AUCTORES
Research Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2768-0487/030
*Corresponding Author: Chen Pan, Human Resource Department, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Citation: J Wang, X Ma, C Pan. (2021) Assessment of Quality Management System for Clinical Nutrition in Jiangsu. Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Research. 3(2); DOI:10.31579/2768-0487/030
Copyright: ©2021 Chen Pan. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received: 02 June 2021 | Accepted: 17 June 2021 | Published: 03 July 2021
Keywords: quality management system; human resource management; artificial intelligence; health services research; information technology; quality improvement methodologies
Objective: To critically evaluate the Quality Management System (QMS) for Clinical Nutrition (CN) in Jiangsu. Monitor its performance in quality assessment as well as human resource management from nutrition aspect. Investigate the appliance and development of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in medical quality control.
Materials and Methods: The study source of this research was all the staffs of 70 Clinical Nutrition Department (CND) of the tertiary hospitals in Jiangsu Province, China. These departments are all members of the Quality Management System of Clinical Nutrition in Jiangsu (QMSNJ). An online survey was conducted on all 341 employees within all these CNDs based on the staff information from the surveyed medical institutions. The questionnaire contains 5 aspects, while data analysis and AI evaluation were focused on human resource information. An paired sample t-Test was conducted to determine differences between their situation in 2018 and 2020 the application of JPCNMP.
Results: 330 questionnaires were collected with the respondent rate of 96.77%. The QMS for CN has been build up for CNDs in Jiangsu, which achieved its target in human resource improvements, especially among dietitians. The increasing number of participated departments (42.8%) and the significant growth of dietitians (p=0.02, t=-0.42) are all expressions of the advancements of QMSNJ.
Conclusion: As the first innovation of an online platform for QM in Jiangsu, JPCNMP has been successfully implemented among QMS from this research. This multidimensional electronic system can help QMSNJ and CND achieve quality assessment from various aspects, so as to realize the continuous improvement of clinical nutrition. The instrument of online platform, as well as AI technology for quality assessment is worth to be recommended and promoted in the future.
From the perspective of medical ethics, patient safety is the core before any other factors within health science. As the application of health science, medical services are inseparable from the safety of patients' lives and medical ethics. Scope of its practice is composed of statutory and individual components, includes codes of ethics (eg, health institution, department director, and/or other national organizations) and other resources [1]. As the Quality Management Center of Clinical Nutrition in Jiangsu (QMCNJ), it is the system`s responsibility to standardize and improve the professional performance within the province`s tertiary hospitals. Their quality assessment comes from the reported data of all CND among these hospitals, such as human and material resource, professional practice, foodservice operation, patient`s satisfaction, and nutrition education presentation for hospital and community [1-2]. All of the required information is scheduled based on the Revised 2016 Standards of Construction and Management of Clinical Nutrition Department in Jiangsu, reflects advances in CND practice during the past 6 years and replaces the 2010 Standards [3].
Within this information era, most of the current information is network-based, as well as the data of healthcare [4]. An electronic system that automatically collects medical information can realize timely monitoring of patient health, improve the effectiveness and accuracy of medical treatment. From a medical quality perspective, a reliance intelligent management system can improve data curation, reduce human resource costs, and contribute to facilitating continuous improvement. As one of the inventions in the information era, AI shows its strong adaptability to the network-based health-care system. It can be introduced into clinical behavior detection accurately and automatically, and of great significance for reducing the incidence of treatment errors and ensuring patients safety [4]. However, the amount of digital data has increased dramatically after the appliance of online system [5]. A crucial consequence is that data management has become more complex, which has increased the necessity for methods that are able to deal with the quality assessment of digital information.
To our knowledge, the application of AI into medical service quality assessment has merely been evaluated, especially for CND. There existed a unified platform for all the QM centers of various medical specialties set up by the Jiangsu Provincial Health Commission (JPHC). After its broken-down in October 2017, the QMCNJ became the first center to independently develop and promote the application of its online platforms named “Jiangsu Province Clinical Nutrition Management Platform”. It was officially launched in the QMSNJ in 2019 and successfully promoted to 70 CND within the quality control system. They are required to fill in relevant information regularly in accordance with the regulations of “Strengthening the Management of Provincial Medical Quality Management System” [6] formulated by JPHC, which has revised in September 2020. Since the stable application of this platform for two years, its effect in QM required to be validated. As for the aim of this research, the application value of JPCNMP could be explored while the development of the CND in Jiangsu can also be clarified within this two years.
