AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Research Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2768-0487/150
Department of Medical Laboratory Science, Babcock University, Ilishan. Ogun State, Nigeria.
*Corresponding Author: Opeyemi Olufeyisola Adesina., Department of Medical Laboratory Science, Babcock University, Ilishan. Ogun State, Nigeria.
Citation: Opeyemi O. Adesina, Oritsetsemaye I. Pinnick, (2024), Association Between Fat Deposition in The Nuchal Region and Haematological Parameters in Obese and Overweight Undergraduate Students in Babcock University, Ilishan Remo, Ogun State, Nigeria, Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Research, 7(7); DOI:10.31579/2768-0487/150
Copyright: © 2024, Opeyemi Olufeyisola Adesina. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 29 August 2024 | Accepted: 10 September 2024 | Published: 16 September 2024
Keywords: obesity; nuchal fat deposition; haematological parameters; body mass index; coagulation profile
Background: Obesity and overweight are global health challenges with significant implications for cardiovascular and metabolic health. The distribution of fat, particularly in the nuchal region, and its association with haematological parameters may offer insights into the health risks faced by these populations. This study investigates the association between fat deposition in the nuchal region and haematological parameters among obese and overweight undergraduate students at Babcock University, Ilishan-Remo, Ogun State, Nigeria.
Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted involving 90 participants categorized into three groups: normal weight (BMI <25.0, n=30), overweight (BMI 25.0-30.0, n=30), and obese (BMI ≥30.0, n=30). Anthropometric measurements were recorded, including BMI, neck circumference, waist-to-hip ratio, and cervical fat fold thickness. Blood samples were analyzed for haematological parameters using an automated haematology analyzer, and coagulation profiles were determined. Data analysis was performed using SPSS version 20, with statistical significance set at p<0.05.
Results: Obese participants exhibited significantly higher mean values for weight, BMI, waist circumference, hip circumference, neck circumference, and cervical fat fold thickness compared to normal-weight and overweight groups (p<0.05). Haematological parameters such as HCT, HGB, and RBC did not differ significantly among the groups. However, obese participants showed significantly higher platelet counts and lower prothrombin time (PT) and international normalized ratio (INR) compared to the other groups (p<0.05).
Conclusion: The study revealed significant correlations between fat deposition in the nuchal region and certain haematological parameters among obese and overweight students, highlighting potential cardiovascular and thrombotic risks in these populations. Further research is recommended to explore these associations in larger cohorts.
Obesity and overweight have become major public health concerns globally, with the World Health Organization (WHO) identifying them as significant contributors to the burden of chronic diseases such as cardiovascular diseases, type 2 diabetes, and certain types of cancer [1]. In Nigeria, the prevalence of obesity has been on the rise, particularly among the younger population, including university students. This alarming trend is attributed to a combination of factors, including changes in dietary patterns, increased sedentary lifestyles, and genetic predispositions [2].
Among the various manifestations of obesity, the deposition of fat in specific anatomical regions has gained attention due to its association with metabolic and cardiovascular risks. The nuchal region, which is located at the back of the neck, is one such area where fat accumulation has been linked to adverse health outcomes. Studies suggest that fat deposition in the nuchal region may serve as a marker of visceral fat, which is more metabolically active and thus more closely associated with metabolic syndrome and related complications [3].
The nuchal region, also known as the nape of the neck, is of particular interest because fat accumulation in this area may be indicative of underlying metabolic disturbances. Previous research has shown that individuals with higher nuchal fat thickness tend to exhibit altered haemodynamic and haematological profiles, including elevated blood pressure, insulin resistance, and dyslipidemia [4]. These haematological alterations are crucial as they are often precursors to more severe health conditions, including cardiovascular diseases and type 2 diabetes [5].
Haematological parameters, including red blood cell (RBC) count, hemoglobin concentration, and hematocrit levels, are essential indicators of an individual's overall health status. Changes in these parameters can reflect the body's response to various physiological and pathological conditions, including obesity. For instance, obesity is often associated with chronic low-grade inflammation, which can alter the production and lifespan of RBCs, leading to anaemia or other haematological disorders [6]. Furthermore, the interplay between obesity, fat deposition in the nuchal region, and haematological parameters remains underexplored, particularly in the Nigerian context.
