AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Chat with us
Research Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2690-1919/333
1 Department of Public Health, Peoples Dental College and Hospital, Kathmandu
2 Department of Public Health, CiST College, Kathmandu
3 Department of Public Health, Yeti Health science Academy, Kathmandu
4 Department of Oncology, Kanti Children’s Hospital, Kathmandu
5 Department of Community Medicine, School of Public Health, Chitwan Medical College, Chitwan, Nepal
6 Department of Dentistry, Peoples Dental College and Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal.
*Corresponding Author: Maheshor Kaphle; Associate Professor of Public Health, Peoples Dental college and Hospital, Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu.
Citation: Maheshor Kaphle, Achel Tamang , Rajesh Karki , Nirmala Regmi , Kishor Adhikari (2023), Assessment of Oral Hygiene Practice and Associated Factors among Middle-aged People in a Rural Municipality, Nepal, J Clinical Research and Reports, 14(1); DOI:10.31579/2690-1919/333
Copyright: © 2023, Maheshor Kaphle. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 11 August 2023 | Accepted: 17 August 2023 | Published: 22 August 2023
Keywords: adults; dental caries; nepal; oral hygiene; rural population
Background: Good oral hygiene practice helps to prevent oral cavity diseases and dental problems.
Objectives: This study is aimed to assess oral hygiene practices and their associated factors among middle-aged people in a rural municipality of central Nepal.
Methods: This study collected data from 291 middle-aged adults in rural Nepal using a semi-structured questionnaire. The data was entered into Epi-data 3.1 and analyzed using SPSS 22. An oral hygiene score was calculated based on good oral hygiene practices, and chi-square tests and logistic regression models were used to measure associations between variables. Adjusted odds ratios were calculated to measure net effects, with a p-value of 0.05 considered significant.
Result: The study found that the majority of respondents (80%) brushed their teeth once a day, with over half (56.7%) having poor oral hygiene practices. The majority (60%) changed their toothbrush every three months, and most (98%) used toothpaste but did not know about fluoride's benefits. A significant association was found between age, sex, education, dental caries, toothache, and regular dental visits with oral hygiene practices. Females had three times higher odds of good oral hygiene practices than males, literate individuals had higher odds of good oral hygiene,
Conclusions: The study found that most respondents brushed their teeth once a day, with over half having poor oral hygiene practices. Gender, education, and toothache were associated with good oral hygiene practices. The study suggests the need for oral health services and hygiene awareness programs in rural areas.
The experience of pain, and problems with eating, chewing, smiling, and communication due to lost discolored, or damaged teeth have a major impact on people’s daily lives and well-being [1]. Oral diseases are still public health problems with high prevalence and incidence all around the world [2]. Poor oral hygiene practice leads to periodontal disease which is one of the most frequent dental problems [3]. Oral health problems are mostly preventable through good oral hygiene habits and regular preventive dental visits [4]. Cleanliness of teeth, gum, tongue, and all part of the oral cavity is considered oral hygiene[5]. Proper oral hygiene is important for preventing oral and dental disease including gingivitis periodontal diseases and dental caries[6, 7]. Good oral hygiene practices promote a good personality, prevent oral cavity diseases, and promote quality of life[8]. So, good oral hygiene is the baseline foundation for controlling more than 80% of oral diseases[6]. Oral health problems due to poor oral hygiene practices are considered many other co-morbidities such as offensive breath, cardiovascular diseases, respiratory diseases, kidney diseases, and oral cancers [9-11]. Oro-pharyngeal cancers are the most serious oral health problems which cause more death than cervical cancer[12].
The most important oral health global burden of disease in oral health is due to periodontal diseases and dental caries among industrialized developed countries as well as other developing countries [1]. Oral diseases affect nearly 3.5 billion people. Untreated dental caries in permanent teeth is the most common health condition according to the Global Burden of Disease 2019[13]. Globally, the greatest burden of oral diseases lies on disadvantaged and poor populations [14]. Poor oral hygiene can have an adverse effect on the overall health and quality of life of a person[15]. Nearly every adult has at least one dental caries, almost 30% of people in the world aged between 65 to 80 do not have any natural teeth left and more than 50% of the school children have at least one dental caries [16]. Most people practice cleaning their teeth at least once a day in Nepal and a substantial number of the population use fluoridated toothpaste [17]. According to Nepal national pathfinder survey, the prevalence of dental caries among adults aged 35-49 years was 57.5% and those aged >50 years were 69.6%[18]. People in rural areas have comparatively poor oral hygiene practices[19] and have high oral care needs[20]. According to the study in Nepal, more than fifty percent of the participant have below-average practice in oral hygiene (55.8%) and only 44.2% of the participant have above-average practice in oral hygiene [21]. Another study conducted in the Kaski district of Nepal showed that education is an important factor associated with oral health status[22]. Individuals with higher education had significantly higher odds of getting good oral hygiene practices compared to those with lower education levels[23].
