Chandipura Virus (Chpv) -The Deadly Paediatric Disease of Monsoon in Bharat

Mini Review Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2768-2757/136

Chandipura Virus (Chpv) -The Deadly Paediatric Disease of Monsoon in Bharat

  • Ahmad Reza Shahraki 1*
  • Elham Shahraki 2
  • Elahe Shahraki 3

1General Surgeon, Department of Surgery, Medical Faculty, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences and Health Services, Zahedan, Iran.

2Associated professor of nephrology, Department of Internal medicine, Nephrologist, Ali Ibne Abitaleb Hospital, Zahedan University of medical   Sciences, Zahedan, I.R. Iran.

3Dentist, Dental faculty, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences and Health Services, Zahedan, Iran.

*Corresponding Author: Ahmad Reza Shahraki., General Surgeon, Department of Surgery, Medical Faculty, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences and Health Services, Zahedan, Iran.

Citation: Ahmad R. Shahraki, Elham Shahraki, Elahe Shahraki, (2024), Chandipura Virus (Chpv) -The Deadly Paediatric Disease of Monsoon in Bharat, Journal of Clinical Surgery and Research, 5(6); DOI:10.31579/2768-2757/136

Copyright: © 2024, Ahmad Reza Shahraki. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: 15 July 2024 | Accepted: 19 August 2024 | Published: 02 September 2024

Keywords: epidemiology; diagnosis; vaccinology and biology

Abstract

The virus has been detected in CSF as well as sera collected from the patients in the acute phase of illness using CHPV specific one-step RT-PCR assay that detects 10-100 pfu / ml of the virus in human clinical specimens. Real-time one-step RT-PCR indicates linear relationship for a wide range of viral RNA 102-1010.

Introduction

Chandipura Virus (CHPV) is a virus belongs to the Rhabdoviridae family, which includes rabies, the deadliest zoonotic disease. It is transmitted by sandflies and mosquitoes, including Aedes aegypti, which is also a vector for dengue too. The virus resides in the salivary glands of these insects and can be transmitted to humans or domestic animals through bites of these infected insects.  The infection may lead to encephalitis and inflammation of the brain’s most active tissues. The Chandipura virus, belonging the Vesiculovirus genus, was discovered in 1965 in the blood of two individuals suffering from febrile sickness in a hamlet near Nagpur, Maharashtra. The virus usually spread by the female phlebotomine sandfly, which is abundant during the y monsoon season. Sergentomyia sandflies play a role in the virus’s spread, with Aedes aegypti being highly susceptible and effective in laboratory conditions. Chandipura infection produces encephalitis, which is the inflammation or swelling of brain tissue. However, no viral isolations from mosquitoes have been documented till date. 

Chandipura virus (CHPV): Symptoms, impact, treatment and prevention

Typical symptoms include a rapid onset of fever, vomiting, altered mental state, convulsions, diarrhoea, neurological deficits, and signs of meningeal irritation. The virus predominantly affects children under the age of 15, mostly in rural areas. Most affected children experience rapid deterioration, with deaths occurring within 48 hours of hospital admission. Enlisted below are some of the symptoms:

  • Sudden fever onset
  • Vomiting
  • Changes in mental status
  • Seizures
  • Diarrhea
  • Impaired neurological function (e.g., difficulty speaking, loss of balance, vision changes)
  • Meningeal irritation (evidenced by symptoms such as headaches, stiff neck, sensitivity to light, aand seizures)

Currently, there is no specific antiviral treatment or vaccine available for the Chandipura virus. Early diagnosis and supportive care, such as managing airways, fluid balance, and the prevention of secondary bacterial infections, are essential for patient management. Chandipura virus (CHPV) was first discovered during an acute febrile outbreak in Nagpur, Maharashtra state, India from two febrile cases [1965] [1, 2]. It belongs to the genus Vesiculovirus, family Rhabdoviridae. This virus has single-stranded RNA genome with negative polarity and size about 11 kilobases. It has five structural proteins which are coded by genome: the nucleocapsid protein (N), the phosphoprotein (P), the matrix protein (M), the glycoprotein (G) and large structural protein (L). These are produced in the form of five monocistronic mRNAs [3]. The available information suggests that sandflies are the vectors for this virus while antibodies against this have been detected in a wide range of vertebrate animals [4]. General clinical features include high-grade fever of short duration, vomiting, altered sensorium, generalized convulsions and decerabrate posture leading to grade 4 coma, acute encephalitis-encephalopathy and death within a few to 48 hours of hospitalization [5]. The available epidemiological data suggest that this disease mostly occurs in sporadic forms; however, has potential to cause outbreaks. This disease is not in a routine laboratory screening for acute encephalitis syndrome [AES]. Therefore, during any AES syndrome, the role of this virus is not understood. Besides this, there have been many queries about CHPV: is sandflies the only vector? What is the natural cycle? Do small mammal, domestic animals have any role and since the transovarial transmission of virus in sandflies may not be enough for its maintenance in nature. Understanding the natural cycle can help in interventions and prediction off or breaks. This article reviews research activities and further developments occurred during the last 10 years, which are necessary to understand CHPV as a growing concern in India, its epidemiology, diagnosis, vaccinology and biology of the virus. It is recorded from Indian subcontinent [India, Bhutan and Nepal], Sri Lanka, and Africa (Nigeria, Senegal) [6,7]. Hence, it is speculated that CHPV may be present in other parts of the country. Although, this was first time identified in India during 1965 but the retrospective serological studies indicate exposure of the human population as early as during 1957–58 [1]. Earlier reports suggest that the association of CHPV with a few undiagnosed outbreaks occurred in 1954 in Bihar [8]. However, CHPV was isolated from sera collected from clinically confirmed encephalitis cases in 1983 from Raipur [9] and the Warangal district of Andhra Pradesh (1997 and 2002) [10] suggesting its wide circulation in the country. However, CHPV re-emerged during 2003 in the form of an encephalitis outbreak affecting 11 districts of Andhra Pradesh with a high fatality ratio of about 56% [11]. CHP encephalitis (CHPE) outbreak was simultaneously documented in 15 districts of Maharashtra during the same time [12, 13]. During the subsequent year (2005), CHPV outbreak with 70?se fatality rate in the pediatric population of Vadodara district of Gujarat was documented [12]. It has been associated with a number of encephalitis epidemics in different states of India viz. Andhra Pradesh in 2003 and 2007, Gujarat in 2004, Maharashtra in 2007 and 2009, and Odisha in 2015 [13, 14]. The CHPV has also been isolated in Nigeria from hedgehogs and in Sri Lanka from macaques [15].

