AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Research Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2690-4861/220
1 Associate Professor. BSC, MSc, PhD. Department of Nursing, University of Patras, Patra, Greece
2 Nurse. BSc. Department of Nursing, University of Patras, Patra, Greece
3 Nurse. BSc. Department of Nursing, University of Patras, Patra, Greece
4 Laboratory Teaching Staff Member. BSC, MSc, PhD. Department of Nursing, University of Patras, Patra, Greece
5 Assistant Professor. BSC, MSc, PhD. Department of Nursing, University of Presov, Presov, Slovac Republic
6 Educator. Ministry of Education. BSc, MSc. Greece
7 Professor of Surgery. BSC, MSc, PhD. Department of Medicine and Surgical Sciences, University of Magna Graecia, Catanzaro, ItalyKoukouli University of Patras Patra, Greece.
*Corresponding Author: Nick Bakalis , Associate Professor. BSC, MSc, PhD. Department of Nursing, University of Patras, Patra, Greece
Citation: Bakalis N. , LAGOGIANNI I., PAILAS K., MICHALOPOULOS A. , KURIPLACHOVA G. (2022) Clinical Decision Making: A Comparison Study between Greece and Slovakia. International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. 11(2); DOI: 10.31579/2690-4861/220
Copyright: © 2022 Nick Bakalis, this is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 05 May 2022 | Accepted: 09 May 2022 | Published: 20 May 2022
Keywords: clinical decision making; nursing; Greece; Slovakia
Background: Clinical decisions are a nurses' daily clinical practice skill that needs to be constantly evolving in order to provide quality patient care.
Purpose: To investigate and compare the clinical decisions made by nurses in Greece and Slovakia.
Materials and Methods: Q-methodology was used and eight modified scenarios were given to the nursing staff. Using power analysis, a total of 100 nurses that worked in public hospitals in Greece (nG = 50) and Slovakia (nS = 50) successfully completed the study.
Results: In the scenarios with more medical interventions, Greek nurses showed higher scores in the scenarios of tachycardia, bradycardia and cardiopulmonary resuscitation. In contrast, Slovak nurses scored higher individual scores in all four scenarios (anxiety - difficulty sleeping –dyspnea - vomiting) with more nursing interventions (p<0.05).
Conclusions: Greek nurses overall had higher individual scores in the scenarios with more medical interventions, probably due to the medically-centered philosophy of nurses, the lack of protocols and autonomy to provide patient care.
Nurses have a holistic approach towards a person and regard the person as a biopsychosocial entity who has the ability to set goals and make decisions as well as the right and responsibility to make informed choices, according to his own beliefs and values (Watkins 2020). Nurses are often required to address important questions that are directly related to the preservation of a patient's life (Hewitt, 2022). Therefore, understanding clinical decision-making methods, finding ways to improve procedures and developing critical thinking are key points of inquiry.
Clinical decision making is a process that involves the interaction between knowledge of pre-existing pathological conditions, patient information, nursing care and experiential learning (Kozlowski et al, 2017). Decision making is synonymous with selection, converting information into practice as well as being directly linked to the nursing process (Al-Hamdan, Bawadi, Redman and Al-Nawafleh, 2016). According to Murali (2020) clinical decision-making is defined as a behaviour that leads to making a choice as well as implementing a specific course of action.
The nursing decision-making process is influenced by environmental factors, patient and nurse-related aspects of care and work practices (Campbell et al, 2019). According to the literature, interdisciplinary teamwork often requires decision-making and these decisions affect team performance on a daily basis (Ahn and Choi 2015). Group work decisions concern healthcare practice, working conditions and the work environment itself (Nibbelink & Brewer 2018). Other factors that influence clinical decision making are clinical experience (Thomas and Kellgren 2017), knowledge (Bakalis et al, 2003), intuition (Melin-Johansson et al 2017), critical thinking ability (Richards et al 2020), structured protocols (Vázquez-Calatayud et al, 2020), autonomy and the application of the medical-centric mode (Fallman et al 2019).
The health professionals are faced with critical situations that they have to deal with successfully as they are inextricably linked to the patient's state of health. When a team of health professionals is made up of specialized and trained nurses and doctors who work dynamically and support each other, medical errors are significantly reduced. Effective clinical decision-making skills are a key factor in preventing iatrogenic injury (Helou et al, 2020). Therefore, decision theory is necessary because health care systems require health professionals to make cost-effective and quality decisions (Jackson et al, 2019).
Clinical decision making is a key element of the nursing role in promoting the patient's health. Nurses make many decisions every day. Acute care nurses face a decision every 10 minutes, Critical care nurses every 30 seconds (Endacott et al, 2015) and Community or Public Health nurses corresponding to 10 crises for each contact they have with new births (Chater et al, 2019).