This study was conducted in a rural municipality, where the majority of the population had little to no knowledge about good oral hygiene practices, and very few practiced dental flossing on a daily basis. People tended to visit a dentist only when they experienced severe pain or toothache. Moreover, the majority of the people in this study area belonged to marginalized castes in Nepal. The study revealed that poor and marginalized people were more likely to experience oral health problems in Nepal [18]. They consume alcohol and are addicted to smoking for enjoyment, to get drunk, to escape problems, or for ritualistic reasons [24]. Additionally, most studies have focused on school children in urban areas, with very few community-based studies conducted in rural areas and among marginalized ethnic groups. Therefore, the aim of this study is to assess oral hygiene practices and their associated factors among middle-aged people in a rural municipality in the Dhading district of Nepal.
2.1. Study area and period: The study was conducted in a community setting in the central part of the country, Netrawati Dabjong rural municipality, Bagmati province, Dhading district from May to October 2022. This rural municipality was 85 km northwest of the capital city. The majority of the community are Tamang tribal ethnic group, thus this rural municipality was chosen for study. Tamang community is marginalized, has low socioeconomic poor health status, and low literacy group, so this group was taken for study[25, 26]. Groups are coded as the Janjati group in this study. Two wards among five were selected randomly by lottery method.
2.2. Study design, participants, and variables: Community-based quantitative cross-sectional study design was conducted among middle-aged adults (40-60 years). Patients taking medication for severe mental illness and who refused to participate in the study were excluded. One individual from each household was included. We took sociodemographic characteristics such as age, sex, occupation, income, employment status, education, ethnicity, and dental condition such as dental caries, toothache, gum bleeding, and previous dental visit as independent variables and oral hygiene practice as dependent variables. Behavioral patterns and eating practices such as frequency of brushing, use of toothpaste, fluoride in toothpaste, the technique of brushing, time of changing brush, and doing mouth rinse were also used as dependent variables.
2.3. Sample size and sampling procedure:
Sample size was calculated by using single population proportion formula. A previous study found that 41.9% of people used toothbrushes and fluoridated toothpaste and not using any tobacco products [27]. By considering this as good oral hygiene practice, the sample size was 375. The household population of selected wards was found to be 1195. By applying the formula for finite population (n =(n∘)/(1+n∘/N)) the sample size was calculated. Where n= sample size, no=375, and N=1195. By calculation, the final sample size was 286 which was further rounded to 291 by taking some surplus data. All people aged between 40 to 60 years were included and those participants who refuse to participate in this study were excluded.
Two wards were randomly selected from a total of five wards. All the eligible participants from the selected household were identified from the selected wards and a sampling frame was constructed. If there were more than one eligible member, only one most senior (age-wise) individual was taken as a sample from each selected household. We used a systematic random sampling technique for the selection of households. The center place was identified from each selected ward to start the data collection. The sampling interval was calculated by total household number i.e., 1195 divided by sample size 291 and obtained 4, so data was collected every 4th household until the sample size was reached. First household and direction were identified by pencil spin method.
2.4. Data collection tools and procedure:
Semi-structured questionnaire was formulated and finalized by the study team in consultation with another public health expert. The data collection tool consisted following parts: socio-demographic characteristic was in the first part; behavioral practice was in the second and eating practice was in the third part. The dependent variable (oral hygienic practice) was assessed by behavioral and eating practices. Oral hygiene practice-related questions such as ‘Do you brush your teeth?’ ‘How often do you clean your teeth?’ (Frequency of brushing), ‘Do you use toothpaste/brush?’, ‘Do you use fluoridated toothpaste?’, use a toothpick, ‘Explain the technique of brushing’(right/wrong), ‘time duration of changing brush’, ‘use of dental floss’, and ‘mouth rinse’ etc., and eating practice related questions were: ‘Do you consume alcohol’, ‘smoking’, ‘tobacco chewing, ‘Do you use of biscuit’, ‘candy’, ‘sugar’, ‘sweets’, ‘nut’. One score was provided for good oral hygiene practice. Data collectors were properly trained and questions were clearly explained during data collection to maintain data integrity, improve data quality, enhance reliability and validity, promote participant understanding, and ensure adherence to ethical standards. The face-to-face interview was conducted with one respondent from each household. Senior (age-wise) member of the household was interviewed if there were more than one member aged 40-60 years within the family. One health professional was recruited for data collection and a BDS doctor was supervised.
