrier to exert significant clinical effects. Morphine-6-glucuronide has pharmacological actions indistinguishable from those of morphine. Morphine-6-glucuronide given systemically is approximately twice as potent as morphine in animal models and in humans. With chronic administration, the 6-glucuronide accounts for a significant portion of morphine’s analgesic action. Indeed, with chronic oral dosing, thee blood levels of morphine-6-glucuronide typically exceed those of morphine. Given its greater MOR potency and its higher concentration, morphine-6-glucuronide may be responsible for most of morphine’s analgesic activity in patients receiving chronic oral morphine. Morphine-6-glucuronide is excreted by the kidney. N-demethylation of morphine to normorphine is a minor metabolic pathway in humans. Excretion. Morphine is eliminated by glomerular filtration, primarily as morphine-3-glucuronide; 90% of the total excretion takes place during the first day. Vere little morphine is excreted unchanged. Extrahepatic circulation of morphine and its glucuronides occur, which accounts for the presence of small amounts of morphine in faeces and urine for several days after the last dose [1]. Morphine is the best-studied opiate analgesic used in the neonatal population [2]. Morphine is an important agent for analgesia and sedation. It is used in the treatment of opioid dependence and neonatal abstinence syndrome. Morphine is incompatible with azithromycin, cefepime, micafungin, phenobarbital and phenytoin [3].
Literature search
The literature search was performed electronically using PubMed database as search engine and the following key words were used: “morphine dosing infants, children“, morphine efficacy, safety infants, children”, “morphine effects infants, children”, “morphine adverse-effects infants, children”, “morphine pharmacokinetics infants, children”, “morphine metabolism”, “morphine drug interaction”, “morphine treatment infants, children”, “morphine transport into human brain”, “morphine placental transfer”, and “morphine breast-milk”. In addition, the books: The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics [1], Neonatal Formulary [2], NEOFAX® by Young and Mangum [3], and The British National Formulary for Children [4] are consulted.
Administration schedules of morphine to infants and children
Administration to infants [2]
Neonatal opioid withdrawal:
Local guidelines may vary; one approach is to monitor using appropriate withdrawal tool (e.g., modified Finnegan’s score every 4 hours). If morphine is required, begin by giving 40 µg/kg by mouth 6 times-daily.
Severe or sustained pain:
Provide ventilator support; give a loading dos of 200 µg/kg, and then a maintenance infusion of 20 µg/kg per hour. While this will usually control even severe pain in the first two months of life, providing a plasma morphine level of 120 to 160 µg/ml, treatment has to be individualized.
Sedation while ventilated:
Infants given both a loading dose of 100 µg/kg and a maintenance infusion of 10 µg/kg per hour.
Short-tern pain relief:
Give 100 µg/kg by subcutaneous or, preferably, by intravenous injection. Avoid intramuscular injection which is pain in itself. Twice this dose is needed if given by mouth. Rapid intravenous administration does not cause hypotension but may cause respiratory depression. A further 50 µg/kg dose can usually be given after 6 hours without making ventilator support necessary.
Administration to children [4]
Treatment of pain by subcutaneous injection
Children aged 1 to 5 months. Give initially 100 to 200 µg/kg 4 times-daily, and then adjust the dose according to the response.
Children aged 6 months to 1 year. Give initially 100 to 200 µg/kg 6 times-daily, and then adjust the dose according to the response.
Children aged 2 to 12 years. Give initially 200 µg/kg 6 times-daily, and then adjust the dose according to the response.
Children aged 12 to 17 years. Give initially 2.5 to 10 mg 6 times-daily, and then adjust the dose according to the response.
Treatment of pain by intravenous injection
Children aged 1 to 5 months. Give: 100 µg/kg 4 times-daily, and then adjust the dose according to the response, the dose should be administered over at least 5 min, alternatively (by intravenous injection) give initially 50 µg/kg, the dose should be administered over at least 5 min, followed by a continuous intravenous infusion of 10 to 30 µg/kg per hour, and then adjust the dose according to the response.
