Research Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2690-8794/065
*Corresponding Author: Ashfaq Chandio, Department of Colorectal Surgery, Luton & Dunstable University Hospital, UK.
Citation: Chandio A., Chandio M., Rai A., Qurashi M, Villani C, Ahmed B, Brown K., (2021) Rendezvous for afferent limb syndrome. Clinical Medical Reviews and Reports 3(2); DOI: 10.31579/2690-8794/065
Copyright: © 2021 Ashfaq Chandio, This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 22 January 2021 | Accepted: 28 January 2021 | Published: 20 February 2021
Keywords: colorectal cancer; familial adenomatous polyposis
Background: Colorectal cancer is a common and lethal cancer worldwide, In the UK, it is the second most common cause of cancer death. 5% of UK population is at risk of colorectal carcinoma during lifetime. 30% of patients with colorectal cancer present with a metastatic disease. Detecting colorectal cancer is challenging patients may present with slight symptoms or asymptomatic. By the time patients becomes symptomatic, the cancer may be more advanced. Therefore, screening for colorectal cancer is recommended for people at average risk.
Method: All patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer at the Luton and Dunstable University Hospital UK from January 2015 through December 2019 were retrospectively identified from the referral database created by colorectal specialist nurses in the colorectal service. Data were retrieved by detailed review of the hospital case notes, ICE/Evolve (Computer database for investigations and correspondence) including endoscopy; radiographic imaging; operative course and cancer follow up.
Results: In the study period 976 patients were diagnosed with colorectal cancer, Male 52.6% (513) Female 47.4% (463). The mean age of 74.14 years (range, 25 to 101). Sixty six 6.76% patients were excluded from the study, therefore the percentages of studied participant were Male 53 % (482) and Female 47 % (428) ratio 1: 1.12. Incidence of colorectal cancer among young adult was low 1.75% (16) up to 39 years of age) and 94.61% are diagnosed in people over the age of 50 years, 60.43% are diagnosed in people aged 70 or over.
Conclusion: Increasing awareness of the symptoms and signs of colorectal cancer be helpful and beneficial. Establish integrated care pathways, centralization of complex procedures and comparison of international cancer outcomes.
Colorectal cancer is a major health problem. In the UK, it is the second most common cause of cancer death. 5% of UK population is at risk of colorectal carcinoma during lifetime. Within the colon, about 50% of cancers arise in the left side and 25% in the right; in 4–5% of cases there are synchronous lesions (Figure 1). Most colorectal cancers arise from adenomatous colon polyps that progress from small (<8 mm) to large (≥8 mm) polyps, then to dysplasia and carcinoma. Adenomatous polyps occur in about 30 percent of men and up to 20 percent of women. Progression from adenoma to carcinoma is believed to take an average of at least 10 years. It is now widely accepted that the majority of colonic cancers arise from pre-existing adenomatous polyps. (Figure 2). Detecting colorectal cancer is challenging patients may present with slight symptoms or asymptomatic. By the time patients becomes symptomatic, the cancer may be more advanced. Therefore, screening for colorectal cancer is recommended for people at average risk.
A diagnosis of colorectal cancer results either from an evaluation of a patient symptoms, or as a result of screening. When colorectal cancer or its precursor lesion is diagnosed early, its 5-year relative survival rate is very high, however advanced colorectal cancer reduces the quality of life of patients. Therefore, novel methods that would allow the early diagnosis of colorectal cancer are chosen. In England almost a 30% of bowel cancer cases are diagnosed through the ‘two-week wait’ referral route1. More than 44%) of these cases diagnosed early (stage I or II [2]. Around 24% of bowel cancer are diagnosed after presenting as an emergency in England [1]. Around 20% of patients presenting with Colo Rectal Cancer have metastatic disease at time of diagnosis [3]. Around 66% presented as an emergency are via Accident and Emergency (ED), with the other cases coming via an urgent GP referral, inpatient referral or outpatient referral [4].
Overview of diagnosis and management of the colorectal cancer patients
All patients managed with colorectal cancer at the Luton and Dunstable University Hospital UK from January 2015 through December 2019 were retrospectively identified from the referral database created by the colorectal specialist nurses in the colorectal service. Data were retrieved by detailed review of the hospital case notes, ICE/Evolve (Computer database for investigations and correspondence) including endoscopy; radiographic imaging; operative course and cancer follow up. The following parameters were recorded: age, gender, and source of referral, presentation, stage of the disease, MDT discussion, intervention, and outcome. Tumour locations were classified as the right colon (i.e. caecum, ascending colon, hepatic flexure, transverse colon, and left colon (i.e. splenic flexure, descending colon, sigmoid, Recto sigmoid, and rectum
Inclusion: All patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer.
