Are we Neglecting Rheumatic (iGAS) Diseases in Clinical Practice?

Research Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2639-4162/089

Are we Neglecting Rheumatic (iGAS) Diseases in Clinical Practice?

  • K. Suresh *

Public Health Consultant and Family Physician Bengaluru and Karnataka State Rural Development and Panchayat Raj University, GADAG, Karnataka, India 582101

*Corresponding Author: Suresh Kishanrao, Public Health Consultant and Family Physician Bengaluru and Karnataka State Rural Development and Panchayat Raj University, GADAG, Karnataka, India 582101.

Citation: Suresh Kishanrao, (2023) Are we Neglecting Rheumatic (gas) Diseases in Clinical Practice?, J. General Medicine and Clinical Practice. 6(2); DOI:10.31579/2639-4162/089

Copyright: © 2023, K. Suresh. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Received: 03 March 2023 | Accepted: 14 March 2023 | Published: 20 March 2023

Keywords: archaeological wood; AVS; biological degrada- tion; erosion bacteria; XPS

Abstract

A resurgence of adult cases of invasive group A streptococci (iGAS) in Germany, and other European countries along with UK, the USA, and Canada has been a matter of concern in 2022. Though this resurgence was reported since 2010 of late it is creating sensation in high-income countries (HICs). However, the burden of invasive GAS is less clear in low-income countries (LMICs). The world health organization (WHO) recently reported that Streptococcus pyogenes (group A streptococci, or GAS) is a major cause of death and disability globally, particularly in low- and middle-income countries.

The first sign and symptom of infection with invasive group A Streptococcus (iGAS) is pharyngitis, mostly in school going aged children. Acute rheumatic fever (ARF) is the result of an autoimmune response to iGAS. A single severe episode or from multiple recurrent episodes of the illness that include sore throat, fever, and fleeting joint pains leading to long-term damage to cardiac valves known as rheumatic heart disease (RHD) or acute post streptococcal infection Glomerulonephritis (APSGN) It is a notable cause of morbidity and mortality in resource-poor settings around the world. 

Despite global understanding of disease pathogenesis advancement in recent years, its diagnostic and treatment approaches, are still reliant on clinical features using the Jones Criteria. Penicillin has been the mainstay of treatment for decades and there is no other treatment that has been proven to alter the likelihood or the severity of RHD after an episode of ARF. The use of echocardiographic diagnosis in those with ARF and in screening for early detection of RHD, progress in developing group A streptococcal vaccines and documentation of the life experiences of those with RHD remind the scientific world the need to improve quality of life against this neglected disease affecting worldwide populations particularly those living in poverty.

In India, RHD continues to be a significant cause of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality among children, adolescents, and young adults. This article is to remind medical fraternity and Public Health System that RFD and RHD have not declined, but they have only been neglected in the burgeoning epidemic of lifestyle diseases such as coronary artery disease, diabetes, and hypertension and recent Pandemic of Covid 19 and other communicable diseases. 

Materials & Methods:

The current literature and management guidelines are reviewed, with regards to developments from the days of first case of RHD, I saw in 1963 and one case of Rheumatic fever and 2 cases of Poststreptococcal glomerulonephritis in the last 2 years.

Introduction

The Robert Koch Institute (RKI) has reported three teenagers with influenza infections died in the German state of Saxony-Anhalt because of secondary infections with invasive group A Streptococcus [1]. Despite being in existence for hundreds of years, Streptococcus pyogenes (group A streptococci) remains a significant cause of global morbidity and mortality, with a particular impact in resource-limited settings. Pyogenic β-haemolytic streptococci (including Group A, C and G Streptococcus) are some of the most important Gram-positive bacterial pathogens in human medicine. Streptococcus pyogenes, (colloquially named “invasive group A streptococcus” (iGAS)), is a pathogen of public health significance, infecting 18.1 million people worldwide and resulting in 500,000 deaths each year. Children, the immunocompromised and the elderly are at the greatest risk of S. pyogenes infections and the associated sequelae, with transmission rates being higher in schools, hospitals, kindergartens, and residential care homes [2]. Although effective therapy is available, invasive streptococcal infections are associated with a significant disease burden. 

