AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Short Communication | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2834-5142/069
1 Le Bonheur Children’s Hospital, The University of Tennessee Health Science Centre, Memphis.
2 The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth Houston).
3 Jeevandeep Diagnostics, Jamshedpur, India.
*Corresponding Author: Som Biswas, Le Bonheur Children’s Hospital, The University of Tennessee Health Science Centre, Memphis
Citation: Som Biswas, Salman Khan, Sandeep S. Awal, (2023), Can ChatGPT Write Radiology Reports?, International Journal of Clinical Nephrology. 5(5); DOI:10.31579/2834-5142/069
Copyright: © 2023, Som Biswas. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 23 October 2023 | Accepted: 06 November 2023 | Published: 24 November 2023
Keywords: chat gpt; magnetic resonance imaging
This example provides proof that radiology report drafting can be assisted by ChatGPT, thus facilitating timely reports. With ever-increasing requisitions for imaging studies, especially after the Covid-19 pandemic and with a global shortage of radiologists there has been a tremendous increase in the workload of currently practicing radiologists. ChatGPT could potentially help by assisting in radiological report writing for imaging studies. Once a diagnosis is entered, ChatGPT can generate a report
This example provides proof that radiology report drafting can be assisted by ChatGPT, thus facilitating timely reports.
With ever-increasing requisitions for imaging studies, especially after the Covid-19 pandemic and with a global shortage of radiologists [1], [2], there has been a tremendous increase in the workload of currently practicing radiologists. ChatGPT could potentially help by assisting in radiological report writing for imaging studies. Once a diagnosis is entered, ChatGPT can generate a report [3][4] for the radiologist to verify and edit before signing off, potentially reducing report writing time and effort. This capability is tested in this article.
What constitutes a good radiology report?
The American College of Radiology guidelines specify how the radiology report should be generated [5]. The following are some of the key characteristics of a good radiology report:
1.Clarity: The report should be written in language that is easily understandable by both medical professionals and patients. The findings should be presented concisely, with relevant imaging findings described.
2.Accuracy: The report should be based on correct interpretations of those imaging findings. The radiologist should take care to ensure that the report is free of errors.
3.Comprehensive: The report should include all relevant information about the patient's clinical history, imaging findings, diagnosis, and recommendations for follow-up care. This helps to ensure that the referring clinician has all the information they need to make informed decisions.
4.Relevant: The report should include only information that is relevant to the patient's care. Irrelevant or redundant information should be excluded, as it can make the report difficult to understand and may lead to confusion.
5.Timeliness: The report should be delivered to the referring clinician promptly, as the results of the imaging examination are often needed to inform the patient's care.
In summary, a good radiology report is a document that helps to ensure that patients receive the best possible care.
What is ChatGPT?
GPT stands for "Generative Pre-trained Transformer", which refers to a type of language model developed by OpenAI. ChatGPT is a specific implementation of the GPT model that is designed for conversational AI applications, such as chatbots. ChatGPT was trained using a massive amount of data, which was collected from various sources such as books, articles, websites, and social media. The training data was preprocessed and tokenized into sequences of words, and then the GPT-3.5 model was trained on this tokenized data using unsupervised learning techniques.
Compared to other large language models (LLMs) like BERT or ELECTRA, ChatGPT is one of the largest in size, with up to 1.6 billion parameters in its latest version. This means that it has a much greater capacity to learn patterns and relationships in language than smaller models. Currently, ChatGPT is not specifically trained for medical use, however, it can be trained on medical data to make it useful for medical report writing. Med-BERT is an LLM being trained/developed specifically for medical use.
We demonstrate below ChatGPT’s capability to generate customized radiology reports based on a few keywords.
Hypothetical case 1: A 62-year-old patient with colon cancer comes with recurrent headaches. MRI Brain is performed. The human radiologist finds a lesion in the right parietal lobe measuring 4x5x3 cm in size that looks like metastasis. Instead of typing or dictating the entire report, just the keywords are entered in ChatGPT “create MRI report of 4x5x3 cm right parietal lobe metastasis”.
Chat GPT then prints the entire report in seconds as below:
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Report
Exam Date: [Insert Date] Patient Name: [Insert Patient Name] Patient ID: [Insert Patient ID]
Clinical Indication: Evaluation of a right parietal lobe mass.
Imaging Findings:
A contrast-enhanced MRI of the brain was performed and evaluated. The images demonstrate a well-defined, hyperintense, and contrast-enhancing lesion in the right parietal lobe measuring approximately 4 cm x 5 cm x 3 cm. The lesion demonstrates central hypointensity on T2-weighted imaging, consistent with neoplastic tissue. The lesion is surrounded by a peripheral rim of contrast enhancement, demonstrating the presence of a blood-brain barrier breach. The lesion is associated with moderate mass effect, with effacement of the adjacent sulci and moderate displacement of the adjacent lateral ventricle. There is minimal surrounding edema. No other intracranial abnormality is identified.
