Mini Review | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2693-4779/243
Voltammetry – NIRS Lab., Medicine Center, Verona, Italy.
*Corresponding Author: Francesco Crespi, Voltammetry – NIRS Lab., Medicine Center, Verona, Italy.
Citation: Francesco Crespi, (2024), Can Near Infrared Spectroscopy (NIRS) link Pharmacological Effects and their Reversal to cerebral Metabolism? A Research Proposal, Clinical Research and Clinical Trials, 11(3) ; DOI :10.31579/2693-4779/243
Copyright: © 2024, Francesco Crespi. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 29 October 2024 | Accepted: 15 November 2024 | Published: 29 November 2024
Keywords: spectroscopy; dopamine; cerebral metabolism
NIRS is indeed a non-ionizing technique that can be used to monitor oxygen saturation in the living tissue as well as changes in oxygenation of hemoglobin (Jobsis 77; Crespi et al. 2006, Obrigh 2014).
In particular, the absorption spectra of near-infrared light differ for the oxygenation–deoxygenation states of hemoglobin (oxygenated form HbO2 vs. deoxygenated form Hb, respectively) so that the two compounds can be directly monitored
Near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) is a non-invasive methodology (Jobsis F. 1977; Crespi F.2007) that has been shown able to to overcome the major limitation of invasive in vivo techniques to study brain activities in rodents as well as in man (Crespi et al. 2018A, Crespi 2021 A, B).
NIRS is indeed a non-ionizing technique that can be used to monitor oxygen saturation in the living tissue as well as changes in oxygenation of hemoglobin (Jobsis 77; Crespi et al. 2006, Obrigh 2014).
In particular, the absorption spectra of near-infrared light differ for the oxygenation–deoxygenation states of hemoglobin (oxygenated form HbO2 vs. deoxygenated form Hb, respectively) so that the two compounds can be directly monitored. Accordingly, the total haemoglobin concentration (HbO2 + Hb) can be considered as total blood volume (THC) (Chia-Wei Sun & Ching-Cheng Chuang (2012).
All together these measurements are indicative of the state of vascular activity and the state of the metabolism in the tissue analyzed. NIRS has been also recently indicated as valuable tool to monitor influence(s) of acute drug treatment(s) on metabolic activity of the brain (Crespi et al. 2018A, B).
In particular, the “pharmacological NIRS” (ph-NIRS) concept has been initially proposed as result of experiments where rodents were treated with drugs of abuse (Crespi F. et al. 2006). Then the phNIRS concept was sustained within specific treatments with cocaine when parallel NIRS and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) experiments were performed (Crespi F. et al. 2018B). The “ph-NIRS” concept has been successively supported in traslational studies when this methodology was applied to compare the effect of alcohol as well as nicotine smoke upon brain metabolism in rodents versus man (Crespi F et al. 2018A; Crespi. F. 2021A, B).
In order to further validate the “pharmacological NIRS” concept experiments could be performed to analyse the effect of various treatments involving different specific influences upon brain activities.
In particular, the specific analysis of pharmacological effect(s) upon NIRS parameters of selective neurotrasmitter receptor agonist(s) as well as the selective receptor antagonist(s), respectively can be proposed.
For istance, neurotrasmitter systems such as dopamine and serotonin systems would be tackled with receptor agonist and - or receptor antagonist., i.e.
a) Concerning the dopamine (DA) system: cocaine as DA receptor agonist and the selected D3 dopamine receptor antagonist SB-277011-A can be selected, while
b) Concerning the serotonin (5-HT) system: 8-OH-DPAT a 5-HT receptor agonist and 5-HT receptor antagonists (i.e., the 5-HT1A antagonist Way 100635) can be used.
Specifically, these two neurotransmitter systems and therefore the chemicals proposed for the proposed study are selected based upon their well-known influence - effect upon the vascular system (McBean et al. 1991; Kaufman et al. 1998; Tiniakov et a. 2012; Rapoport et al. 2016).
Briefly:
a) Concerning the dopamine (DA) system:
Experiments will be performed in anaesthetized rats treated i.e., with cocaine alone or preceded by treatment with the selective D3 receptor antagonist SB-277011-A as described earlier (Congestri et al. 2008).
These experiments will be useful to reveal the possibility of using NIRS to detect i.e., the putative efficacy of the D3 receptor antagonist on modifying the effect of cocaine upon brain metabolism.