Sixty years ago (1962-63) in our medical college student days, we used to see lots of cases of acute rheumatic fever (ARF), rheumatic heart disease (RHD), a few acute post-streptococcal glomerulonephritis (APSGN), and invasive S. pyogenes cases [3].  The world health organization (WHO) had reported that Streptococcus pyogenes (group A streptococci, or GAS) is a major cause of death and disability globally, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. The greatest burden is due to rheumatic heart disease which results from damage to heart valves caused by one or several episodes of rheumatic fever, an autoimmune inflammatory reaction to throat infection with GAS. In addition, there is significant burden due to invasive GAS diseases, acute rheumatic fever and post-streptococcal glomerulonephritis, and pharyngitis caused by GAS is a contributor to global antibiotic use.  ‘Rheumatic Fever and Rheumatic Heart resolution (WHA71.14) has led in 2018 to the development of a Preferred Product Characteristics (PPC) and a R&D Roadmap on GAS vaccines, and guidance to the development of novel GAS vaccines [5].

What was a phenomenon of Low-Income countries (LICs) is increasing in epidemic proportions in some European countries. This rise may be since GAS/iGAS infections only need to be reported in some European countries [4]. The global burden of disease caused by group A streptococcus (GAS) is not known. A 2005 review of population-based data to estimate the burden of GAS diseases highlighted the deficiencies in the available data. The study estimated that there will be at least 517,000 deaths each year due to severe GAS diseases (e.g., acute rheumatic fever, rheumatic heart disease, post-streptococcal glomerulonephritis, and invasive infections). The prevalence of severe GAS disease is at least 18.1 million cases, with 1.78 million new cases each year. 

Overall extent of the spread in the European region is not yet clear but typification data indicate that the increase in cases is neither connected to a specific or new strain nor to an increase in antibiotic resistance to GAS.   The number of acute respiratory infections (ARIs) in the German population has dropped to 4.7% (Week 1 of 2023). During the previous week, the figure was 7.3%. The Robert Koch Institute (RKI) has inferred that the currently incidence is like that of the pre-pandemic years. The major concern is three teenagers with influenza infections died in the German state of Saxony-Anhalt because of secondary infections.

The incidence of invasive disease caused by group A streptococcus (GAS) has increased in multiple countries in the past 15 years. The burden from infectious disease is high, particularly in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). Streptococcus pyogenes group A streptococcus [GAS] is an important cause of invasive bacterial disease in the post-partum period and in children. A resurgence of adult cases of invasive GAS in the UK, the USA, and Canada has been reported since 2010. In LMICs, the burden of invasive GAS is less clear than it is in high-income countries (HICs); 

Global understanding of disease pathogenesis has advanced in recent years, led to dramatic improvements in diagnostic approaches, that are still reliant on clinical features using the Jones Criteria, or treatment practices. Penicillin has been the mainstay of treatment for decades and there is no other treatment that has been proven to alter the likelihood or the severity of RHD after an episode of ARF. The use of echocardiographic diagnosis in those with ARF and in screening for early detection of RHD, progress in developing group A streptococcal vaccines and documentation of the life experiences of those with RHD remind the scientific world the need to improve quality of life against this neglected disease affecting worldwide populations particularly those living in poverty [6]. A recent study highlights the gaps in knowledge about the incidence of invasive GAS in LMICs in pregnant women and children and its long-term outcomes [7]. 

Understanding the epidemiology of invasive GAS is important to design prevention and management strategies like case management and deployment of vaccines.

