AUCTORES
Research Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2767-7370/127
*Corresponding Author: Mona Eid Ahmed, National Nutrition Institute, Cairo, Egypt.
Citation: Mona Eid Ahmed, (2024), Assess the risk factors of developing hypoglycemia among term infants born to diabetic mothers, J New Medical Innovations and Research, 5(7); DOI:10.31579/2767-7370/127
Copyright: © 2024, Mona Eid Ahmed. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 22 October 2024 | Accepted: 01 November 2024 | Published: 11 November 2024
Keywords: hypoglycemia; neonates; diabetic mothers
Objective: to assess the risk factors of developing hypoglycemia among term infants born to diabetic mothers and to characterize rates of glucose concentrations in the first 2 days of life.
Methods: A prospective study included all IDMs who were born at EL Kasr EL-Aini Hospital with exclusion of major congenital anomalies, polycythemia, respiratory distress, sepsis, asphyxia or other clinical manifestations not clearly attributed to hypoglycemia. Blood glucose level was measured immediately after delivery and over 48 hours, taking into consideration maternal data before and during pregnancy and neonatal data including gestational age, sex, body weight, apgar score, clinical manifestations of hypoglycemia and nutrition of the newborn.
Results: Hypoglycemia at 0 hour was more among those born to uncontrolled diabetic mothers, mothers who were on insulin therapy (either GDM-A2 or IDDM) , severe hypoglycemia after birth and on the 1st day of life was more common in neonates that were born to hypertensive, uncontrolled diabetic mothers as well as to mothers on insulin therapy. The mean of glucose values on the 2nd day of life showed improvement for the majority of the neonates.
Conclusions: It seems that infants born to diabetic mothers tend to have very high rates of hypoglycemia on the first day of life when a higher cut-off point is used. When considering glucose values in newborn infants, it is necessary to distinguish between ‘common’ glucose values that can be low not only among high-risk infants and values of infants born to diabetic mothers. Then it must be decided whether these values should be accepted as ‘normal’ or, as suggested in a number of recent studies. Whether they indicate a correlation between hypoglycemia (even moderate and asymptomatic) and unfavorable outcome, leading to a recommendation to maintain higher glucose levels.
The majority of fetal glucose is obtained from maternal circulation through facilitated diffusion, maintaining fetal glucose levels during the second and third trimesters (Lord and De León, 2024). Upon severance of the umbilical cord, a maternal cutoff occurs, necessitating the newborn's prompt engagement in glycogenolysis of hepatic reserves, gluconeogenesis, and the assimilation of exogenous nutrients (Rosenfeld and Paul Thornton, 2023). Hypoglycemia poses a significant issue, resulting in numerous severe short- and long-term complications, including convulsions, apnea, cyanosis, and cognitive impairment. Blood glucose levels in term neonates exhibit considerable variability, with values below 30 mg/dl commonly observed due to the underdevelopment of gluconeogenesis and ketogenesis (Adamkin, 2017; De Rose et al. 2024).
The reported incidence of hypoglycemia fluctuates according on its definition, with estimates indicating it occurs in around 25-50% of newborns born to diabetic mothers and 15-25% of infants born to mothers with gestational diabetes; however, only a minor fraction exhibit symptoms (Suraiya et al. 2018). Insulin resistance is a typical occurrence that arises during the second trimester of pregnancy and subsequently escalates to levels comparable to those observed in non-pregnant individuals with type 2 diabetes; it is believed to ensure glucose availability for the developing fetus (Andrews et al. 2024).Women with gestational diabetes mellitus exhibit insulin resistance that cannot be mitigated by augmented production in the pancreatic β-cells (Nazarpour et al. 2024).
Placental hormones, together with a lower contribution from increased fat deposits, appear to facilitate insulin resistance during pregnancy. Cortisol and progesterone are the primary factors, but human placental lactogen, prolactin, and estradiol also play a role (Handwerger and Freekman, 2000; Schenk et al. 2024). Variable maternal hyperglycemia leads to fetal hyperglycemia, pancreatic B-cell hyperplasia, and hyperinsulinemia. Postnatally, hyperinsulinemia continues, as indicated by increased utilization of exogenous glucose and reduced endogenous glucose synthesis. Additionally, free fatty acids and ketones are diminished (Klaus and Fanaroff, 2001; Mittal et al. 2024).