2.5. Measurement of oral hygiene practice
i. Poor oral hygienic practice: There were 18 items to assess hygiene practices. Questions from behavioral and eating practice were summed by providing a ‘one’ score for hygienic and a ‘zero’ for unhygienic practices for calculation of poor and good hygienic practices. The total score was obtained from 18 practice questions. Cut-off scores below average/mean (mean=9.91) were categorized as poor oral hygiene practice [28].
ii. Good oral hygienic practice: Cut-off scores equal and more than the mean were categorized as good oral hygiene practice[28].
2.6. Data quality control: The questionnaire was prepared after intensive discussions among the study team and was finalized after pretesting with 10% of the population. Initially, the questionnaire was prepared in English and then back-translated to Nepali by collaborating closely with a local language expert, an English language expert, and a dental healthcare professional. This collaboration ensured technical consistency and reliability. One researcher was responsible for data collection to maintain the validity of the questionnaire. The collected data were promptly checked and rechecked by a dental doctor to ensure data quality.
2.7. Data processing and analysis: Epi-Data version 3.1 was used to enter the data after the necessary validation and generation of check files. Data were then transferred, cleaned, and analyzed in SPSS 22. Descriptive statistics such as frequency, percentage, a measure of central tendency, etc. were calculated according to the characteristics of variables. The information was presented in a summary and descriptive table for further interpretation. We used bivariate analysis to measure the association between independent and dependent variables by chi-square test. We calculated the odds ratio and 95% confidence interval to find out the significant association between the study and outcome variables. The variables which were significantly associated with dependent variables with p<0>
2.8. Ethical consideration:
A verbal explanation of objectives was given to the rural municipality office for permission for data collection. The purpose and objectives of the study were explained to all the respondents. Written consent was taken from each respondent. Confidentiality of information from respondents was highly maintained. Ethical approval was taken from IRC-CiST (Ref. no: 135/078/079)
3.1. Sociodemographic characteristics: Altogether 291 respondents were included in this study. Among all respondents, 52% were male and 40.9% were illiterate and 37 % completed primary education with a mean age of 50.55(±4.89). Only 14.4% of respondents were employed. More than 76% were Janjati caste followed by the upper caste group. A total of 70.8% of respondents followed the Buddhism religion followed by the Hindu religion (28.5%). Nearly half of the respondents were from nuclear (Table 1).
3.2 Respondents practice oral hygiene: The majority of respondents, i.e., 80% practiced brushing their teeth once a day. Among them, 60% of respondents changed their toothbrush every three months. Surprisingly, 1.4% of participants responded that they never brush their teeth. The majority of respondents, i.e., 98% didn’t know about fluoride and its benefits. Most of the respondents (98.6%) used toothpaste while brushing their teeth. The majority i.e., 79.8% of respondents reported that they have fluoride in their toothpaste. A high proportion of respondents (97.6%) brushed their teeth in the horizontal and vertical directions. Almost all (98.6%) of the population rinses their mouth after their meal. The majority of (62.2%) respondents have visited a dentist only when they have a toothache and surprisingly, 37.5% of respondents never visited a dentist (Table 2). Moreover, a person's dietary habits can have an impact on oral hygiene as well. The research findings showed that more than two-thirds of the respondents used tobacco products, while over half (54%) reported consuming biscuits. Additionally, nearly one-third (32%) of the participants included alcohol and sweet candy in their daily food intake (Table 3).
3.3 The overall level of oral hygiene practices: Among all 291 respondents, 56.7% have poor, while 43.3% have good oral hygiene practices (Figure 1
Table 1: Sociodemographic characteristics of respondents among middle aged people in rural Nepal 2022(n=291)
Table 2:Respondents practice on oral hygiene
Table 3:Respondents behavioral practice on food habit related oral hygiene
Figure 1:Level of oral hygiene of respondents among middle age people in rural Nepal 2022 (n=291)
3.4 Affecting factors with oral hygienic practice among middle age people:
Association between socio-demographic variables such as age, sex, education, monthly income, and employment status were identified to be significantly associated to oral hygienic practice (Table 4)
| Variables | Attributes | Practice | ||
| Poor n (%) | Good n (%) | p-value | ||
| Age | 40-50 | 100(68.5) | 46(31.5) | <0> |
| 50-60 | 65(44.8) | 80(55.2) | ||
| Gender | Male | 76(49.7) | 77(50.3) | 0.011* |
| Female | 89(64.5) | 49(35.5) | ||
| Education | Illiterate | 109(63.4) | 63(36.6) | <0> |
| Literate | 56(47.1) | 63(52.9) | ||
| Monthly income | Up to 10,000 | 131(53.7) | 113(46.3) | 0.018* |
| More than 10000 | 34 (72.3) | 13 (27.7) | ||
| Ethnicity | Under Privilege | 128(57.7) | 94(42.3) | .555 |
| Privileged | 37(53.6) | 32(46.4) | ||
| Employment status | Employed | 30(71.4) | 12 (28.6) | 0.037* |
| Unemployed | 135 (54.2) | 114 (45.8) | ||
Table 4: Association between socio-demographic variables and oral hygiene
'3.5. Associated factors with oral hygienic practice among middle age people:
In the multivariate analysis, a variance inflation test (VIF) was performed among the independent variables, and the highest reported VIF was 2.87, suggesting no issues of multicollinearity. Regarding socio-demographic variables, the results indicate no significant difference between oral hygiene practices and age group, income, and employment groups. Similarly, the results reveal that females have three times higher odds of
having good oral hygiene practices compared to males (AOR: 3.51, 95% CI: 1.86-6.62), and literate individuals have higher odds of having good oral hygiene practices compared to illiterate individuals (AOR=2.04, p=0.032). In terms of dental condition and oral hygiene practices, the results demonstrate that individuals with toothache have higher odds of having poor oral hygiene practices compared to those without toothache (AOR=3.93, p=0.002) (see Table 5).