Children aged 6 months to 11 years. Give: 100 µg/kg 6 times-daily, and then adjust the dose according to the response, the dose should be administered over at least 5 min, alternatively by a continuous intravenous infusion give initially 100 µg/kg and the dose should be administered over at least 5 min, followed by a continuous intravenous infusion of 20 to 30 µg/kg per hour, and then adjust the dose according to the response.
Children aged 12 to 17 years. Give: 5 mg 6 times-daily, adjust the dose according to the response, the dose should be administered over at least 5 min, alternatively by an intravenous injection give initially 5 mg, the dose should be administered over at least 5 min, followed by a continuous intravenous infusion of 20 to 30 µg/kg per hour, and then adjust the dose according to the response.
Treatment of pain by moth or by rectum
Children aged 1 to 2 months. Give initially 50 to 100 µg/kg 6 times-daily, and then adjust the dose according to the response.
Children aged 3 to 5 months. Give: 100 to 150 µg/kg 6 times-daily, and then adjust the dose according to the response.
Children aged 6 to 11 months. Give: 200 µg/kg 6 times-daily, and then adjust the dose according to the response.
Children aged 1 year. Give initially 200 to 300 µg/kg 6 times-daily, and then adjust the dose according to the response.
Children aged 2 to 11 years. Give initially 200 to 300 µg/kg 6 times-daily (maximum per dose = 10 mg), and then adjust the dose according to the response.
Children aged 12 to 17 years. Give initially 5 to 10 mg 6 times-daily, and then adjust the dose according to the response.
Treatment of pain by continuous subcutaneous infusion
Children aged 1 to 2 months. Give: 10 µg/kg per hour, and then adjust the dose according to the response.
Children aged 3 months to 17 years. Give: 20 µg/kg per hour, and then adjust the dose according to the response.
Efficacy and safety of morphine in infants and children
Oral morphine given at a dose of 100 μg/kg to non-ventilated premature infants effectively and safely treats pain [5]. Combination of morphine with gabapentin provides better analgesia than morphine alone and this combination is safe in children [6]. Nebulized morphine, or a bolus of 10 mg, has similarly efficacy and safe than intravenous morphine in children with severe posttraumatic pain [7]. No significant difference in analgesic effect is observed between oral morphine and oral ibuprofen in children [8]. Morphine is efficacy and safe in treating pain in newborns, infants, and children [9]. Caudal anaesthesia supplemented with low dose of morphine provides a long duration of analgesia without significant adverse-effects in children undergoing renal surgery [10]. Caudal morphine provides 8 to 24 hours analgesia in children without causing significant adverse-effects than caudal bupivacaine or intravenous morphine [11]. In children, the duration of pain relief is significantly longer using morphine (range, 610 to 2,195 min) than using bupivacaine (range, 245 to 515 min) [12].
Effects of morphine in infants and children
Newborns, with neonatal abstinence syndrome, treated with morphine have significantly higher scores in cognitive and gross motor domains compared to infants treated with methadone [13]. Medication of preterm infants with morphine is associated with prolonged amplitude-integrated electroencephalogram depression independent of blood pressure changes [14]. Newborns and young infants have the same respiratory response to morphine infusions as older infants and children at the same blood level [15]. When morphine is administered to patients, the analgesic effect is mainly caused by morphine-6-glucuronide instead of morphine itself [16]. Morphine provides enhanced cardio-protection against ischemia/reperfusion injury in children undergoing corrections of Tetralogy of Fallot [17].
Adverse-effects caused by morphine in infants and children [4]
Common or very common adverse-effects
With oral use:
Appetite decreased, asthenic conditions, gastrointestinal discomfort, insomnia, and neuromuscular dysfunction.
Uncommon adverse-effects
With oral use:
Agitation, bronchospasm, mood altered, myoclonus, peripheral oedema,
pulmonary oedema, seizures, sensational abnormal, syncope, and taste altered.
