Short Communication | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2690-8794/012

Cancer Can Be Cured

  • Andrew Hague 1*

1 Professor of Advanced Medicine, President, Cellsonic, Manufacturers of Medical Equipment, United Kingdom.

*Corresponding Author: Andrew Hague, Professor of Advanced Medicine, President, Cellsonic, Manufacturers of Medical Equipment, United Kingdom.

Citation: Andrew Hague (2020) Cancer Can Be Cured, Clinical Medical Reviews and Reports 2(2): DOI: 10.31579/2690-8794/012

Copyright: © 2020 Andrew Hague, This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of The Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Received: 14 February 2020 | Accepted: 18 February 2020 | Published: 24 February 2020

Keywords: cancer,bombarded,desperation

Abstract

More than three years ago, I worked out how to cure cancer with the CellSonic VIPP machine [1]. There are no side effects, drugs are not used or needed and the cure is quick, maybe immediate. Since then, hundreds more patients in many countries have been cured with different types of cancers.

Introduction

At first, we understood that the pressure pulse from CellSonic was the main means by which the tumours were killed. That process is certainly involved and applies in many cases. Within a few months and in conversation with Bradford University where they were diagnosing cancer by measuring permittivity [2], we realised that we were also changing the voltage of the potential across the membrane of the cell to lift it from the -15 MV of cancer to the -75 MV of a healthy cell. In other words, we were changing the behaviour of the cell and in that sense it was a cure. The replication of mutant cells ceased and the correct replication of cells continued.

I sit in the middle of a network linked to CellSonic users around the world and get feedback from them. To know that the protocol [3] on cancer works in all continents on a variety of cancers and patients is the evidence I need to be able to claim to have a cure for cancer. There have been no trials. For the first patient [4], we told him we were confident there would be no harm but could not be sure of success. For forty years, similar technology with higher energy had bombarded the kidneys to smash stones and there were no side effects. No cancers were caused and none were spread. If there had been any bad news, we would all of heard about it. Millions of patients in urology departments in all countries were being safely treated. That allowed us to use CellSonic on cancer patients [5].

Within three days of the first treatment, the patient declared himself cured. Tests in the following weeks confirmed his own assessment. Many more patients said the same [6]. These were patients paying to be treated. Usually they had already been damaged by chemotherapy and radiation so their immune system was not working or almost useless and they found a CellSonic Clinic in desperation [7]. Thus, apart from the first patient, there have been no experiments; we could predict the outcome.

It has been interesting to observe how oncologists remain committed to deadly poisons as a cure for cancer. They believe they can selectively kill cancer without harming other parts of the body and when the patient suffers, they say that the patient is not responding to treatment as though it is a failure by the patient. Despite never having found a chemical cure for cancer in a hundred years or more, researchers continue to look for a weakness in cancers of all types and hope to find a poison that will attack the weak area and not damage other areas. There is a constant barrage from charities begging for money to pay for more research in laboratories for a better drug and never do they find a cure but still the public, who are not biochemists, have faith in those in whitecoats because they know no better.

That the cure has come from biophysics [8] is lost on most doctors who were never educated in the science [9]. I thought I was the first to find the cure for cancer. Indeed, I was the first to have an easy to use method that is none surgical and completely without side effects. As Dr Steve Haltiwanger [10] said to me, “I should get a Nobel Prize for medicine if I can live long enough to collect it”. The more I explore the literature on my predecessors, the more I learned about non-surgical, irreversible electroporation.

Invasive electroporation was successfully demonstrated by Dr Bjorn Nordenström over fifty years ago. At the time, he was also the chairman of the Nobel Price committee and commentators said that his own invention was far better than any that his committee was recommending for prizes. Electroporation was never accepted by the pharmaceutical establishment that ruled medicine in America and Nordenström ended up giving his patents to China where they continued to use it successfully but since then it has disappeared. Certainly, inserting needles almost blindly into a tumour and then another needle adjacent to the tumour to pass a current across is difficult and fiddly. The simplicity of a drug injection was always appealing and if the authorities approved the drug, the doctors were exonerated when the patient died.

CellSonic users are becoming more confident. At first, they could not believe what they saw. As time went on, without understanding the science, they accepted that there was a cause and effect; CellSonic VIPP was causing the cancer to stop mutating. They also grudgingly admitted that they never really understood how drugs were supposed to cure but because they were told to use the drugs they obeyed. It is a pathetic attitude that persists throughout a lot of the profession. Credit to the CellSonic doctors [11] who were thinking for themselves and determined to do better for their patients.

References

Dear Editorial Team, Clinical Medical Reviews and Reports. My experience with the journal was highly positive. The peer-review process was rigorous, constructive, and completed in a timely manner. The reviewers provided valuable comments that helped improve the quality and clarity of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout all stages of the publication process. Communication was clear and efficient, and any questions were addressed promptly. Overall, I found the journal to maintain high scientific standards and an excellent publication workflow. I would be pleased to consider submitting future work to this journal. Best wishes from, Elena Popa.

img

Dr Elena Popa

It was my pleasure to submit my testimonial concerning the Reviewer Board of our Scientific Journal “Brain and Neurological Disorders”. The Reviewers focused on some modifications and their contribution was helpful. The ladies of our Editorial Office were also supported my efforts. It was my honor to have such a co-operation and I am looking forward for more collaboration.

img

Dr Nikolaos Andreas Chrysanthakopoulos

Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Thank you for the speedy and efficient peer review process. I appreciate the fact that your peer reviewers do not take months to respond like with some other journals. I would also like to thank the editorial office for responding quickly to my questions. It is an excellent journal. I plan to submit more manuscripts in the future. Best wishes from, Robert W. McGee

img

Robert W McGee

Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Working with you and your team on our recent publication in JCRR has been a truly wonderful and enjoyable experience. The responses were prompt, and the reviewers were patient, constructive, and highly professional. One reviewer in particular gave me the feeling that a professor was carefully reading and commenting on my coursework, which was deeply touching. The entire process was straightforward and hassle‑free, with no tedious online forms to complete. I highly recommend this journal. Best wishes from, DR Aibing Rao, Head of R&D

img

Aibing Rao

I Appreciate the Opportunity to Share my Experience with the Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. The peer review process was timely and constructive, and the feedback provided helped improve the quality of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout the process, ensuring smooth communication and efficient handling of the submission. Overall, it was a positive experience collaborating with your team.

img

Kashani Mehdi

Dear Mercy Grace, Editorial Coordinator of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, We would like to express our gratitude for your help at all stages of publishing and editing the article. The editors of the magazine answer all the necessary questions and help at every stage. We will definitely continue to cooperate and publish other works in the Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences! Best wishes from, Alla Konstantinovna Politova,

img

Alla Konstantinovna Politova