Table 5: Logistic regression analysis of factors associated with oral hygiene practice
In our study, the majority of respondents i.e., 80% practiced brushing their teeth once a day. According to the study conducted in India, the majority of respondents brushed their teeth once a day[20, 29]. It shows that people have normalized brushing their teeth once a day in both study areas.
In this study, the majority of respondents (60%) changed their toothbrush every three months and the majority of respondents i.e., 98% didn’t know about fluoride and its benefits. According to the study in Mangalore South India, only 22.4% of the participants knew that fluoride strengthens the teeth[30]. According to a study among students in Odisha (India), nearly 34.53% of the students changed their toothbrushes once in 2 months and nearly 45.6% of the students always used fluoridated toothpaste[29]. Our finding revealed that the majority of the population brushed their teeth in the horizontal and vertical directions was supported by the literature found[31].
As per the study findings, about 62.2% of respondents have visited a dentist only when they have dental pain and 37.5% never visited a dentist which is similar to the findings of the study conducted in Saudi Arabia [32] and Dharan, Nepal[33]. This shows that people visit the dentist mostly when they have oral health problems which could be due to the very expensive cost of treatment. This study revealed that more than half (56.7%) were practicing poor oral hygienic practice. The study conducted in Ethiopia found that more than 27% had poor knowledge[28]. This huge difference is due to different study settings. But another study from Saudi Arabia found nearly the same result[34]. Half of the respondents i.e., 65.6% had oral health-related problems. Among them 61.5%had dental caries. According to the study done among German refugees, 79% of the participants had dental caries [35].
As per our results, oral hygiene practice was found to be statistically significant to the age of the respondents, which is in agreement with the literature found[36-38]. Association between socio-demographic variables such as sex and education were identified to be significantly associated with oral hygienic practice in this study. The study conducted among USA ethnic group [39], STEPS survey Nepal[17], and a study in Burkino Faso[40] supports our result that more knowledgeable and educated people are performing better hygiene practices than uneducated people. Socio-economic status and oral hygiene index are statistically significant[41]. According to the study conducted UAE in being employed is significant with oral hygiene practice [42] which was consistent with our study.
Many study found that dental caries and periodontal diseases are significantly associated with oral hygiene-related behavior[43]. Dental problems and dental visits were significantly associated[44]. People who were facing problems related to oral health were practicing better oral hygiene behavior.
This study found that the odds of using good oral hygiene practices are increasing with age (AOR: 2.67, 95% CI: 1.65-4.31) in bivariate analysis which is supported by the study done in American middle-aged (35-44 years). Navajo Native Americans were showing better oral hygiene scale scores compared with the older age group in multivariate analysis[45]. Oral hygiene practice gets better as age increases (AOR=0.722 (0.277-1.880) [28].
In this study, people with good income are more likely to adopt better oral hygiene practices (AOR: 2.25(1.13-4.48) which is supported by the study in India which revealed, more affluent people have better oral health status[46].
The limitation of this study is the possibility of information bias because we have only collected self-recorded dental conditions. We did not perform clinical examinations to confirm the reported dental conditions. Generally, there are nine wards are there in a rural municipality of Nepal. So due to the limited sample size and area, the findings of this study may not be generalizable to the large population of urban areas. However, this study has conducted this study in a rural area of Nepal and among the adult population, which is the strength of this study. This study finding helps rural municipalities to emphasize following good oral hygiene practices to reduce dental diseases.
In this study, middle-aged adults, most of the respondents brushed their teeth once a day, and all the people who brushed their teeth used toothpaste. The majority of respondents had no knowledge about fluoride and its benefits. More than half of the respondents had poor oral hygiene practices. Among oral health-related problems, dental caries was the most prevalent problem. Sex, education, and suffering from toothache were factors associated with oral hygiene practice. Oral health services, awareness programs, and campaigns need a special focus on low-education clusters to be organized by the rural municipality to improve oral hygiene practice.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