Case Studies:

  1. First ever RHD case seen in my Life:

In my first clinical posting in 1964, in the medical ward, I can across a man of 41 years was admitted with the history of fever, cough and Breathlessness on walking since a week, he also complained of palpitation in the past 3 weeks and cough with sputum over 2 months. The past history revealed multiple episodes of fever and joint pains from the age of 5 years to 15 years, for which he was given Penicillin Injections. There was no other significant information of ill health or surgeries in the past. On physical examination he was afebrile, pulse was 98/minutes and irregular, Respiratory Rate was 18/minutes. On auscultation we could hear mid-diastolic murmur at the apex of the heart without any radiation. This case was the discussion of the day. Bilateral rales were also heard indicating mild bronchial Asthma. Elevated jugular vein distension was also seen. An Xray and CT scan revealed Left ventricular function reduction, The right ventricle was a bit dilated with hypokinetic Right ventricular systolic function, flattened septum consistent with Right ventricular volume overload. There was a severe mitral valve stenosis. The mean and peak gradients were 9 mm Hg and 15mm Hg respectively and the valve area was 1 cm2.The case was diagnosed using Jones Criteria.

  1. Recent Acute Rheumatic Fever (ARF) case seen:

A 12-year-old girl presented to me with a complaint of pain and swelling in her lower extremities for 3 days, more severe in her left knee over the last 2 days in July 2022. She denied any history of recent or past trauma to that region. She recalled similar previous experiences 6 months ago of pain in right elbow, that subsided with a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID). On physical examination, the patient was afebrile with normal blood pressure, pulse rate and respiratory rate. The right lower extremity was normal with no oedema, deformity, or restricted range of motion. On the left side, she showed signs of tenderness in both the medial and lateral aspects of her left knee. She did not have any hepatosplenomegaly, or any other systemic abnormalities. She was prescribed painkillers and sent home. The patient presented again 10 days later with more severe pain in her ankles, wrists, and knees. She reported that the symptoms had not improved since her last visit, and she was unable to come earlier because of her job. There were blanching erythematous plaques over her body, most noticeably over the trunk and back. Subcutaneous nodules were also found on both arms. No murmurs were heard on auscultation and her neurologic examination was without any abnormalities. She was immediately admitted for further examination with a suspected diagnosis of acute rheumatic fever. Lab investigations done included 1) A throat culture was found negative for group A streptococcus, but she had elevated titres of ant streptolysin O (ASO) and ant deoxyribonuclease B (ADN-B). 2) She tested negative for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae and syphilis. 3) She had an elevated white blood cell count of 14.6/mm3 with an elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) of 62 mm/h. Her haemoglobin was normal at 12.2 g/dl. 4) Her ECG (electrocardiogram) and echocardiogram (ECHO) revealed no abnormalities. On treating her with aspirin symptoms gradually subsided over the next 48 hrs. She was discharged on high dose aspirin and oral penicillin and scheduled for regular cardiac follow-ups. At each visit, her WBC count, ESR, bleeding profiles, ASO and ADN-B levels monitored, and a cardiac echocardiogram was performed. She is fine with no cardiac involvement so far.

  1. A case of Glomerulonephritis:

Smitha a 15-year-old girl presented to me in November 2022 complaining of swollen hands and feet’s for the last week. She had also noticed that over the last two days she noticed swelling around her eyes and was short of breath. No significant history, but both parents suffered from Hypertension and diabetes for over 10 years. She is the youngest of the 5 siblings. Clinical examination revealed: an awake and alert, girls with periorbital oedema, bilateral oedema of the hands and feet and mild tachypnoea at rest. Temperature: 37C, afebrile, BP:150/95 mmHg, hypertensive, HR:85 beats per minute, tachycardic and RR:20 breaths per minute, tachypnoea. There was a mild conjunctival and tongue pallor. On auscultation Bilateral basal crackles were heard. Abdomen, CNS and Skin examination did not show any significant signs but there were a few mild scarring from healed lesions noted on thighs may be due to scratching after itching. Key biomarker changes in a) blood examination was raised Urea-28 (2.5-6.4 mmol/L), Creatinine-650 (50-80 umol/L) and Potassium (K)- 6.1 (3.3-5.0 mmol/L). b) Urine examination- Urine Dipstick test showed i) Blood- 4+ and ii) Protein= 2+. C) Xray chest and d) ECG were normal. This case is a typical form of acute & diffuse proliferative glomerulonephritis following an infection caused by group A beta-haemolytic streptococci throat infection. The patient responded well to diuretics and antibiotics over next 10 days. The major effort was to control fluid balance and BP.