The pathogenetic basis of neonatal hypoglycemia in infants of diabetic mothers (IDMs) is elucidated by maternal hyperglycemia as described by Pederson. The fetal hyperinsulinism hypothesis posits a correlation between fetal macrosomia, elevated HbA1c levels in maternal and cord blood, and neonatal hypoglycemia. Additionally, the relationship between increased cord blood C-peptide or immunoreactive insulin levels and hypoglycemia indicates that regulating maternal blood glucose during the final trimester may reduce the occurrence of neonatal hypoglycemia in infants of diabetic mothers (De Rose et al. 2024).
In typical circumstances, the adrenergic response occurring immediately post-birth inhibits insulin secretion and promotes glucagon release, thereby augmenting gluconeogenesis and ketogenesis. This results in a reversal of the insulin/glucagon ratio shortly after birth, constituting a normal physiological occurrence. Consequently, a post-delivery glucose nadir is attained within 30 to 90 minutes after birth, followed by an autonomous recovery before 3 to 4 hours of age (Giouleka et al. 2023). In infants born to diabetic mothers, the inversion of the ratio is delayed, resulting in more severe and prolonged hypoglycemia (Rennie and Roberton, 2002). The aim of this study is to evaluate the risk factors for hypoglycemia in term children born to diabetic mothers and to delineate glucose concentration levels over the first two days of life.
Study design
This is a prospective controlled non-randomized study conducted at Kasr El-Aini Hospital Cairo University. 100 full-term babies more than 37 weeks gestation born to diabetic mothers were enrolled in our study after written concern form the parents or their cavere.
Patients criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
The glucometer used in this study was called Optime-x-ceed made in china. Each glucometer had its test strips and its code which were specific for the device. Each test strip and lancet was used for a single measurement and reading to follow infection control rules.
Blood glucose level was measured using whole blood glucometer (Optime x-ceed) as it has the advantage of being bedside and helps rapid intervention than plasma glucose levels as there is time elapsed between withdrawing of the sample and the results. We measured blood glucose levels at 0, 2, 4, 6, 8 hrs and every 8 hours for 48 hours to find out the rates of hypoglycemia and the symptoms accompanying the corresponding blood glucose levels. Oral feeding was initiated during the first 2-4 h of life and thereafter every 2-3 h as requested. Infants with glucose values lower than 30mg/dl and those with repeated values in the range of 30-39 mg/dl will be treated with continuous intravenous glucose after an intravenous bolus of 10% glucose 2 ml/Kg (Maayan-metzger et al. 2009).
Statistical analysis
All data were compiled and analyzed using SPSS version 25 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Continuous variables are presented as means (± standard deviation [SD]), and categorical variables are presented using relative frequency distributions and percentages. Categorical data were analyzed using the chi-square (X2) test, Fishers exact test. Statistical significance was established at p ≤ 0.05.
The patients were categorized into two groups, A and B, based on post-natal glucose levels assessed at 0 hours, utilizing a cut-off point of 47 mg/dl instead of 40 mg/dl to mitigate false-negative results due to elevated plasma glucose concentrations. Group (A) comprised infants with glucose levels below 47 mg/dl, while group (B) consisted of neonates with glucose levels equal to or beyond 47 mg/dl. The average mother age and standard deviation were 32.29 ± 6.01 years. Group (A) had a mean age of 32.32±5.88 years, while group (B) had a mean age of 32.16±6.51 years. Among 100 diabetic women, 36 had gestational diabetes (GDM-A0) without insulin therapy or dietary management (36.0%), 47 were receiving insulin therapy (GDM-A2) (47%), and 16 were diagnosed with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) (16%). Only one case exhibited gestational diabetes managed with dietary intervention (GDM-A1).