Materials and Methods
Subjects
An online questionnaire was designed for employees in 70 CND of the tertiary hospitals in Jiangsu Province, which are all members of QMSNJ. There are 341 staffs in total based on the human resource information from the surveyed medical institutions. The questionnaire contains 5 aspects: hospital information, personal profile, education in QM, scientific research achievements, and nutrition education presentation though internet.
Survey recruitment and data collection
Before distribution, the survey and methods were approved by the QMCNJ and JPHC. The data were collected through an online survey (ID: 97003762) through the free-access platform “Wen Juan Xing”. One specific code was requested to fill the questionnaire. An electronic reminder was sent by QMCNJ to the secretary of these 70 CND through SMS, email, JPCNMP and WeChat. The deadline for completing this survey is Nov. 14, 2020.
Ethics
Institutional ethics approval was obtained for this study from Ethics Committee of First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University. This survey presents no risks to the participants, neither did it involve any therapeutic intervention. All the personal information within the questionnaire was designed to verify the authenticity of the feedback. After screening valid questionnaires, all personal information would not be included in the statistical analysis. As the result, there is no risk of additional use or disclosure of private information. Key informants were assured that confidentiality would be maintained and that findings would be presented in an anonymous fashion.
Data analysis
Because information about the CND's human resource and service requirements of related hospitals could be automatically captured through the JPCNMP and the Hospital Information System (HIS), the risk of error caused by manual filling should be avoided. All of these information was gathered on Nov. 14, 2020. The original data is online-accessible for the QMCNJ from the link “https://www.wjx.cn/report/97003762.aspx”.
Only completed questionnaires will be included in the data analysis. An overall description was performed to summarize the demographic and professional characteristics of the valid study sample. The current construction of the CND and their human resource has been clarified with this description. Comparing it with the corresponding data when the online management system was not activated, which is documented in the survey “Current Status of the CND among tertiary hospitals in Jiangsu Province” [7] conducted by our research team in 2018, a preliminary evaluation result of the progress of the quality control was obtained. Another criterion is the consistency between “Numbers of Colleges in your Department” in the "Hospital Information" and the number of documented staffs of the CND in their HIS system. It is used to verify the authenticity of the feedback. The questionnaire was considered valid while these two data matched.
Statistical method
SPSS Statistics 22.0 (SPSS, Inc, an IBM Company, Chicago, IL) was used to describe the results. An paired sample t-Test was conducted to determine differences between their situation before and after the application of JPCNMP. Statistical significance was set at p ≤ 0.05 as shown in the “Supplementary Table 1”.
Based on the staff information from the surveyed medical institutions` HIS, there are 341 employees within all these CND. On November 1st, once the survey was delivered to each participant, they were provided 14 days to complete. All of the collected questionnaires were screened according to the rubrics of valid conditions. With a respondent rate of 96.77%, a total of 330 valid questionnaires were counted.
There are 70 departments in this QM system in 2020, which has raised 42.8
The significant growth in the human resource as well as in the number of CND involved in the QM system in Jiangsu provided a promising development of professionals within the nutrition area. This progress certified that the importance of CNM in healthcare services had been concentrated by health institutions, department managers, and other national organizations such as JPHC [8]. The ratio criteria between CND professionals to hospital beds issued by JPHC for hospital accreditation is 1:200 (0.5×10-2), the CND is still in need of implementation for human resource and should make more effort or resource management.
