Clinical Pharmacology of Ceftriaxone

Research Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2693-7247/145

Clinical Pharmacology of Ceftriaxone

  • Gian Maria Pacifici *

Professor of Pharmacology via Sant’Andrea 32,56127 Pisa, Italy.

*Corresponding Author: Gian Maria Pacifici, Professor of Pharmacology via Sant’Andrea 32,56127 Pisa, Italy.

Citation: Gian Maria Pacifici, (2023), Clinical Pharmacology of Ceftriaxone, J. Pharmaceutics and Pharmacology Research, 6(5); DOI: 10.31579/2693-7247/145

Copyright: © 2023, Gian Maria Pacifici. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: 25 August 2023 | Accepted: 12 September 2023 | Published: 27 September 2023

Keywords: breast-milk; ceftriaxone; cerebrospinal-fluid; efficacy-safely; meningitis; pharmacokinetics; placental-transfer;prophylaxisresistance;treatment;trials

Abstract

Ceftriaxone is a third-generation cephalosporin and is resistant to many narrow-spectrum β-lactamases and has good activity against most gram-positive and gram-negative aerobic bacteria. Ceftriaxone is the drug of choice for treatment of serious infections caused by Escherichia coli, Klebsiella, Proteus, Haemophilus influenzae, Moraxella catarrhalis, Citrobacter, Enterobacter, Serratia, Neisseria gonorrhoea, Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pneumoniae, and Streptococcus pyogenes, and for severe forms of Lyme disease. Ceftriaxone treats ureteral, cervical, rectal, and pharyngeal infection, gonorrhoea, Lyme disease, and bacterial meningitis. The efficacy and safely of ceftriaxone have been reviewed. Following intravenous administration, ceftriaxone rapidly diffuses into the body with a distribution half-life of about 14 min. A half of ceftriaxone is eliminated by renal route and the remainder is secreted into the bile. The elimination half-life of ceftriaxone is 6.4 hours in patients with normal renal function and 21.4 hours in patients with renal failure. The prophylaxis, treatment, and trials with ceftriaxone have been reviewed. Ceftriaxone penetrates into the cerebrospinal fluid in significant amounts, treats bacterial meningitis, some bacteria may become resistant to ceftriaxone, and ceftriaxone is poorly transferred across the human placenta, and poorly migrates into the breast-milk. The aim of this study is to review ceftriaxone efficacy and safely, pharmacokinetics, prophylaxis, treatment, trials, penetration into the cerebrospinal fluid, treatment of bacterial meningitis, resistance to bacteria, transfer across the human placenta, and migration into the breast-milk. 

Introduction

Pharmacology of ceftriaxone Ceftriaxone is a third-generation cephalosporin is resistant to many narrow-spectrum β-lactamases and has good activity against most gram-positive and gram-negative aerobic bacteria. Ceftriaxone activity is very similar to that of cefotaxime but a longer elimination half-life of 8 hours allowing for only-daily dosing for most indications. Administration of the drug twice-daily has been effective for patients with meningitis. About half of the drug can be recovered from the urine; the remainder is eliminated by biliary secretion. Single doses of intramuscular ceftriaxone have long been used in the management of ureteral, cervical, rectal, or pharyngeal gonorrhoea; increasing resistance has necessitated the use of higher doses (recently increased to 500 mg) [1].

Antimicrobial spectrum of ceftriaxone

Ceftriaxone is the drug of choice for treatment of serious infections caused by Escherichia coli, Klebsiella, Proteus, Haemophilus influenzae, Moraxella catarrhalis, Citrobacter, Enterobacter, Serratia, Neisseria gonorrhoea, Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pneumoniae, and Streptococcus pyogenes, and for severe forms of Lyme disease. Ceftriaxone is used for the empiric treatment of meningitis in non-immunocompromised adults and children (in combination with vancomycin and ampicillin pending identification of the causative agent), owing to its excellent activity against to Haemophilus influenzae, sensitive Streptococcus pneumoniae, Neisseria meningitides, and gram-negative enteric bacteria. Ceftriaxone lacks activity against Listeria monocytogenes and penicillin-resistant pneumococci, which may cause meningitis. The antimicrobial spectrum of ceftriaxone is excellent for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia [1].


 

Ceftriaxone molecular structure (molecular weight = 554.58 grams/mole)


 

Literature search

The literature search was performed electronically using PubMed database as search engine and the following key words were used: “ceftriaxone efficacy, safely”, “ceftriaxone pharmacokinetics”, “ceftriaxone prophylaxis” “ceftriaxone treatment”, “ceftriaxone trials”, ceftriaxone CSF”, “ceftriaxone meningitis”, “ceftriaxone resistance”, “ceftriaxone placental transfer”, and “ceftriaxone breast-milk”. In addition, the book “The pharmacological basis of therapeutics” [1] has been consulted.

Results

Efficacy and safely of ceftriaxone

Ceftriaxone administered intravenously at a dose of 2 grams twice-daily effectively and safely treats patients with community-acquired pneumonia [2,3]. Ertapenem and ceftriaxone administered intravenously at a dose of 1 gram once-daily have similar efficacy and safely in treatment of hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia [4]. Ceftriaxone administered intravenously at a daily dose of 2 or 4 grams effectively and safely treats patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis [5]. ceftriaxone administered intravenously at a daily dose of 250 mg effectively and safely treats patients with uncomplicated gonorrhoea [6]. ceftriaxone administered intravenously at a daily dose of 2 gram effectively and safely treats paediatric patients with urinary-tract, lower respiratory-tract, skin, soft-tissue, bone and joint infections, bacteraemia, and septicaemia caused by gram-negative bacteria [7]. treats serious infections caused by gram-negative bacteria in paediatric patients [8], and ceftriaxone administered intravenously at a dose of 50 to 80 mg/kg once-daily effectively and safely paediatric patients infected by Haemophilus influenzae, Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pyogenes, Streptococcus pneumoniae, or by Escherichia coli [9].