In terms of Maternal Data, the incidence of gestational diabetes type GDM-A0 was higher in group (A) with 26 cases, compared to only 10 instances in group (B). Similarly, GDM-A2 was more prevalent in group (A) with 41 cases, in contrast to 6 cases in group (B). Group (A) had 9 cases of IDDM moms, whereas group (B) included 7 cases. GDM-A1 was identified in one instance within group (B). The difference was statistically significant, with a P value of 0.01. Group (A) had sixty-nine neonate cases with mothers suffering from uncontrolled diabetes, whereas group (B) had fifteen cases, resulting in a statistically significant difference of P=0.001. The comparison of maternal data between diabetic women in groups (A) and (B) concerning mode of delivery, meconium-stained amniotic fluid, hypertension, and insulin therapy yielded statistically negligible results (Table 1).
Table 1: The maternal data in the 2 groups.
Regarding glucose measurements at 0 hours and maternal data, it was observed that 53.8% of severely hypoglycemic cases (<30>47 mg/dl), 85.7% of mildly hypoglycemic cases (40-46 mg/dl), and 96.7% of moderately hypoglycemic cases (30-39 mg/dl) were born to normotensive mothers. The difference was statistically significant with a P-value of 0.001. In the comparison of glucose measurements at 0 hours and the control of maternal diabetes, it was shown that 87.2% of severely hypoglycemia cases (<30>47 mg/dl), 85.7% of mildly hypoglycemic cases (40-46 mg/dl), and 96.7% of moderately hypoglycemic cases (30-39 mg/dl) were born to normotensive mothers. The difference was statistically significant with a P-value of 0.001. In the comparison of glucose measurements at 0 hours and the control of maternal diabetes, it was shown that 87.2% of severely hypoglycemia cases (less than 30 mg/dl) were born to diabetic mothers using insulin therapy during pregnancy, while only 12.8% of these cases were delivered to moms not receiving insulin therapy during pregnancy. The difference was statistically significant with a P-value of 0.0011. In the comparison of glucose measurements at 0 hours and the type of maternal diabetes, it was shown that 66.7% of severely hypoglycemic cases were born to GDM-A2 mothers, while 20.5% were born to IDDM moms. The difference was statistically significant with a P-value of 0.001. The comparison of glucose measurements at 0 hours, delivery mode, and meconium-stained amniotic fluid was statistically insignificant (Table 2).
Table 2: Glucose measuremnt at 0 hour in relation to maternal data.
Concerning maternal data, the kind of gestational diabetes: Among the LGA neonates, 31 (47%) were born to mothers with GDM-A2, 28 (42.4%) to those with GDM-A0, and 7 (10.6%) to mothers with IDDM, with no statistical significance seen (P=0.06). Upon comparing the relevance of gestational age and birth weight with maternal data (mode of delivery, meconium-stained amniotic fluid, hypertension, insulin therapy, diabetes type, and diabetes management), no statistical significance was observed among the various groups. In the comparison of maternal diabetes management, 55 (83.3%) LGA and 5 (83.3%) SGA neonates were delivered by moms with uncontrolled diabetes, which demonstrated no statistical significance. Furthermore, the comparison of gestational age and birth weight with neonatal data, including initial glucose level and subsequent glucose bolus followed by infusion, demonstrated statistical insignificance (Table 3).
Table 3: Appropriateness of gestational age and birth weight in relation to neonatal data
Also, mothers with GDM-A0, GDM-A2, IDDM had uncontrolled diabetes (97.2%), (80.9), (68.8%) respectively and that was statistically significant with P=0.001 (Table 4). When comparing the type of maternal diabetes and the maternal data (mode of delivery, me conium-stained amniotic fluid and hypertension all proved to be statistically insignificant (Table 5).
Table 4: Type of maternal diabetes and neonatal data.
