AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Research Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2768-2757/039
1Pediatric Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, Enugu State University Teaching Hospital, Enugu, Nigeria.
2General Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, Enugu State University Teaching Hospital, Enugu, Nigeria.
*Corresponding Author: Chukwubuike Kevin Emeka, Department of Surgery, Enugu State University Teaching Hospital, Enugu, Nigeria.
Citation: Chukwubuike K Emeka, Eze T Chikaodili. (2022). Challenges in the Management of Congenital Malformations in Infants: A Single Centre Experience. Journal of Clinical Surgery and Research. 3(2); DOI: 10.31579/2768-2757/039
Copyright: ©2022 Chukwubuike Kevin Emeka, This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 08 December 2021 | Accepted: 30 December 2021 | Published: 20 January 2022
Keywords: congenital anomalies; challenges; hypospadias; infants; single centre
Background: Congenital malformations are structural anomalies that occur during intra-uterine life that may be identified before or at birth or later in life.
Materials and Methods: This was a retrospective evaluation of the challenges encountered during the management of children with congenital anomalies at the pediatric surgery unit of Enugu State University Teaching Hospital (ESUTH), Enugu, Nigeria. Diagnosis of congenital anomalies was made based on clinical and radiological findings.
Results: A total of 104 infants with congenital anomalies were evaluated during the study period. There was male predominance and majority of the patients were neonates. Seven days and 3 days were the mean age at diagnosis and median interval before presentation respectively. Hypospadias was the most common congenital anomaly and surgical site infection was the most common post-operative complication. Mortality occurred in about one-third of the patients. The general challenges encountered in the management of these patients could categorized as patient related, surgeon related or facility related.
Conclusion:In developing countries, management of congenital anomalies is challenging and is fraught with difficulties. Modifiable factors such as late presentation and provision of facilities will improve outcome.
Congenital malformations also known as congenital anomalies or birth defects refer to structural anomalies that occur during intra-uterine life regardless of its cause. Congenital malformations develop prenatally and may be identified before or at birth or later in life. World Health Organization (WHO) defined congenital anomalies as “any pathological conditions arising before birth, whether they are evident at birth or become evident later in life” [1]. It comprises of a wide range of abnormalities of body structure. The prevalence of congenital anomalies varies widely, ranging from 1.07% in Japan to 4.3% in Taiwan [2]. Among newborn babies, a prevalence of 3 -5% has been reported [3]. The prevalence rate of congenital anomalies may be more in developing countries due to underreporting, unavailability of diagnostic facilities and inaccurate medical records [4]. Congenital anomalies can be correctable or non-correctable. Congenital anomalies may result in lifelong physical and mental disabilities if not managed appropriately and adequately [5]. Treatment of congenital anomalies depends on the specific type of congenital anomalies. In low-income countries, treatment of birth defects can be difficult and challenging due to several factors. There is paucity of data on the challenges experienced in the management of congenital anomalies in developing countries. Toobaie et al reported the lack of robust data on congenital anomalies from low income countries when compared to high income countries [6]. Hence there is need to carry out this study. The aim of this study was to evaluate the challenges we encountered in the management of pediatric patients who presented with congenital anomalies.
This was a retrospective evaluation of the challenges encountered during the management of children with congenital anomalies at the pediatric surgery unit of Enugu State University Teaching Hospital (ESUTH), Enugu, Nigeria. Only children less than 1 year of age with obvious congenital anomalies were recruited into the study. Both elective and emergency cases were considered and this study covered a period of 5 years, from January 2016 to December 2020. Patients who have had surgery for congenital anomalies at a peripheral hospital before referral to ESUTH for reoperation were excluded from this study. ESUTH is a tertiary hospital located in Enugu, South East Nigeria. The hospital serves the whole of Enugu State, which according to the 2016 estimates of the National Population Commission and Nigerian National Bureau of Statistics, has a population of about 4 million people and a population density of 616.0/km2. The hospital also receives referrals from its neighboring states. Information was extracted from the case notes, operation notes, operation register and admission-discharge records. The information extracted included the age, gender, duration of symptoms before presentation, clinical diagnosis, operative procedure performed, complications of treatment, duration of hospital stay and outcome of treatment. Diagnosis of congenital anomalies was made based on clinical and radiological findings. The follow-up period was 12 months. Ethical approval was obtained from the ethics and research committee of ESUTH and informed consent was obtained from the patients’ caregivers. Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) version 21 (manufactured by IBM Corporation Chicago Illinois) was used for data entry and analysis. Data were expressed as percentages, median, mean, and range.
Patients’ demographics
A total of 112 infants with congenital anomalies were managed during the study period. However, 104 infants had a complete record and form the basis of this report. Details of the patients’ demographics are shown in Table 1.
Diagnosis and treatment performed
The diagnoses of the patients managed during the study period vary widely. The operative procedure performed was dependent on the type of congenital anomaly. For instance, intestinal atresia was treated by intestinal resection and anastomosis through a laparotomy. Gastroschisis required reduction of the eviscerated bowel and repair of the anterior abdominal wall. The frequency of the different diagnosis and the treatment rendered are shown in Table 2.
