AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Case Report | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2690-4861/197
1 Senior Physiotherapist, the Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom.
2 Speech and Language Therapist, the Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom.
3 Clinical Specialist Physiotherapist, Critical Care Outreach Team, the Royal London Hospital.
*Corresponding Author: Amanda Thomas, FCSP, Clinical Specialist Physiotherapist, Critical Care Outreach Team, the Royal London Hospital.
Citation: Hussain Z, Adshead B and Thomas A.J. (2022) Barriers to Tracheostomy Weaning: A Case Report of Sialorrhea in a Patient with Persistent Seizure Activity and Head Injury. International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. 10(4); DOI: 10.31579/2690-4861/197
Copyright: © 2022 Thomas Amanda J, This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attributiosn License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 13 December 2021 | Accepted: 19 January 2022 | Published: 27 January 2022
Keywords: tracheostomy weaning; sialorrhea, hypersalivation; seizures; dysphagia; anti-epileptic drugs
We describe a single case following the acute hospital journey of a 54 year old admitted due to seizure activity and associated traumatic brain injury. The patient was cared for in a specialist neurosurgical centre. The hospital stay was complicated by difficulty managing seizure activity. The patient had several failed extubations due to high oral secretion burden, resulting in a percutaneous tracheostomy. Prolonged tracheostomy weaning ensued due to the impact of seizure activity, pharmacological interventions to manage both seizure activity and secretion management (including the use of Botulinum Toxin to the salivary glands), and dysphagia. Successful decannulation of tracheostomy was achieved 141 days after insertion and was associated with a reduction in anti-epileptic drug administration.
Glossary, Acronyms and Medical Abbreviations
Computed Tomography (CT), One Way Valve (OWV), Anti-epileptic drugs (AED’s), Nil By Mouth ( NBM), Electroencephalogram (EEG), Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), Fibreoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES), Pro re nata (PRN), Once a day (OD), Twice a day ( BD), Three times a day (TDS), Four times a day (QDS), Arterio Venous Malformation (AVM), Sub Dural Haemorrhage (SDH), Fibreoptic Nasendoscopy (FNE), no abnormality detected (NAD), Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), Central Nervous System (CNS), One Way Valve (OWV), Activities of Daily Living (ADL), Multi-Disciplinary Team (MDT), Hospital Acquired Pneumonia (HAP), Percutaneous Gastroscopy (PEG), Nasogastric Tube (NGT).
Introduction
Sialorrhea is defined as excessive saliva or hyper-salivation commonly associated with drooling. Some neurological conditions can cause autonomic changes leading to primary sialorrhea [1], and impairments in swallow which may affect oral secretion clearance [2]. Studies have also demonstrated hyper-salivation in patients who are post ictal [3, 4]. The post-ictal presentation can also be associated with symptoms such as impaired consciousness, sensory and motor responses, hypersalivation and cognitive impairment [5].These symptoms have been shown to last from 3 seconds to 12.3 days [5]. There is a deficit of literature on the impact of excessive saliva production (or clearance) secondary to seizure activity on the tracheostomy weaning process.
Effective management of saliva permitting the removal of a tracheostomy can reduce the secondary complications of Tracheostomy insertion. Decannulation of tracheostomy restores physiological processes such as speech and swallow and may reduce the risk of aspiration, promote activities of daily living, progress physical rehabilitation, improve overall quality of life, facilitate hospital flow and reduce nursing/carer burden [6]. While management of sialorrhea with pharmaceutical agents such as anticholinergic drugs are often the first line approach, these have been associated with undesirable systemic effects due to inability to act specifically on salivary gland receptors (7). They have also been shown to affect the central nervous system, causing increased confusion, drowsiness and disorientation, which may be undesirable in the neurologically affected population [7]. Evidence demonstrates the efficacy of Botulinum Toxin for the management of excessive oral secretions with fewer systemic effects due to the direct effect on the salivary glands and longer duration of action [1, 2, 8].