Nursing is a profession that is constantly changing in response to the needs of society as a whole. For this reason, in every country there is an institutionalized health care system whose main purpose is the development and promotion of Nursing as an independent and autonomous Science and Art. The Hellenic Regulatory Body of Nurses was constituted by the law 3252/2004 as a form of a Public Body and functions as the official professional body representing the nurses. Nursing practice in Greece is characterized by a medical-centered model of care (Bakalis, Bowman and Porock, 2003, Papathanassoglou et al 2005), lack of current (modern) duty and responsibilities guidebook (Karra et al, 2014), lack of clinical protocol implementation, lack of nursing staff resulting in basic principles of nursing (psychological support, communication) not being applied to the necessary extent. Also, the ratio of nurse to patient is high (1/8 in clinical wards) (Aiken et al, 2014). It is worth mentioning that Greece went through a prolonged economic crisis (about 10 years), which significantly affected the health sector both patients and health professionals. The monthly salary of a newly appointed nurse in Greece ranges from 1000-1200 euros and increases in relation to the years of service and the administrative position.
The Slovak Chamber of Nurses and Midwives issues a professional license to practice nursing to a citizen who has obtained a University degree and has applied for this license. The Slovak Chamber of Nurses and Midwives also issues a license for independent nursing practice in the patient's apartment or home as well as in other healthcare provider's facility. In case the nurse intends to practice privately (freelancer), it is vital to submit the permit issued by the chamber to the appropriate regional authority, according to local practice. In Slovakia, nursing care is holistic, the duty and responsibilities guidebook is clear and focused on nursing knowledge and skills (Zelenikova et al, 2014).
The purpose of this study was to investigate and compare the clinical decisions made by nurses in Greece and Slovakia.
Design
A search of the literature showed that research related to the subject presented different research methods with a common focus on the important role of autonomy in decision making. In addition, the lack of studies in the literature search was the incentive to conduct the present research in order to better understand the topic and offer new knowledge. The method used to conduct the research was the Q-methodology which allows the researcher to identify the groups of participants’ similar and alternative views, and in turn to identify similarities and differences between the groups (Hammami et al, 2020).
Modified script cards developed and used in previous research by Bakalis, Bowman and Porock (2003) were used. More specifically, the present research used eight scenarios of clinical decision making (four with mainly or more medical intervention: heart attack – bradycardia – tachycardia - cardiopulmonary resuscitation and four with mainly or more nursing intervention: anxiety / anxiety - difficulty sleeping –dyspnea - vomiting) in order to investigate how the incidents are resolved.
For the construction of the Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation scenario, the Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Protocol within the Hospital of the European Resuscitation Council (Soar et al 2015) was used, while the Myocardial Infraction (MI) Management Protocol of the European Resuscitation Council (Nikolaou et al 2015) was used for the MI scenario. There were no protocols found in the literature review regarding the other scenarios, so the most current methods, found in literature, were chosen to construct these scenarios as well as other nursing procedures as suggested by Bakalis Bowman and Porock (2003) in their respective research.
A modified scoring system adopted by Williamson (1965) was used. The scoring system was as follows: helpful (+2), facilitate but not essential (+1), neither promotes, nor impedes care (0), unnecessary and/or cause discomfort (-1), inappropriate (-2). Consequently, five choices in each row were presented. In all series, there was an option "Call the doctor" card, where nurses chose it when they considered its presence necessary. The "Call the doctor" card was the "inappropriate" clinical decision with a score of -2 in all series thus, meaning that the nurses had a passive role, while at the same time the patient's condition worsened until the doctor was present or until he gave further instructions. If the nurses chose the "Call the Doctor" card in two consecutive rows then the scenario would be unsuccessful.
An expert panel was used to minimize culture bias. The cards were given to a team of experts (one Nursing professor specializing in clinical decisions and two other nurses with many years of experience in the clinical area) and decisions were made on the content, the number of available decisions choices and the translation of cards. After studying the scenarios, changes were made in order to create the final version of the Clinical Decision Making (CDM) cards.
Initially, each participant was given the script card. After reading it carefully, the researcher then displayed the five options and after reading the alternatives, he made the choice. The researcher provided information and displayed the following options until the script was completed. The answers were recorded in a form for the subsequent analysis of the results. When all the scenarios were completed, the participant filled in some demographic data (age, gender, education, postgraduate, clinical work and years of service) in order to analyze and correlate the data with the answers.
Sample
Non-probability sampling and more specifically convenience sampling was used for the study due to limited financial resources. To avoid error, the sample selected for the present study was homogeneous, i.e. the population group selected were all graduate nurses, had a degree in nursing and worked for more than six months in public hospitals. The larger the sample is, the more reliable the survey results are, and thus, the better the statistical analysis (Sami et al, 2018). In the present study it was calculated, using power analysis, that a sample of 100 nurses (50 from Greece and 50 from Slovakia) would be needed with a probability power of 99%.
