AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Research Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2640-1045/172
National Institute of Endocrinology (INEN), University of Medical Sciences of Havana. Havana Cuba.
*Corresponding Author: Maite Cabrera Gámez., National Institute of Endocrinology (INEN), University of Medical Sciences of Havana. Havana Cuba
Citation: Maite C. Gámez, Emma D. Alonso, Alina A. Cedeño, Silvia E. Turcios, Maydelin M. González, (2024), Clinical Manifestations Before and After Surgical Treatment in Patients with Endogenous Hypercortisolism, J. Endocrinology and Disorders, 8(1): DOI:10.31579/2640-1045/172
Copyright: © 2024, Maite Cabrera Gámez. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 23 January 2024 | Accepted: 01 February 2024 | Published: 09 February 2024
Keywords: endogenous hypercortisolism; symptoms; signs
Endogenous hypercortisolism (EH) presents varied and complex clinical manifestations (CM) but useful in follow-up. Objective to describe the CM in patients with HE before and after surgery. Material and Methods: Prospective study, cohort of 25 patients with HE, evaluated before and after surgical treatment. Medians and ranges of quantitative variables and frequency distributions of qualitative variables were determined. Cross tabulations of the presence (or not) of symptoms and signs before and after surgery were carried out, using the McNemar test, comparison of medians of quantitative variables before and after surgery using the Wilcoxon test. Results: Cushing's disease predominated (64%). The median age at diagnosis was 45 years and at the time of the study 46 years. Some symptoms that improved after surgery: fatigue (before 64% vs after 36%, p=0.039), weight gain (92% vs 44%, p=0.002), decreased concentration (64% vs 20%, p =0.001), menstrual disorders (76% vs 36% p=0.013). Signs were: bruising (72% vs 16%, p=0.000), moon face (80% vs 40%, p=0.006), buffalo hump (80% vs 48%, p=0.021), supraclavicular fat (68% vs. 40%, p=0.039). The medians of the variables decreased and the difference before and after treatment were statistically significant. Conclusions: In this cohort, all manifestations improved with weakened symptoms after surgical treatment, reaffirming the usefulness of the clinical method for early diagnosis and follow-up of HE.
Endogenous hypercortisolism (EH) is an endocrine disorder characterized by varied clinical symptoms, produced by prolonged exposure to excess glucocorticoids in tissues and by its adverse consequences; it is ideal to make an early diagnosis, which in many cases can become a real challenge [1-3]. The incidence depends on the population studied and has been estimated at 2 to 3 cases per million inhabitants per year [4-6]. HE or Cushing syndrome (CS) as it is also known, has different causes: dependent and independent of corticotropic hormone (ACTH). ACTH-dependent causes include: production of ACTH by pituitary tumors, also known as Cushing's disease (CD), 70%, by extrapituitary tumors, ectopic Cushing's syndrome, and less frequently corticotropin-producing tumors (CRH) [6]. A 15%, is the result of the increase in the autonomous production of cortisol by tumors (adenomas or carcinomas) or hyperplasia of the adrenal glands 6. It has been seen to be more common in females with a ratio of 3-4:1 [7]. A retrospective study spanning 10 years, conducted in China and published in 2019 8 reported a similar ratio of 3.6: [1] in women. HE can be a diverse and sometimes complex clinical picture and therefore difficult to diagnose; In a review, which included more than 5 series of patients with HE, carried out by Susmeeta T col [7]. and published in 2015, the most frequent clinical characteristics were described: obesity and weight gain, moon fascie, hirsutism, facial plethora, violaceous stretch marks, menstrual irregularities, neuropsychiatric alterations, muscle weakness, osteopenia, high blood pressure, glucose intolerance, hyperlipidemia and nephrolithiasis. In a study carried out at the Institute of Endocrinology of Havana, Cuba, in 2013, Moreno et al. 9 in patients with active disease prior to surgical treatment, found the most frequent clinical manifestations: weight gain (78%), irregularities menstrual disorders (46%), fatigue (46%), increased abdominal circumference (88%), moon fascia (84%) and hirsutism (70%). The confirmatory diagnosis is hormonal and is based on demonstrating elevated levels of cortisol more than once and with several diagnostic tests [3, 10,11], to move on to definitive treatment, which is surgical [6]. It is important to evaluate the effectiveness of the treatment from a clinical point of view and to know, in the context we are in, what clinical characteristics are modified and that help to monitor this disease and recover the psychological and biological well-being of the patients; which motivated us to present the results of the cohort of patients treated at our institution, with the aim of describing the clinical manifestations in patients with endogenous hypercortisolism before and after surgery.