Babcock University, located in Ilishan Remo, Ogun State, Nigeria, provides a unique setting to study these associations due to its diverse student population. The rising prevalence of obesity among undergraduate students in this institution mirrors the broader national trend and underscores the need for targeted research to understand the health implications of obesity in this demographic [7]. Understanding the relationship between fat deposition in the nuchal region and haematological parameters in obese and overweight students could provide valuable insights into early markers of metabolic syndrome and inform intervention strategies to mitigate the associated health risks.
Moreover, this study is particularly relevant in the context of the ongoing global efforts to address non-communicable diseases (NCDs) as part of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). By focusing on a specific population group within a university setting, this research aligns with the broader public health objective of early detection and prevention of NCDs among young adults, thereby contributing to the global agenda of reducing premature mortality from these diseases by 2030 [8].
Study design
This study was a cross-sectional study, carried out during the period of this project on samples from undergraduate students of Babcock University, Ilishan-Remo Campus, Ogun state, Nigeria. Thirty (30) obese and thirty (30) overweight undergraduate students at Babcock University were recruited as test subjects while 30 normal-weight students were recruited as control subjects. The body mass index (BMI) was used to group the study participants as follows; normal weight (BMI <25>
Study site
The study was carried out at the Teaching Laboratory, Department of Medical Laboratory Science, School of Public and Allied Sciences, Babcock University, Ilishan-Remo, Ogun state. Ilisan-Remo, is a geographical area located in Ikenne Local Government Area of Ogun State, Nigeria.
Sample Size Determination
The sample size was determined using the Cochran formula for estimating proportions in a population outlined by Uduma et al. [9]:
The existing prevalence of obesity is 33%.
A total number of 90 participants were selected for the study.
Ethical Approval
Ethical approval was obtained from the Babcock University Health Research Ethics Committee (BUHREC) before the commencement of the study.
Determination of Anthropometric Indices and Blood Pressure
Anthropometric indices were evaluated using the methods outlined by Zurmi et al. [10]. The body mass index for each participant was calculated from weight and height measurements obtained through the use of Hanson’s weighing scale (capacity of 120 kg) and a meter rule attached to a wooden pole, respectively. The participants were weighed in light clothing and reading was taken to the nearest 0.1 kg. Height to the nearest 0.1 cm was measured with the participants standing erect on a flat surface. Having a BMI of ≥30 Kg/m2 was taken as general obesity. Waist circumference was measured with a flexible non-stretch tape placed on the midpoint between the top of the iliac crest and the bottom of the rib cage where the last palpable rib is found. The weighing scale was maintained at zero before taking the weight measurements.
The blood pressure was measured following the methods of Agu et al. [11]. A sphygmomanometer and stethoscope were used to measure their blood pressure. This was done by ensuring that the study subject was relaxed, with the arm straight, and palm facing up on a level surface. The cuff of the sphygmomanometer was placed on the biceps muscle of the arm and the balloon was inflated. Once inflated, the stethoscope was placed with the flat surface facing down on the inside of the elbow crease towards the inner part of the arm where the major artery of the arm is located, ensuring that the ears of the stethoscope were pointing towards the eardrum. The balloon was slowly deflated as the stethoscope was listened to, hearing the first sound of the blood flowing through, which is the systolic blood pressure. As the balloon was gradually deflated, the diastolic blood pressure was recorded.
Blood Sample Collection
About 5.0 ml of whole blood was collected from the antecubital fossa vein of the subjects, 2.25 ml was dispensed into 3.2% trisodium citrate anticoagulant bottles in ratio 9:1(blood: citrate), containing 0.25 ml of citrate and mixed properly; the remaining 2 ml of whole blood was dispensed into an EDTA bottle for the analysis of haematological parameters.
The citrated blood samples were centrifuged at 2000 g for 15 minutes to obtain platelet-poor plasma. The supernatant plasma was aspirated into a plain bottle and stored at 4 oC, to be used for the clotting profile.
Determination of Haematological and Coagulation Indices
Haematological parameters were determined using an Automated machine following the methods outlined in Chikezie et al. [12], while coagulation indices were determined using the methods of Ugwu et al. [13].
