AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Research Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2692-9759/146
Cardiology Department, Mohammed VI University Hospital of Marrakech, Morocco.
*Corresponding Author: Choukri Moulay Achrafa, Cardiology Department, Mohammed VI University Hospital of Marrakech, Morocco.
Citation: Ztati Mohameda, Choukri Moulay Achrafa, Ait Yahya Abdelkarima, Joumana El Masriouia, El Jamili Mohamed et al., (2024), Balloon valvuloplasty for pulmonary stenosis: Experience of Mohammed VI University Hospital of Marrakech, Cardiology Research and Reports, 6(6); DOI:10.31579/2692-9759/146
Copyright: © 2024, Choukri Moulay Achrafa. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 23 October 2024 | Accepted: 04 November 2024 | Published: 15 November 2024
Keywords: pulmonary stenosis; balloon valvuloplasty; congenital heart disease; hemodynamic evaluation; interventional cardiology
Introduction: Pulmonary stenosis (PS) is a common congenital heart disease that obstructs the blood flow from the right ventricle (RV) to the pulmonary artery (PA). Percutaneous balloon valvuloplasty is the first-line treatment for this disease, and the outcomes depending on the anatomical characteristics of the right ventricle and the pulmonary artery.
Objectives: To conduct an epidemiological study, investigate the circumstances of pulmonary stenosis diagnosis, evaluate the diagnostic role of Doppler echocardiography, and determine the therapeutic role of interventional treatment.
Methods: This descriptive retrospective study involved patients with PS followed in the functional exploration department of Mohammed VI University hospital of Marrakech between March 2024 and June 2024.
Results: Three patients were included. The presenting symptoms were dyspnea with paroxysmal palpitations in two patients and feeding difficulty in one patient. All patients had an ejection systolic murmur in pulmonary area. Balloon dilatation was successfully performed in all patients, with the saturation increasing from an average of 93% to 97%.
Conclusion: Percutaneous balloon treatment for pulmonary stenosis is a safe and effective alternative with few complications and good immediate results.
Pulmonary stenosis or valvular pulmonary stenosis is a relatively common congenital heart defect that can occur in isolation or more commonly in association with other congenital heart defects. Pulmonary stenosis was defined as an obstruction at the level of the right ventricle outflow tract, the pulmonary valve ring, or the pulmonary valve leaflets or within the main pulmonary arteries and branches [23]. It can be isolated in 7% to 12% of patients but is more commonly associated with other congenital heart defects in 25% to 30% of these patients [24]. Symptomatic patients are usually those with moderate or severe pulmonary stenosis. They typically experience exertional dyspnea or fatigue, depending on the severity of the obstruction and the compensatory capacity of the heart [1]. Percutaneous balloon angioplasty is a good alternative to surgery. First described by Kan et al [2,3], percutaneous balloon valvuloplasty has satisfactory short- and long-term results, depending on the anatomy of the pulmonary valve and the compliance with the right ventricle [4]. However, despite initial procedural success, some patients will later require additional intervention.
In this work, we report the experience of the cardiology department of Mohammed VI university hospital of Marrakech in treating pulmonary stenosis. The objective of this study was to conduct an epidemiological retrospective study, investigate the circumstances of pulmonary stenosis diagnosis, evaluate the diagnostic role of Doppler echocardiography, and determine the therapeutic role of interventional treatment.
This was a retrospective study involving three patients who underwent percutaneous balloon dilatation for pulmonary stenosis, followed at the cardiology department of CHU Mohammed VI of Marrakech over a period of three months, from March 2024 to June 2024. The patients varied in sex and age. All patients underwent clinical examination, echocardiography for diagnostic confirmation, right ventricular ventriculography, and pulmonary artery arteriography. The limited sample size is because of the first hospital’s experience in this field. Broader studies are scheduled for the coming years, once a more substantial number of patients will be documented.