Molecular Diagnostic Assays for CHPV

CHPV causes acute encephalitis in pediatric population under the age of 15 years. The critical feature of CHPE is sudden onset of the clinical symptoms including neurological complications (within 24-30 hrs.) and high fatality rate. Due to the short duration between the onset of clinical feature and neurological illness, serological diagnostsis is not useful. The virus has been detected in CSF as well as sera collected from the patients in the acute phase of illness using CHPV specific one-step RT-PCR assay that detects 10-100 pfu / ml of the virus in human clinical specimens. Real-time one-step RT-PCR indicates linear relationship for a wide range of viral RNA 102-1010. When RNA from other viruses or healthy individual was used, specificity was found to be 100% [16].

Serological Diagnosis Assay for CHPV

CHPV specific IgM capture ELISA with specific polyclonal antibodies shows polyclonal antibodies masking the specificity of the assay to be used for the detection of anti-CHPV IgM antibodies in the patient’s CSF and sera. Monoclonal antibodies were generated and replaced in antiCHPV IgM ELISA to increase the sensitivity, specificity and rapidity of the assay [17]. Plaque reduction neutralization test (PRNT) is considered as ‘gold standard’ to detect neutralizing antibodies against Chandipura virus. However, the test is cumbersome to perform, time intensive and reading is subjective. Recently developed micro-neutralization ELISA (MN ELISA) detects neutralizing antibodies against CHPV with readouts in the form of optical density and shorter turnaround time. This test may serve as an alternative to conventional assay in serosurveillance and vaccine studies [18]. Prevention strategies include vector control, identifying and eliminating sandfly breeding sites, and using protective measures to prevent sandfly bites, such as wearing protective clothing and using repellents and nets. Environmental control, including proper waste disposal and sanitation, is also critical to preventing the spread of the virus. Public health authorities must take proactive measures to curb the spread of the virus and provide the necessary support and resources to the affected regions.

References

Dear Editorial Team, Clinical Medical Reviews and Reports. My experience with the journal was highly positive. The peer-review process was rigorous, constructive, and completed in a timely manner. The reviewers provided valuable comments that helped improve the quality and clarity of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout all stages of the publication process. Communication was clear and efficient, and any questions were addressed promptly. Overall, I found the journal to maintain high scientific standards and an excellent publication workflow. I would be pleased to consider submitting future work to this journal. Best wishes from, Elena Popa.

img

Dr Elena Popa

It was my pleasure to submit my testimonial concerning the Reviewer Board of our Scientific Journal “Brain and Neurological Disorders”. The Reviewers focused on some modifications and their contribution was helpful. The ladies of our Editorial Office were also supported my efforts. It was my honor to have such a co-operation and I am looking forward for more collaboration.

img

Dr Nikolaos Andreas Chrysanthakopoulos

Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Thank you for the speedy and efficient peer review process. I appreciate the fact that your peer reviewers do not take months to respond like with some other journals. I would also like to thank the editorial office for responding quickly to my questions. It is an excellent journal. I plan to submit more manuscripts in the future. Best wishes from, Robert W. McGee

img

Robert W McGee

Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Working with you and your team on our recent publication in JCRR has been a truly wonderful and enjoyable experience. The responses were prompt, and the reviewers were patient, constructive, and highly professional. One reviewer in particular gave me the feeling that a professor was carefully reading and commenting on my coursework, which was deeply touching. The entire process was straightforward and hassle‑free, with no tedious online forms to complete. I highly recommend this journal. Best wishes from, DR Aibing Rao, Head of R&D

img

Aibing Rao

I Appreciate the Opportunity to Share my Experience with the Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. The peer review process was timely and constructive, and the feedback provided helped improve the quality of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout the process, ensuring smooth communication and efficient handling of the submission. Overall, it was a positive experience collaborating with your team.

img

Kashani Mehdi

Dear Mercy Grace, Editorial Coordinator of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, We would like to express our gratitude for your help at all stages of publishing and editing the article. The editors of the magazine answer all the necessary questions and help at every stage. We will definitely continue to cooperate and publish other works in the Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences! Best wishes from, Alla Konstantinovna Politova,

img

Alla Konstantinovna Politova