Automation method-OutroSH800 plus is a quantitative automated haematology analyser for in-vitro diagnostic use which can determine 19 haematological parameters. It directly measures PCV, total WBC counts, RBC counts, platelet count, absolute lymphocyte count and haemoglobin (Hb) while parameters like MCH, MCV, MCHC, and red cell distribution width are calculated.
The data was summarized in tabular form percentages for categorical variables. The data was expressed in mean ± standard error of mean (SEM). The difference among the means was analyzed using ANOVA. All the analysis was done with Statistical Package Social Sciences (SPSS) software, version 20 (International Business Machine Incorporated). A p-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
The socio-demographic characteristics of participants reveal no statistically significant associations between BMI categories (Normal, Overweight, Obese) and variables such as age group, university level, and religion. For example, the majority of participants across all BMI categories were aged 21-25 years (68.3%, p=0.231) and predominantly at the 400 level (70%, p=0.788). Christianity was the most common religion (68.3%, p=0.231) across all BMI categories (Table 1).
Anthropometric measurements showed significant differences across the BMI categories. Obese participants had the highest mean weight (101.85±17.6 kg) and BMI (36.56±5.1), with p-values <0 p=0.015)>
Regarding lifestyle characteristics, a statistically significant association was observed between BMI and family history of diabetes mellitus (DM) (p=0.007), with a higher prevalence in the obese group (55%). However, there were no significant associations between BMI and other lifestyle factors such as physical activity (p=0.363) or diet (p=0.791) (Table 3).
No significant differences were found in hematological parameters such as HCT, HGB, RBC, and WBC among normal, overweight, and obese participants, as all p-values were greater than 0.05 (Table 4).
Significant differences were observed in certain coagulation parameters across BMI categories. Obese participants had significantly higher platelet counts (p=0.006) and lower prothrombin time (PT) (p=0.023) compared to normal and overweight participants. Additionally, the international normalized ratio (INR) was significantly lower in the obese group (p=0.015) (Table 5).
Correlation analyses showed varied relationships between anthropometric and hematological parameters across different BMI categories. In normal weight participants, the only significant correlation was between INR and waist circumference (r=0.489, p=0.029) (Table 6). In overweight participants, a significant negative correlation was found between monocyte count and hip circumference (r=-0.493, p=0.027) (Table 7). In obese participants, platelet count showed significant positive correlations with waist and hip circumferences (r=0.497, p=0.026 and r=0.458, p=0.042, respectively) (Table 8).
| Normal (n=20) | Overweight (n=20) | Obese (n=20) | Total | p-value | |
Age group (Years) 17-20 21-25 |
4(20.0) 16(80.0) |
9(45.0) 11(55.0) |
6(30.0) 14(70.0) |
19(31.7) 41(68.3) |
0.231 |
University level 400 500 |
13(65.0) 7(35.0) |
15(75.0) 5(25.0) |
14(70.0) 6(30.0) |
42(70.0) 18(30.00 |
0.788 |
Religion Christianity Islam |
14(70.0) 6(30.0) |
16(80.0) 4(20.0) |
11(55.0) 9(45.0) |
41(68.3) 19(31.7) |
S0.231 |
Table 1: Socio-demographic characteristics of participants.
| Variable | Normal (n=20) Mean±SD | Overweight (n=20) Mean±SD | Obese(n=20) Mean±SD | F-value | p-value |
| Weight | 63.00±8.8 | 75.45±11.2 | 101.85±17.6 | 45.991 | <0> |
| Height | 168.86±10.3 | 166.29±10.8 | 166.96±8.3 | 0.366 | 0.695 |
| BMI | 22.14±1.3 | 27.16±1.5 | 36.56±5.1 | 106.247 | <0> |
| Waist circumference | 73.74±8.0 | 84.84±6.5 | 101.35±10.7 | 52.027 | <0> |
| Hip circumference | 98.89±7.3 | 109.74±7.8 | 125.55±11.2 | 44.885 | <0> |
| Waist hip ratio | 0.75±0.1 | 0.78±0.1 | 0.80±0.1 | 4.494 | 0.015* |
| Neck circumference | 34.73±3.1 | 35.94±1.9 | 39.42±2.7 | 17.471 | <0> |
| CFF thickness | 29.03±3.7 | 32.42±2.7 | 35.09±2.8 | 19.536 | <0> |
Table 2: Anthropometric parameters among participants.