A retrospective study focused on patients with pulmonary stenosis over a three-month period. Clinical and operative data of the surgical patients were collected from the following manual sources:
• Medical records archives
• Operative reports archives
Patients with supravalvular stenosis, significant infundibular stenosis, or pulmonary stenosis associated with complex congenital heart defects were excluded. Clinical characteristics of the patients, including age at discovery, sex, weight, intervention delay, clinical presentation at admission, saturation, and hemodynamic status were collected. Electrocardiographic and echocardiographic characteristics were also analyzed. The state of the pulmonary valve and the pressure gradient between the RV and the pulmonary artery were also analyzed. Percutaneous pulmonary dilatation was performed under general anesthesia. A right femoral vein puncture was performed with the placement of a 6 French sheath. After the puncture, a right coronary catheter (Judkins Right: Jr) 4 was advanced from the right femoral vein to the pulmonary artery. Right ventricular pressure and the peak-to-peak RV-PA gradient was measured. Right ventricular angiography was performed by automatic injection of a low-osmolarity contrast agent at 15 cc/sec through this coronary catheter. This procedure allows for the evaluation of the RV anatomy and simultaneous opacification of the pulmonary bed. A 0.035 coronary guidewire was advanced after crossing the pulmonary orifice was crossed distally into one of the PA branches. The balloon diameter was equal to 120% of the diameter of the pulmonary ring measured by echocardiography and/or angiography. The balloon was positioned across the valve, and the operator proceeded with balloon inflation until partial disappearance of the pulmonary imprint was achieved, followed by rapid deflation and RV opacification to evaluate the final result. Percutaneous balloon valvuloplasty was considered successful when the residual gradient is less than 50 mmHg with an oxygen saturation greater than 90% in the absence of complications. Immediate monitoring was performed after dilatation, with evaluation of post-dilatation oxygen saturation, the RV-PA gradient, and pulmonary regurgitation post-dilatation by echocardiography. Procedural or immediate post-procedural complications were immediately recorded. Follow-up parameters included saturation and echocardiographic parameters (RV compliance, pulmonary regurgitation, pulmonary ring diameter, and RV-PA gradient).
a. Epidemiological characteristics
The mean age was 21 years (ranging from 2 to 44 years). Two patients were female. The mean weight of our patients was 406 kg (ranging from 17 kg to 55 kg). The mean intervention time (time between diagnosis and pulmonary dilatation) was 35 months (ranging from 15 days to 9 months after diagnosis). All pregnancies were carried out at term. The presenting symptoms were dyspnea with paroxysmal palpitations in two cases and feeding difficulty in one patient. All patients had an ejection systolic murmur in the pulmonary area. The baseline oxygen saturation was 93% on average (ranging from 84% to 99%). An electrocardiogram showed regular sinus rhythm in all patients, with right axis deviation, RVH, and RAH in one patient.
b. Echocardiographic characteristics
•Right Ventricle
Right ventricular hypertrophy was present in all patients, and was associated with one patient with right ventricular dilation and limited function.
•Pulmonary Valve
The “dome sprayer” appearance of the pulmonary valves was observed in all the patients, dysplastic appearance in one patient. The mean pulmonary ring diameter was 153 mm (ranging from 11 to 177 mm).
•Doppler echocardiographic criteria
The maximum RV-PA gradient measured by Doppler echocardiography at the pulmonary valve level averaged 121 mmHg (ranging from 78 to 204 mmHg). The right ventricular pressure (RV pressure) averaged 113 mmHg (ranging from 90 to 140 mmHg).
c. Pulmonary Dilatation Technique
Pulmonary dilatation was performed in all patients under general anesthesia. This procedure was performed immediately with a dedicated balloon in all patients. A right femoral vein puncture was performed with the placement of a 6F introducer. An FR4 diagnostic catheter was advanced on a 0.035 guide (Hydrophile) into the trunk of the pulmonary artery. An exchange over a long PTFE guide (Starter 260 cm) was performed with the placement of a 5F pigtail catheter into the pulmonary artery. Pulmonary arteriography (15 ml/s) was performed in profile incidence. Angiographic measurement of the pulmonary ring was performed. A TYSHAK II dilatation balloon was advanced. Pulmonary valve dilatation was performed at 4 atm. Control arteriography and invasive hemodynamic measurements of the RV-PA gradient were performed. Percutaneous valvuloplasty was successfully performed in all patients (RV-PA gradient < 50 mmHg). The success rate is estimated at 100%. SpO2, which was 84% in one patient, increased to 96%, raising the average SpO2 from 93% to 97%. A decrease in the VD-AP gradient was noted in all our patients. This gradient decreased on average from 99 mmHg before dilation to 30 mmHg after dilation. A decrease in RV pressure was noted in all our patients. The RV pressure decreased on average from 113 mmHg to 57 mmHg (Table I).
d. Complications
Complications were recorded in all three patients. These included 2 patients with moderate pulmonary insufficiency and 1 patient with bronchospasm related to anesthesia, both of which had a favorable outcome.
