Case Report | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2641-0419/484
Department of Cardiology, UHC Ibn Rochd, Casablanca, Morocco.
*Corresponding Author: Samia Ejjebli, Department of Cardiology, UHC Ibn Rochd, Casablanca, Morocco.
Citation: Samia Ejjebli, Anas Elmahi, Alaa Altimimi, Salim Arous, Mohammed G. Bennouna., et al, (2025), Cardiac Storm, Sepsis from Inoperable Osteitis, and Thromboembolic Complications in a Patient with Suspected Non compaction Cardiomyopathy: A Clinical Deadlock, J Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, 8(9); DOI: 10.31579/2641-0419/484
Copyright: © 2025, Samia Ejjebli. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 23 May 2025 | Accepted: 10 July 2025 | Published: 24 June 2025
Keywords: left ventricle non compaction cardiomyopathy; electrical storm; sepsis; osteitis
Background: Left ventricular non-compaction cardiomyopathy (LVNC) is a rare congenital disorder characterized by prominent myocardial trabeculations and deep intertrabecular recesses. It is often complicated by ventricular arrhythmias, thromboembolic events, and progressive heart failure. Electrical storm and systemic infections significantly worsen the prognosis in these patients.
Case Presentation: We report the case of a 40-year-old man with a history of dilated hypokinetic cardiomyopathy, chronic osteitis, and substance abuse, who presented with sustained ventricular tachycardia and cardiogenic shock. Echocardiography revealed severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVEF 20%), apical thrombus, and features consistent with LVNC. Despite intensive antiarrhythmic therapy and multiple cardioversions, the arrhythmia proved refractory. The patient developed worsening sepsis from a chronic knee infection, followed by multiorgan failure, splenic infarction, and embolic stroke, ultimately culminating in death.
Conclusion: This case illustrates the catastrophic interplay between LVNC, electrical storm, and systemic infection. It underscores the importance of early recognition, aggressive rhythm and infection control, and the limitations of current therapeutic strategies in advanced cardiomyopathy complicated by systemic inflammation.
Left ventricular non-compaction cardiomyopathy (LVNC) is a rare myocardial disorder characterized by prominent trabeculations and deep intertrabecular recesses, thought to result from arrested myocardial development during embryogenesis. It is often associated with systolic dysfunction, arrhythmias, thromboembolic events, and progressive heart failure. The clinical course can be further complicated by electrical storm defined as recurrent episodes of ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation within a short time frame which carries a high risk of mortality. Infections and systemic inflammation may act as additional stressors that exacerbate cardiac instability. We present the case of a 40-year-old man with dilated cardiomyopathy and features suggestive of LVNC, whose clinical deterioration was driven by a refractory electrical storm and concomitant sepsis, ultimately leading to multiorgan failure. This case underscores the complex interplay between arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy and systemic inflammatory states in critically ill cardiac patients.
Mr. A.M., a 40-year-old man, was admitted to the cardiology department with a background of dilated hypokinetic cardiomyopathy and presented with an acute clinical decompensation marked by severe palpitations. His medical history was already complex, including chronic substance abuse, a previous ischemic stroke, and a long-standing orthopedic complication a chronic osteitis following tibial surgery which made his case particularly challenging to manage from the outset.
The patient's symptoms began about six hours prior to admission, with a sudden onset of intense palpitations, profuse sweating, and vomiting. On arrival, he was tachycardic at 220 bpm, showing clear signs of poorly tolerated sustained ventricular tachycardia (figure 1).

Figure 1: ECG after admission showing a ventricular tachycardia
Echocardiography confirmed a severely depressed left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of 20%, with a markedly dilated left ventricle, prominent trabeculations, spontaneous echogenic contrast, and an apical thrombus—all features raising suspicion of a left ventricular non-compaction cardiomyopathy (LVNC) (figure 2 and 3)