P<0> Family history of obesity Yes No 1(5.0) 19(95.0) 3(15.0) 17(85.0) 6(30.0) 14(70.0) 10(16.7) 50(83.3) 0.102 History of DM Yes No 1(5.0) 19(95.0) 0(0.0) 20(100.0) 1(5.0) 19(95.0) 2(3.3) 58(96.7) 0.596 Family history of DM Yes No 2(10.0) 18(90.0) 5(25.0) 15(75.0) 11(55.0) 9(45.0) 18(30.0) 42(70.0) 0.007* Diet Mixed Non-vegetarian Vegetarian 11(55.0) 8(40.0) 1(5.0) 9(45.0) 11(55.0) 0(0.0) 10(50.0) 9(45.0) 1(5.0) 30(50.0) 28(46.7) 2(3.3) 0.791 Physical activity Active Minimal Inactive 12(60.0) 5(25.0) 3(15.0) 11(55.0) 8(40.0) 1(5.0) 7(35.0) 9(45.0) 4(20.0) 30(50.0) 22(36.7) 8(13.3) 0.363Variable Normal (n=20) Overweight (n=20) Obese (n=20) Total p-value
Table 3: Lifestyle characteristics of participants
P<0>Variable Normal (n=20) Mean±SD Overweight (n=20) Mean±SD Obese(n=20) Mean±SD F-value p-value HCT 40.10±6.4 39.88±5.2 37.87±3.4 1.131 0.330 HGB 12.73±2.4 12.81±1.9 12.17±1.3 0.652 0.525 RBC 4.31±1.0 4.31±0.6 4.06±0.5 0.731 0.486 MCV 90.76±11.3 93.93±11.5 93.78±7.9 0.595 0.555 MCH 28.55±4.7 29.81±3.9 30.09±3.3 0.826 0.443 MCHC 31.43±1.8 31.78±1.6 32.03±1.2 0.722 0.490 WBC 5.63±2.6 5.80±3.3 4.76±2.6 0.759 0.473 Neutrophil 41.30±11.8 47.00±15.9 45.65±12.2 0.983 0.380 Lymphocyte 52.10±11.6 46.60±14.8 48.00±12.4 0.964 0.388 Monocyte 3.30±1.2 3.60±1.3 3.90±1.4 0.491 0.614 Eosinophil 2.00±0.7 1.65±0.5 1.70±0.5 0.774 0.466 Basophile 0.75±0.2 0.90±0.3 0.75±0.3 0.257 0.774
Table 4: Hematological parameters of Participants.
P<0>Variable Normal (n=20) Mean±SD Overweight (n=20) Mean±SD Obese (n=20) Mean±SD F-value p-value Platelet 233.85±62.5 216.75±66.9 282.15±63.2 5.572 0.006* NLR 0.90±0.3 1.24±0.3 1.12±0.3 1.042 0.359 PT 11.21±1.6 10.98±1.1 10.04±1.4 4.054 0.023* APTT 26.16±6.2 26.12±6.2 24.76±6.2 0.330 0.720 INR 1.21±0.2 1.20±0.2 1.08±0.1 4.521 0.015*
Table 5: Coagulation Parameters of Participants.
P<0>Variable Waist circumference Hip circumference Waist hip ratio Neck circumference HCT 0.077 (0.748) -0.191 (0.419) 0.224 (0.343) -0.063 (0.793) HGB 0.166 (0.484) -0.180 (0.448) 0.316 (0.174) -0.163 (0.493) RBC 0.011 (0.963) -0.116 (0.626) 0.049 (0.838) 0.059 (0.804) MCV 0.055 (0.817) 0.129 (0.589) 0.061 (0.799) 0.059 (0.804) MCH 0.146 (0.539) 0.065 (0.789) 0.184 (0.437) -0.158 (0.505) MCHC 0.302 (0.196) -0.072 (0.762) 0.399 (0.081) -0.257 (0.275) WBC -0.112(0.637) 0.271 (0.247) -0.304 (0.193) -0.332 (0.153) Neutrophil -0.058 (0.809) 0.276 (0.239) -0.295 (0.206) 0.475 (0.534) Lymphocyte 0.074 (0.758) -0.116 (0.483) 0.230 (0.329) 0.289 (0.281) Monocyte 0.063 (0.793) -0.339 (0.144) 0.316 (0.175) -0.193 (0.415) Eosinophil 0.009 (0.970) -0.274 (0.242) 0.197 (0.405) -0.203 (0.391) Basophile -0.274 (0.242) -0.472 (0.036) 0.062 (0.794) 0.199 (0.405) Platelet -0.099 (0.677) 0.219 (0.354) -0.224 (0.343) 0.197 (0.405) NLR -0.241 (0.307) 0.229 (0.332) -0.417 (0.067) 0.476 (0.034) PT 0.099 (0.678) 0.113 (0.634) 0.059 (0.806) 0.345 (0.136) APTT -0.192 (0.417) -0.137 (0.564) -0.049 (0.837) 0.161(0.498) INR 0.489 (0.029) 0.155 (0.515) 0.392 (0.088) 0.289 (0.216)
Table 6: Correlation between anthropometric parameters and hematological parameter in normal weight participants.