Pharmacokinetics of ceftriaxone in patients with severe sepsis

Joynt et al. [10]. studied the pharmacokinetics of ceftriaxone in 12 patients with nosocomial pneumonia, intraabdominal sepsis, or urinary sepsis and ceftriaxone was intravenously infused at a dose of 2 grams once-daily. The patients were aged 45+16 years (range, 33 to 68) weighed 62+13 kg (range, 52 to 96), had a creatinine serum concentration of 70.7+24.2 µmol/L (range, 41 to 111), a creatinine clearance of 97.7+49.6 ml/min (range, 21 to 167), an album in concentration of 22.2+6.1 grams/L (range, 19 to 31) and a bilirubin concentration of 39.6+50 µmol/L (range, 9 to 155). Ten patients had normal renal function and 2 patients had renal failure.

 Table 1. Pharmacokinetic parameters of ceftriaxone which have been obtained in 12 patients with nosocomial pneumonia, intraabdominal sepsis, or urinary sepsis. Ten patients had normal renal function and 2 patients had renal failure. Values are the minimum, maximum, mean, and+SD, by 


 

 Trough conc. (µg/ml)a
ValueVc (L)Vss (L)

Kel

(min-1)

K12

(min-1)

K21

(min-1)

T1/2α

(min)

T1/2β

(h)

TBC

(ml/min)

Peak conc. (µg/ml)Day 1Day 3
Ten patients with normal renal function
Minimum1.313.60.000220.0130.0126.04.823.0148< 5>< 5>
Maximum7.222.60.01080.0850.02626.07.262.024214.013.0
Mean5.919.90.00720.0420.01713.36.441.32058.89.6
+SD1.33.30.00220.0230.0086.81.111.731.33.07.2
Two patients with renal failure
Patient 47.025.70.00310.0220.00821.014.522.020521.025.0
Patient 116.541.20.00270.0380.00715.028.418.018427.049.0
Mean6.833.50.00290.0300.00818.021.419.919424.236.9
+SD0.311.00.00030.0110.0014.79.83.115.04.017.1
All patients (N = 12)
Mean6.022.40.00640.0410.01514.09.237.020312.016.0
+SD1.27.10.00260.0220.0087.06.914.029.07.014.0

 

Vc = distribution volume of the central compartment. Vss = distribution volume at steady-state. Kel = elimination-rate constant. K12, K21 = rate constant between the two compartments. T1/2α = distribution half-life. T1/2β = elimination half-life. TBC = total body clearance. Peak conc. = peak concentration. aTrough concentration of ceftriaxone measured at day 1 and at day 3 of treatment.


 

This table shows that ceftriaxone rapidly distributes into the body with a mean distribution half-life is 14 min and is slowly eliminated with a mean elimination half-life is 9.2 hours in all patients. The comparison of the pharmacokinetic parameters of ceftriaxone obtained in patients with normal renal function to those obtained in patients with renal failure is difficult because the small number of patients with renal failure however the impression prevails that the pharmacokinetic parameters of ceftriaxone are different in these two groups of patients. In particular, the mean elimination half-life of ceftriaxone is 6.4 hours in patients with normal renal function and 21.4 hours in patients with renal failure. Ceftriaxone is largely eliminated by renal route thus the renal function is an important factor for the clearance of ceftriaxone from the body. Joynt et al. [10] stated that that moderate or severe renal failure causes approximately three-fold increase in the elimination half-life, a 50% increase in the distribution volume at steady-state, and halved the total body clearance. There is remarkable inter-patient variability in the pharmacokinetic parameters of ceftriaxone and this variability is accounted by the wide variability in patient’s demographic characteristics and disease.

Prophylaxis with ceftriaxone

Ceftriaxone administered intravenously at a daily dose of 2 grams prevents both local and remote postoperative infections more effectively (P-value = 0.01) than other antibiotics [11], intravenous ceftriaxone plus intravenous metronidazole prevents the infection in children with perforated appendicitis more effectively than anti-pseudomonal antibiotics [12]. ceftriaxone administered intravenously at a daily dose of 1 gram is more effective than norfloxacin administered orally at the dose of 400 mg twice-daily (P-value = 0.03) for the prophylaxis of bacterial infections in patients undergoing surgery [13], one single intravenous dose of 1 gram of ceftriaxone is effective as ampicillin/cloxacillin administered intravenously at a dose of 1 gram 3 times-daily in preventing complications during post-Caesarean section [14]. intravenous ceftriaxone prevents surgical infections, urinary-tract infections, and respiratory-tract infections more effectively (P-value < 0 xss=removed>