  1. Poststreptococcal acute glomerulonephritis case report of an elderly male:

A 71-year-old man was admitted to a private hospital in Bengaluru in first week of January 2023, with a complaint of pain and swelling of the right ankle and Knees. He had a history of recurrent arthritis, Hypertension, and diabetes mellitus for nearly 20 years. He used Ibuprofen 400 mg {a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAIDs)}, together with daily glimepiride, metformin, and beta blockers and potassium citrate-sodium citrate hydrate. On admission, his body temperature was 37.1 °C and blood pressure was 140/75 mmHg. Bilateral lower leg oedema and swollen right ankle and knee were observed. He gave history of half a dozen throat infections, fleeting joint pains in childhood. Laboratory tests revealed high levels of white blood cells (14,300/μL) and C-reactive protein (15.92 mg/dL), an elevated creatinine level (3.28 mg/dL). On the next day, he complained oliguria, no response to diuretic drugs prescribed and his creatinine increased to 5.81 mg/dL. He was put on haemodialysis for next 3 days. He was put on antibiotics and steroids injection for his joint pain, that promptly improved. NSAIDs-associated nephropathy was suspected, yet his renal function did not show improvement, therefore was put on dialysis. While providing symptomatic treatment, a renal biopsy was done on day 7. That showed 25 glomeruli, including ten global scleroses. IF staining for nephritis-associated plasmin receptor (NAPlr) and in situ zymography for plasmin activity were strongly positive. The final diagnosis was ‘PSAGN combined with small vessel vasculitis’. The patient recovered over a period of 3 weeks and is under observation till day.

Discussions:

The annual incidence varies from 0.5 per 100,000 in the USA, to 8 -51 per 100,000 in children and young adults in developing countries [6]. In India the prevalence of RHD is estimated at around 0.9 cases per 1000 children in the age-group of 5-14 years. Presuming 20% of the country's total population is in 5-14 years age-group, it is estimated that there are around 2.18 lakh cases of RHD in the country [7]. A 2022 retrospective study of 307 patients out of 402 records screened, included 188 male (61%) and 119 female patients (39%) of mean age 9.73 ± 3.45 years at diagnosis. A family history of acute RF or RHD was documented in 23%. A larger household was significantly associated with an increased incidence rate of acute RF (P < 0.001). Nearly two thirds of patients (77%) had multiple joints involved with fleeting characteristics and in only 10% one joint only.  The joints involved were in order of highest prevalence were Knees (63%), ankles (57%), small joints of hand & feet (28%0 , Hip (21%), wrist (15%), elbow (12%), spine (7%) and shoulder 965).  Carditis was found in (52%); Of them 147 (92%) had mitral valve insufficiency and 109 (68%), Steroid therapy was given to 31 patients with severe carditis and the remaining carditis patients received acetylsalicylic acid. Cardiac failure developed in 21 patients 5 of these patients’ required admission to the ICU [9]. 

The pooled prevalence of GAS pharyngitis among asymptomatic children and pharyngitis cases aged 5 to 15 y was estimated as 2.79 percent and 13 percent respectively. The prevalence rate of rheumatic fever was 0.04%. The pooled prevalence rate of RHD among children aged 5–15 y using clinical auscultation and echocardiography was estimated as 0.36% and 0.28% respectively [9].

Diagnosis of ARF is currently based on the Jones criteria [8]. Five major criteria were carditis, arthritis, chorea, erythema marginatum, and subcutaneous nodules, whereas the minor criteria are arthralgia, hyperpyrexia, high erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and/or high C-reactive protein (CRP), and prolonged PR interval. For making a diagnosis of acute rheumatic fever, two major, or one major and two minor manifestations must be accompanied by supporting evidence of antecedent group A streptococcal infection in the form of positive throat culture or elevated or rising anti-streptolysin titre. The revised criteria as of 2015 suggests Major criteria: carditis (clinical and/or subclinical), polyarthritis, chorea, Erythema marginatum, and subcutaneous nodules. Minor criteria: Polyarthralgia, fever (≥38.5° F), sedimentation rate ≥60 mm and/or C-reactive protein (CRP) ≥3.0 mg/dl, and prolonged PR interval. The last revision of the Jones criteria consists mainly in the supplementation of the major criteria with echocardiographic examination, the introduction of a concept of subclinical carditis and the isolation of low, medium and high-risk populations among the patients [8].