Adverse-effects whose frequency is not known
With oral use:
Amenorrhoea, biliary pain, cough decreased, hyperalgesia, hypertension, pancreatitis exacerbated, sexual dysfunction, thinking abnormal and ureteral spams.
With parenteral use:
Alertness decreased, bile ductus disorders, mood altered, myoclonus, sexual dysfunction, ureteral spasm, urinary disorders, and vision disorders.
Pharmacokinetics of morphine in preterm newborns
Scott et al. [18] 48 preterm newborns were stratified according to the postconceptional age and morphine infusions were initiated at doses of 20 to 30 µg/kg per hour preceded by a bolus infusion of 50 µg/kg
Ko (all) = morphine infusion rate for all subjects completing the study. Ko (Css) = morphine infusion rate for subjects reaching Css. Css = morphine concentration at the steady-state. *P-value = 0.02; group A versus groups B, C, and D. **P-value = 0.023; group A versus groups C and D. §P-value < 0>
This table shows that the concentration of morphine at the steady-state decreases according to the subject maturation, and the total body clearance increases according to the subject maturation. Morphine is cleared from the body by metabolism and renal excretion and both elimination pathways increase with the infant maturation.
Pharmacokinetics of morphine and its metabolites in newborns, infants, and young children
Bouwmeester et al. [19] investigated the pharmacokinetics of morphine in 184 subjects (106 boys and 78 girls) aged 0 to 1,000 days undergoing surgery and morphine was administered intravenously. A loading dose of morphine hydrochloride of 100 µg/kg was followed by an infusion of 10 µg/kg per hour. Arterial blood samples were taken after induction of anaesthesia, at the end of surgery, and 6, 12, and 24 hours after surgery.
DV = distribution volume. CL2M6G = formation clearance to morphine-6-glucuronide. CL2M3G = formation clearance to morphine-3-glucuronide. CLM3G = elimination clearance of morphine-3-glucuronide. CLM6G = elimination clearance of morphine-6-glucuronide. CLEX = morphine clearance by other routes. CLT base = Total body clearance of morphine.
70 kg person and are the median, by Bouwmeester et al. [19].
This table shows that the elimination clearance of morphine-3-glucoronide, morphine-6-glucuronide, and the total body clearance of morphine increases with infant maturation and child development.
Metabolism of morphine
The metabolism of morphine has been studied in 9 children, aged 9.6+1.3 years (range, 1 to 16) and in 9 infants, aged 4.8+1.6 days (range, 2 to 12), and morphine was administered by a continuous infusion at a dose of 59.7+22.5 µg/kg per hour (range, 20 to 270) to children and at a dose of 23.1+3.6 µg/kg per hour (range, 15 to 40) to infants [20].
ND = not detectable. M3G = morphine-3-glucuronide.
This table shows that the plasma concentration of morphine-3-glucuronide is higher than those of morphine and morphine-6-glucuronide.
ND = not detectable. M3G = morphine-3-glucuronide.
This table shows that the plasma concentration of morphine-3-glucuronide is higher than that of morphine and morphine-6-glucorinide is not detectable. In addition, the plasma concentration of morphine is higher in infants than children and the plasma concentration of morphine-3-glucuronide is lower in infants than.