Treatment of bacterial infection with ceftriaxone

Intravenous ceftriaxone has similar efficacy as intravenous benzylpenicillin in treating patients with neurosyphilis [22]. ceftriaxone administered intravenously at a dose of 2 grams once-daily treats endocarditis, spondylodiscitis, and prosthetic joint infections caused by Cutibacterium acnes [23]. ceftriaxone administered intravenously at a daily dose of 1 or 2 grams for 3 to 6 days treats patients with uncomplicated and severe forms of leptospirosis [24]. ceftriaxone administered intravenously at a daily dose of 2 grams treats patients with acute tonsillopharyngitis [25]. a single intravenous dose of 2 grams of ceftriaxone treats patients with meningococcal meningitis [26]. ceftriaxone administered intravenously at a daily dose of 3 grams for 7 days treats patients with typhoid fever [27]. ceftriaxone administered intravenously once-daily at a dose of 2 grams for 4 weeks treats patients with streptococcal endocarditis [28]. ceftriaxone administered intramuscularly at a dose of 1 gram 4 times-daily every 2 days treats patients with primary and secondary syphilis [29]. intramuscular ceftriaxone has been found efficacy as intravenous trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole in the treatment of patients with urinary-tract infections [30]. ceftriaxone administered intravenously at a dose of 2 grams once-daily for 14 days treats patients with acute disseminated Borrelia burgdorferi infection as doxycycline administered orally at a dose of 100 mg twice-daily for 21 days [31]. ceftriaxone administered intravenously at a dose of 1 gram twice-daily treats patients with respiratory-tract, urinary-tract, skin, soft-tissue, bone and joint infections, catheter-related septicaemia, liver abscess, and otitis media [32]. ceftriaxone administered intravenously at a dose of 1 gram once-daily treats patients with bacteriologically proven cellulitis, suppurative diabetic foot ulcer, and soft-tissue infections [33]. ceftriaxone administered intravenously at a dose of 1 gram twice-daily effectively treats patients with respiratory-tract, urinary-tract, skin, soft-tissue, bone, and joint infections caused by Staphylococcus aureus, aerobic gram-positive cocci, Enterobacteriaceae, or by Pseudomonas aeruginosa [34]. and ceftriaxone administered intravenously at a dose of 1 gram twice-daily treats patients with skin, soft-tissue, urinary-tract, biliary-tract infections, pneumonia, and sinusitis caused by Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Streptococcus faecalis, Escherichia coli, Proteus mirabilis, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Serratia marcescens, Enterobacter cloacae, Haemophilus influenzae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Bacteroides fragilis, or by anaerobic cocci [35].

Trials with ceftriaxone

Ceftriaxone administered intravenously at a dose of 2 grams twice-daily for 3 days is more effective than placebo in treating gallbladder infection and diarrhoea caused by Clostridium difficile in adult patients [36]. ceftriaxone administered intravenously at a dose of 2 grams once-daily is effective as multiple dosing regimens of anti-staphylococcal antibiotics in treating patients infected by methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus [37]. ceftriaxone administered intravenously at a daily dose of 1 gram is effective as ceftriaxone administered intravenously at a daily dose of 2 grams in treatment of adult patients with community-acquired pneumoniae [38]. a 12-month follow-up resulted that ceftriaxone administered intravenously at a daily dose of 1 gram treats early syphilis as doxycycline, or tetracycline, or penicillin administered intravenously at a daily of 1 gram [39]. ertapenem administered intravenously at a dose of 1 gram once-daily for 3 days is efficacy as ceftriaxone administered intravenously at a dose of 2 grams once-daily for 3 days in treatment of acute pyelonephritis in adult patients [40]. ceftriaxone administered intravenously at a dose of 2 grams once-daily for 3 days is efficacy as cefditoren pivoxil administered orally at a dose of 400 mg once-daily for 3 days in treatment of acute pyelonephritis in adult patients [41]. ceftriazone administered intravenously at a daily dose of 2 grams is 3 times more effective than ampicillin/sulbactam administered intravenously at a daily dose of 3 grams in treatment of postoperative neurosurgical infections in adult patients [42].and ceftriaxone administered intravenously at a daily dose of 2 grams is efficacy as cefotaxime administered intravenously at a dose of 2 grams 4 times-daily in treatment of serious bacterial infections [43].

Penetration of ceftriaxone into the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)

Nau et al. [44]. investigated the penetration of ceftriaxone into CSF of 7 patients with uninflamed meninges aged 59.7+3.3 years (range, 49 to 76) and weighing 78.6+3.0 kg (range, 65 to 90). All patients had respiratory-tract infection, 2 patients had intracerebral blending, and 2 patients had cerebral ischemic infarction. Ceftriaxone was intravenously infused at a dose of 2 grams twice-daily for 3 days. Table 2 summarizes the pharmacokinetic parameters of ceftriaxone in CSF.

Table 2. Pharmacokinetic parameters of ceftriaxone which have been obtained in CSF of 7 patients. Ceftriaxone was intravenously infused at a dose of 2 grams twice-daily for 3 days. Values are the minimum, maximum, mean, and +SD, by Nau et al. [44].

Results obtained after the 1st doseResults obtained after the 3rd dose
ValuePeak Conc. (µg/ml)Tmax (h)

AUC0-∞

(µg*h/ml)

in CSF

AUC0-∞

(µg*h/ml)

in serum

§AUC0-∞

CSF/serum

aConc. (µg/ml)*Half-life (h)
Minimum0.181.002.308960.00250.3015.7
Maximum1.0416.018.12,4060.00751.0318.4
Mean0.5311.49.001,1740.00760.6217.0
+SD0.152.702.829640.00400.210.78

 

Tmax = time to reach the peak concentration in CSF. AUC0-∞ = area under concentration-time curve from 0 to infinity. §AUC0-∞ = ratio of the area under the concentration-time curve in CSF to that in serum. aConcentration of ceftriaxone in CSF which has been measured 12 hours after the end of the 3rd infusion. *Elimination half-life.


 

