AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Case Report | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2693-4779/066
1 Neurosurgery Department Ali Ait Idir Hospital Health Establishment, Algiers, Algeria
2 Neurosurgery Department, Mustapha Pacha University Hospital, Algiers, Algeria
*Corresponding Author: F. Bouchenaki. Neurosurgery Department Ali Ait Idir Hospital Health Establishment, Algiers, Algeria.
Citation: F. Bouchenaki, k. badache, N. Habchi, M S. Benachour, S. Bakhti. (2021) Caudal Regression Syndrome. Clinical Research and Clinical Trials. 4(3); DOI: 10.31579/2693-4779/066
Copyright: © 2021 F. Bouchenaki, This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 17 September 2021 | Accepted: 24 September 2021 | Published: 29 September 2021
Keywords: caudal regression syndrome; agenesis of the coccygeal or lumbosacral vertebrae - attached lower marrow syndrome - lipomatous filum
Caudal Regression Syndrome (CRS) is a rare malformation syndrome associating to varying degrees agenesis of the coccygeal or lumbosacral vertebrae.This vertebral anomaly can therefore be reduced clinically to a simple coccygeal agenesis without any deficit or even lumbosacral agenesis accompanying a clinical picture with sphincter disorders associated or not with transit disorders and various deficits involving the lower limbs.This syndrome is accompanied by other orthopedic malformations such as shortening of the lower limbs, and / or gastrointestinal abnormalities, see also genitourinary as well as cardiovascular.Its incidence is 1 to 5 cases per 100,000 births.
Its precise cause has not yet been identified, but its relationship to maternal diabetes is well established.
We report in our study 5 patients with CRS from different clinics whose sphincter disorders were found in the foreground in all our patients and whose results vary according to the inaugural clinical picture. MRI made it possible to refine and confirm the diagnosis highlighting the congenital anomaly and the associated lesions.We have obtained 75% good results and 25% clinical stabilization; nor do we deplore any case of aggravation or death.
The interest is to suspect the diagnosis of CRS; document it at the start of the prenatal period and determine its severity and associated abnormalities in order to present options for patient management; because once the diagnosis is made, surgical treatment becomes imperative due to the formidable neurological sequelae compromising the functional prognosis.
Caudal regression syndrome (CRS) is a rare disorder first described by Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire and Hohl in 1852, and in 1964 Duhmel coined the term “caudal regression syndrome” [2-3].It affects between 0.1 and 0.25 pregnancies in 10,000, with a male-to-female ratio of 2.7 [1].-In a prenatal context, approximately 20% of cases of caudal regression syndrome are associated with type I or type II diabetes mellitus in the mother [5] and / or carrying a hydramnios [6].From an embryological point of view, it is believed that CRS is the result of defects in the induction of caudal elements in the embryo before the 28th day of gestation [7].The vertebral anomaly can vary from a simple coccygeal agenesis without any deficit to lumbosacral agenesis with sphincter and intestinal transit disorders associating motor damage affecting the lower limbs of varying severity corresponding to the spinal cord segments concerned.Orthopedic malformations associated with the type of shortening of the lower limbs, and gastrointestinal abnormalities with the type of anal imperforation are frequently revealed in the literature review [3].The diagnosis must be made in order to avoid the installation of complications that involve the functional prognosis, leaving definitive neurological sequelae and sometimes life-threatening [6].
This is a retrospective study of 5 patients treated for caudal regression syndrome between January 2018 and May 2021.The average age was 3.5 years with extremes ranging from 08 months to 60 months. The reason for consultation was most often:-Sphincteric disorders are found in 4 patients, i.e. in 80% of cases.Represented mainly by:-Urinary tract infections which is a very common reason in these patients carrying this pathology,-Difficulty urinating- Transit disorders a type of obstinate constipation in 02 patients or in 40% of cases.-Motor sensory deficits which can go as far as complete cauda equina syndrome which was found in 01 case in the oldest child.-Orthopedic malformations:-A type of scoliosis in 03 cases.-Isolated deformities of club feet 02 cases with contractures of the lower limbs characteristic of sacral agenesis with narrow hips, hypoplastic gluteal muscles and a shallow intergluteal cleft are described in the literature.- Associated malformations can enrich the clinical picture and worsen the prognosis and will therefore require multidisciplinary management.-Anorectal malformations such as anal imperforation in 01 cases.-Gastro-intestinal abnormalities atresia of the duodenum trachea-esophageal fistulas 01 case -Congenital genitourinary abnormalities (renal agenesis or hydronephrosis) in 02 cases.-Imaging this is essential for the diagnosis, but also for the therapeutic decision.-Simple x-rays: Sacro-coccygeal agenesis is often associated with agenesis of the lumbar vertebrae as well as cone anomalies better explored by MRI.In caudal regression syndrome, Renshaw [11] classified agenesis into four types, in order of increasing severity:Type 1 (A): total or partial unilateral sacral agenesis.Type 2 (B): partial sacral agenesis. Usually a first sacral vertebra is normal or hypoplastic, the rest of the sacrum is absent.The malformation of the sacrum is bilateral and symmetrical.Type 3 and 4 (C and D): Agenesis variable at the lumbar level and total at the sacral level.The type of junction between the most caudal vertebra and the iliums determines whether the agenesis is type 3 or 4.
Prenatal ultrasound: Prenatal diagnosis is based on ultrasound The cone often ends well above the expected level sometimes even above L1. [7]The Sacrum may be absent or hypoplastic.The extremities of the fetus can be seen in a “cross-legged” or “Buddha” position.MRI is in general the following can be observed:- Agenesis of the lumbosacral or sacral vertebral body which is generally less than L1 and often limited to the sacrum. -the spinal cord with the distal tip to a blunt, blunt pointed end terminating above the expected level said the medullary cone has a wedge-shaped or cigar-shaped appearance. [8-9]Imaging can differentiate two large groups of patients with caudal regression syndrome. [12]Group 1: the medullary cone is blunt and ends above the normal level; sometimes there is an associated dilated central duct or cyst filled with cerebrospinal fluid at the lower end of the cone.Type 1 is associated with urinary and bladder dysfunction.A sacred motor deficit occurs, and corresponds to the level of vertebral agenesis while the sensitive functions are relatively preserved.
Group 2: The medullary cone is elongated and attached by a thickened terminal filum or intraspinal lipoma and ends below the normal level [5].Neurological disorders are more marked in this group.-Other associated nervous malformations described in the literature.
For the prognosis:
All our patients were operated on 2 patients stabilized and 3 patients improved.There are no cases of motor or sphincter aggravation.Treatment and prognosis depend on the extent of the regression because Morbidity mainly concerns genitourinary and neuromuscular complications and management options are often centered on these with both urological and orthopedic support.
Caudal regression syndrome covers a range of orthopedic, gastrointestinal, genitourinary and neurological congenital malformations.Its close relationship with maternal diabetes is well established, hence the importance of early prenatal diagnosis for adequate management.The doctor's role is to suspect CRS in a diabetic mother, hence the importance of an early prenatal diagnosis for adequate management and to document it at the start of the prenatal period and determine its severity as well as the associated anomalies. in order to present options to the patient.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