In adult patients, morphine-6-glucuronide and morphine-3-glucuronide are present in abundance after chronic oral morphine administration and the plasma AUC of morphine-3-glucuronide exceeds that of morphine-6-glucuronide [21]. The ratio of hydromorphone to morphine plasma concentration ranges from 0.015 to 0.024, thus hydromorphone is a minor metabolite of morphine in humans [22]. Plasma morphine concentrations are correlated with the volume of liver (P-value < 0>
Interaction of morphine with drugs
The interaction between morphine and phenelzine is limited [25]. Morphine significantly decreases the peak plasma concentration of prasugrel [26]. Morphine co-administered with acetylsalicylic acid increase the acetylsalicylic acid exposure by 20% [27]. Co-administration of morphine with prasugrel or ticagrelor, inhibitors of P2Y12, decreases their efficacy in platelet inhibition [28]. The combination of morphine with tramadol produces opioid sparing effect and synergism [29]. There is a potentiation of morphine analgesia when morphine is co-administered with lithium [30]. Morphine co-administered with ticagrelor decreases ticagrelor plasma concentrations [31]. Gabapentin and morphine combination produces better analgesia than morphine alone [32]. In patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction, morphine use is associated with a delayed onset of action of the oral antiplatelet agents [33].
Treatment of infants and children with morphine
Morphine is able to control withdrawal symptoms in infants exposed to opioids in utero [34]. Newborns, with neonatal abstinence syndrome, were treated with morphine which significantly produces higher scores in cognitive and gross motor domains compared to infants treated with methadone [35]. Neonatal abstinence syndrome treatment with morphine is associated with better outcomes in infants compared to methadone treatment [36]. Methadone has a shorter length of neonatal withdrawal treatment compared to morphine [37]. There are no significant differences in the duration of treatment, duration of hospital stay, and the requirement for adjunctive treatment between newborns with neonatal abstinence syndrome who received morphine sulfate and newborns who received phenobarbital [38]. Clonidine is a favourable alternative to morphine for neonatal abstinence syndrome [39]. Chlorpromazine shorts the duration of neonatal abstinence syndrome more effectively than morphine hydrochloride [40]. Morphine has a better analgesic effect in children than control children who did not receive morphine [41]. Patients with P-glycoprotein+ tumours require a higher dose of morphine to achieve an analgesic effect [42]. Inhaled morphine is associated with a beneficial effect on dyspnoea [43].
Transport of morphine into the human brain
Morphine-6-glucuronide and Morphine-3-glucuronide are both highly hydrophilic, but only morphine-6-glucuronide penetrates the blood-brain-barrier. Morphine-6-glucuronide produces higher analgesic effect than the parent drug and morphine-3-glucuronide [44]. In patients who received 10 mg of morphine, the elimination half-life and Tmax of morphine are longer in the brain than in plasma and morphine crosses the blood-brain-barrier by active efflux [45].
Transfer of morphine across the human placenta
Twenty-five healthy women in labour received morphine intrathecally at a dose of 1 to 1.75 mg, the maternal plasma concentration of morphine is 6 ng/ml or less and the mean umbilical arterial plasma concentration of morphine is 0.8 ng/ml [46]. Morphine was intravenously infused and at steady-state the maternal to foetal free drug concentration ratio is 7.6+0.6 [47]. Term human placental cotyledons were perfused in-vitro. The placenta was perfused with 50 ng/ml of morphine and the maternal-to-foetal morphine transfer rate is 0.73+0.44 ng/ml/min. The final morphine concentrations is 9.78+6.17 ng/ml (maternal compartment) and 3.43+2.14 ng/ml (foetal compartment) thus morphine does not equilibrated between the maternal and foetal compartment [48].
Migration of morphine into the breast-milk
Morphine concentration in maternal serum is 4 ng/ml while the concentration in the breast-milk varies in three samples collected within 2 hours and are 10, 100, 12 ng/ml [49]. The milk-to-plasma ratio is 2.45+0.8 [50].