Table 5: Type of maternal diabetes with the neonatal data
Moreover, a comparison of maternal diabetes management with neonatal outcomes revealed that neonates receiving a glucose bolus followed by infusion were predominantly those born to mothers with uncontrolled diabetes (79.8%), whereas a lesser proportion were born to mothers with controlled diabetes (31.2%). This demonstrated statistical significance with a P value of 0.001. Upon comparing maternal diabetes management with glucose levels at baseline, it was observed that 82.1% of neonates in group A were born to mothers with uncontrolled diabetes, whereas 56.2% in group B were born to moms with controlled diabetes. This was statistically significant with P=0.001. (Table 6).
Table 6: Neonatal data in controlled and uncontrolled diabetes.
In our study, the comparison of glucose measurements on day 1 with maternal data revealed that 76.7% of hypertensive mothers delivered hypoglycemic neonates (glucose less than 30 mg/dl), while 21.4%, 10.0%, and 41.4% of normotensive mothers delivered neonates with glucose values exceeding 47 mg/dl, ranging from 40-46 mg/dl, and 30-39 mg/dl, respectively. This demonstrated statistical significance with P=0.001. In the comparison of glucose measurements on day 1 with maternal data, it was observed that 44.0% and 37.0% of mothers with uncontrolled diabetes delivered neonates with glucose levels below 30 mg/dl and between 30-39 mg/dl, respectively. Conversely, 56.25% and 12.5% of mothers with controlled diabetes delivered neonates with glucose levels of 47 mg/dl or higher and between 40-46 mg/dl, respectively. This demonstrated statistical significance with P=0.001. Further more, it was observed that 37.1% of mothers on insulin therapy delivered neonates with severe hypoglycemia (less than 30 mg/dl), while 16.2% of moms not receiving insulin therapy had hypoglycemic newborns (less than 30 30 mg/dl). This demonstrated a statistically significant P value of 0.00. It was determined that 62.5% of IDDM moms and 61.9% of GDM-A2 mothers gave birth to neonates with severe hypoglycemia (less than 30 mg/dl). This demonstrated statistical significance with a P-value of 0.001 (Table 7).
Table 7: Glucose measurement on day 1 in relation to maternal data.
Figure 1: The mean glucose values at 0,2,4,6,8,16,24,32,40 and 48 hrs in 100 full-term neonates born to diabetic mothers and their improvement over 48 hours. The mean glucose value at 0 hour was 38.330 ± 21.33. When comparing the glucose measurement on day 1 and gestational age and birth-weight, it was found that (84.9%) of LGA neonates and (100%) of SGA had shown hypoglycemia on the first day of life.
Historically, infants born to diabetes mothers have been seen as having an elevated risk for symptomatic hypoglycemia compared to other newborns. The impact of intensified evaluation of pregnant women for glucose intolerance, together with rigorous glucose monitoring and therapy during gestation, on the infant's risk of hypoglycemia remains ambiguous (Van Howke and Storms, 2006). Currently, 3-10% of pregnancies are impacted by gestational diabetes, with the majority of these instances associated with impaired glucose management throughout pregnancy. Approximately 3% to 5% of patients with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) possess pre-existing type 1 or type 2 diabetes, with pregnancy serving as the initial occasion for diagnostic testing (Parritz and Cloherty, 2008). Infants of diabetes mothers are often healthy and benefit from contemporary obstetrical and neonatal care; yet, they remain susceptible to problems. The risk is correlated with the duration, severity, and management of the mother's diabetes (Rudolph et al. 2003). In evaluating glucose levels in neonates, it is essential to differentiate between 'normal' glucose values, which may be low in both high-risk infants and those born to diabetes moms. It must be determined whether these levels should be regarded as 'normal' or, as indicated in several recent research. The findings suggest a link between hypoglycemia, including moderate and asymptomatic cases, and adverse outcomes, prompting a suggestion to sustain elevated glucose levels (Maayan-Metzger et al. 2009).