Exclusion: Colo Rectal Cancer of unknown primary site. Anal cancer, Appendix, Small bowel carcinoma
Data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS, version 26). Mean values were compared using the Student t test (Table 1). Univariate analysis of categorical variables was performed by the chi-square test (Table 2). Pearson’s chi squared test was used for comparing two proportions (Table 3). An OR with corresponding 95% confidence interval >1 implied a positive association where as an OR with corresponding 95% confidence interval <1 implied a negative association (Table 4). Two-sided p values < 0.05 were considered significant. The results are mainly illustrated by descriptive statistics. Fisher’s exact and Student’s t tests were used to compare the frequencies of both categorical and continuous variables (Table 5)
In the study period 976 patients were diagnosed with colorectal cancer, Male 52.6% (513) Female 47.4% (463). The mean age of 74.14 years (range, 25 to 101). Sixty six 6.76% patients were excluded from the study 29 Anal canal cancer (2.97%), Appendix 19 (1.94%) small bowel cancer 10 (1.02%) and eight patients 8 (0.87 %), as no primary site of colorectal cancer was identified (Fig: 3), therefore the percentages of studied participant were Male 53 % (482) and Female 47 % ( 428) ratio 1: 1.12. (Table 6) In the Right colon subset of patients there was a total of 342 patients 190 female and 152 male, In 568 patients with Left Colon cancer there were 330 Male and 238 Female. (Table 7)Incidence of colorectal cancer among young adult was low 1.75% (16) up to 39 years of age) and 94.61% are diagnosed in people over the age of 50 years, 60.43% are diagnosed in people aged 70 or over. (Table 8) Incidence of colorectal cancer were more marked for cancers of the left side of colon than right colon. 64.13% (583) of colorectal cancer cases were diagnosed through “GP” (two -week and urgent call) referral route. 10.89% (99) were diagnosed as a colorectal cancer after presenting as an emergency and 24.97% (227) were referred as in patients and other sources after diagnosis of bowel cancer. (Table 9).
Colorectal cancer is a common and lethal cancer worldwide, 30% of patients with Colorectal cancer present with a metastatic disease [5, 6] more than nine out of ten new cases (94%) are diagnosed in people over the age of 50, and nearly six out of ten cases (59%) are diagnosed in people aged 70 or over. bowel cancer can affect anyone of any age. Colorectal cancer is specific and considers the history of clinical symptoms and signs of bowel disease, family history together with investigation results. In our study we found 5.38% (49) up to 49 years of age , 34.17% (311) between 50 - 69 years of age and 60.43% (550) age 70 -101 years this is in contrast to study of Haggar et al [7] and other published studies.8 More than 2,500 new cases are diagnosed each year in people under the age of 50. 1 in 15 men and 1 in 18 women will be diagnosed with bowel cancer during their lifetime.Incidence and mortality rates vary markedly around the world. Environmental and genetic factors can increase the likelihood of developing colorectal cancer [9]. Unfortunately we still know very little about the causes of colorectal cancer. However, studies have shown that 5% of bowel cancers are because of two inherited conditions that can increase the risk of developing colorectal cancer. They are Familial Adenomatous Polyposis (FAP) and Hereditary Non-Polyposis Colon Cancer (HNPCC). Incidence of bowel cancer is greater in countries, which eat a diet high in fat and low in fibre (roughage). It has been suggested that an excessive alcohol intake, particularly of beer, may be linked to bowel cancer. A history of inflammatory bowel disease affecting the large bowel may also increase the risk of developing colorectal cancer. A diagnosis of colorectal cancer results either from an assessment of a patient symptoms or as a result of screening. The disease can be associated with a range of symptoms, including change in bowel habits, bleeding per rectum, tenesmus. Other symptoms include tiredness, anaemia-related symptoms, such as pale appearance and shortness of breath, and weight loss. “Be Clear on Cancer” [10] campaign in the United Kingdom, in 2011, was launched to raise awareness of colorectal cancer symptoms and signs at a local and nationwide level. It was particularly successful in fighting the embarrassment associated with alarming symptoms [11]. In our study, we found increase incidence of colorectal cancer were more marked for cancers of the left side of colon than right colon this is similar to United State studies ( Austin et al and Siegel et al) [12, 13]. we found colorectal cancer among young adult was low (1.75% (16) age up to 39 years) , this is in contrast to other published studies[14, 15] red-flag symptoms in a younger patients such as persistent changes in bowel habits, bleeding per rectum or abdominal pain should not be lightly dismissed as being unlikely to stem from a serious cause. In our cohort we diagnosed 64.13% (583) colorectal cancer through two -week wait “GP” referral route this is in contrast to study of Logan RF et al. In England almost a 30% of bowel cancer cases are diagnosed through the ‘two-week wait’ referral route, [1] More than 44%) of these cases diagnosed early (stage I or II [3] Around 24% of bowel cancer are diagnosed after presenting as an emergency in England, [1] Whereas in our study 10.89% (99) were diagnosed as a colorectal cancer after presenting as an emergency. Around 20% of patients presenting with Colorectal Cancer have metastatic disease at time of diagnosis.2 A further 20%–25% will develop metastatic disease during follow-up after initial curative intent treatment of their primary tumour. In our study 0.88% (8) patients presented as a metastatic colorectal cancer of unknown primary site this is in contrast to other published studies. Around (68%) with known stage are diagnosed late (stages III or IV). [3] Around 66% presented as an