We present a single case of tracheostomy weaning which was excessively prolonged by the impact of seizure activity, pharmacological intervention to manage seizures, excessive oral secretion and dysphagia.
54 year old admitted following witnessed tonic-clonic seizure and a fall. CT demonstrated right tentorial SDH with subarachnoid extension to the quadrigeminal cistern and posterior quadrant. Cerebral angiogram was NAD. The SDH was conservatively managed. Past medical history included alcohol excess and outpatient investigation for six month history of left sided odynophagia, voice change and weight loss. Pre-admission FNE and MRI were largely normal. Seizures persisted during the first 3 days of admission despite medical management with Levetiracetam (2g BD), Lacosamide (250mg BD), Lorazepam (1mg QD) and PRN Midazolam. On the 3rd day the patient was transferred to critical care with on-going seizure activity and reduced GCS, requiring propofol and fentanyl sedation and intubation. Sodium Valproate was added to the AED’s and ceftriaxone and acyclovir prescribed to cover possible CNS infection.
Ventilation requirements were minimal and a first trial of extubation occurred 4 days after critical care admission. This attempt failed due to high oral secretion load and on-going reduced GCS affecting airway protection. Two subsequent failed extubations in the following 5 days were due to an inability to manage oral secretions despite a trial of Hyoscine Hydrobromide. 11 days after critical care admission, a percutaneous tracheostomy with subglottic port was inserted. This step enabled liberation from mechanical ventilation and critical care discharge 5 days later.
Following critical care discharge, Hyoscine Hydrobromide was ceased in favour of Propantheline Bromide to help manage on-going high subglottic aspirates, oral and pulmonary secretions. Multiple AED’s were prescribed to control seizure activity (Levetiracetam 2g BD, Lacosamide 250mg BD, Sodium Valporate 1g BD, Clonidine 25mg QDS, Lorazepam PRN). Tracheostomy weaning commenced 6 days after insertion and progressed to 24 hours cuff deflation and OWV tolerance on the 17th day after insertion. At this time the patient exhibited a GCS of 14, was mobile with therapist assistance, participating in ADL and had been started on thin fluids. High oral and chest secretion persisted despite demonstrating effective swallow and strong cough.
Unexpectedly, the patient then experienced multiple seizures and a reduced GCS. EEG findings were consistent with status epilepticus requiring increased dosages of Sodium Valproate and Lacusomide, and the introduction of Clobazam and Tropitramate when seizures were refractory. Tracheostomy weaning was suspended and an increased oral secretion burden required an increased dose of Propantheline Bromide. Over the next 3 weeks focal seizure activity reduced on serial EEG’s but high oral secretion load persisted. Coupled with an ineffective swallow and drowsiness the patient was intolerant of short periods of cuff deflation and tracheostomy weaning was limited. At this stage, measured subglottic aspirates were in excess of 170mls over a 24hour period (see Figure 1).
46 days after tracheostomy insertion the MDT requested Botulinum Toxin to the bilateral submandibular glands, to reduce oral secretion and facilitate Tracheostomy weaning. Propantheline Bromide persisted (30mg TDS) but there was no significant change to oral secretion volume and after a further 14 days Hyociene Hydrobromide was recommenced (1.5mg patch). Tracheostomy weaning continued to be significantly limited by oral secretion load and prolonged coughing with cuff deflation. AED’s were gradually weaned at this time including Topitramate, Clobazam, and Levetiracetam. There was no further seizure activity reported and the patient was able to follow single stage commands, with minimal verbal output.
60 days after tracheostomy insertion, FEES revealed severe motor and sensory dysphagia and a score of 7 on the New Zealand Secretion Scale (see first assessment Table 1). There was frank aspiration of thin fluids, puree diet and secretions. There was no cough response to aspiration, voluntary cough was ineffective. There was moderate-severe arytenoid oedema bilaterally with the right appearing slightly worse and an abnormality noted on the right vocal fold, thought to be due to repeated intubation oedema.