In this study, a cut-off point of ≥47 mg/dl was employed, as the glucometer does not adjust for the established discrepancy between whole blood and plasma glucose concentrations (with plasma glucose exhibiting higher levels). Consequently, the 47 mg/dl threshold was selected instead of the more frequently utilized 40 mg/dl for defining hypoglycemia, to mitigate the risk of false-negative results that could pose safety concerns. At this stage, we discovered that over 75% of neonates born to diabetic moms exhibited hypoglycemia (defined as <47>In contrast to our findings, Maayan-Metzger et al. (2009), in their study involving retrospective analysis of 576 infants born to diabetes mothers, calculated that around half of the neonates had comparable rates of hypoglycemia when applying the same threshold. Van Howe and Storms (2006) reported reduced hypoglycemia rates in infants of diabetic mothers when employing a lower threshold ( les than 40 mg/dl).
In contrast to our findings, Maayan-Metzger et al. (2009), in their study involving retrospective analysis of 576 infants born to diabetes mothers, calculated that around half of the neonates had comparable rates of hypoglycemia when applying the same threshold. Van Howe and Storms (2006) reported reduced hypoglycemia rates in infants of diabetic mothers when employing a lower threshold ( less than 40 mg/dl). It was revealed that 59% of the 66 examined IDMs exhibited blood glucose levels below 40 mg/dl. Agrawal et al. (2000) observed that 47% of the thirty-eight term newborns investigated exhibited hypoglycemia, utilizing a cut-off point of less than 40 mg/dl. Using a comparable cutoff criterion to our study (≥47 mg/dl), the incidence was 71%. In contrast to our findings, Van Howe and Storms (2006) reported reduced rates of hypoglycemia in infants of diabetic mothers (IDMs) when employing a lower cut-off point (less than 40 mg/dl). It was revealed that 59% of the 66 examined IDMs exhibited blood glucose levels below 40 mg/dl. Agrawal et al. (2000) observed that 47% of the thirty-eight term newborns investigated exhibited hypoglycemia, utilizing a cut-off point of less than 40 mg/dl. Using a comparable cutoff criterion to our study (≥47 mg/dl), the incidence was 71%. In contrast to our findings, Van Howe and Storms (2006) reported reduced rates of hypoglycemia in infants of diabetic mothers (IDMs) when employing a lower cut-off point ( less than 40 mg/dl). It was revealed that 59% of the 66 examined IDMs exhibited blood glucose levels below 40 mg/dl. In our study, 39% of the examined newborns exhibited severe hypoglycemia ( less than 30 mg/dl) at 0 hours, whereas 42% experienced hypoglycemia on their first day of life. Conversely, Van Howke and Storms (2006) reported a reduced incidence of severe hypoglycemia, noting that 16.6% of the 66 examined infants of diabetic mothers (IDMs) experienced severe hypoglycemia soon after birth. Maayan-Metzger et al. (2009) revealed that the incidence of severe hypoglycemia was under 4% among the neonates tested on their first day of life.
In the present study, 80.3% of hypoglycemic newborns were asymptomatic, with no cases of convulsions or coma reported. Likewise, Maayan-Metzger et al. (2009) noted that no infants had significant coma or convulsions. Van Howke and Storms (2006) observed that none of the 66 infants who underwent blood glucose assessments developed symptomatic hypoglycemia. Numerous investigations have been conducted to elucidate the neurodevelopmental outcomes of neonatal hypoglycemia. McKinlay et al. (2018) demonstrated that asymptomatic hypoglycemia was formerly deemed clinically insignificant; nevertheless, the presence of aberrant electroencephalograms and sensory evoked potentials in asymptomatic hypoglycemic babies has called this assumption into question. Furthermore, Stenninger et al. (2008) revealed that school-age children of diabetes mothers who experienced recurrent neonatal asymptomatic hypoglycemia (BGL less than 27 mg/dl) have a significantly elevated total score on the minimum brain dysfunction screening test compared to matched controls. Nevertheless, other investigations have shown that the absence of symptoms is encouraging. Singh et al. (1991) discovered that 94% of the 107 asymptomatic and symptomatic infants with hypoglycemia exhibited normal developmental outcomes at follow-up.