This table shows that the peak concentration of ceftriaxone in CSF exceeds the minimum inhibitory concentration of Neisseria meningitides, Haemophilus influenzae, penicillin G-sensitive Streptococcus pneumoniae, Borrelia burgdorferi, and some members of the family of Enterobacteriaceae by approximately 10-fold thus ceftriaxone is bactericidal. Ceftriaxone slowly penetrates into CSF as the mean time to reach the peak concentration is 11.4 hours. The ratio of the mean area under the concentration-time curve in CSF to that in serum is 0.0076 suggesting that ceftriaxone resides mainly in serum. Ceftriaxone is slowly eliminated from CSF as the mean elimination half-life is 17.0 hours. In addition, there is a remarkable interindividual variability in the pharmacokinetic parameters of ceftriaxone in plasma and in CSF and this variability is accounted by the wide variation in patient’s demographic characteristics and disease [44]. Ceftriaxone was administered intravenously at a median daily dose of 6.5 grams (range, 4 to 9) corresponding to a median daily dose of 97.5 mg/kg (range, 77 to 131) to 16 patients with meningitis caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae which had a minimum inhibitory concentration of 0.5 µg/ml. The median concentration of ceftriaxone in CSF is 13.3 µg/ml (range, 0.9 to 91.2) thus the concentration of ceftriaxone in CSF is higher than the minimum inhibitory concentration of Streptococcus pneumoniae and ceftriaxone treats the meningitis caused by this organism [45]. Ceftriaxone was intravenously infused at a daily dose of 50 or 75 mg/kg to 17 paediatric patients, aged 0.6 to 52 months, with meningitis caused by Haemophilus influenzae. The mean peak concentration of ceftriaxone in plasma is 267 and 184 µg/ml following the administration of ceftriaxone at the daily dose of 75 and 50 mg/kg, respectively. The mean peak concentration of ceftriaxone in CSF exceeds the minimal inhibitory concentrations of Haemophilus influenzae by 480 to 5,600-times, the mean elimination half-life of ceftriaxone in CSF is 4.2 hours, and the mean penetration-rate of ceftriaxone into CSF is 4.8+3.5% thus ceftriaxone is an appropriate antibiotic to treat the meningitis caused by Haemophilus influenzae in paediatric patients [46].

Treatment of bacterial meningitis with ceftriaxone

Ceftriaxone was administered intravenously at a daily dose of 100 mg/kg on day one followed by a daily dose 80 mg/kg to 14 patients with the meningitis caused by Haemophilus influenzae type b, to 5 patients with the meningitis caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae and to 3 patients with the meningitis caused by Neisseria meningitides. The concentration of ceftriaxone in the cerebral spinal fluid is 10 to 100-fold higher the minimum inhibitory concentration of the pathogens causing the meningitis 24 hours after starting the treatment and is 5 to 50-fold higher the minimum inhibitory concentration of the organisms causing the meningitis at the end of therapy. Thus, ceftriaxone is an effective antibiotic for treatment of bacterial meningitis [47]. A single intravenous dose of 50 mg/kg of ceftriaxone was administered to adult patients with the meningitis caused by Neisseria meningitides (N = 34), Streptococcus pneumoniae (N = 25), Escherichia coli (N = 25), Klebsiella pneumoniae (N = 3), Haemophilus influenzae (N = 2), Viridians streptococci (N = 2), or by unknown organism (N = 16). The mean trough concentration of ceftriaxone in the cerebral spinal fluid is 3.5 µg/ml and the mean trough bactericidal titre is 1:128 thus a single dose of 50 mg/kg of ceftriaxone treats the meningitis caused by different bacteria [48]. Ceftriaxone was administered intravenously at a dose of 100 mg/kg once-daily to 53 infants and children and was administered intravenously at a dose of 60 mg/kg 4 times-daily to 53 infants and children. Subjects were aged 3 years (range, 42 days to 16 years) and the meningitis was caused by Haemophilus influenzae. The cerebral spinal fluid becomes sterilized 18 to 36 hours after the start of treatment, the clinical response is similar according the two treatments, and the meningitis is cured in all children [49].

Resistance of bacteria to ceftriaxone

Strains of non-typhoid Salmonella were isolated from 50 children and the isolates had an increased resistance to ceftriaxone. The dissemination of extended-spectrum-β-lactamase-producing Salmonella isolates results in an increased prevalence of ceftriaxone resistance in children. The resistance of this organism to ceftriaxone is increasing and constitutes a serious problem in children [50]. Multiple prescriptions of ceftriaxone and ceftriaxone misuse induce resistance to ceftriaxone in isolates of non-typhoid Salmonella. Ceftriaxone-resistant in non-typhoid Salmonella infection is increasing problem and limits treatment options for serious infections caused by this bacterium [51]. Salmonella producing β-lactamases has spread rapidly worldwide and poses a serious problem to human health. The resistance of this organism to ceftriaxone is found in 33.6% of isolates and the resistance genes are blaCTX-M, blaTEM, and blaOXA which are detected in 207 (94.1%), 99 (45.0%), and 53 (24.1%) isolates, respectively [52]. Strains of salmonella enterica serotype typhimurium β-lactamase-producing resistant to ceftriaxone were isolated from stool specimens of patients and the minimum inhibitory concentration of ceftriaxone is 256 µg/ml and the resistance to ceftriaxone is caused by the transfer of a 3.2-kb plasmid [53]. Three-hundred-twenty-seven strains of non-typhoid Salmonella enterica were isolated from stool of patients and the resistance is attributed to the genes CTX-M-14 β-lactamase and CMY-2 β-lactamase [54]. Episodes of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis with positive blood and/or ascitic culture were observed in 246 patients. In these patients the resistance to ceftriaxone is due to gram-negative bacilli with extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing, other resistant gram-negative bacilli, and enterococci and the resistance of these bacteria to ceftriaxone is due to the previous use of cephalosporins [55]. The proportion of isolates of Enterobacter cloacae resistant to ceftriaxone increased from 64.3% to 77.6% during the period 1999 to 2002 and the extent of resistance is correlated with the use of ceftriaxone [56].

Transfer of ceftriaxone across the human placenta

Ceftriaxone was administered intravenously at a daily dose of 1 gram to 133 pregnant women at the third trimester of pregnancy. The concentration of ceftriaxone ranged between 3.02 to 18.92 µg/ml in the umbilical cord venous serum and between 3.07 to 78.20 µg/ml in the maternal serum thus ceftriaxone is poorly transferred across the human placenta [57]. Ceftriaxone was administered intravenously at a daily dose of 2 grams to 17 pregnant women at term of pregnancy and Kafetzis et al. [58] determined the area under the concentration-time curve and the elimination half-life of ceftriaxone in maternal serum, in umbilical cord venous serum, in amniotic fluid, and in the placenta.