| Oxygen saturation | |
| Pre-procedural | 93% |
| Post-procedural | 97% |
| Pulmonary valve | |
| Dysplastic PV (yes/no) | 1/2 |
| RV-PA Gradient (mmHg) | |
| Pre-procedural | 99 mmHg |
| Post-procedural | 30 mmHg |
| RV pressure (mmHg) | |
| Pre-procedural | 113 mmHg |
| Post-procedural | 57mmHg |
Table I: Pre and post-procedural outcomes
The dilatation was successfully performed on three patients. The type of anesthesia varies among authors. For instance, Alsawah [5], Yucel [6], and Tabatabei [7] also performed general anesthesia, while Zeevi et al. [8], Fedderly et al. [9], and Sullivan et al. [10] opted for local anesthesia in all patients in their series. Ladusan et al. [11], in a study involving a series of 15 patients, performed general anesthesia in eight patients and local anesthesia in seven patients.
Several approaches can be used during right heart catheterization. We used a right femoral vein approach in all our patients. Zeevi [8] and Gournay [12] used the same technique in their series. Alsawah [5] used the right femoral vein approach in 55% of his population and the umbilical route in 44% of cases. A heparin bolus was also administered to all our patients at a dose of 50 IU/kg. This heparin premedication has also been described by Kan [3] and Zeevi [8].
To cross the pulmonary valve, we used a right coronary catheter of the right Judkins (JR) type. Gournay et al. [12] reported the same technique. Difficulty in crossing the stenotic valve orifice with the catheter tip during pulmonary dilation has been noted by some authors [8,13,15]. We encountered this problem in one patient in our series. Immediately after dilation, a decrease in ventricular pressure was observed in our patients. The right ventricular pressure decreased on average from 113 to 57 mmHg, a reduction of 46%. The right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) gradient decreased on average from 99 mmHg to 30 mmHg, a reduction of 61%. This finding has been reported by several authors [12,11,9,15,17-18].
Several clinical, echocardiographic, and hemodynamic parameters have been studied to determine immediate procedural success [1,12]. According to published series reported in the literature, the success rate of percutaneous balloon valvuloplasty varies from 58 to 98% [1,12,9,6-8,16,19]. The main causes of percutaneous valvuloplasty failure cited by different authors are failure to cross the pulmonary valve, failure of balloon progression, unfavorable valve anatomy (dysplasia, annular hypoplasia), right ventricular (RV) hypoplasia, and reduced RV compliance, which partly accounts for the persistence of cyanosis [12,7,17].
In our series, we had no cases of valvuloplasty failures The most important factor determining valvuloplasty success is RV compliance, which is partly determined by the size of the right ventricular cavity [17]. RV noncompliance plays a significant role in worsening hypoxemia even after pulmonary dilation. It is secondary to myocardial ischemia and fibrosis of the RV elastic fibers due to elevated right ventricular pressure [17].
Minor complications following valvuloplasty have been reported in the literature, such as transient bradycardia and hypotension during balloon inflation [9], variable atrioventricular block without hemodynamic consequences [5], right bundle branch block [8], and transient ventricular arrhythmias occurring during passage through the infundibular portion of the RV [9,12,5,6,16]. Local complications can also occur at the access site, such as intimal dissection of the right iliac vein during balloon passage attempts [8].
he mortality rate reported in the literature following percutaneous valvuloplasty ranges from 0 to 14% [12,5,7,20,14,17]. These rates are lower than those for surgery, estimated at 20-25% [17]. Causes of mortality from valvuloplasty are generally due to infundibular perforation with hemopericardium and tamponade, or myocardial dissection occurring a few hours after the procedure [12,5,10,16]. The follow-up mortality rate ranges from 0 to 25% in the literature [8,10,6,7,14,20,21]. The restenosis rate varies in the literature from 0.1% to 41% [7,0,17,18,22]. In the case of postvalvuloplasty restenosis, a second valvuloplasty is indicated.
The limited sample size is because of the first center’s experience in this field. Broader studies with predictive factors for reintervention are scheduled for the coming years, once a more substantial number of patients will be documented.
The experience of our center in pulmonary dilation for pulmonary stenosis demonstrates the efficacy and safety of this procedure as an alternative to surgery. Our results indicate a significant improvement in hemodynamic parameters and a reduction in clinical symptoms in the majority of treated patients. Complications were rare and generally minor, reinforcing the relevance of this intervention in managing pulmonary stenosis. Longer-term studies with larger patient numbers are needed to confirm these observations and refine therapeutic strategies.
The authors declare no competing interest.
No funding.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.