A descriptive, longitudinal and prospective study was carried out in patients treated at the Institute of Endocrinology (INEN), La Havana, Cuba, with a recent diagnosis of endogenous hypercortisolism, aged ≥ 20 and ≤ 60 years in the period between January 2017-January 2021.
The patients were evaluated (clinical and hormonal) before surgical treatment and six months after it; twenty-five patients were included taking into account the INEN statistics, according to the new cases admitted per year, which are approximately between 6-8 cases. This research was part of a project that included the assessment of the quality of life of these patients.
They were asked for consent to carry out the research, and they filled out the data collection form created for this research, which contained variables related to the interrogation, pre- and post-surgical physical examination.
Variables:
• Age: current age, reason, years old
• Sex: according to biological sex, nominal, female/male
• Personal pathological history: depending on the presence of any history mentioned in the interview, nominal, diabetes mellitus/ high blood pressure/ others,
• Family pathological history: presence of a family member with the history, nominally, diabetes mellitus/hypertension/others
• Age at diagnosis: years old when the disease was diagnosed, reason, years
• Time of evolution of HE: time in years from diagnosis to the present, reason, years
• Diagnosis of endogenous hypercortisolism: causes of HE, nominal, Cushing's disease/Cushing's syndrome,
• Current symptoms: they will be obtained according to what is referred to in the history of the current illness and through questioning, nominal, present/absent.
• Current signs: they will be obtained according to what is referred to in the history of the current illness and through the physical examination, nominal, present/absent.
• Body mass index (BMI): ordinal, underweight (less than 18.5 Kg/m2), normal weight (18.5 – 24.9 Kg/m2), overweight (25 – 29.9 Kg/m2), obesity (more than 30 Kg/m2).
• Waist circumference (WC): reason, normal for women (less than and equal to 88 cm) altered (greater than 88 cm)
Statistical analysis: Mean and standard deviation of the quantitative variables and frequency distributions (absolute numbers and percentages) of the qualitative variables were determined. Cross-tabulations of the presence (or absence) of symptoms and signs before and after surgery were carried out, using the Mc Nemar test to explore the statistical significance of the possible association. The medians of quantitative variables (clinical, hormonal) before and after surgery were compared using the Wilcoxon test. A statistically significant difference was considered when the p value was less than 0.05.
Ethical aspects: The research was approved by the INEN ethics committee. It did not put aspects of the patients' physical or mental health at risk. Informed consent was requested, participation was voluntary and the confidentiality and discretion of the data obtained was guaranteed.
Graph 1 shows the distribution of patients according to the cause of endogenous hypercortisolism. 64% had Cushing's disease and in 36% the cause was an adrenal adenoma.
The average time from diagnosis to surgery was 1.09 years. 68% of them were cured from a biochemical point of view six months after treatment.
The median age at diagnosis of the disease was 45 years with a range between 19 and 58 years. The median age of the patients at the time of the study was 46 years with a range between 20 and 58 years.
In relation to the distribution of the patients according to age range at the diagnosis of HE and at the time of the study, the groups between 40 - 49 years and 50 -59 years predominated with 36% and 28% respectively, figures that were similar in the two age groups studied, followed by the 30–39-year-old group, but with 12%. In this series, a patient was diagnosed with the disease at the age of 19.
Regarding personal pathological history, 48% of the patients had two comorbidities, diabetes mellitus and arterial hypertension, followed by 24% who only had arterial hypertension, 16% of the sample had other comorbidities and the same percentage reported a history of health. The average number of years of patients with comorbidities was 1.9.