Current Recommendations for RHF management: 

i). Prevention of rheumatic fever in patients with group A beta haemolytic streptococci (GABHS) pharyngitis-Oral (PO) penicillin V remains the drug of choice for treatment of GABHS pharyngitis, but ampicillin and amoxicillin are equally effective. When PO penicillin is not feasible or dependable, a single dose of intramuscular benzathine penicillin G, or benzathine/procaine penicillin combination is advised. For patients allergic to penicillin, alternate administration of erythromycin or a first-generation cephalosporin or clarithromycin for 10 days, or azithromycin for 5 days are recommended. Tetracyclines and sulphonamides to treat GABHS pharyngitis are not advocated. For recurrent group A streptococci (GAS) pharyngitis, a second 10-day course of the same antibiotic may be repeated. Exposed persons: People in contact with patients having documented cases of streptococcal infection first should undergo appropriate laboratory testing if they have clinical evidence of GABHS infection and should undergo antibiotic therapy if infected. School and childcare centres: Children with GABHS infection should not attend school or childcare centres for the first 24 hours after initiating antimicrobial therapy [11, 12]

                                                                

                                                          


 

GABHS carriage status is difficult to eradicate with conventional penicillin therapy, therefore PO clindamycin (20 mg/kg/d PO in 3 divided doses for 10 days is recommended. Antimicrobial therapy is not indicated for pharyngeal carriers of GABHS except during outbreaks of rheumatic fever or poststreptococcal glomerulonephritis, Family history of rheumatic fever, during outbreaks of GAS pharyngitis in a closed community and when tonsillectomy is considered for chronic GABHS carriage [11] 

ii. Treatment for patients with rheumatic fever

Therapy is directed towards eliminating the GABHS pharyngitis (if still present), suppressing inflammation from the autoimmune response, and providing supportive treatment of congestive heart failure (CHF). Residual GABHS pharyngitis, if still present as also treated similarly. Treatment of the acute inflammatory manifestations consists of salicylates and steroids. Aspirin in anti-inflammatory doses effectively reduces all manifestations of the disease except chorea, and the response typically is dramatic. If rapid improvement is not observed after 24-36 hours of therapy, reconsider the diagnosis of rheumatic fever. When discontinuing therapy, aspirin is to be withdrawn   gradually over weeks while monitoring the APRs for evidence of rebound. Chorea most frequently is self-limited but may be alleviated or partially controlled with phenobarbital or diazepam [12].

If moderate to severe carditis is present as indicated by cardiomegaly, third-degree heart block, or CHF, adding oral prednisone to salicylate therapy is recommended. Prednisone needs to be continued for 2-6 weeks based on the severity of the carditis and tapered during the last week of therapy. Maintaining salicylates for an additional 2-4 weeks, can minimize adverse effects. Include digoxin (after checking serum Potassium) and diuretics, afterload reduction, supplemental oxygen, bed rest, and sodium and fluid restriction as additional treatment for patients with acute rheumatic fever and CHF. The diuretics most used in conjunction with digoxin for children with CHF include furosemide and spironolactone. The total loading dose is 20-30 mcg/kg PO every day, with 50% of the dose administered initially, followed by 25% of the dose 8 hours and 16 hours after the initial dose. Maintenance doses typically are 8-10 mcg/kg/d PO in 2 divided doses. For older children and adults, the total loading dose is 1.25-1.5 mg PO, and the maintenance dose is 0.25-0.5 mg PO every day. Therapeutic digoxin levels are present at trough levels of 1.5-2 ng/mL. Afterload reduction (ie, using ACE inhibitor captopril) may be effective in improving cardiac output, particularly in the presence of mitral and aortic insufficiency. Start these agents judiciously. Use a small, initial test dose and administer only after correcting hypovolemia [11,12].