67 days post tracheostomy insertion, the patient had a second injection of Botulinum Toxin, on this occasion both submandibular and parotid glands were injected bilaterally. 21 days following these injections there was a dramatic decrease in measured subglottic aspirates (to 7.5ml over 24 hours, see Figure 1) but the patient remained highly productive of pulmonary secretions and tracheostomy weaning remained limited. AED’s continued to be adjusted with increased doses of Levetiracetam and Clobazam.
88 days post tracheostomy insertion, cuff deflation had progressed to 1 hour twice a day. Bedside swallow assessment revealed improved tolerance to thin fluids with no overt signs of aspiration. Videofluoroscopy was unable to be completed due to lack of patient alertness for the procedure, but repeat FEES revealed a reduction in the volume of secretions penetrating the laryngeal vestibule with all consistencies trialled (see second assessment, Table 1).
100 days post tracheostomy insertion, the patient had progressed to 12 hours cuff deflation with OWV tolerance, but respiratory deterioration temporarily suspended weaning progress. Transient motor seizures accompanied this HAP required further adjustments to prescribed AED’s (Levetiracetam, 2g BD, Sodium Valoprate, 1.3g BD, Clobazam, 20mg BD, Lacosamide, 300mg BD).
107 days post tracheostomy insertion the patient showed improvements in alertness and engagement, responding to questions and following single stage commands. Cuff deflation remained at 15 minute tolerance due to prolonged coughing, reduced swallow frequency and anterior loss of secretions (drooling) although measured subglottic aspirates remained minimal over a 24 hour period.
130 days post tracheostomy insertion, the patient had a failed PEG insertion due to iatrogenic bowel perforation and was made NBM, preventing administration of NGT Clobazam. Subsequently a 55 minutes seizure occurred requiring the addition of Phenytoin. Pulmonary secretions remained high, though measured subglottic aspirates had not been significant and all drying agents were stopped. No Tracheostomy weaning occurred during this period.
141 days post insertion tracheostomy weaning was recommenced, and quickly progressed to 12 hours cuff deflation during daylight hours with OWV tolerance. Repeat FEES 148 days post tracheostomy insertion (see third assessment, Table 1) showed significantly improved secretion management, nil aspiration or penetration and the patient was recommended to commence thin fluids and easy chew diet. Seizure activity was well controlled with AED’s weaned to a therapeutic dose: Levetiracetam 2g BD, Sodium valproate 1.3g BD, Lacusomide 300mg BD with continuation of Escitalopram 15 mg OD for mood. Tracheostomy weaning, alertness and engagement continued to progress and 159 days post tracheostomy insertion the tracheostomy was replaced with a mini-tracheostomy to accommodate ongoing pulmonary secretion requirements. The mini-tracheostomy was removed 6 days later.
Challenges with oral secretion management can be a barrier to tracheostomy weaning and decannulation. In our case, tracheostomy weaning was limited by high volumes of oral and chest secretion evidenced by frequent coughing of secretions from the tracheostomy and frequent tracheal suctioning requirements. Conservative management of sialorrhea usually includes MDT input for erect posture maintenance, mobilisation, swallow rehabilitation and biofeedback [6]. In our case, use of these approaches was limited by the patient’s reduced GCS, therefore pharmaceutical agents were considered. There is limited evidence for the use of drying agents during the acute management of patients with acquired brain injury. The use of these medications is derived from research describing their use in other populations such as Cerebral Palsy, Parkinson’s disease, Motor Neurone Disease and Palliative Care.
The accepted pharmaceutical management of Sialorrhea are anticholinergic drugs due to their ability to bind to muscarinic receptors. Anticholinergic drugs are also favoured due to ease of availability and administration. However, anticholinergic drugs may cause undesirable systemic parasympathetic effects, such as; cardiac arrhythmias, constipation, headaches, blurred vision, urinary retention and drowsiness (Table 2) [7]. Some anticholinergic drugs such as glycopyrronium and propantheline show a reduced affinity to cross the blood brain barrier and are often the agent of choice in the neurological cohort [9]. In cases where use of anticholinergic drugs have been shown to be ineffective or unsuitable due to side effects, the administration of Botulinum toxin should be considered [1,6].