Table 1 shows the symptoms reported by patients before and six months after surgical treatment. All symptoms improved after surgery, decreasing their frequency of presentation. Those that presented statistically significant differences were: fatigue (before 64% vs after 36%, p=0.039), weight increase (before 92% vs after 44%, p=0.002), back pain (before 80% vs after 52%, p=0.039), decrease in concentration (before 64% vs after 20%, p=0.001), menstrual disorders (before 76% vs after 36% p=0.013), decreased libido (before 68% vs after 28%, p=0.002) and decreased memory (before 56% vs after 16%, p=0.002)
Table 2 shows the signs present before and after surgery. All signs also improved after surgical treatment, among those that were statistically significant were: bruising (before 72% vs after 16%, p=0.000), redness (before 92% vs after 44%, p=0.000), face full moon (before 80% vs after 40%, p=0.006), buffalo hump (before 80% vs after 48%, p=0.021), supraclavicular fat (before 68% vs after 40%, p=0.039), thin skin and hirsutism presented similar percentages (before 76% vs after 36%, p=0.002 and p= 0.006 respectively).
Table 3 shows the median of some quantitative variables before and after surgical treatment. All the medians of the variables studied decreased and the difference before and after surgical treatment was statistically significant, except for ACTH. Cortisol post inhibition with 2 mg of dexamethasone: median before 363 vs after 50, p= 0.000; waist circumference: median before 107 vs after 94, p= 0.003.
The most common etiology of HE are corticotropin-producing pituitary adenomas, which represent up to 15% of pituitary tumors, with an incidence of 1.6 cases per million people 12. They are more common in women and are the cause of HE. in more than 70% of cases, followed by ACTH-producing ectopic tumors and adrenal lesions 13. A recent Chinese study from 2019 [14] found that Cushing's disease was invariably the most common cause of HE in the period studied and this frequency ranges between 56.0%- 73.0% [14]. This study coincides with the previous ones, with a similar frequency.
Although there are several treatment modalities for, HE, surgical treatment is the first line for most of its causes. However, not all patients are initially cured with this treatment and recurrence rates are high despite apparently being cured for some years; For example, up to 10% recurrence is reported for Cushing's disease [15].
In the Chinese study [14] that analyzed some epidemiological characteristics of the patients studied for 10 years, it was found that the most frequent age range for both the dependent and independent causes of ACTH was between 30-39 years, unlike the present study that both Age at diagnosis of the disease as at the time of the study was the 40s, followed by the 50s. HE appears more frequently in the fifth decade of life [4].
In the research presented, the majority of the patients were married and this coincides with the frequency in the study by Sawant et al [16] where twenty-two patients (63%) had similar marital status. There is also a coincidence in the number of widows, one in the previous study and two in ours.
In relation to the comorbidities associated with HE, from a physiopathological point of view it is explained that hypercortisolemia affects both the function of the beta cell of the pancreas and insulin sensitivity, age avanzada, la historia familiar de diabetes y los defectos en la secreción de insulina juegan un rol adicional en la aparición de esta enfermedad [17].
It is known that 18.5% to 64% of patients with HE have alterations in glucose metabolism while 20-47% have frank diabetes mellitus (DM) [18,19,20].
In the study by Zhou et al. [14] the most frequent comorbidities were HTN (71.2%) and DM (38.9%), both coinciding with this study.
Giordano et al [21] found that the prevalence of alterations in glucose metabolism and DM is significantly reduced after one year of remission in patients with Cushing's syndrome; this was not observed in patients with the disease. Colao et al [22]. reported 27% and 33% alterations in glucose metabolism and DM respectively in patients with Cushing's disease after 5 years of remission.
Regarding HTN, HE intervenes in its pathogenesis by increasing the activity of mineralcorticoids, vasoconstriction, the production of endothelin 1 and inhibiting vasodilation [23]. Glucocorticoids modulate the renin angiotensin aldosterone system and the regulation of the autonomic nervous system [23]. Pivonello et al [24]. state that if hypercortisolism is not controlled, the management of HBP in this type of patient is very difficult.