Treatment for patients following rheumatic heart disease (RHD)

Preventive and prophylactic therapy is indicated after rheumatic fever and RHD to prevent further damage to valves. Primary prophylaxis (initial course of antibiotics administered to eradicate the streptococcal infection) also serves as the first course of secondary prophylaxis (prevention of recurrent rheumatic fever and RHD). An injection of 0.6-1.2 million units of benzathine penicillin G intramuscularly every 4 weeks is the recommended regimen for secondary prophylaxis for most patients. Administer the same dosage every 3 weeks in areas where rheumatic fever is endemic, in patients with residual carditis, and in high-risk patients. Patients with rheumatic fever with carditis but no valve disease should receive prophylactic antibiotics for 10 years or well into adulthood, whichever is longer. Finally, patients with rheumatic fever with carditis and valve disease should receive antibiotics at least 10 years or until aged 40 years ]12].

Presentation and Treatment for Post Streptococcal infection Glomerulonephritis (PSGN):

The most common presenting symptom is gross haematuria as it occurs in 30 to 50% of cases with acute PSGN; patients often describe their urine as rusty. The haematuria is usually a as post-pharyngitis phenomenon. Renal involvement is common and is transient with recovery in 1-2 weeks. Less than half of the patients experience oliguria. Depending on the severity of renal involvement, signs, and symptoms suggestive of anuric renal failure or life-threatening acid-base imbalance, hyperkalaemia, and fluid overload would require RRT. About 60-80% of the patients experience high blood pressure which typically resolves in 10 days as was in our case. The incidence of oedema is seen in about 65-90% of the cases. Periorbital oedema is typical for the nephritic syndrome [13]. It is most prominent in the morning and tends to resolve at the end of the day. Generalized oedema is also a common feature. Some patients might experience respiratory distress because of pulmonary oedema. Some may experience anorexia, malaise, nausea, vomiting, etc [8]. Poststreptococcal acute glomerulonephritis (PSAGN) in the elderly tends to have a severe clinical course and often presents with crescentic necrotizing glomerulonephritis in the renal biopsy [14].

Conclusion:

  • The exact burden of RFD and RHD is not available and is almost impossible to estimate because of the multiple shortcomings with the available data.
  • Indian study emphasizes the importance of developing a population-based surveillance framework to track patterns, management strategies, and outcomes to develop informed recommendations for launching contextual measures to regulate RF and RHD.
  • The development of a successful anti-GAS vaccine remains outstanding, due to the inherent challenges, and lack of urgency in Government of India that did wonders in Covid 19 vaccine. 
  • Emphasis must be placed on creating awareness among the community about the fact that sore throat in their child may not be as benign, and about its serious repercussions, if left untreated.
  • The surveillance of pharyngitis among school-aged children and the knowledge about differentiating viral and bacterial pharyngitis and the importance of early diagnosis and treatment of streptococcal pharyngitis must be widely disseminated among primary care physicians. However, the prevalence of GAS among asymptomatic children is a twist to this tale.

References

Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.

img

Virginia E. Koenig

Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.

img

Delcio G Silva Junior

Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.

img

Ziemlé Clément Méda

Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.

img

Mina Sherif Soliman Georgy

We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.

img

Layla Shojaie

The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.

img

Sing-yung Wu

Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.

img

Orlando Villarreal

Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.

img

Katarzyna Byczkowska

Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.

img

Anthony Kodzo-Grey Venyo

Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.

img

Pedro Marques Gomes

Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.

img

Bernard Terkimbi Utoo

This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.

img

Prof Sherif W Mansour

Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.

img

Hao Jiang

As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.

img

Dr Shiming Tang

Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.

img

Raed Mualem

International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.

img

Andreas Filippaios

Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.

img

Dr Suramya Dhamija

Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.

img

Bruno Chauffert

I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!

img

Baheci Selen

"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".

img

Jesus Simal-Gandara

I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.

img

Douglas Miyazaki

We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.

img

Dr Griffith

I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.

img

Dr Tong Ming Liu

I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.

img

Husain Taha Radhi

I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.

img

S Munshi

Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.

img

Tania Munoz

“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.

img

George Varvatsoulias

Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.

img

Rui Tao

Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.

img

Khurram Arshad