Figure 2: 4 cavity echocardiography showing the left ventricle trabeculations

Figure 3: short axe Vue showing the Left ventricle trabeculations
In parallel, a purulent wound over the left knee (figure 4), presumed secondary to chronic osteitis, suggested ongoing systemic infection.
This case highlights the catastrophic interplay between advanced structural heart disease, arrhythmogenic instability, and systemic infection culminating in multiorgan failure. The patient, a 40-year-old man with known dilated hypokinetic cardiomyopathy, presented with features strongly suggestive of left ventricular non-compaction (LVNC)—a rare but increasingly recognized cardiomyopathy marked by prominent trabeculations and deep intertrabecular recesses resulting from arrested myocardial compaction during embryogenesis [1].
LVNC carries a high arrhythmic burden, with sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) being a frequent and often life-threatening manifestation. In this case, the patient’s electrical storm, defined as three or more episodes of VT/VF in 24 hours, was refractory to both pharmacological therapy and repeated synchronized cardioversion, underscoring the malignant arrhythmic potential of LVNC in end-stage disease [2]. Electrical storm is independently associated with increased mortality and often indicates advanced myocardial scarring and electrical instability [3]. Compounding the cardiac substrate was the presence of an apical thrombus, commonly observed in LVNC due to stagnant flow within the non-compacted myocardium, depressed LVEF, and endocardial dysfunction [4]. This likely served as the embolic source for the splenic infarct and recurrent ischemic stroke, illustrating the embolic risk inherent in this cardiomyopathy.
Concomitantly, the patient had a chronic purulent focus from osteitis of the knee, which evolved into a presumed source of sepsis. The resultant systemic inflammatory response added a second axis of pathophysiological stress. Septic shock in the context of underlying cardiogenic shock creates a vicious circle: inflammatory cytokines worsen myocardial depression and vasoplegia, while impaired cardiac output further compromises perfusion and host immune responses [5]. As his course progressed, the clinical picture evolved into multiorgan dysfunction syndrome (MODS) with acute kidney injury, neurological deterioration from embolic stroke, hepatic and splenic hypoperfusion, and systemic edema demonstrating the terminal trajectory in patients with end-stage cardiomyopathy complicated by infection and arrhythmias. Importantly, his refractoriness to conventional antiarrhythmic therapy and ineligibility for advanced heart failure interventions (e.g., ventricular assist device, transplant) due to systemic infection and comorbidities contributed to the fatal outcome.
The coexistence of LVNC and chronic systemic infection is exceedingly rare in the literature, but this case underscores how extra myocardial factors like infection and inflammation can unmask or accelerate terminal decompensation in cardiomyopathy patients. Furthermore, it raises questions regarding earlier detection, aggressive rhythm control, prophylactic anticoagulation, and surgical debridement of chronic infections in similar high-risk patients.
This case illustrates the lethal convergence of cardiac electrical instability, unresolved systemic infection, and thromboembolic events in a patient with advanced cardiomyopathy. The inability to control the rhythm disturbances, surgically treat the infectious source, or prevent embolic complications reveals the clinical limitations we still face in such scenarios. Early identification of high-risk features, multidisciplinary management, and possibly earlier consideration of mechanical circulatory support might be avenues for improving outcomes in future similar cases.
As per international standard or university standard, patient(s) written consent has been collected and preserved by the author(s).
It is not applicable.
Authors have declared that no competing interests exist
Dear Editorial Team, Clinical Medical Reviews and Reports. My experience with the journal was highly positive. The peer-review process was rigorous, constructive, and completed in a timely manner. The reviewers provided valuable comments that helped improve the quality and clarity of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout all stages of the publication process. Communication was clear and efficient, and any questions were addressed promptly. Overall, I found the journal to maintain high scientific standards and an excellent publication workflow. I would be pleased to consider submitting future work to this journal. Best wishes from, Elena Popa.
It was my pleasure to submit my testimonial concerning the Reviewer Board of our Scientific Journal “Brain and Neurological Disorders”. The Reviewers focused on some modifications and their contribution was helpful. The ladies of our Editorial Office were also supported my efforts. It was my honor to have such a co-operation and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Thank you for the speedy and efficient peer review process. I appreciate the fact that your peer reviewers do not take months to respond like with some other journals. I would also like to thank the editorial office for responding quickly to my questions. It is an excellent journal. I plan to submit more manuscripts in the future. Best wishes from, Robert W. McGee
Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Working with you and your team on our recent publication in JCRR has been a truly wonderful and enjoyable experience. The responses were prompt, and the reviewers were patient, constructive, and highly professional. One reviewer in particular gave me the feeling that a professor was carefully reading and commenting on my coursework, which was deeply touching. The entire process was straightforward and hassle‑free, with no tedious online forms to complete. I highly recommend this journal. Best wishes from, DR Aibing Rao, Head of R&D
I Appreciate the Opportunity to Share my Experience with the Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. The peer review process was timely and constructive, and the feedback provided helped improve the quality of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout the process, ensuring smooth communication and efficient handling of the submission. Overall, it was a positive experience collaborating with your team.
Dear Mercy Grace, Editorial Coordinator of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, We would like to express our gratitude for your help at all stages of publishing and editing the article. The editors of the magazine answer all the necessary questions and help at every stage. We will definitely continue to cooperate and publish other works in the Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences! Best wishes from, Alla Konstantinovna Politova,