Botulinum Toxin is a neurotoxic protein produced by the bacterium clostridium botulinum. It has been used since the 1970’s for the therapeutic management of conditions such as dystonia, spasticity, strabismus and eye spasms. It has shown to have good efficacy on hyper-salivation when administered directly to the salivary glands [2, 6]. Botulinum prevents the release of the neurotransmitter acetylcholine at the neuromuscular junction causing irreversible functional denervation which may last until the growth of new synapses [8]. Saliva production is mediated by parasympathetic nervous system control of three major paired salivary glands, two parotid, two submandibular and two sublingual. Research suggests the highest efficacy of secretion reduction is targeted Botulinum to the parotid and submandibular glands bilaterally [1] with the parotid glands receiving a higher dosage [18]. Botulinum can last an average of 3-6 months when administered under ultrasound guidance [19, 20]. There is evidence in some populations that drooling scores do not return to baseline for 12 months following Botulinum injection [20].
Our case demonstrated significant improvement in saliva production as evidenced by the reduction in daily subglottic aspirate volume 3 weeks after the second round of Botulinum was administered (see Figure 1). The second administration targeted both parotid and submandibular glands in comparison to the first round, when only the submandibular glands were injected. Evidence suggests the maximum response to Botulinum is achieved 2-4 weeks after administration [20, 21]. Reduced saliva production in our case was correlated with progression of the tracheostomy wean but final progression toward decannulation readiness continued to be limited by the patients reduced cognitive function, engagement and reliance on high doses of AED’s for the management of seizures. AEDs have been known to affect salivary gland function and can cause both sialorrhea and salivary gland hypofunction [22].
Typically, patients compensate for increased secretions through an increased frequency of swallow. In our case dysphagia impacted the ability to do this effectively. There were multiple factors which may have contributed to dysphagia, including; presence of an acquired brain injury, reduced GCS related to seizure activity, poly-pharmacy for seizure management, decompensation from a period of prolonged intubation and a prolonged period of NBM. Medications that depress the central nervous system such as AEDs (Sodium Valproate and Lorazepam) and Benzodiazepines can negatively impact swallow causing reduced awareness, reduced voluntary muscle control and difficulty initiating a swallow [23]. Dysphagia has been a noted side effect in 20% of patients on either single or multiple AEDs [24]. Dysphagia can manifest itself in terms of movement disorders, myopathy and salivary changes [25]. In addition to causing increased drowsiness, benzodiazepines may induce or exacerbate pharyngeal dysphagia by suppressing brainstem swallowing regulation [25]. In the case presented here, improved swallow function appeared in conjunction with therapeutic weaning of AED’s. While it is difficult to attribute a single cause for successful tracheostomy weaning in the case presented, improved seizure status, reduction of secretion volume (with Botulinum toxin) and improved swallow following the reduction in AED’s combined to allow the Tracheostomy to be removed.
Tracheostomy presence has been associated with significant impacts on quality of life [2, 26] and patient flow through a rehabilitation pathway. The MDT management of tracheostomy therefore focuses on the goal of successful decannulation. There are a number of criteria that must be fulfilled prior to considering decannulation, including prolonged tolerance to cuff deflation, and management of oral secretion load through functional swallow. In the case presented, secretion management and coughing associated with salivary aspiration significantly impacted the ability to progress the tracheostomy wean. Both oral secretion volume and dysphagia appear to have been negatively impacted by the use of multiple AED’s to manage seizure activity. These drugs also impacted on the patients level of alertness and ability to engage consistently in rehabilitation sessions (sitting out of bed and mobilisation). In the case presented, pharmacological management of excessive oral secretion using Botulinum toxin and improved dysphagia coincident with the reduction of AED’s appeared to remove the barriers preventing decannulation.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