Table 3. Area under the concentration-time curve and elimination half-life of ceftriaxone which have been obtained in maternal serum, umbilical cord venous serum, amniotic fluid, and in placenta. Values are the mean, by Kafetzis et al. [58].


 

ParameterAUC0-24h (µg*h/ml)Elimination half-life (h)
Maternal serum6526.0
Umbilical cord venous serum2347.0
Amniotic fluid2566.8
Placenta1625.4

 

AUC = area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 hours.


 

This table shows that the area under the concentration-time curve obtained in umbilical cord venous serum is about one third of that in maternal serum suggesting that ceftriaxone is poorly transferred across the human placenta. The area under the concentration-time curve of ceftriaxone in amniotic fluid is similar to that in umbilical cord venous serum and the area under the concentration-time curve of ceftriaxone in the placenta is about one half of that in the umbilical cord venous serum. These results indicate that ceftriaxone resides mainly in maternal serum. The elimination half-life of ceftriaxone is about 6 hours in maternal serum, in umbilical cord venous serum, in amniotic fluid, and in placenta indicating that ceftriaxone is slowly eliminated from these compartments.

Migration of ceftriaxone into the breast-milk

Kafetzis et al. [58] determined the area under the concentration-time curve and the elimination half-life of ceftriaxone in maternal serum and the area under the concentration-time curve, the absorption and elimination half-live of ceftriaxone in breast-milk. Ceftriaxone was administered at a daily dose of 1 gram to 20 lactating women, 10 women received ceftriaxone intravenously and 10 women received ceftriaxone intramuscularly.

Table 4. Area under the concentration-time curve and elimination half-life of ceftriaxone which have been determined in maternal serum and area under the concentration-time curve and the absorption and elimination half-live of ceftriaxone which have been determined in the breast-milk. Ceftriaxone was administered at a daily dose of 1 gram. Values are the mean+SD, by Kafetzis et al. [58].


 

 Maternal serumBreast-milk
 AUC0-24 (µg*h/ml)

Elimination

Half-life (h)

AUC0-24 (µg*h/ml)

Absorption

half-life (h)

Elimination

half-life (h)

Administration route (N) 

Intravenous

(N = 10)

392+23.05.3+0.211.8+4.51.7+0.912.8+3.7

Intramuscular

(N = 10)

379+56.35.3+0.421.0+2.51.7+0.217.3+2.1

 

AUC0-24 = area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 hours.


 

This table shows that the area under the concentration-time curve of ceftriaxone is about 30-times lower in the breast-milk than in maternal serum indicating that ceftriaxone poorly migrates into the breast-milk. The elimination half-life of ceftriaxone is about 2.5-times longer breast-milk than is maternal serum indicating that ceftriaxone is eliminated more slowly in breast-milk than in maternal serum. The area under the concentration-time curve of ceftriaxone is higher following intramuscular than intravenous dosing. The absorption half-life of ceftriaxone in breast-mil is 1.7 hours indicating that ceftriaxone rapidly migrates into the breast-milk.