P<0>Variable Waist circumference Hip circumference Waist hip ratio Neck circumference HCT -0.111 (0.642) 0.267 (0.254) -0.334 (0.150) -0.226 (0.337) HGB -0.154 (0.516) 0.186 (0.433) -0.306 (0.190) -0.253 (0.282) RBC 0.150 (0.529) 0.589 (0.006) -0.361 (0.118) 0.056 (0.816) MCV -0.267 (0.255) -0.348 (0.132) 0.048 (0.841) -0.314 (0.177) MCH -0.238 (0.313) -0.372 (0.106) 0.105 (0.659) -0.251 (0.286) MCHC 0.019 (0.937) -0.178 (0.453) 0.198 (0.403) 0.138 (0.562) WBC 0.085 (0.720) 0.181 (0.444) -0.127 (0.593) 0.086 (0.720) Neutrophil -0.263 (0.313) 0.087 (0.717) -0.334 (0.150) 0.144 (0.545) Lymphocyte 0.351 (0.129) 0.024 (0.919) 0.325 (0.162) -0.123 (0.605) Monocyte -0.305 (0.190) -0.493 (0.027*) 0.157 (0.508) -0.071 (0.766) Eosinophil -0.215 (0.363) -0.430 (0.058) 0.099 (0.677) -0.208 (0.380) Basophile -0.153 (0.520) -0.329 (0.157) 0.154 (0.518) 0.046 (0.849) Platelet 0.226 (0.339) 0.115 (0.628) 0.132 (0.579) 0.445 (0.049*) NLR -0.225 (0.340) 0.010 (0.968) -0.224 (0.343) 0.235 (0.319) PT -0.240 (0.308) 0.099 (0.677) -0.325 (0.163) -0.113 (0.636) APTT 0.031 (0.897) 0.085 (0.722) -0.019 (0.936) 0.227 (0.337) INR -0.340 (0.142 -0.063 (0.790) -0.269 (0.252) -0.166 (0.483)
Table 7: Correlation between anthropometric parameters and hematological parameter in Overweight participants.
P<0>Variable Waist circumference Hip circumference Waist hip ratio Neck circumference HCT 0.222(0.347) 0.084 (0.724) 0.256 (0.276) -0.128 (0.590) HGB 0.271 (0.249) 0.175 (0.461) 0.210 (0.374) -0.147 (0.535) RBC 0.098 (0.681) -0.009 (0.969) 0.179 (0.451) -0.301(0.197) MCV 0.095 (0.690) 0.094 (0.694) 0.029 (0.904) 0.264 (0.261) MCH 0.187 (0.429) 0.185 (0.434) 0.054 (0.820) 0.182 (0.444) MCHC 0.294 (0.209) 0.245 (0.298) 0.138 (0.562) -0.067 (0.780) WBC 0.099 (0.677) -0.122 (0.609) 0.313 (0.179) 0.057 (0.810) Neutrophil -0.078 (0.078) -0.236 (0.316) 0.201 (0.395) 0.041 (0.863) Lymphocyte 0.057 (0.811) 0.225 (0.340) -0.219 (0.354) -0.053 (0.823) Monocyte 0.290 (0.214) 0.217 (0.357) 0.164 (0.491) 0.045 (0.850) Eosinophil -0.077 (0.746) -0.296 (0.205) 0.253 (0.282) 0.282 (0.228) Basophile -0.331 (0.154) -0.231 (0.328) 0.184 (0.438) -0.039 (0.871) Platelet 0.497 (0.026) 0.458 (0.042) 0.153 (0.520) 0.284 (0.224) NLR -0.085 (0.721) -0.275 (0.240) 0.242 (0.305) -0.146 (0.540) PT -0.256 (0.276) -0.216 (0.361) -0.132 (0.579) 0.138 (0.561) APTT -0.409 (0.073) -0.128 (0.590) -0.455 (0.044) -0.052 (0.826) INR -0.259 (0.270) -0.229 (0.331) -0.119 (0.617) 0.132 (0.580)
Table 8: Correlation between anthropometric parameters and hematological parameter in obese participants.