emergency are via Accident and Emergency (A&E), with the other cases coming via an urgent GP referral, inpatient referral or outpatient referral [4]. In our study 24.97% (227) were referred as inpatients after diagnosis of bowel cancer. A 10% of bowel cancer cases in England are diagnosed by screening. Bowel cancer screening reduces risk of dying from bowel cancer by at least 25%, survival rates are greatly improved if an individual is diagnosed early [16]. The cancer detection rate in UK rapid investigation clinics is 6 – 11%; however, these clinics identify only around a third of colorectal cancers [17]. Surgery is the mainstay curative treatment for patients with non-metastasized colorectal cancer. However, outcome is strongly related to the quality of surgery [18, 19] the quality of preoperative staging and treatment selection. There have been major developments in surgical resection of both primary and metastatic diseases, with advanced techniques permitting radical resection [20]. Special attention should be given to the circumferential surgical resection margins [21] however; fundamental questions remain unanswered such as whether primary tumor resection in the presence of synchronous inoperable metastatic disease affects the natural history of the disease. The proportion of colorectal cancer patients having surgery is strongly influenced by stage at diagnosis, other factors are also important, such as the patient’s fitness to tolerate the treatment, the patient’s age, and their own treatment preference. The resected tumour specimen can be used to judge the quality of surgery; if the margin around the specimen is free of cancer cells in both colon and rectal cancer, the surgery is considered high quality [22, 23]. The removal and assessment of the lymph nodes is another guide for determining whether the mesocolic or mesorectal resection is adequate [24]. Colorectal surgery is aimed at minimizing trauma and preserving organ function. One of the strengths of our study is that the sample size is not small. The limitations of this study were retrospective and single-institution design, some missing notes/data although detailed charts were available for most patients, large number of patients were excluded due to presentation of cancer at other segments of the bowel and Colorectal cancer of unknown primary. Most patients with colorectal cancers are diagnosed after the onset of cancer-related symptoms [25] and it is imperative that frontline providers recognize early diagnostic clues to colorectal cancer, Studies have shown that rectal bleeding as an initial presentation of colon cancer and are associated with an early stage of the disease and better survival [26, 27]. This study estimate the risk of colorectal cancer across different ages, gender, source of referral, and tumours located in different areas of the colon and rectum.
It is imperative to recognize early diagnostic clues to colorectal cancer, increasing awareness of the symptoms and signs be beneficial and helpful. Establish integrated care pathways, centralization of complex procedures and comparison of international cancer outcomes.
Dear Editorial Team, Clinical Medical Reviews and Reports. My experience with the journal was highly positive. The peer-review process was rigorous, constructive, and completed in a timely manner. The reviewers provided valuable comments that helped improve the quality and clarity of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout all stages of the publication process. Communication was clear and efficient, and any questions were addressed promptly. Overall, I found the journal to maintain high scientific standards and an excellent publication workflow. I would be pleased to consider submitting future work to this journal. Best wishes from, Elena Popa.
It was my pleasure to submit my testimonial concerning the Reviewer Board of our Scientific Journal “Brain and Neurological Disorders”. The Reviewers focused on some modifications and their contribution was helpful. The ladies of our Editorial Office were also supported my efforts. It was my honor to have such a co-operation and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Thank you for the speedy and efficient peer review process. I appreciate the fact that your peer reviewers do not take months to respond like with some other journals. I would also like to thank the editorial office for responding quickly to my questions. It is an excellent journal. I plan to submit more manuscripts in the future. Best wishes from, Robert W. McGee
Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Working with you and your team on our recent publication in JCRR has been a truly wonderful and enjoyable experience. The responses were prompt, and the reviewers were patient, constructive, and highly professional. One reviewer in particular gave me the feeling that a professor was carefully reading and commenting on my coursework, which was deeply touching. The entire process was straightforward and hassle‑free, with no tedious online forms to complete. I highly recommend this journal. Best wishes from, DR Aibing Rao, Head of R&D
I Appreciate the Opportunity to Share my Experience with the Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. The peer review process was timely and constructive, and the feedback provided helped improve the quality of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout the process, ensuring smooth communication and efficient handling of the submission. Overall, it was a positive experience collaborating with your team.
Dear Mercy Grace, Editorial Coordinator of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, We would like to express our gratitude for your help at all stages of publishing and editing the article. The editors of the magazine answer all the necessary questions and help at every stage. We will definitely continue to cooperate and publish other works in the Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences! Best wishes from, Alla Konstantinovna Politova,