The increasing number of departments that participated in QMSNJ brought their staff into the QM system of CN, which led to an increased total amount of human resources. However, most of this growth was resulted from the hired clinicians and nurses instead of dietitians. This led to a shrink of the professionals who were graduated from nutrition majors and desired to provide nutrition-related medical services. Based on the human resource profile from surveyed hospitals and the documentation in JPCNMP, most of the clinicians employed in CND were educated as physicians, such as gastroenterologists or endocrinologists. As a result, the CND was still in lack of certified dietitians. This vagueness may be induced by the late development of CN in China. The certification of RD/RDNs was officially organized by the CNS in the past five years. Compared to the lack of RD/RDNs throughout the province two years before, there were 92 now accounted for 26.98% in total, while 38.04% are from nutrition majors. Though it is still less ideal than the proportion of RD/RDN in the US CNM (98.6%) [9], it had achieved breakthroughs within this time period.
The advancement of CND`s staff resource might be mainly related to the expansion of QMSNJ, which has proved the QMCNJ has achieved initial results in the QM of human resource engaged in CN in Jiangsu in recent years. However, judging from the comparison of the personnel situation of the 48 original CNDs, which had been involved in the 2018 QMSNJ and participated in the last construction survey [7], the number of their dietitians has increased significantly (p=0.02, t=-0.42). From the perspective of balancing the CN resources and health service requirements, the results confirmed that the medical institution and the department`s director had realized the importance of a solid foundation of professional staff to improve the quality of specialist work and ensure patient safety. These 48 CND have continuously increased their emphasis on CNM, while QMCNJ has indicated in promoting the RD/RDN resource within clinical trial by improving CND professionalism. Within the “Education in QM” part of this questionnaire, 327 out of 330 employees took part in the QM training held through the online platform JPCNMP by QMCNJ in 2020. In the exam after the course, the passing rate of trainees was 99.20%.
The expansion of the organization of QMCNJ has been proved through this research and the rising focus on CNM and human resource management by medical institutions and health commission. All of these signs of progresses are inseparable from the introduction of AI instruments. With the implementation of the specialized online platform JPCNMP after 2019, a real-time quality assessment of CND`s daily work could be observed by themselves and by QMCNJ. The platform functions involve quality assessment, information communication, personnel education, and training, etc. It is convenient for QMCNJ to publish the latest QM guidelines, the QM progress of CNDs in Jiangsu, and the frontier QM research trends as well. It is effectively saving the resource consumption caused by traditional forms such as paper information filling and on-site supervision with the application of this AI technology. Consistent with the trend of the information technology revolution of our era, AI provides an automated method and various rules that are able to deal with the quality assessment of big data for healthcare [4]. Its advantages have been reported in multidiscipline, such as geothermal systems [9], medical centers [4], clinical laboratories [10], as well as medical QM [11]. The JPCNMP provides a freely available, open-source tool in data collection for CND of QMSNJ, which achieves the goal of intelligent management. The part of artificial is still in need of QMCNJ to achieve data curation and evaluation. As a result, QMCNJ highlights the importance of the QM data quality assessment by developing and continuously revising the index evaluation standards since its foundation in 2010. Similar to any data analysis service, the most crucial process of JPCNMP is the data quality assessment, which is related to the evaluation of data metrics, the organizational structure of the data, and the overall information management [4, 12]. Rather than the initial QM system requires artificial analysis of quality control data, it will be more accurate and reliable if an automated framework effectively manages the quality of JPCNMP`s data in the future.
QMS: Quality Management System
CN: Clinical Nutrition
AI: Artificial Intelligence
CND: Clinical Nutrition Department
QMSNJ: Quality Management System of Clinical Nutrition in Jiangsu
QMCNJ: Quality Management Center of Clinical Nutrition in Jiangsu
CNM: Clinical Nutrition Management
JPCNMP : Jiangsu Province Clinical Nutrition Management Platform
HIS: Hospital Information System
JPHC: Jiangsu Provincial Health Commission
RD: Registered Dietitian
RDN: Registered Dietitian Nutritionist
CNS: Chinese Nutrition Society
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.
I would like to offer my testimony in the support. I have received through the peer review process and support the editorial office where they are to support young authors like me, encourage them to publish their work in your esteemed journals, and globalize and share knowledge globally. I really appreciate your journal, peer review, and editorial office.