P<0>
Figure 1: Correlation between BMI and waist circumference among participants.
Correlation coefficient =0.846, p<0>
Figure 2: Correlation between BMI and hip circumference among participants.
Correlation coefficient =0.874, p<0>
Figure 3: Correlation between BMI and waist hip ratio among participants.
Correlation coefficient =0.301, p=0.019*
Obesity and overweight have become global health concerns, significantly impacting the health and well-being of individuals across various age groups. The World Health Organization (WHO) defines obesity and overweight based on Body Mass Index (BMI) thresholds, with a BMI of 25-29.9 kg/m² categorized as overweight and a BMI of 30 kg/m² or higher as obese. The prevalence of these conditions has been steadily increasing, particularly among younger populations, including university students, due to lifestyle changes, dietary habits, and reduced physical activity [14].
Fat deposition in specific body regions, such as the nuchal region (back of the neck), has been associated with various metabolic and cardiovascular risk factors. The nuchal region fat deposition is a marker of central obesity, which has been linked to insulin resistance, dyslipidemia, and hypertension [15]. Understanding the relationship between fat deposition in the nuchal region and hematological parameters in obese and overweight individuals is crucial for the early detection and management of obesity-related complications.
Several studies have explored the relationship between fat deposition, particularly in the nuchal region, and various metabolic and hematological parameters. A study by Stabe et al. [16] found that increased neck circumference was strongly associated with insulin resistance and higher triglyceride levels in overweight and obese individuals. This finding aligns with the current study, where neck circumference was significantly higher in obese participants (39.42±2.7 cm) compared to overweight (35.94±1.9 cm) and normal-weight participants (34.73±3.1 cm), indicating a potential risk of metabolic syndrome.
The present study's findings on the correlation between increased BMI and waist circumference with higher neck circumference further support the notion that central obesity, indicated by nuchal fat deposition, is a predictor of adverse metabolic outcomes. This observation is consistent with research by Preis et al. [17], who reported that larger neck circumference was independently associated with cardiometabolic risk factors, including elevated blood pressure and fasting glucose levels.
Furthermore, the study's results indicate a significant association between fat deposition in the nuchal region, measured by CFF thickness, and BMI. Obese participants had a significantly higher CFF thickness (35.09±2.8 mm) compared to overweight (32.42±2.7 mm) and normal-weight participants (29.03±3.7 mm). This finding aligns with the study by Yang et al. [18], which demonstrated that nuchal fat thickness was correlated with increased cardiovascular risk in obese individuals.
Regarding lifestyle characteristics, the present study found that a higher percentage of obese participants had a family history of diabetes mellitus (55.0%) compared to overweight (25.0%) and normal-weight participants (10.0%). This observation aligns with previous research that highlights the genetic predisposition to obesity and its associated comorbidities [19].
Hematological parameters, including red blood cell (RBC) count, hemoglobin (HGB), hematocrit (HCT), and white blood cell (WBC) count, are essential indicators of an individual's health status. These parameters can be influenced by various factors, including nutritional status, inflammation, and body composition [20]. Obesity has been shown to alter hematological parameters, potentially contributing to the development of obesity-related complications. For instance, increased WBC count has been associated with chronic low-grade inflammation in obese individuals, which may predispose them to cardiovascular diseases [21].
Coagulation parameters, such as platelet count, prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), and international normalized ratio (INR), are critical in assessing the risk of thrombotic events in individuals with obesity [22]. Obesity is known to induce a hypercoagulable state, increasing the risk of thrombosis and other cardiovascular events [23]. The relationship between fat deposition in specific regions, such as the nuchal area, and alterations in coagulation parameters remains under-explored, particularly in young populations.