Morphine is the best-studied opiate analgesic in adult and paediatric patients and the analgesic effect is supraspinal, spinal, and peripheral. Morphine is used to treat pain; it is an important agent for analgesia and sedation, is used in the treatment of opioid dependence, and for treatment of neonatal abstinence syndrome. Morphine may be administered by intravenous or subcutaneous injection, orally, by rectum, by continuous subcutaneous infusion or by intranasal or buccal application. Following oral administration, the bioavailability is modest whereas after rectal administration and intranasal and buccal application the bioavailability is good [1]. In infants, morphine may be administered to control severe or sustained pain, for sedation in ventilated infants, and for short-term relief pain and the treatment consists in an intravenous loading dose followed by a maintenance infusion [2]. In children, morphine is administered by subcutaneous or intramuscular injection, by rectum, by continuous subcutaneous infusion, or orally and the dose of morphine varies according to the child age. Morphine has been found efficacy and safe in infants and children [5-12]. Oral morphine given, at a dose of 100 µg/kg, effectively and safely treats pain in premature infants [5], and the combination of morphine with gabapentin provides better analgesia than morphine alone in children [6]. Nebulized morphine has similar efficacy than intravenous morphine in children with severe posttraumatic pain [7], and oral morphine and oral ibuprofen have similar analgesic efficacy [8]. Morphine effectively and safely treats pain in newborns, infants and children [9]. In children undergoing renal surgery, caudal anaesthesia supplemented with low dose of morphine provides a long analgesia without inducing adverse-effects [10] and caudal morphine provides analgesia in children compared to caudal bupivacaine or intravenous morphine [11]. In children, the pain relief is longer using morphine than bupivacaine [12]. The effects of morphine have been reported in infants and children [13-17]. The treatment of neonatal abstinence syndrome in newborns is more efficacious with morphine than with methadone [13], and medication of preterm infants with morphine is associated with prolonged amplitude-integrated electroencephalogram depression [14]. Newborns and young infants have similar respiratory response to morphine infusion as older infants and children at the same blood level [15]. The analgesic effect caused by morphine is mainly due to morphine-6-glucuronide [16], and morphine provides enhanced cardioprotective against ischemic/reperfusion injury undergoing corrections of Tetralogy of Fallot [17]. The pharmacokinetics of morphine have been studied in preterm newborns [18] and in newborns, infants, and children [19]. In preterm newborns, morphine elimination half-life ranges from 7.7 to 13.5 hours and decreases with infant maturation and the total body clearance ranges from 2.27 to 7.80 ml/kg/min and increases with infant maturation [18]. In newborns, infants, and children, the total body clearance of morphine ranges from 14.5 to 71.1 L/h/70 kg, and increases with infant maturation and child development. The elimination clearance of morphine-3-glucuronide ranges from 3.0 to 17.3 L/h/70 kg, and that of morphine-6-glucuronide ranges from 0.98 to 5.8 L/h/70 kg and both increase with infant maturation and child development [19]. Morphine is cleared from the body by renal route and by metabolism and both elimination pathways increase with infant maturation and child development. The metabolism of morphine has been studied in infants and children [20] and in adult patients [21-24]. In infants, the plasma concentrations of morphine and morphine-3-glucuronide are 113 and 339 ng/ml, respectively, and that of morphine-6-glucuronine is not detectable. In children, the plasma concentrations of morphine, morphine-3-glucuronide, and morphine-6-glucuronide are 34, 837, and 43 ng/ml, respectively [20]. These results indicate that morphine plasma concentration is lower in children than in infants because of a more extensive metabolism of morphine in children. Consequently, the plasma concentration of morphine-3-glucuronide is higher in children than in infants and morphine-6-glucuronide is not detectable in the plasma of infants. In children, the plasma concentration of morphine-3-glucuronide is higher than that of morphine-6-glucuronide and consisting results have been observed in adult patients [21]. Hydromorphone is formed following morphine administration to adult patients and hydromorphone is a minor metabolite of morphine. In adult patients, the plasma concentration of morphine is correlated with the liver volume [22, 23] and the plasma concentrations of morphine-6-glucuronide and morphine-3-glucuronode do not vary in patients undergoing liver resection compared to patients undergoing colon resection [23]. Human skin poorly