The majority of hypoglycemia neonates, 90.8%, were born to women with uncontrolled diabetes, in contrast to 62.5% in group (B), with this difference being statistically significant (P value = 0.00). This resulted from variable maternal hyperglycemia caused by insulin resistance in uncontrolled diabetic pregnancies, leading to fetal hyperglycemia, pancreatic B-cell hyperplasia, and hyperinsulinism. Following birth, the maternal impact diminished, resulting in persistent hyperinsulinemia, which subsequently caused neonatal hypoglycemia (Klaus and Fanar off, 2001). Consistent with our findings, Van Howke and Storms (2006) conducted a research at Marquette General Hospital in Michigan, aimed at identifying characteristics that contribute to neonatal hypoglycemia in infants born to diabetes mothers. The study of 66 neonates revealed that the incidence of symptomatic hypoglycemia seems reduced with stricter management of gestational diabetes. Conversely, Mayan – Metzger et al. (2009) conducted a comparable trial and discovered that even well-managed maternal diabetes did not avert newborn hypoglycemia. Agrawal et al. (2000) underscored that effective clinical and potentially laboratory glycemic management during pregnancy and delivery did not avert hypoglycemia in the neonate. The comparison of glucose levels at 0 hours with gestational age, birth weight, and sex was statistically insignificant. The research conducted by Sarkar et al. in 2003, which determined that birth weight, gestational age, sex, and maternal HbA1c did not forecast low glucose levels during initial screening, corroborated our findings.
Nonetheless, a comparison of glucose measurements on day one with gestational age and birth weight revealed that 84.8% of LGA neonates and all SGA neonates had hypoglycemia on their first day of life. This aligns with the findings of Maayan-Metzger et al., 2009, which indicated that hypoglycemia is more prevalent in LGA and SGA newborns. The heightened risk associated with larger infants and younger moms may indicate inadequate management of diabetes during pregnancy (Van Howke and Storms, 2006). Large for gestational age (LGA) newborns indicate inadequate management of gestational diabetes throughout pregnancy, leading to fetal hyperinsulinemia and macrosomia; hence, upon cessation of maternal insulin, hyperinsulinemia causes hypoglycemia. SGA newborns exemplify inadequate management of pre-diabetes, leading to vasculopathy and reduced glycogen and lipid reserves, which culminates in hypoglycemia within the initial 12 to 24 hours of life (Rennine and Roberton, 2002).
In our study, only 1 case was born to controlled GDM-A1 mother and did not experience hypoglycemia. In the study done by Sarkar et al., 2003, they proved that infants of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM)-A1 women are unlikely to experience the marked excursion in maternal glucose levels that may characterize insulin-requiring GDM (class-A2) or insulin-dependent diabetes (IDDM).
Our study revealed that 65.8% of hypoglycemic neonates (<47> mg/dl) were delivered to women on insulin therapy when analyzing blood glucose levels in relation to the type of maternal diabetes. Furthermore, it was determined that 37.1% of mothers undergoing insulin therapy during pregnancy, whether classified as GDM-A2 or IDDM, delivered infants with severe hypoglycemia (defined as less than 30 mg/dl) on the first day of life, which is statistically significant. Consistent with our findings, Maayan-Metzger et al. (2009) calculated that severe hypoglycemia was more prevalent in the same cohort. A notable correlation between maternal hypertension and severe hypoglycemia incidents, which accounted for 76.7% of hypertensive mothers, was observed on the first day of life. It was determined that 55.3% of GDM-A2 moms and 62.5% of IDDM women delivered severely hypoglycemia neonates on the first day of life. Sarkar et al. (2003) and Maayan-Metzger (2009) found that maternal hypertension substantially linked with newborn hypoglycemia, in addition to the type and control of maternal diabetes, which aligns with our findings. Numerous research have disclosed alarming findings concerning the consequences of newborn hypoglycemia. Prolonged or severe hypoglycemia (glucose less than 18 mg/dl) has been demonstrated to induce neuronal death when the EEG becomes flat (Auer, 2004). Less severe hypoglycemia has been demonstrated to induce sensor-evoked potential anomalies in children (Maayan Metzger, 2009).