This study focuses on the association between fat deposition in the nuchal region and haematological and coagulation parameters in overweight and obese undergraduate students at Babcock University, Ilishan Remo, Ogun State, Nigeria. University students represent a critical demographic for studying the early onset of obesity and its related complications due to the transition from adolescence to adulthood, where lifestyle changes can significantly impact health outcomes [24].
Understanding the relationship between regional fat deposition and haematological parameters in this population may provide insights into the early markers of obesity-related complications, offering opportunities for early intervention and prevention. Furthermore, this study contributes to the growing body of evidence linking specific fat deposition patterns with systemic health outcomes, particularly in understudied populations in Nigeria and other sub-Saharan African regions.
The findings of this study align with and expand upon existing research on the relationship between obesity and haematological parameters. Previous studies have reported that obesity is associated with alterations in haematological parameters, including decreased RBC count, HCT, and HGB levels, as observed in the present study [25,26]. However, the current study's focus on the nuchal region's fat deposition provides a more nuanced understanding of how regional fat distribution affects these parameters.
The results also indicate a significant increase in platelet count and a decrease in PT and INR among obese participants, suggesting a hypercoagulable state. These findings are consistent with previous research, which has demonstrated that obesity is linked to increased platelet activation and aggregation, contributing to an elevated risk of thrombotic events [22,23]. The observed decrease in INR among obese participants further supports the notion of a hypercoagulable state, as lower INR values indicate a faster clotting time.
Previous studies have highlighted the complex relationship between obesity and haematological parameters. For instance, a study by Park et al. [25] found that central obesity was associated with increased HCT and HGB levels, suggesting that obesity might influence erythropoiesis through mechanisms such as hypoxia and inflammation. Similarly, elevated WBC counts, which are indicative of systemic inflammation, have been frequently reported in obese individuals [27]. However, the specific relationship between fat deposition in the nuchal region and haematological parameters remains underexplored, particularly in young adults in the Nigerian context.
Anthropometric measurements, including waist circumference (WC), hip circumference (HC), waist-hip ratio (WHR), and neck circumference (NC), are commonly used to assess body fat distribution. These measurements have been linked to various health outcomes, with particular emphasis on their association with cardiovascular risk factors and metabolic syndrome [28].
In normal-weight participants, most correlations between anthropometric parameters and haematological indices were not statistically significant. However, a notable correlation was observed between INR (International Normalized Ratio) and waist circumference (r = 0.489, p = 0.029), indicating that even in normal-weight individuals, waist circumference might influence coagulation profiles. This finding aligns with previous studies that suggest waist circumference as a predictor of coagulation activity and potential thrombosis risk [29].
Among overweight participants, a significant correlation was observed between hip circumference and RBC count (r = 0.589, p = 0.006), and between platelet count and neck circumference (r = 0.445, p = 0.049). These findings suggest that fat deposition in the hip and neck regions may influence erythropoiesis and thrombopoiesis, possibly through localized inflammation or altered hemodynamics. Previous research has similarly reported associations between hip circumference and increased RBC count, proposing that fat accumulation in the gluteofemoral region might have protective cardiovascular effects [30].
In obese participants, a significant correlation was found between platelet count and both waist circumference (r = 0.497, p = 0.026) and hip circumference (r = 0.458, p = 0.042). Additionally, an inverse correlation between APTT (Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time) and waist-hip ratio (r = -0.455, p = 0.044) was observed. These results suggest that obesity, particularly central obesity, may be associated with a prothrombotic state, which could increase the risk of cardiovascular events. This finding is consistent with prior studies that have identified central obesity as a key contributor to hypercoagulability and thrombosis [31].
The findings of this study revealed significant differences in anthropometric parameters such as waist circumference, hip circumference, neck circumference, and Cervical Fat Fold (CFF) thickness across BMI categories, with obese participants showing the highest values. Despite these variations, no significant differences were observed in key hematological parameters such as hemoglobin levels, red blood cell counts, and hematocrit among the different BMI groups. However, obese participants exhibited significant differences in coagulation parameters, including higher platelet counts and lower prothrombin time, suggesting a potential link between obesity and alterations in blood coagulation.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.