Discussion

Ceftriaxone is a third-generation cephalosporin and is resistant to many narrow-spectrum β-lactamases and has good activity against most gram-positive and gram-negative aerobic bacteria. Ceftriaxone has an elimination half-life of about 8 hours allowing for once-daily dosing for most indications. Ceftriaxone is the drug of choice to treat serious infections caused by Escherichia coli, Klebsiella, Proteus, Haemophilus influenzae, Moraxella catarrhalis, Citrobacter, Enterobacter, Serratia, Neisseria gonorrhoea, Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pneumonia, and Streptococcus pyogenes, and for severe forms of Lyme disease. Ceftriaxone is used for the empiric treatment of meningitis in non-immunocompromised adults and children (in combination with vancomycin and ampicillin pending the identification of the causative agent) owing to its excellent activity against Haemophilus influenzae, sensitive Streptococcus pneumoniae, Neisseria meningitides, and gram-negative enteric bacteria. Ceftriaxone is used to treat community-acquired pneumonia, ureteral, cervical, rectal, and pharyngeal infections, all forms of gonorrhoea, and severe forms of Lyme disease. About half of ceftriaxone is recovered from the urine and the remainder is eliminated by biliary secretion [1]. The efficacy and safely of ceftriaxone have been reviewed. Ceftriaxone administered intravenously at a dose of 2 grams twice-daily effectively and safely treats patients with community-acquired pneumonia [2, 3]. Ertapenem and ceftriaxone administered intravenously at a dose of 1 gram once-daily have similar efficacy and safely in treatment of hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia [4]. Ceftriaxone administered intravenously at a daily dose of 2 or 4 grams effectively and safely treats patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis [5], ceftriaxone administered intravenously at a daily dose of 250 mg effectively and safely treats patients with uncomplicated gonorrhoea [6], ceftriaxone administered intravenously at a daily dose of 2 grams effectively and safely treats paediatric patients with urinary-tract, lower respiratory-tract, skin, soft-tissue, bone and joint infections, bacteraemia, and septicaemia caused by gram-negative bacteria [7], treats serious infections caused by gram-negative bacteria in paediatric patients [8], and ceftriaxone administered intravenously at a dose of 50 to 80 mg/kg once-daily effectively and safely treats paediatric patients with infection caused by Haemophilus influenzae, Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pyogenes, Streptococcus pneumonia, or by Escherichia coli [9]. These results indicate that ceftriaxone administered intravenously at the daily dose of 1 gram or 2 grams effectively and safely treat infections caused by different bacteria. The pharmacokinetics of ceftriaxone have been studied in 12 patients with nosocomial pneumonia, intraabdominal sepsis, or urinary sepsis and ceftriaxone was intravenously infused at a dose of 2 grams once-daily. Then patients had normal renal function and 2 patients had renal failure [10]. The mean elimination half-life and the total body clearance of ceftriaxone are 6.4 hours and 41.3 ml/min, respectively, in 10 patients with normal renal function, and 21.4 hours and 19.9 ml/min, respectively, in 2 patients with renal failure. Ceftriaxone is eliminated in part by renal route thus the elimination half-life is longer in patients with renal failure than in patients with normal renal function. Consequently, the total body clearance of ceftriaxone is lower in patients with renal failure than in patients with normal renal function. The prophylaxis with ceftriaxone has been reviewed. Ceftriaxone administered intravenously at a daily dose of 2 grams prevents postoperative infections more effectively than other antibiotics [11], intravenous ceftriaxone plus intravenous metronidazole prevents the infection in children with perforated appendicitis more effectively than anti-pseudomonal antibiotics [12], intravenous ceftriaxone administered at a daily dose of 1 gram is more effective than norfloxacin administered orally at a dose of 400 mg twice-daily for the prophylaxis of bacterial infections in patients undergoing surgery [13], one single intravenous dose of 1 gram of ceftriaxone is effective as ampicillin/cloxacillin administered intravenously at a dose of 1 gram 3 times-daily in preventing complications during post-Caesarean section [14], intravenous ceftriaxone prevents surgical infections, urinary-tract infections, and respiratory-tract infections more effectively than another cephalosporin such as cefamandole, cefazolin, cefotaxime, or cefuroxime [15], and intravenous ceftriaxone administered at a daily dose of 2 grams prevents the infection in patients undergoing colorectal surgery more effectively than penicillins [16], a single intravenous dose of 2 grams of ceftriaxone administered at the induction of anaesthesia prevents the infection in patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery [17], ceftriaxone administered intravenously at a single dose of 2 grams before surgery and administered at an intravenous dose of 2 grams for 2 days after surgery prevent the infection in patients undergoing liver transplantation [18], ceftriaxone administered at an intragluteal daily dose of 2 grams prevents the infection in patients undergoing orthopaedic and traumatic surgery [19], ceftriaxone administered intravenously at a daily dose of 2 grams prevents post-operative pyrexia and infections in patients undergoing chest surgery and shorts the hospital stay [20], and ceftriaxone administered intravenously at a daily dose of 2 grams is more efficacious that placebo for the prevention of infections in patients undergoing chest surgery [21]. These results indicate that ceftriaxone administered intravenously at a daily dose of 1 gam or 2 grams prevents different infections. The treatment of bacterial infections with ceftriaxone has been reviewed. Intravenous ceftriaxone effectively treats neurosyphilis as intravenous benzylpenicillin [22], ceftriaxone administered intravenously at a dose of 2 grams once-daily treats endocarditis, spondylodiscitis, and prosthetic joint infections caused by Cutibacterium acnes [23], ceftriaxone administered intravenously at a daily dose of 1 or 2 grams for 3 to 6 days treats patients with uncomplicated and severe forms of leptospirosis [24], ceftriaxone administered intravenously at a daily dose of 2 grams treats patients with acute tonsillopharyngitis [25], a single intravenous dose of 2 grams of ceftriaxone treats patients with meningococcal meningitis [26], ceftriaxone administered intravenously at a daily dose of 3 grams for 7 days treats patients with typhoid fever [27], ceftriaxone administered intravenously once-daily at a dose of 2 grams for 4 weeks treats patients with streptococcal endocarditis [28], ceftriaxone administered intravenously at a dose of 1 gram 4 times-daily every 2 days treats patients with primary and secondary syphilis [29], intramuscular ceftriaxone treats patients with urinary-tract infection as intravenous trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole [30], ceftriaxone administered intravenously at a dose of 2 grams once-daily for 14 days treats acute disseminated Borrelia burgdorferi infection as doxycycline administered orally at a dose of 100 mg twice-daily for 21 days [31], ceftriazone administered intravenously at a dose of 1 gram twice-daily treats patients with respiratory-tract, urinary-tract, skin, soft-tissue, bone and joint infections, catheter-relayed septicaemia, and otitis media [32], ceftriaxone administered intravenously at a dose of 1 gram once-daily treats patients with bacteriologically proven cellulitis, suppurative diabetic foot ulcer, and soft-tissue infections [33], ceftriaxone administered intravenously at a dose of 1 gram twice-daily treats patients with respiratory-tract, urinary-tract, skin, soft-tissue, bone, and joint infections caused by Staphylococcus aureus, aerobic gram-positive cocci, or by Pseudomonas aeruginosa [34], and ceftriaxone administered intravenously at a dose of 1 gram twice-daily treats patients with skin, soft-tissue, urinary-tract, biliary-tract infections, pneumoniae, and sinusitis caused by Staphylococcus epidermis, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Streptococcus faecalis, Escherichia coli, Proteus mirabilis, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Bacteroides fragilis, or by anaerobic cocci [35]. These results indicate that ceftriaxone administered intravenously treat different infections. The trials with ceftriaxone have been reviewed. Ceftriaxone administered intravenously at a dose of 2 grams twice-daily for 3 days is more effective than placebo in treating gallbladder infection and diarrhoea caused by Clostridium difficile [36], ceftriaxone administered intravenously at a dose of 2 grams once-daily is effective as multiple dosing regimens of anti-staphylococcal antibiotics in treating patients infected by methicillin-susceptible staphylococcus aureus [37], ceftriaxone administered intravenously at a daily dose of 1 gram is effective as ceftriaxone administered intravenously at a daily dose of 2 grams in treating patients with community-acquired pneumonia [38], a 12-month follow-up resulted that ceftriaxone administered intravenously at a daily dose of 1 gram treats early syphilis as doxycycline, or tetracycline, or penicillin administered intravenously at a daily dose of 1 gram [39], ertapenem administered intravenously at a dose of 1 gram once-daily for 3 days is efficacy as ceftriaxone administered intravenously at a dose of 2 grams once-daily for 3 days in treating patients with acute pyelonephritis [40], ceftriaxone administered intravenously at a dose of 2 grams once-daily for 3 days is effective as cefditoren pivoxil administered orally at a dose of 400 mg once-daily for 3 days in treating patients with acute pyelonephritis [41], ceftriaxone administered intravenously at a daily dose of 2 grams is 3 times more effective than ampicillin/sulbactam administered intravenously at a daily dose of 3 grams in treatment of patients with postoperative neurosurgical infections [42], and ceftriaxone administered intravenously at a daily dose of 2 grams is effective as cefotaxime administered intravenously at a dose of 2 grams 4 times-daily in treating serious bacterial infections [43]. These results indicate that ceftriaxone administered intravenously is efficacy as other antibiotics in treatment of different bacterial infections. The penetration of ceftriaxone into the cerebrospinal has been reviewed. Ceftriaxone was administered intravenously at a dose of 2 grams twice-daily for 3 days to 7 patients with uninflamed meninges. The mean time to reach the peak concentration of ceftriaxone in the cerebrospinal fluid is 11.4 hours indicating that ceftriaxone penetrates slowly into the cerebrospinal fluid. The mean ratio of the area under the concentration-time curve of ceftriaxone in the cerebrospinal fluid to that in serum is 0.0076 indicating that ceftriazone resides mainly is serum. The mean peak concentration of ceftriaxone in the cerebrospinal fluid is 0.53 µg/ml, this concentration is higher the minimum inhibitory concentration of Neisseria meningitidis Haemophilus influenzae, penicillin G-sensitive Streptococcus pneumonia, Borrelia burgdorferi and some Enterobacteriaceae by approximately 10-fold thus ceftriaxone is bactericidal. The mean elimination half-life of ceftriaxone in the cerebrospinal fluid is 17.0 hours indicating that ceftriaxone is slowly eliminated from the cerebrospinal fluid [44]. Ceftriaxone was administered intravenously at a median daily dose of 6.5 grams (range, 4 to 9) corresponding to a median daily dose of 97.5 mg/kg (range, 77 to 131) to 16 patients with the meningitis caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae. The median concentration of ceftriaxone in the cerebrospinal fluid is 13.3 µg/ml (range, 0.9 to 91.2) this concentration is higher the minimum inhibitory concentration (0.5 µg/ml) of Streptococcus pneumoniae and the meningitis is cured in all patients [45]. Ceftriaxone was intravenously infused at a daily dose of 50 or 75 mg/kg to 17 paediatric patients with meningitis caused by Haemophilus influenzae. The concentration of ceftriaxone in the cerebrospinal fluid is 480 to 5,600-times higher the minimum inhibitory concentration of Haemophilus influenzae thus ceftriaxone is a useful agent to treat the meningitis caused by Haemophilus influenzae in paediatric patients [46]. These results indicate that ceftriaxone penetrates into the cerebrospinal fluid in concentration higher than the minimum inhibitory concentration of the organisms causing the meningitis. The treatment of bacterial meningitis with ceftriaxone has been reviewed. Ceftriaxone was administered intravenously at a daily dose of 100 mg/kg on day 1 followed by a daily dose of 80 mg/kg to patients with the meningitis caused by Haemophilus influenzae type b, or by Streptococcus pneumoniae, or by Neisseria meningitides. The concentration of ceftriaxone in the cerebrospinal fluid is 10 to 100-fold higher the minimum inhibitory concentration of the agents causing the meningitis at 24 hours after the start of treatment and is 5 to 50-fold higher the minimum inhibitory concentration of the organisms causing the meningitis at the end of therapy. Thus, ceftriaxone is an effective antibiotic to treat the meningitis caused by these organisms [47]. A single dose of 50 mg/kg of ceftriaxone was administered intravenously to patients with the meningitis caused by Neisseria meningitides, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, Viridians streptococci, or by unknown organisms. The mean trough concentration of ceftriaxone in the cerebrospinal fluid is 3.5 µg/ml and the mean trough bactericidal titre is 1:128 thus a single intravenous dose of 50 mg/kg of ceftriaxone treats the meningitis caused by different bacteria [48]. Ceftriaxone was administered intravenously at a dose of 100 mg/kg once-daily to 53 infants and children and was administered intravenously at a dose of 60 mg/kg 4 times-daily to 53 infants and children. The meningitis was caused by Haemophilus influenzae and the cerebrospinal fluid becomes sterilized 18 to 36 hours after the start of treatment, the clinical response is similar according to the two treatments, and the meningitis is cured in all subjects [49]. These results indicate that ceftriaxone administered intravenously treats the meningitis caused by different bacteria in adults and in infants and children. The resistance of bacteria to ceftriaxone has been reviewed. The dissemination of extended-spectrum-β-lactamase-producing Salmonella isolates results in an increased prevalence of resistance to ceftriaxone and this resistance is increasing and constitutes a serious problem [50]. Multiple prescriptions of ceftriaxone and ceftriaxone misuse induce resistance to ceftriaxone in isolates of non-typhoid Salmonella and the resistance to ceftriaxone is in increasing problem and limits treatment options for serious infections caused by this organism [51]. The resistance of Salmonella producing β-lactamases to ceftriaxone is found in 33.6% of isolates and the resistance genes are blaCTX-M, blaTEM, and blaOXA which have been detected in 94.1%, 45.0%, and 24.1% isolates, respectively [52]. Strains of Salmonella enterica serotype typhimurium β-lactamase-producing become resistant to ceftriaxone, the minimum inhibitory concentration is 256 µg/ml, and the resistance to ceftriaxone is caused by the transfer of a 3.2-kb plasmid [53], strains of non-typhoid Salmonella enterica become resistant to ceftriaxone and the resistance is due to genes CTX-M-14 β-lactamase and CMY-2 β-lactamase [54], the resistance of gram-negative bacilli extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing, other resistant gram-negative bacilli, and enterococci to ceftriaxone is due to the previous use of cephalosporins [55], and the resistance of Enterobacter cloacae to ceftriaxone increases from 64.3% to 77.6% during the period 1999 to 2002 and the extent of resistance is correlated with the use of ceftriaxone [56]. These results indicate that different bacteria may become resistant to ceftriaxone and the resistance to ceftriaxone is due to different mechanisms. The transfer of ceftriaxone across the human placenta has been reviewed. Ceftriaxone was administered intravenously at a daily dose of 1 gram to 133 pregnant women at the third trimester of pregnancy and the concentration of ceftriaxone ranges between 3.07 and 78.20 µg/ml in the maternal serum and between 3.02 and 18.92 µg/ml in the umbilical cord venous serum [57]. Ceftriaxone was administered intravenously at a daily dose of 2 grams to 17 pregnant women at term of pregnancy and the mean area under the concentration-time curve of ceftriaxone is 652 and 234 µg*h/ml in the maternal serum and in the umbilical cord venous serum, respectively. The elimination half-life of ceftriaxone is 6.0 and 7.0 hours in the maternal serum and in the umbilical cord venous serum, respectively, indicating that ceftriaxone is slowly eliminated in the maternal serum and in the umbilical cord venous serum [58]. These results indicate that ceftriaxone is poorly transferred across the human placenta. The migration of ceftriaxone into the breast-milk has been reviewed. The pharmacokinetics of ceftriazone were studied in the maternal serum and in the breast-milk of 20 lactating women receiving ceftriaxone. Ten lactating women received ceftriaxone intravenously at a daily dose of 1 gram and 10 lactating women received this dose of ceftriaxone intramuscularly [58]. The area under the concentration-time curve of ceftriaxone is about 33-fold higher in the maternal serum that in the breast-milk, the mean absorption elimination half-life of ceftriaxone is 1.7 hours. The mean elimination half-life of ceftriaxone is 12.8 and 17.3 hours following the intravenous and intramuscular administration of ceftriaxone, respectively. These results indicate that ceftriaxone poorly migrates into the breastmilk, is rapidly absorbed in the breast-milk and is slowly eliminated from the breast-milk.