Diagnosis:
Right parietal lobe metastasis is demonstrated.
Comparison: [Insert comparison with previous studies, if applicable].
Impression: The imaging findings are consistent with a right parietal lobe metastasis. The presence of contrast enhancement and moderate mass effect suggest a neoplastic origin, although biopsy is recommended to establish a definitive diagnosis and determine the primary origin of the lesion. The patient's clinical presentation and history should be taken into account when interpreting the imaging findings.
This report is intended to be used in conjunction with the referring clinician's findings and is not a replacement for a complete medical evaluation.
Radiologist: [Insert Radiologist Name and Signature]
The human-generated report written by an independent radiologist (who has not seen the ChatGPT report) for this case is given below:
Radiology Report
Exam: Mri of The Brain
technique:
A Multiplanar multi-echo MRI of the brain was performed without and with IV contrast.
Findings:
A well-defined lesion with perilesional edema is seen in the right parietal region. It measures 4x5x3 cm in size. It shows restricted diffusion on DW images. No blooming is seen on SW images. The lesion is hypointense on T1W and hyperintense on T2W images. The lesion shows heterogeneous enhancement on post-contrast images with a central non-enhancing area of necrosis. Mass effect is seen on adjacent neuroparenchyma with effacement of the adjacent lateral ventricle. A midline shift of 4mm is seen to the left.
The rest of the cerebral cortex and underlying white matter reveal no abnormal signal intensity. Grey-white matter differentiation is normal.
The cerebellum and brainstem are unremarkable. The deep nuclei are normal.
No evidence of acute infarction or bleed is seen.
The rest of the ventricular system, basal cisterns, sulcal spaces, sylvian fissures, and cerebellar folia appear normal for age.
Bilateral mastoid air cells, paranasal sinuses, and orbits appear normal.
Impression: Solitary well-defined lesion with perilesional edema in the right parietal region with a central area of necrosis, mass effect, and midline shift. Findings indicate neoplastic mass. Histopathological correlation is suggested.
On comparison, we notice that although the ChatGPT-generated report is not perfect, it is close enough to a human-written report to serve as a provisional draft. Some errors do occur in the current version of ChatGPT that needs to be corrected by the human radiologist. For instance, the line stating, “The lesion demonstrates central hypointensity on T2-weighted imaging, consistent with neoplastic tissue” and the line stating that the "lesion is surrounded by a peripheral rim of contrast enhancement, demonstrating the presence of a blood-brain barrier breach.” needs to be edited, as this is hallucination by ChatGPT and no such information is provided in the input. Also, the description of the lesion by ChatGPT is less detailed regarding the findings on each MR sequence, compared to the human radiologist’s report. The presence or absence of midline shift is not mentioned in the chatGPT report, and neither are the rest of the normal structures, like the cerebellum and brainstem.
On using ChatGPT for reporting a more complex case of peritoneal carcinomatosis on CT as shown below, we see that the hallucinations and inaccuracies increase.
Hypothetical Case 2: “52-year-old with peritoneal carcinomatosis with small bowel obstruction with multiple liver metastases and bilateral hydroureteronephrosis from pelvis metastatic disease”.
MRI Report: Peritoneal Carcinomatosis with Small Bowel Obstruction, Multiple Liver Metastases, and Bilateral Hydroureteronephrosis from Pelvic Metastatic Disease
Clinical History: The patient is a 52-year-old male with a history of peritoneal carcinomatosis and multiple liver metastases, who presented with small bowel obstruction and bilateral hydroureteronephrosis from pelvic metastatic disease.
MRI Findings: The MRI examination was performed with T1 and T2 weighted sequences in axial and coronal planes, as well as gadolinium-enhanced images.
The liver demonstrates multiple round and irregularly shaped lesions, ranging in size from 1 cm to 5 cm, consistent with metastatic disease. The largest lesion is located in segment VII of the liver.
The peritoneal cavity shows diffuse thickening and nodularity of the peritoneal surface with the presence of multiple soft tissue masses. The peritoneal nodules appear to have invaded the small bowel mesentery, leading to small bowel obstruction.
In the pelvis, there are multiple soft tissue masses, involving the bladder, rectum, and bilateral pelvic sidewalls. The bladder wall appears thickened with invasion by the pelvic masses. There is also evidence of bilateral hydroureteronephrosis, likely due to the obstruction of the ureters by the pelvic masses.