Data collection
The survey was conducted from September to December 2019. This study received ethical approval by the institutional review board of the University of Patras (Greek registration number: 7445). The sample included nurses working in public hospitals in Greece (one from Athens and two from Patras-large cities) and Slovakia (two from Presov and one from Kosice-large cities). Letters were sent to the Directors of the Nursing of each hospital in Greek and English. In Slovakia the health professionals speak English very well, so the letters and cards were sent in English.
The letter stated all the necessary information and emphasizes the confidentiality, voluntary participation and anonymity of the participants. The Hospitals Directors forwarded the letters to the wards so nurses who wished to participate gave their names and the researcher contacted them in order to determine the day and time of the meeting. For the research process, a quiet and without strong environmental stimuli area was selected and the average interview time for each nurse ranged from 30 to 40 minutes.
Statistical analysis
The results of the research were analyzed using the statistical program SPSS Statistics, setting the significance level p-value <0>
Demographic characteristics
For Greece the ages ranged from 30-53 years (x = 42.60 years) while for Slovakia the ages were from 27-54 years (x = 39.80 years). The vast majority of nurses, in both countries, were women (86% and 92% respectively) and they did not have a master's degree (66
The present study categorized the quality of clinical decisions that nurses make in two different countries. However, there is a paucity of research regarding comparative studies in the literature. Greek nurses had higher scores in the tachycardia, bradycardia and cardiopulmonary resuscitation scenarios while Slovak nurses presented higher scores in the heart attack, anxiety, sleep, dyspnea and vomiting scenarios. This was evident from the quality of the clinical decisions made by the nurses as well as from the completion rate that shows the degree of autonomy of the nurses in both countries.
Similar results were found by Bakalis et al (2003) investigating the clinical decisions of nurses in Greece and England. This is likely to happen because in Greece the medical-centric model prevails in clinical practice where doctors in many cases fully control patient care. In addition, the lack of protocols from the units has nurses dealing with emergencies and orients nursing skills in iatrogenic terms resulting in better treatment of the acute condition. On the contrary, although Slovak nurses follow specific protocols focused on the nursing profession there is a need to define Advanced Practice Nursing and specialists' competencies (Halasz et al, 2021). It is generally accepted that the absence of protocols weakens the nursing profession and leaves nurses legally vulnerable. The existence of structured protocols allows nurses to practice autonomously because they will be able to make clinical trials without having to first follow doctors (Srivali-Teal et al, 2018). Protocols and guidelines could be teaching aids or information resources for new or inexperienced staff as well as following procedures (Kim et al, 2018).
Furthermore, the lack of a modern nursing duties and responsibilities guidebook in Greece does not help nurses make clinical decisions and or increase their degree of autonomy (Bakalis and Watson, 2005). Although the involvement of nurses in emergencies is very important, the application of knowledge and skills in the clinical field assumes a clear and comprehensive framework will be used that will allow nurses to implement decisions and take responsibility in critical situations (Bijani, Abedi, Karimi and Tehranineshat, 2021). There is an urgent need for the immediate construction and implementation of nursing protocols in Greece as well as the revision of the routine so that nurses are more autonomous and improve the provision of care to patients.
The research also showed that there is a correlation between clinical decision making in more medical interventions and age, work experience as well as the clinical workplace in the hospital. More specifically, the older nurses, who will probably have more seniority, had higher scores and made better decisions. The literature has highlighted the importance of clinical experience in making clinical decisions especially in emergencies (Rosciano et al, 2016). Also, Critical Care Units are one of the forms of medical care that requires the most use of resources due to the severity of patients' disease and assumes nurses will act immediately in an emergency (Murray et al 2018). The desire for autonomy has been strengthened, as nurses have developed specialized skills and knowledge, which they have applied with satisfactory results (Asakura et al, 2016).
The main limitation of the present study was the small sample size. Although the research provided important data on how to obtain clinical results, in order to be able to generalize the conclusions in the future, it is necessary to use a larger sample from more hospitals.
In daily clinical practice, nurses make clinical decisions. The present study showed that Greek nurses had overall higher scores, mainly in the scenarios with more medical interventions. The Greek nurses are largely dependent on the medical staff and therefore make low quality clinical decisions, not due to lack of knowledge and clinical skills, but due to the fact that the legal framework in Greece limits nurses’ autonomy and thus, hinders making clinical decisions. Greek legislation is very strict and for this reason nurses are apprehensive to take initiatives, so they entrust the responsibility to doctors. However, Slovak nurses scored better in the scenarios that had more nursing interventions. This is due to the fact that nurses in Slovakia apply holistic care to patients and have specific nurse duties and responsibilities guidebook.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