In conclusion, ceftriaxone is a third-generation cephalosporin, is resistant to many narrow-spectrum β-lactamases, and has good activity against most gram-positive and gram-negative aerobic bacteria. Ceftriaxone is the drug of choice to treat serious infections caused by Escherichia coli, Klebsiella, Proteus, Haemophilus influenzae, Moraxella catarrhalis, Citrobacter, Enterobacter, Serratia, Neisseria gonorrhoea, Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pneumoniae, and Streptococcus pyogenes, and for severe forms of Lyme disease. Single doses of intramuscular ceftriaxone have long been used in the management of ureteral, cervical, rectal, or pharyngeal gonorrhoea; increasing resistance has necessitated the use of higher doses. Half of ceftriaxone is eliminated by renal route and the remainder is secreted into the bile. The mean elimination half-life of ceftriaxone is 6.4 hours in patients with normal renal function and 21.4 hours in patients with renal failure thus the elimination half-life of ceftriaxone is longer in patients with renal failure. The prophylaxis, treatment and trials with ceftriaxone have been reviewed. Ceftriaxone penetrates into the cerebrospinal fluid in significant amounts and treats the meningitis caused by different bacteria. Ceftriaxone may become resistant to bacteria, is poorly transferred across the human placenta, and poorly migrates into the breast-milk. The aim of this study is to review the clinical pharmacology of ceftriaxone.