In addition, confirmation of specificity of NIRS evaluations could be performed comparing the efficacy of a selective versus non selective D3 receptor antagonists (for a review Smith et al. 2012) on the effect of cocaine upon brain metabolism.
b) Concerning the 5-HT system:
The vasoconstriction effect of 5-HT receptor agonists such as 8-OH-DPAT (Garrat et al. 1989, Odland et al. 2021) could be monitored using NIRS as above. In particular, the treatment with this 5-HT 1A agonist should result in a significant decrease of total volume (HbT) monitored in the brain of anaesthetized rats. Then, the complete or partial blockade of such effect(s) with selective antagonist (i.e. Way 100635, Rabiner et al. 2002) could be supportive of the phNIRS concept.
c) A further kind of experiment will be analysing the influence of inflammatory process upon NIRS parameters i.e., via experiments studying the effect(s) of interleukin-1 and the respective antagonist (IL-Ira):
Experimental evidence indicates that interleukin-1 (cytokine IL-1) is a pivotal mediator of inflammation playing a major role in neuroinflammation (Basu et al. 2004) and in neurodegeneration (Simi et al. 2007). Furthermore, a major role of cytokines in the mechanism of action of HbO2 is proposed (Al-Waili & Butler 2006; Vinkel et al. 2023).
The respective endogenous specific receptor antagonist (IL-IRa) (Dinarello 1998) is produced in numerous experimental animal models of disease as well as in human autoimmune and chronic inflammatory diseases (Arend et al. 1998) in which it has been shown to selectively inhibits the effects of IL1 (Schiff 2000) with possibly beneficial effect(s) upon human diseases (Hallegua & Weisman 2002).
The NIRS analysis of the effect(s) of interleukin-1 as well as of IL-Ira or that a further compound such as anakinra, a recombinant human IL1 receptor antagonist (for a review Hallegua & Weisman 2002) will add knowledge on their putative influence upon brain HbO2.
Altogether these experiments will be of help on confirming the “pharmacological NIRS” concept as proposed in previous work. Therefore, this will improve the quality of NIRS analysis as qualitative and possibly also quantitative in vivo non-invasive tool for studying brain metabolism in preclinical and possibly parallel traslational clinical work.
Dear Editorial Team, Clinical Medical Reviews and Reports. My experience with the journal was highly positive. The peer-review process was rigorous, constructive, and completed in a timely manner. The reviewers provided valuable comments that helped improve the quality and clarity of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout all stages of the publication process. Communication was clear and efficient, and any questions were addressed promptly. Overall, I found the journal to maintain high scientific standards and an excellent publication workflow. I would be pleased to consider submitting future work to this journal. Best wishes from, Elena Popa.
It was my pleasure to submit my testimonial concerning the Reviewer Board of our Scientific Journal “Brain and Neurological Disorders”. The Reviewers focused on some modifications and their contribution was helpful. The ladies of our Editorial Office were also supported my efforts. It was my honor to have such a co-operation and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Thank you for the speedy and efficient peer review process. I appreciate the fact that your peer reviewers do not take months to respond like with some other journals. I would also like to thank the editorial office for responding quickly to my questions. It is an excellent journal. I plan to submit more manuscripts in the future. Best wishes from, Robert W. McGee
Dear Grace Pierce, Editorial Coordinator of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports, Working with you and your team on our recent publication in JCRR has been a truly wonderful and enjoyable experience. The responses were prompt, and the reviewers were patient, constructive, and highly professional. One reviewer in particular gave me the feeling that a professor was carefully reading and commenting on my coursework, which was deeply touching. The entire process was straightforward and hassle‑free, with no tedious online forms to complete. I highly recommend this journal. Best wishes from, DR Aibing Rao, Head of R&D
I Appreciate the Opportunity to Share my Experience with the Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. The peer review process was timely and constructive, and the feedback provided helped improve the quality of our manuscript. The editorial office was professional, responsive, and supportive throughout the process, ensuring smooth communication and efficient handling of the submission. Overall, it was a positive experience collaborating with your team.
Dear Mercy Grace, Editorial Coordinator of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, We would like to express our gratitude for your help at all stages of publishing and editing the article. The editors of the magazine answer all the necessary questions and help at every stage. We will definitely continue to cooperate and publish other works in the Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences! Best wishes from, Alla Konstantinovna Politova,