It seems that infants born to diabetic mothers tend to have very high rates of hypoglycemia on the first day of life when a higher cut-off point is used. When considering glucose values in newborn infants, it is necessary to distinguish between ‘common’ glucose values that can be low not only among high-risk infants and values of infants born to diabetic mothers. Then it must be decided whether these values should be accepted as ‘normal’ or, as suggested in a number of recent studies. Whether they indicate a correlation between hypoglycemia (even moderate and asymptomatic) and unfavorable outcome, leading to a recommendation to maintain higher glucose levels.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, we deeply appreciate the interest shown in our work and its publication. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you. The peer review process, as well as the support provided by the editorial office, have been exceptional, and the quality of the journal is very high, which was a determining factor in our decision to publish with you.
The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews journal clinically in the future time.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude for the trust placed in our team for the publication in your journal. It has been a true pleasure to collaborate with you on this project. I am pleased to inform you that both the peer review process and the attention from the editorial coordination have been excellent. Your team has worked with dedication and professionalism to ensure that your publication meets the highest standards of quality. We are confident that this collaboration will result in mutual success, and we are eager to see the fruits of this shared effort.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my utmost gratitude for your excellent work and for the dedication and speed in the publication process of my article titled "Navigating Innovation: Qualitative Insights on Using Technology for Health Education in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients." I am very satisfied with the peer review process, the support from the editorial office, and the quality of the journal. I hope we can maintain our scientific relationship in the long term.
Dear Monica Gissare, - Editorial Coordinator of Nutrition and Food Processing. ¨My testimony with you is truly professional, with a positive response regarding the follow-up of the article and its review, you took into account my qualities and the importance of the topic¨.
Dear Dr. Jessica Magne, Editorial Coordinator 0f Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, The review process for the article “The Handling of Anti-aggregants and Anticoagulants in the Oncologic Heart Patient Submitted to Surgery” was extremely rigorous and detailed. From the initial submission to the final acceptance, the editorial team at the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” demonstrated a high level of professionalism and dedication. The reviewers provided constructive and detailed feedback, which was essential for improving the quality of our work. Communication was always clear and efficient, ensuring that all our questions were promptly addressed. The quality of the “Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions” is undeniable. It is a peer-reviewed, open-access publication dedicated exclusively to disseminating high-quality research in the field of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular interventions. The journal's impact factor is currently under evaluation, and it is indexed in reputable databases, which further reinforces its credibility and relevance in the scientific field. I highly recommend this journal to researchers looking for a reputable platform to publish their studies.
Dear Editorial Coordinator of the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing! "I would like to thank the Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing for including and publishing my article. The peer review process was very quick, movement and precise. The Editorial Board has done an extremely conscientious job with much help, valuable comments and advices. I find the journal very valuable from a professional point of view, thank you very much for allowing me to be part of it and I would like to participate in the future!”
Dealing with The Journal of Neurology and Neurological Surgery was very smooth and comprehensive. The office staff took time to address my needs and the response from editors and the office was prompt and fair. I certainly hope to publish with this journal again.Their professionalism is apparent and more than satisfactory. Susan Weiner
My Testimonial Covering as fellowing: Lin-Show Chin. The peer reviewers process is quick and effective, the supports from editorial office is excellent, the quality of journal is high. I would like to collabroate with Internatioanl journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews.
My experience publishing in Psychology and Mental Health Care was exceptional. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive, with reviewers providing valuable insights that helped enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team was highly supportive and responsive, making the submission process smooth and efficient. The journal's commitment to high standards and academic rigor makes it a respected platform for quality research. I am grateful for the opportunity to publish in such a reputable journal.
My experience publishing in International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews was exceptional. I Come forth to Provide a Testimonial Covering the Peer Review Process and the editorial office for the Professional and Impartial Evaluation of the Manuscript.