 

Conflict of interests

The authors declare no conflicts of financial interest in any product or service mentioned in the manuscript, including grants, equipment, medications, employments, gifts, and honoraria.

This article is a review and drugs have not been administered to men or animals.

Acknowledgments

The author thanks Dr. Patrizia Ciucci and Dr. Francesco Varricchio, of the Medical Library of the University of Pisa, for retrieving the scientific literature.

References

Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.

img

Virginia E. Koenig

Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.

img

Delcio G Silva Junior

Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.

img

Ziemlé Clément Méda

Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.

img

Mina Sherif Soliman Georgy

We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.

img

Layla Shojaie

The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.

img

Sing-yung Wu

Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.

img

Orlando Villarreal

Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.

img

Katarzyna Byczkowska

Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.

img

Anthony Kodzo-Grey Venyo

Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.

img

Pedro Marques Gomes

Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.

img

Bernard Terkimbi Utoo

This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.

img

Prof Sherif W Mansour

Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.

img

Hao Jiang

As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.

img

Dr Shiming Tang

Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.

img

Raed Mualem

International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.

img

Andreas Filippaios

Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.

img

Dr Suramya Dhamija

Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.

img

Bruno Chauffert

I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!

img

Baheci Selen

"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".

img

Jesus Simal-Gandara

I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.

img

Douglas Miyazaki

We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.

img

Dr Griffith

I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.

img

Dr Tong Ming Liu

I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.

img

Husain Taha Radhi

I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.

img

S Munshi

Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.

img

Tania Munoz

“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.

img

George Varvatsoulias

Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.

img

Rui Tao

Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.

img

Khurram Arshad

Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.

img

Gomez Barriga Maria Dolores

The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.

img

Lin Shaw Chin

Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.

img

Maria Dolores Gomez Barriga

Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.

img

Dr Maria Dolores Gomez Barriga

Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.

img

Dr Maria Regina Penchyna Nieto

Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.

img

Dr Marcelo Flavio Gomes Jardim Filho

Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”

img

Zsuzsanna Bene

Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner

img

Dr Susan Weiner

My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.

img

Lin-Show Chin

My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.

img

Sonila Qirko

My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.

img

Luiz Sellmann