Complications of treatment
The complications seen in the patients are shown in Table 3.
Treatment outcome
Seventy (67.3%) patients achieved full recovery and were discharged home. However, 34 (32.7%) patients expired. The causes of mortality included overwhelming sepsis 24 (23.1%), respiratory failure 4 (3.8%), anesthesia related death 4 (3.8%) and electrolyte derangement 2 (1.9%).
Challenges of management
The challenges encountered may be patient related, surgeon related or facility/equipment related. It could also be a combination of the various factors.
Congenital anomalies are important cause of mortality and disability. They encompass a wide range of disorders with differing severity [7]. Following the Second World War, the United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effect of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR) was empowered to collect and evaluate information on the effect of ionizing radiation on birth defects in children [8]. The setting up this committee demonstrated the importance for epidemiological data on congenital anomalies and the need for surveillance.
In the present study, there is male predominance. Other series on congenital anomalies also reported this male predominance [9, 10]. The reason for the gender difference is not known. However, the specific type of congenital anomaly may determine the gender that is more affected. For instance, a study on hypospadias will only involve males. Majority of our patients were neonates. The obvious nature and appearance of congenital anomalies makes them to be detected at neonatal age. Again, severe congenital anomalies present with symptoms that are noticeable at birth. This may explain why several studies on congenital anomalies are carried out on neonates [11, 12]. In fact, Lee et al reported that most congenital anomalies are common in newborns and infants [13]. The mean age at diagnosis of 7 days recorded in the present study is consistent with the report of Ajao et al [14]. A study from Australia reported that 1 out of every 8 case of congenital anomalies is diagnosed in children beyond one year of age [15]. The nature of the congenital anomaly and the presence/absence of symptoms may determine the age at diagnosis. For instance, neonates with intestinal atresia are more likely to be diagnosed earlier than those with intestinal stenosis. The duration of the patients’ hospitalization may be related to the specific pathology, modality of treatment and possible complications that may arise from treatment.
Hypospadias was the most common diagnosis in the patients. Other series on congenital anomalies also reported hypospadias as one of the most common congenital anomalies [16, 17]. Hypospadias is a congenital anomaly of the penis in which the urethral opening is not correctly positioned at the tip of the penis [18]. The challenge encountered in the management of children with hypospadias lies in the non-availability of the appropriate sutures required for the repair of the hypospadias. Moreover, most children present with circumcised penis making the hypospadias repair more challenging. Omphalocele was the second most common congenital anomaly managed in the current series. Omphalocele is a midline anterior abdominal wall defect in which there is herniation of the abdominal viscera covered by a thin membrane [19]. Other studies also reported omphalocele as the most common congenital abdominal wall defect [20, 21]. The absence of facilities required for the assessment of chromosomal and other associated anomalies is the challenge encountered in the management of omphalocele. The cost and non-availability of surgical mesh required for repair of the ventral hernia is another challenge. When omphalocele ruptures, it is a surgical emergency requiring immediate operative reduction and abdominal wall closure. This also applies to gastroschisis in which the eviscerated bowel is not covered by membrane. Challenges such as thermoregulation, high risk of infection, nutrition, hypoglycemia and anesthesia are other problems associated with operating on neonate with congenital anomalies. Talipes equinovarus (clubfoot) and polydactyly/syndactyly are congenital musculoskeletal anomalies. Late presentation of children with clubfoot presents a challenge in management due to fibrotic and bone changes that occur in the foot over time.
Surgical site infection was the most common post-operative complication recorded in the present study. Ekenze et al also reported wound infection as one of the most common complications in children with surgical correctable congenital anomalies [22]. The high incidence of wound infection may be explained by the large number of neonates involved in the present study. Neonates are not small adults and are prone to infection due to immaturity of the immune system and their low resistance to infections.
One-third of our patients died due to surgery related complications. This finding is comparable to the report of a study from Enugu, Nigeria [22]. Severe sepsis in children is detrimental to the wellbeing of the children because it may lead to multiple organ dysfunction syndromes (MODS). Hecker et al documented that post-operative infections cause mortality particularly infants and newborns [23]. Anesthetic complications may lead to respiratory failure and death. One study from Europe emphasized the effect of anesthesia on peri-operative mortality in children [24]. Also, the effect of electrolyte derangements on perioperative mortality in infants has been reported by some authors [25].
Generally, the challenges in the management of congenital anomalies can be categorized into 3: Patient related, surgeon related and facility/equipment related. The patient related factors include late presentation, poverty and nature of the pathology. Surgeon related factors are skill, experience and technique. The facility/equipment related factors are ventilators, incubators, infusion pump and radiant warmers.
1. Only overt (obvious) congenital anomalies were considered.
2. Children older than 1 year of age were excluded.
3. Small number of patients. A larger number would have made better analysis.
In developing countries, management of congenital anomalies is challenging and is fraught with difficulties. Male neonates are mostly affected. Hypospadias was the most common congenital anomaly treated in the index study. Modifiable factors such as late presentation and provision of facilities will improve outcome.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.