In the study by Lambert JK et al. 20 the prevalence of HTN in the HE was approximately 70%, in the present study the prevalence was lower (24%) but it was double the frequency when DM was associated.
Giordano et al 21 found a significant reduction in the prevalence of HBP one year after remission, but only in patients with HE due to adrenal causes. Likewise, Colao et al [22]. reported that both systolic and diastolic pressure remained elevated in patients with CD after 5 years in remission, compared with controls matched for age, sex and BMI.
Among the most frequent clinical manifestations is body pain that generates limitations in and makes daily living activities difficult, which negatively affects general QoL. Hormonal disturbances also have a negative impact on energy levels and most patients complain of body weakness or easy early fatigue. Most of them are affected by the impact of changes in their physical appearance that later result in a deterioration in social functioning [16]. In this study, pain and fatigue were frequent and although they decreased, they remained present after surgical treatment.
Weight gain is the most common clinical characteristic reported, and can reach up to 82. Nishioka H 25 states that, although it is common, it is not definitive in patients with CD. In the present study this was also the most frequent clinical manifestation, and occurred in 90% of patients before surgery. The distribution of fat in the central region, in the cervical dorsum (buffalo hump) and the facial plethora are typical characteristics, but with low specificity, as demonstrated by another Cuban study that used a comparison group [26]. La adiposidad central presente en el HE excede el tejido celular subcutáneo predominando la grasa visceral; entre los mecanismos propuestos se encuentran la disminución de la activación de la proteína quinasa del AMP (AMPK) con un consecuente incremento en la expresión de la enzima que sintetiza ácidos grasos (lipidsynthesizing enzyme fatty acid synthase (FAS) [27].
Carluccio A et al [28]. found in their study that after remission, parameters such as weight, BMI, waist circumference and fat deposits improved compared to the active phase of the disease. In this study, all patients had abdominal obesity and the referred parameters also improved significantly. This specific fat distribution often resolves after normalization of cortisol levels and is an important finding in distinguishing CD from exogenous obesity [28].
Among other clinical manifestations, it is reported that menstrual irregularities have a frequency of 56% as a result of the suppression of the function of the hypothalamus-pituitary-ovarian axis by hypercortisolemia [29]. This occurs at different levels, in the hypothalamus it produces a decrease in synthesis and release of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GNRH), at the level of the pituitary gland it exerts the same effect, but at the level of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and luteinizing hormone (LH) and at the ovarian level it directly modulates steroidogenesis and gametogenesis [30]. In this study, menstrual disorders were also among the most frequent and improved considerably after surgical treatment.
A study [31] in patients after adrenalectomy (including 28% of CD patients) found that the median time to resolution of symptoms was at least seven months, with some symptoms such as acne taking a median of 17 months. to be resolved. In fact, not all patients perceived themselves to be completely recovered. In the research we present, all clinical manifestations decreased and the majority with statistical significance six months after surgical treatment.
In a cohort of 102 patients treated for CD, 92% of patients reached the criteria for biochemical cure, while only 80.4% perceived themselves to be in remission 28. In our sample, 65% were not hypercortisolic, of them 52% cured and 16% with adrenal insufficiency (HE is considered cured of HE).
In patients with HE in this cohort, all clinical manifestations improved considerably six months after surgical treatment, reaffirming the usefulness of the clinical method for early diagnosis and follow-up of people with this condition.
Authorship contribution
Maite Cabrera Gámez: Development of the protocol, the research idea and participated in each of the stages of the research. She reviewed and approved the final version of the document.
Emma Domínguez Alonso: she performed statistical processing. She reviewed and approved the final version of the document.
Alina Acosta Cedeño: participated in the analysis of the results. She reviewed and approved the final version of the document.
Silvia Elena Turcios Tristá: participated in the preparation of the discussion. She reviewed and approved the final version of the document.
Maydelin Mustelier González: primary data collection. She reviewed and approved the final version of the document.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.