metabolizes morphine [24]. Morphine interacts with drugs [25-33]. The interaction of morphine with phenelzine is limited [25] whereas morphine decreases the peak concentration of prasugrel [26], morphine increases the acetylsalicylic acid exposure [27], and the co-administration of morphine with prasugrel or ticagrelor, inhibitors of P2Y12, decrease their efficacy in platelet inhibition [28]. The combination of morphine with tramadol produces both opioid sparing effect and synergism [29], and the analgesic effect of morphine is potentiated by the co-administration of lithium [30]. Morphine decreases the ticagrelor plasma concentration [30], the combination of gabapentin with morphine produces better anaesthesia even when administered at low dose [32], and morphine is associated with a delayed onset of action of oral antiplatelet agents [33]. The treatment of infants and children with morphine has been extensively studied [34-43]. Morphine controls the withdrawal symptoms in infants exposed to opioids in utero [35], morphine is more active than methadone in controlling the neonatal abstinence syndrome in newborns [36], methadone is less effective than morphine in controlling neonatal withdrawal [37], morphine and phenobarbital have similar efficacy in the treatment of newborns with neonatal abstinence syndrome [38], and clonidine is a preferable alternative to morphine in the treatment of neonatal abstinence syndrome [39]. Chlorpromazine is more effective than morphine in shortening the duration of neonatal abstinence syndrome [40], and morphine has a better analgesic effect than placebo in children [41]. Patients with P-glycoprotein+ tumours require higher dose of morphine to achieve the analgesic effect [42]. Inhaled morphine produces a beneficial effect on dyspnoea [43]. The transport of morphine and its metabolites has been studied in two occasions [44, 45]. Morphine and morphine-6-glucuronide cross the blood-brain-barrier whereas morphine-3-glucuronide is not transported into the human brain [44]. The morphine elimination half-life and Tmax are longer in brain than in plasma and morphine crosses the blood-brain-barrier by active efflux [45]. The transfer of morphine across the human placenta has been studied in-vivo [46, 47] and in-vitro using the placenta perfusion [48]. Morphine reaches lower concentration in neonatal plasma than in maternal plasma [46, 47] and morphine concentration in the perusing medium remains lower in the foetal than in maternal compartment [48]. The migration of morphine into the breast-milk has been investigated in two occasions and morphine reaches higher concentrations in the breast-milk than in maternal plasma [49, 50].
In conclusion, morphine is an important agent for treating analgesia and sedation and it is used in the treatment of opioid dependence and neonatal abstinence syndrome. Morphine may be administered by intravenous or subcutaneous injection, orally, by rectum, by continuous subcutaneous infusion or by intranasal or buccal application. Following oral administration, the bioavailability is modest whereas after rectal administration and intranasal or buccal application the bioavailability is good. In infants, intravenous morphine is used to treat severe, sustained pain, sedation, and for short-term pain relief. In children, the treatment of pain with morphine is obtained by subacute or intravenous injection, by mouth or by rectum administration, or by continuous subcutaneous infusion and the morphine dose varies according to the child age. Morphine has been found efficacy and safe in infants and children but may induce adverse-effects. The effects and the treatment with morphine have been extensively studied in infants and children. The pharmacokinetics of morphine have been studied in newborns and in newborns, infants and children. Morphine elimination half-life decreases and the total body clearance increases with infant maturation and child development. Morphine is metabolized; the main metabolites are morphine-3-glucurinide and morphine-6-glucuronide and the plasma concentration of the former is higher than that of the latter. Morphine is transported into the human brain and the elimination half-life of morphine is longer in brain than in plasma. Morphine poorly crosses the placenta whereas the breast-milk concentrations of morphine are higher than those in plasma. The aim of this study is to review the clinical pharmacology of morphine in infants and children.
The authors declare no conflicts of financial interest in any product or service mentioned in the manuscript, including grants, equipment, medications, employments, gifts, and honoraria.
This article is a review and drugs have not been administered to men or animals.
The author thanks Dr. Patrizia Ciucci and Dr. Francesco Varricchio, of the Medical Library of the University of Pisa, for retrieving the scientific literature.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.