No evidence of ascites is seen.
The visualized portions of the thorax are within normal limits.
Impression:
1.Diffuse peritoneal carcinomatosis with involvement of the small bowel mesentery, leading to small bowel obstruction.
2.Multiple liver metastases.
3.Bilateral hydroureteronephrosis is likely due to pelvic metastatic disease.
4.Pelvic masses involving the bladder, rectum, and bilateral pelvic sidewalls.
As an example of inaccuracy, the statement “The peritoneal nodules appear to have invaded the small bowel mesentery, leading to small bowel obstruction” does not make sense.
Multiple iterations do improve the report as ChatGPT learns from prior inputs and is becoming better every day. ChatGPT also gives a slightly different output each time on entering the same input, providing non-template-like generic reports and giving the impression of a customized report for each patient. ChatGPT’s performance varies depending on the selection of keywords, with more keywords producing a more accurate and more customized report. However, the final responsibility to edit, verify, and then dispatch the report still lies with the human radiologists.
Studies are being conducted on the utility of chatGPT in radiology. In one study by Jeblick et al, radiology reports simplified by ChatGPT were assessed by 15 radiologists, who found 51% of the simplified reports had incorrect statements and 36% had potentially harmful conclusions [6]. However, they do conclude that the rest of the positive votes received from human radiologists illustrates the great potential of LLMs to simplify medical text
Disadvantages of writing radiology reports using a language model like ChatGPT.
Creating radiology reports with ChatGPT also presents possible pitfalls.
These include:
1.Bias: ChatGPT may exhibit bias in its responses, possibly related to race, gender, or religion. This could result in ChatGPT providing responses that are discriminatory or offensive. To address this issue, OpenAI has implemented measures such as bias evaluation and mitigation techniques in the development of ChatGPT.
2.Hallucination (Fabrication): ChatGPT can generate text that is convincing but false. This can occur when the model is asked to generate text that is beyond the scope of its training data or when it is given ambiguous or vague prompts. This could be problematic if the model is used to spread fake news or propaganda. OpenAI has implemented measures such as content filtering and fact-checking to address this issue.
3.Lack of clinical context: ChatGPT does not currently have access to the patient's complete medical history, examination findings, and previous imaging studies, which are critical in interpreting the radiology images and generating a complete and accurate report. This can be rectified by creating a medical version of ChatGPT that would have access to patient data and be compliant with HIPAA guidelines. Recently Doximity, a social networking platform designed specifically for healthcare professionals, has come out with DocsGPT.com. This is a beta version of the ChatGPT tool to streamline administrative paperwork.
4.Inaccurate reports: AI language models like ChatGPT are trained on vast amounts of data, but they are still limited in their ability to understand the complexities of medical imaging and the nuances of human physiology. This can lead to inaccuracies or inconsistencies in the reports generated by ChatGPT.
5.Legal status and liability: Radiology reports are an important part of a patient's medical record and can have legal implications. The use of AI-generated reports may raise questions about their admissibility in legal proceedings. This can be solved by keeping the mandatory requirement of human editing and verification of every report before dispatch. Concerning liability, ChatGPT could be used to provide advice or guidance that leads to harm. It is important to provide appropriate disclaimers and disclosures to users. Some legal precedents about automated text outputs raise concerns about bias and privacy [7].
6.Privacy: ChatGPT may be used to collect personal information from users, such as their names or location. Depending on the jurisdiction in which the model is being used, there may be specific legal requirements for obtaining user consent, handling personal information, and protecting user privacy.
7.Need for human review: Despite their potential benefits, AI-generated reports still need to be reviewed by a qualified radiologist to ensure accuracy and completeness.
8.Lack of a personal touch: Radiology reports written by a language model can result in a report that is more impersonal and less engaging for the referring clinician and the patient than that authored by a human radiologist.
What does ChatGPT say when asked “Can ChatGPT write radiology reports?”
“Yes, I can write radiology reports. However, it's important to note that I am a machine learning model trained on text data and may not have the same level of expertise and knowledge as a licensed radiologist. To ensure accurate and reliable radiology reports, it's recommended to consult a licensed radiologist or use specialized software designed specifically for this purpose. That being said, if you provide me with the relevant imaging and any additional clinical information, I can generate a radiology report based on that information.”
Declaration of Generative AI and AI-assisted technologies in the writing process’.
Statement: During the preparation of this work the author(s) used ChatGPT (powered by OpenAI's language model, GPT-3.5; http://openai.com) in order to generate radiology reports to demonstrate ChatGPT’s abilities. After using this tool/service, the author(s) reviewed and edited the content as needed and take(s) full responsibility for the content of the publication.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.
